cover
Contact Name
Mohammad Fikri
Contact Email
jaladalah@gmail.com
Phone
+6285190060450
Journal Mail Official
lp2m@stisnq.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Imam Sukarto no 60, Baletbaru, Sukowono, Jember, Jawa Timur, 68194, Indonesia
Location
Kab. jember,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
ISSN : 2962889X     EISSN : 29628903     DOI : 10.59246
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora is published by Islamic Sharia College Nurul Qarnain, Jember, East Java, Indonesia. The journal publishes articles of interest to education practitioners, teachers, education policy makers, and researchers. This journal encompasses research articles, original research report, reviews social studies. The journal is highly receptive to new research patterns and methods. The following articles will be issued for publication: political sciences, social, law, and humanities, etc.
Articles 26 Documents
Search results for , issue "article in press" : 26 Documents clear
Multikulturalisme di Ruang Urban: Dinamika Politik Perkotaan dan Peran SETARA Institute dalam Kasus Intoleransi terhadap Minoritas Agama Cendana Anabel; Naura Rania Bari; Silvia Zahra Zahira; Aniqotul Ummah; Chomariyana Kartika Hesti
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Article in Press
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/e3xw5q04

Abstract

Urban spaces are often imagined as inclusive environments where diverse religious identities coexist. In reality, urban political dynamics, power distribution, and relations between majority and minority groups frequently create unequal recognition toward religious minorities, leading to discrimination and intolerance. An analysis through Charles Taylor’s Politics of Recognition reveals how urban political dynamics shape religious intolerance and how SETARA Institute responds through advocacy efforts. A qualitative descriptive approach was used. Primary data were collected through semi structured interviews with the Coordinator of Indonesian Social Inclusion and Security Studies at SETARA Institute, while secondary data were obtained through documentation studies consisting of journals, books, news articles, and official publications from SETARA Institute. The findings show that intolerance in urban areas remains closely tied to exclusionary governance and weak institutional protection, placing minority groups in vulnerable positions. SETARA Institute strengthens advocacy through documenting violations of freedom of religion and belief, developing the Tolerant City Index, producing empirical research, and promoting human rights based policies.
Perbandingan Perspektif Hukum Positif dan Hukum Pidana Islam dalam Asas Legalitas Ananda Dewi Maharani; Syahrul Anwar
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Article in Press
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/xqdt4329

Abstract

The principle of legality constitutes a foundational doctrine in criminal law, serving to ensure legal certainty and protect individuals from arbitrary punishment. This study examines the legality principle from a comparative perspective between modern criminal law and Islamic criminal law through normative legal research employing comparative and historical approaches. The analysis reveals that both legal systems share a common commitment to legal certainty, accountability, and the protection of individual rights by requiring a legal basis for criminal liability and punishment. However, significant differences emerge in their sources of law and underlying philosophical orientations. Modern criminal law primarily derives legitimacy from statutory regulations and emphasizes formal legality, whereas Islamic criminal law integrates divine revelation, moral values, and the objectives of maqashid al-shari’ah in determining criminal responsibility and sanctions. Consequently, the legality principle in Islamic criminal law encompasses not only procedural certainty but also substantive justice and social welfare considerations. The findings highlight the relevance of Islamic criminal law values in enriching contemporary criminal law reform, particularly within pluralistic societies. Integrating substantive justice principles with modern legal frameworks may contribute to the development of a more humane, balanced, and socially responsive criminal justice system.
Efektivitas Kuota Gender dalam Sistem Pencalonan Pemilu terhadap Keterwakilan Perempuan di DPR RI Vallerian Antaresa; Muhammad Fahreza Ramadan; Muhammad Putra Tyanto; Aniqotul Ummah; Chomariyana Kartika Hesti
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Article in Press
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/89bqzg36

Abstract

Gender quota policies constitute an important affirmative action mechanism for promoting women’s political representation in democratic institutions. This study investigates the effectiveness of gender quotas in Indonesia’s electoral nomination system and examines the political and social factors shaping their implementation in the House of Representatives (DPR RI). Employing a descriptive qualitative approach, the analysis is grounded in theories of political representation and gender quotas. The findings indicate that quota regulations have contributed to a significant increase in the number of women candidates and improved women’s descriptive representation in parliament. Nevertheless, greater numerical representation has not been consistently translated into stronger substantive influence over legislative decision-making and policy outcomes. The effectiveness of quota implementation remains constrained by internal political party recruitment processes, the dynamics of the open-list proportional electoral system, unequal access to political resources, and the persistence of patriarchal norms that limit women’s participation in politics. These structural and cultural barriers continue to affect women’s electoral competitiveness and political influence. Strengthening women’s representation therefore requires not only quota-based regulations but also institutional reforms within political parties, improved access to political resources, and broader transformations in political culture to ensure more equitable and meaningful democratic participation.
Partisipasi Politik Masyarakat pada Pilkada Ulang Kota Pangkalpinang dan Kabupaten Bangka Tahun 2025: Perspektif Participatory Democracy Annaml Salma Jaffis; Tata Dwi Syintia; Nadira Ramadani; Serlyani Rizky Octaria; Suci Aprilia
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Article in Press
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/zbdf4593

Abstract

The re-run local elections in Pangkalpinang City and Bangka Regency following the victory of the blank box option in the 2024 simultaneous local elections provide an important context for understanding contemporary patterns of political participation in Indonesia. This study explores the forms, levels, and determinants of political participation through a qualitative multiple-case study comparing urban and rural communities. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with 14 informants, complemented by document analysis and literature review, and analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña. The findings indicate that political participation extends beyond voting behavior to include involvement in election campaigns, political discussions, and electoral oversight activities. Participation levels are shaped by the interaction of structural, institutional, and cultural factors. Structural determinants include educational attainment, economic conditions, access to information, and social media utilization. Institutional factors encompass the performance of electoral management bodies, political socialization processes, and public trust in political institutions. Cultural influences involve political values, community leadership, and patronage networks. The study further reveals distinct participation patterns between urban and rural communities, with urban voters tending to demonstrate more rational and autonomous political behavior, while rural participation remains strongly influenced by social relations and local leadership structures.
Tata Kelola Aksesibilitas Layanan Publik bagi Perempuan Penyandang Disabilitas di Perkotaan dalam Perspektif Komunitas Spooniestory Alita Aura Zahir; Calista Mutiara Uma; Nabilah Nameera Ruzdi; Aniqotul Ummah; Chomariyana Kartika Hesti
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Article in Press
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/42xpcs62

Abstract

The realization of accessible public services is a crucial requirement for creating an inclusive urban environment for all, including women with disabilities. However, in practice, this group still faces various obstacles that limit their access to public services. This study aims to describe the accessibility of public services, identify various obstacles experienced by women with disabilities, and analyze the governance and implementation of accessibility policies from the perspective of the Spooniestory Community. The research was conducted using a qualitative approach through observation, interviews, documentation, and document studies. The results show that some public services have attempted to provide more disability-friendly facilities, but their implementation remains uneven and does not fully meet the needs of women with disabilities, particularly those with invisible disabilities. Obstacles identified include limited facilities, social stigma, gender-based discrimination, and services that do not fully understand user needs. These findings emphasize that accessibility is determined not only by the availability of physical facilities, but also by inclusive governance and the ability of public policies to accommodate the experiences of vulnerable groups.
Dinamika Self-Censorship dalam Musrenbang: Analisis Faktor dan Dampaknya terhadap Representasi Aspirasi Masyarakat di Kota Surabaya Alita Aura Zahir; Calista Mutiara Uma; Cendana Anabel; Nabilah Nameera Ruzdy; Ridwan Ridwan; Gema Pertiwi
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Article in Press
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/sfyr4h88

Abstract

The Development Planning Conference (Musrenbang) is a forum for public participation in the preparation of regional development plans. However, discussions on the socio-psychological factors that influence the quality of public participation in Musrenbang remain understudied. This study aims to analyze the phenomenon of self-censorship in the Surabaya City Musrenbang and its impact on the representation of public aspirations. The study used a qualitative approach with a case study design and the self-censorship theory from Bar-Tal (2017). Research data were obtained through a literature review including scientific journals, books, online news, and official government publications. The results show that self-censorship practices are still found in the implementation of Musrenbang due to low confidence in the effectiveness of aspirations, limited understanding of development planning mechanisms, and obstacles in utilizing available participation spaces. These conditions have an impact on the less than optimal representation of public aspirations in the regional development planning process.
Marital Rape dalam Perspektif  Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif Indonesia: Reinterpretasi Hak Seksual dalam Pernikahan Firmansyah Firmansyah; Muliadi Muliadi; Ferdian Ferdian; Nanta Septia; Illian Hikma
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Article in Press
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/ssstq839

Abstract

Marital rape, or forced sexual intercourse within marriage, is a sensitive issue that remains rarely discussed openly, particularly within the framework of classical Islamic law. Traditional fiqh literature often positions sexual relations as the husband’s absolute right, which the wife is obligated to fulfill, and her refusal is frequently labeled as nusyūz (disobedience), with consequences on her legal entitlements. However, in modern contexts, the maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah (higher objectives of Islamic law) approach emphasizes the protection of life, dignity, and bodily autonomy within marital relations. This study aims to examine the concept of marital rape from the perspectives of both classical and contemporary Islamic law, while also comparing it with the provisions of Indonesia’s positive law, particularly Law No. 23 of 2004 on the Elimination of Domestic Violence and Law No. 12 of 2022 on Sexual Violence Crimes. Using a qualitative library research method, the study finds that marital rape contradicts both the ethical foundations of Islamic law and the constitutional principles of national law. Thus, there is an urgent need for reinterpretation of religious texts and stronger law enforcement to ensure justice and protection for women within the institution of marriage.
Eksistensi Pidana Tutupan dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia dalam Kaitannya dengan Asas Equality Before The Law Muhammad Faiz Indriansyah Reza; Yudi Krismen US
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Article in Press
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/244sqv26

Abstract

The reintroduction of pidana tutupan (custody penalty) under Article 74 of Law Number 1 of 2023 on the Indonesian Criminal Code has renewed debates concerning its compatibility with the constitutional principle of equality before the law. This study analyzes the legal basis of pidana tutupan and evaluates whether the preferential treatment afforded to offenders acting on honorable motives (Custodia Honesta) is consistent with Article 27 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution. Employing a normative legal approach with statutory analysis and library research, the study critically examines relevant legal norms and constitutional doctrines. The findings suggest that pidana tutupan is not inherently inconsistent with the principle of equality before the law, provided that differential treatment is justified by objective, rational, and universally applicable legal criteria. Nevertheless, the absence of explicit parameters defining “honorable motives” creates significant interpretative ambiguity and increases the risk of arbitrary application. Without clear legal limitations, the provision may evolve into a privileged mechanism benefiting certain groups, particularly political elites, thereby undermining legal certainty and constitutional equality. The study highlights the need for more precise regulatory standards to ensure consistent implementation while safeguarding equal protection under the law.
Ketika Dakwah Tunduk pada Algoritma: Semiotika dan Mediatization Konten @nurulhayatku di Instagram Zidan Abdillah; Salbana Ziadatul Ramadhan; Meity Suryandari
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Article in Press
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/7352yp93

Abstract

Digital platforms have transformed contemporary Islamic da’wah by reshaping how religious messages are produced, circulated, and interpreted within algorithm-driven communication environments. This study examines the semiotic construction of digital da’wah content on the Instagram account @nurulhayatku, the official account of the Islamic philanthropic institution ZakatKita Nurul Hayat, while exploring how platform logic influences its communication strategy through the lens of mediatization. A qualitative descriptive approach employing semiotic content analysis was applied to ten Instagram posts selected through retroactive purposive sampling across multiple formats and thematic categories. The analysis integrates Roland Barthes’s three-level semiotics with Hjarvard’s and Hepp’s mediatization framework, alongside the principles of Islamic da’wah communication derived from Qur’an, An-Nahl:125. The findings identify five dominant patterns: limited and inconsistent hashtag utilization, the superior engagement of Palestine-related content, asymmetric engagement across thematic categories, the consistent use of persuasive calls-to-action, and strategically organized carousel narratives. The study demonstrates that mediatization functions as a negotiated rather than deterministic process, reflecting institutional algorithmic literacy in adapting religious communication to digital platforms. An engagement paradox also emerges, showing that semiotically sophisticated content does not necessarily achieve greater audience interaction, whereas emotionally resonant narratives generate stronger algorithmic engagement.
Eksistensi Hukum Islam dalam Sistem Negara Hukum Indonesia   Rahmiah Nur Rahmianti; Kurniati Kurniati; Musyfikah Ilyas
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Article in Press
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/3xq8yg07

Abstract

Islamic law occupies a distinctive position within Indonesia’s pluralistic legal system, where religious, customary, and state legal norms interact within a constitutional framework. This article examines the constitutional position and contemporary development of Islamic law within the Indonesian rule of law through a qualitative descriptive-analytical library research approach. Secondary sources published between 2020 and 2025, including scholarly articles, academic books, and relevant legislation, were selected purposively and analyzed using content analysis and thematic synthesis. The findings demonstrate that Islamic law has acquired significant constitutional and sociological recognition through statutory regulations, the institutionalization of religious courts, and its continued operation as living law. Nevertheless, its interaction with customary and national law generates normative tensions, overlapping institutional authority, and potential legal uncertainty, particularly where different legal norms regulate similar social domains. The analysis indicates that a substantive approach grounded in maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah can provide a normative framework for reconciling Islamic legal values with constitutional principles, justice, and human rights protection. The study contributes to the discourse on legal pluralism by positioning Islamic law not merely as a religious normative system but as an integral component of Indonesia’s evolving legal order. Harmonized legislation, consistent judicial interpretation, and inclusive legal policymaking are essential for managing pluralism while maintaining constitutional coherence.

Page 2 of 3 | Total Record : 26