cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Siska Amelya
Contact Email
jojafh@upp.ac.id
Phone
+6282297203413
Journal Mail Official
jojafh@upp.ac.id
Editorial Address
Universitas Pasir Pengaraian Fakultas Hukum Jl. Tuanku Tambusai, Desa Kumu, Kecamatan Rambah Hilir, Kabupaten Rokan Hulu, Riau
Location
Kab. rokan hulu,
Riau
INDONESIA
Journal of Juridische Analyse
Published by Universitas Pasir Pengaraian
ISSN : -     EISSN : 28306023     DOI : https://doi.org/10.30606/joja
Core Subject :
Journal of Juridische Analyse  is one of the oldest published law journal in  Indonesia. Published since 2022, Journal of Juridische Analyse focused on various subdiscipline of the legal science, among others basic principle of jurisprudence private law criminal law procedural law economic and business law constiutional law administrative law international law law and society Other than forementioned field, Journal of Juridische Analyse also accepts articles which cover the topic on the cross section between law and other scientific field, such as sociology of law, legal anthropology, law and economics, and others. Published 2 (two) times annually, on April and September. Each of the issue has 6 articles both  on review and research article. Journal of Juridische Analyse published in Bahasa Indonesia, but articles written in English are also welcomed.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 64 Documents
 3   4   5   6   7 
PENGUATAN KEPATUHAN KONSTITUSIONAL (CONSTITUTIONAL COMPLIANCE) TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM PEMBENTUKAN UNDANG UNDANG DI INDONESIA: PENGUATAN KEPATUHAN KONSTITUSIONAL (CONSTITUTIONAL COMPLIANCE) TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM PEMBENTUKAN UNDANG UNDANG DI INDONESIA Fitri Elfiani; Rahmi Yuniarti
Journal of Juridische Analyse Vol. 5 No. 02 (2026): Journal of Juridische Analyse
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasir Pengaraian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30606/joja.v5i02.5005

Abstract

Constitutional Court decisions are final and binding, yet their effectiveness depends not only on their normative authority but also on the compliance of the addressees responsible for implementing their legal consequences. The issue becomes more complex when decisions are non self executing and require legislative amendments by the House of Representatives and the President. This study analyzes the problems of constitutional compliance in lawmaking and formulates an institutional model for strengthening compliance within Indonesia’s legislative system. It applies normative legal research using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. The analysis focuses on Constitutional Court Decisions No. 91/PUU XVIII/2020, No. 116/PUU XXI/2023, No. 135/PUU XXII/2024, and the subsequent Decision No. 37/PUU XXIV/2026. The study identifies three principal gaps: an institutional gap caused by the absence of an integrated procedure linking constitutional judgments to the legislative agenda, a temporal gap arising from inconsistent time limits for follow up, and a substantive gap because legislators are not required to demonstrate conformity between implementing legislation and the judgment’s operative order and ratio decidendi. This article proposes an Institutionalized Constitutional Compliance Model consisting of a Constitutional Decision Register, Legislative Compliance Trigger, Constitutional Compliance Deadline, Constitutional Compliance Statement, and Constitutional Compliance Review. The model seeks to transform compliance from dependence on political willingness into an institutional and legal obligation while preserving the constitutionally legitimate policy space of lawmakers.
EFEKTIVITAS RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA ANAK BERHADAPAN HUKUM: EFEKTIVITAS RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA ANAK BERHADAPAN HUKUM Susi Ramadhani; Siska Amelya
Journal of Juridische Analyse Vol. 5 No. 02 (2026): Journal of Juridische Analyse
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasir Pengaraian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30606/joja.v5i02.5006

Abstract

The resolution of cases involving children in conflict with the law requires a different approach from the resolution of criminal cases involving adults. Children are legal subjects who have psychological, social, and developmental conditions that require special protection. Through Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, restorative justice and diversion are positioned as important instruments to protect children from the negative impacts of the criminal justice process. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of restorative justice in resolving cases involving children in conflict with the law and to examine its contribution to child protection and social reintegration. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and limited case approaches. The findings indicate that restorative justice has a strong legal foundation through the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law, Government Regulation Number 65 of 2015, Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2014, and Regulation of the National Police Number 8 of 2021. Its effectiveness is determined by victim recovery, child accountability, family and community involvement, prevention of negative stigma, and the ability to return children to their social environment constructively. Nevertheless, its implementation continues to face challenges, including differences in law enforcement officials’ understanding, institutional readiness, victim and family participation, community involvement, and post-resolution supervision. Therefore, restorative justice should not merely be understood as a mechanism for terminating criminal proceedings, but as a recovery process oriented toward the best interests of the child and sustainable social reintegration.
The PENERAPAN PEMERINTAH DALAM PENGELOLAAN DAN MEMPERTAHANKAN PULAU-PULAU KECIL TERLUAR DI INDONESIA: Indonesia Marfuah MARFUAH; Zulkifli; Evi Yanti
Journal of Juridische Analyse Vol. 5 No. 02 (2026): Journal of Juridische Analyse
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasir Pengaraian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30606/joja.v5i02.5016

Abstract

Indonesia’s outermost small islands hold a strategic position in determining national boundaries, safeguarding sovereignty, and supporting economic development and community welfare. This study aims to analyze the implementation of government policies concerning the management and defense of Indonesia’s outermost small islands and to identify obstacles to their implementation. It employs normative legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches. Primary and secondary legal materials were collected through a literature review and analyzed qualitatively. The findings indicate that Indonesia has established an adequate legal framework through UNCLOS 1982, legislation on state territory, legislation on the management of coastal areas and small islands, and regulations concerning the utilization of outermost small islands. These policies are implemented through island designation, infrastructure development, public service provision, economic empowerment, environmental protection, territorial surveillance, and strengthened defense. However, implementation continues to face constraints related to accessibility, infrastructure, funding, human resources, and interagency coordination. This study concludes that the management and defense of outermost small islands must be undertaken in an integrated manner by combining legal, security, community welfare, and environmental sustainability approaches. Keywords: government policy; outermost small islands; management; defense; sovereignty.
EFEKTIVITAS MEDIASI DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA HARTA WARIS DI PENGADILAN AGAMA (STUDI KASUS NO. 165/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Ppg): EFEKTIVITAS MEDIASI DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA HARTA WARIS DI PENGADILAN AGAMA (STUDI KASUS NO. 165/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Ppg) Almadison; Rina Kristiana Sitompul; Boy Jerry Event Sembiring
Journal of Juridische Analyse Vol. 5 No. 02 (2026): Journal of Juridische Analyse
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasir Pengaraian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30606/joja.v5i02.5021

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis efektivitas mediasi dalam penyelesaian perkara harta waris di Pengadilan Agama Pasir Pengaraian berdasarkan Putusan Nomor 165/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Ppg, serta mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi keberhasilan dan kegagalan mediasi. Mediasi sebagai salah satu mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa di pengadilan diatur dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 yang mewajibkan setiap perkara perdata terlebih dahulu diupayakan penyelesaiannya melalui perdamaian. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis empiris dengan pendekatan deskriptif analitis. Data diperoleh melalui wawancara, observasi, dan studi dokumen, kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif dengan model interaktif Miles dan Huberman. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan mediasi dalam perkara harta waris di Pengadilan Agama Pasir Pengaraian telah efektif secara prosedural karena memenuhi seluruh tahapan PERMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2016, namun tidak efektif secara substantif karena gagal menghasilkan kesepakatan perdamaian. Kegagalan tersebut terutama disebabkan oleh kompleksitas objek sengketa, banyaknya pihak berkepentingan (sebelas pihak), pendekatan hukum yang adversarial, tindakan konfrontatif para pihak, serta rendahnya itikad untuk berdamai. Dengan demikian, mediasi belum sepenuhnya efektif sebagai sarana penyelesaian sengketa harta waris, meskipun tetap memiliki nilai penting dalam menjaga hubungan kekeluargaan dan mengurangi konflik berkepanjangan.

Page 7 of 7 | Total Record : 64

 3   4   5   6   7 

Filter by Year

2022 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 5 No. 02 (2026): Journal of Juridische Analyse Vol. 5 No. 01 (2026): Journal of Juridische Analyse Vol. 4 No. 02 (2025): Journal of Juridische Analyse Vol. 4 No. 01 (2025): Journal of Juridische Analyse Vol. 3 No. 02 (2024): Journal of Juridische Analyse Vol. 3 No. 01 (2024): Journal of Juridische Analyse Vol. 2 No. 02 (2023): Journal of Juridische Analyse Vol. 2 No. 01 (2023): Journal of Juridische Analyse Vol. 1 No. 01 (2022): Journal of Juridische Analyse Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): Journal of Juridische Analyse