cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Education Mathematics
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 369 Documents
 20   21   22   23   24 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION DENGAN PENDEKATAN CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING PADA MATERI POKOK BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI SIKAP SISWA TERHADAP MATEMATIKA DAN PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA Ardianzah, Ferri; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (326.071 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of cooperatif learning models viewed from the attitude of students. The learning model compared were TAI-CTL, TAI and direct instruction. This was quasi-experimental research designed by factorial 3x3. The population was 8th grade students of junior high school even semester academic year 2013/2014 in Magetan regency. The sample was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling. Total sample was 231 students, consisted of 77 students as TAI-CTL class, 78 students as TAI class, and 76 students as direct instruction class. Hypothesis testing was performed using two-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. Based on the results of hypothesis testing, it is concluded that: (1) students learns using TAI-CTL and TAI had better achievement than students learnt using direct instruction, students learnt using TAI-CTL had better achievement than students learnt using TAI  (2) positive attitude students had better achievement than those of neutral and negative attitudestudents, neutral attitude students had better achievement than negative attitude students (3) for TAI-CTL and TAI, students with positive attitude had better achievement than neutral and negative attitude, however neutral attitude students had the same achievement as negative attitude students, for direct instruction, positive attitude students had the same achievement as neutral attitude students, meanwhile positive attitude students had better achievement than negative attitudeand students with neutral attitude had the same achievement as negative attitude students (4) for  positive attitude students, students learnt using TAI-CTL had the same achievement as students learnt using TAI, meanwhile students learnt using TAI-CTL and TAI had better achievement than students learnt using direct instruction, for neutral and negative attitude students, students learnt using TAI-CTL, TAI, and direct instruction had the same achievement.Keywords: TAI-CTL, TAI, Direct Instruction, Attitude 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STRUCTURED NUMBERED HEADS, THINK TALK WRITE, DAN LEARNING TOGETHER DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN LOGIKA MATEMATIKA SISWA Utami, Desi Tri; Budiyono, Budiyono; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (267.954 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this research was to find out the effect of the cooperative learning models on the learning achievement in mathematics viewed from the students’ logical mathematical intelligence. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning models of Structured Numbered Heads (SNH), Think Talk Write (TTW), and Learning Together (LT) with scientific approach. This research used quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 3x3. The population of the research was all of the students in grade VII of Junior High School in Sukoharjo Regency. The data was analyzed using two-ways analysis of variance with unbalanced cell. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) SNH and TTW with scientific approach had the same learning achievement. SNH and TTW with scientific approach had better learning achievement than LT with scientific approach. (2) Students with high logical mathematical intelligence had better learning achievement than the students with middle and low logical mathematical intelligence, also students who had middle logical mathematical intelligence had better learning achievement than students who had low logical mathematical intelligence. (3) In SNH with scientific approach, the students who had high logical mathematical intelligence had learning achievement as good as students with middle and low logical mathematical intelligence. In TTW and LT with scientific approach, the students who had high logical mathematical intelligence had learning achievement as good as students with middle logical mathematical intelligence, and the students who had high and middle logical mathematical intelligence had better learning achievement than the students with low logical mathematical intelligence. (4) For all level of students’ logical mathematical intelligence, the students who were given by SNH, TTW, and LT with scientific approach had the same learning achievement.Keywords: Structured Numbered Heads, Think Talk Write, Learning Together, Scientific Approach, Logical Mathematical Intelligence
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN REALISTIC MATHEMATICS EDUCATION (RME) DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP/MTs DI KABUPATEN SRAGEN Nyoto, Nyoto; Usodo, Budi; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (410.365 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to investigate: (1) which one had a better mathematics achievement, students instructed with the cooperative learning of Think Pair Share (TPS) type with Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach, the cooperative learning of TPS type, or the direct learning model; (2) which one had a better mathematics achievement, students who had visual learning style, auditorial learning style, or kinesthetic learning style; (3) on each type of learning model, which one had a better mathematics achievement, students who had visual learning style, auditorial learning style, or kinesthetic learning style; (4) on each learning style, which one had a better mathematics achievement, students instructed with the cooperative learning of TPS type with Realistic Mathematics Education approach, the cooperative learning of TPS type, or the direct learning model. This research was quasi experimental with 3×3 factorial design. The population was all students of the grade VIII State Junior High Schools/Islamic State Junior Secondary School in Sragen Regency. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The sample consisted of 308 students. The instrument used to collect data was mathematics achievement test and questionnaire of students learning style. Balance test used unbalanced one way analysis of variance. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways analysis of variance at the significance level of 0,05. Based on hypothesis test, it can be concluded as follows. (1) Students intructed with the cooperative learning model of TPS type with RME approach had the same mathematics achievement as students intructed with the cooperative learning model of TPS type. Students intructed with the cooperative learning model of TPS type with RME approach and the cooperative learning model of TPS type had better mathematics achievement than students intructed with the direct learning model. (2) Students with visual learning style had the same mathematics achievement as students with auditorial learning style. Students with visual learning style had better mathematics achievement than student with kinesthetic learning style, and students with auditorial learning style had the same mathematics achievement as students with kinesthetic learning style. (3) On the cooperative learning model of TPS type with RME approach, the cooperative learning model of TPS type, and the direct learning model, students with visual learning style had the same mathematics achievement as students with auditorial learning style. Students with visual learning style had better mathematics achievement than student with kinesthetic learning style, and students with auditorial learning style had the same mathematics achievement as students with kinesthetic learning style. (4) On students with visual learning style, auditorial learning style, and kinesthetic learning style, students intructed with the cooperative learning model of TPS type with RME approach had the same mathematics achievement as students intructed with the cooperative learning model of TPS type. Students intructed with the cooperative learning model of TPS type with RME approach and the cooperative learning model of TPS type had better mathematics achievement than students intructed with the direct learning model.Keywords: TPS, RME, students learning style
EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA MENGGUNAKAN MEDIA KOMPUTER PADA MATERI POKOK PERSAMAAN GARIS LURUS DITINJAU DARI MOTIVASI BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP SURAKARTA Hirtanto, Hirtanto; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (399.667 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this research were to determine: 1) which students have better achievement in learning mathematics among Macromedia Flash and PowerPoint used as learning media 2) which students have better achievement in learning mathematics, ones with high, medium, or low learning motivation, 3) at each leaning by using media (Macromedia Flash and PowerPoint) which students have better achievement in learning mathematics, ones with high, medium, or low learning motivation, 4) at each of categories of learning motivation (high, medium, and low) which students have better achievement in learning mathematics, ones who are use Macromedia Flash or PowerPoint as learning media. The research was a quasi experimental. The population of this research was all students of grade VIII Junior High School of the Surakarta City, academic year 2011/2012. The samples in this research were 177 students taken by stratified cluster random sampling. Instruments used to collect data were mathematics achievement instrument test and questionnaires of student’s learning motivation instrument. Data analysis technique used hypothesis test with two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells resume test of multiple comparisons. From the results of the analysis, can be concluded that: 1) the learning achievement in mathematics of the students who were learning mathematics with macromedia flash were better than with powerpoint as learning media, 2) the learning achievement in mathematics of the students with the high learning motivation were better than the ones with the medium and low learning motivation, however the students with the medium  learning motivation were better  than the ones with the low learning motivation, 3) in students with high learning motivation, students who use macromedia flash have a learning achievement were better than using powerpoint. Students with medium and low learning motivation have the same learning achievement, using either the macromedia flash or powerpoint, 4) in mathematics learning with macromedia flash, students who have high motivation have better math achievement of students with medium and low motivation. But the students who have medium and low motivation the achievement were equally as good. In mathematics learning used powerpoint, students who have high, medium and low learning motivation have the same learning achievement.Keywords: Learning, Macromedia Flash, PowerPoint, Motivation, Achievement Learning Mathematics.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISCOVERY LEARNING, PROBLEM SOLVING, DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI SELF REGULATED LEARNING Miatun, Asih; Sujadi, Imam; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (471.297 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from student’s self regulated learning. The learning model compared were discovery learning, problem solving, and TPS. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research. The population were all students at the grade VIII of Junior High School in Boyolali regency. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The samples were students of SMPN 4 Boyolali, SMPN 6 Boyolali, and SMPN 4 Mojosongo. The instruments used were mathematics achievement tests and self regulated learning questionnaire. The data were analyzed using unbalanced two-ways Anova. The conclusions were as follows. (1) Discovery learning model gave mathematics learning achievement better than problem solving and TPS learning model, problem solving and TPS learning model gave the same mathematics learning achievement. (2) Mathematics learning achievement of students with high self regulated learning was better than students with medium and low self regulated learning. Mathematics learning achievement of students with medium self regulated learning was better than students with low self regulated learning. (3) There was an interaction between learning models and the categories of self regulated learning towards the students mathematics learning achievement.Keywords: Discovery Learning, Problem Solving, Think Pair Share (TPS), self regulated learning.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DAN PAIRS CHECK (PC) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI HIMPUNAN DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN LOGIS MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI SE-KOTA SURAKARTA Andini, Fahimah; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (316.784 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This study aimed at determining the effect of models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the students’ logical mathematical intelligence. The learning models compared were learning model of the scientific Team Assisted Individualization (TAI), scientific Pairs Check (PC), and scientific classical. The type of this study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3x3 factorial design. The population was all grade VII students of Junior High Schools in Surakarta. The instruments used for the data collection were mathematics achievement test and logical mathematical intelligence test. The data analysis technique used was unbalanced two ways analysis of variance. Based on the hypothesis, the results of the study can be summarized as follows. (1) The use of Scientific PC resulted better achievement than that of scientific TAI and with scientific classical, the use of scientific TAI resulted better achievement than that of scientific classical. (2) The students’ achievement who have high logical mathematical intelligence was better than those who have middle or low logical mathematical intelligence, and students who have middle logical mathematical intelligence were better than those who have low logical mathematic intelligence. (3) At the students with high logical matematical intelligence, scientific TAI, scientific PC, and scientific classical gave the same achievement. At the students with middle logical matematical intelligence, scientific PC gave the better achievement than that with scientific TAI and scientific classical. At the students with low logical matematical intelligence, scientific TAI gave the better achievement than that with scientific PC and scientific classical. (4) In scientific TAI, high logical mathematical intelligence students’ achievement was better than the middle one, high and middle level of logical mathematical intelligence students’ achievement were better than the lower one. In scientific PC, high logical mathematical intelligence students’ achievement have equal achievement to the middle one students, high and middle level of logical mathematical intelligence students’ achievement were better than the low one. In scientific classical, high logical mathematical intelligence students’ achievement was better than the middle one, high and middle level of logical mathematical intelligence students’ achievement were better than the students with low logical mathematical intelligence.Keywords: Scientific TAI, Scientific PC, Scientific Classical, Scientific Approach, Logical Mathematical Intelligence.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK-PAIR-SHARE (TPS) DAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN AWAL SISWA SMP KELAS VIII SE-KABUPATEN SRAGEN Supriyatin, Supriyatin; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Mardiyana, Mardiyana
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (295.561 KB)

Abstract

Abstract : The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from prior competency. The learning models compared were TPS with scientific approach, PBL with scientific approach and direct learning. This was quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population were all students of Junior High School in Sragen. The samples of research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique and consisted of 297 students. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and prior competency test. The data analysis technique used unbalanced two ways anova. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded as follows. (1) The students treated with PBL learning model with scientific approach provided better learning achievement than those treated with TPS and those treated with direct learning model. The students treated with TPS learning model with scientific approach provided equal mathematics learning achievement to those treated with direct learning. (2) The students with high prior competency had better learning achievement than those with medium and those with low prior competencies. The students with medium prior competency had better learning achievement than those with low one. (3) In the TPS learning model with scientific approach and direct learning, the students with high and medium prior competencies had better learning achievement than those with low one. In the PBL learning model with scientific approach, the students with high prior competency had better learning achievement than those with low prior competencies and both of them provided the same learning achievement than those with medium one. (4) The students with high prior competency category had the same learning achievement in TPS type of learning model with scientific approach, PBL learning model with scientific approach and direct learning model. In medium prior competency category, PBL learning model with scientific approach provided better learning achievement than TPS learning model with scientific approach did, and both of them provided the same learning achievement as the direct learning did. Meanwhile in low prior competency category, PBL learning model with scientific approach provided better learning achievement than TPS learning model with scientific approach and direct learning model, and TPS learning model with scientific approach provided the same learning achievement as the direct learning did.Keywords: Mathematics Learning Achievement, TPS, PBL, Scientific Approach, Prior Competency 
ANALISIS PROSES DAN TINGKAT BERPIKIR KREATIF SISWA SMP DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH BENTUK SOAL CERITA MATERI LINGKARAN DITINJAU DARI KECEMASAN MATEMATIKA Machromah, Isnaeni Umi; Riyadi, Riyadi; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (246.622 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this research was to analyze the process and level of creative thinking of junior high school students based on mathematics anxiety’s students. The subjects of this research were taken by using purposive sampling. The Subjects of this research were six 9th grade students of SMP N 3 Colomadu Karanganyar regency. The data were collected by questionnaire and task-based interview technique and validated by using time triangulation. The data were analyzed by collection, reduction, presentation, and conclusion. The results of this research were: (1) students with high mathematics anxiety had level 1 (almost not creative) and the processes were at preparation stage, students feel difficult to understand and identify the problem; at the incubation stage, students found the idea from picture’s observation; at illumination stage, students could not  make mathematics statement based on the problem enough; at verification stage, students read or counted again for investigating the answer and they could resume the result appropriate the reality of the problem, (2) students with medium mathematics anxiety had level 1 (almost not creative) and level 2 (quite creative), and the processes were at preparation stage, students could understand and identify the problem well; at the incubation stage, students found the idea from picture’s observation; at illumination stage, students could make mathematics statement based on the problem well; at verification stage, students counted again for investigating the answer and they could resume the result appropriate the reality of the problem, (3) students with low mathematics anxiety had level 2 (quite creative), and the processes were at preparation stage, students could understand and identify the problem so well; at the incubation stage, students found the idea from picture’s observation and from the knowledge before; at illumination stage, students could make mathematics statement based on the problem so well; at verification stage, students counted again for investigating the answer and they could resume the result appropriate the reality of the problem.Keywords: creative thinking processes; creative thinking level; word problem solving; mathematics anxiety. 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT, NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER DAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI OPERASI DAN FAKTORISASI BENTUK ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI AKTIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA Buana, Asip Cakra; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (295.368 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this research is to determine the influence of learning models using scientific approach with the students achievement viewed from the student activities. The learning models compared are TGT, NHT, and PBL. This research is a quasi experimental research. The population is all students of eight grade of state Junior High School in Bojonegoro Regency in the academic year of 2014/2015. The samples are 300 students. The methods of data collection are documentation, questionaire, and test. The technique of data analysis used is two ways analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. Based on the result of data analysis, it can be concluded that : (1) The students’ learning achievement by using cooperative learning model TGT, NHT, and PBL with the scientific approach had the same learning achievement. (2) The students’ learning achievement of students with high learning activity had better learning achievement than students with medium and low learning activity, while students with medium and low learning activity had the same result. (3) For category high, medium, and low learning activities, the learning achievement of students who were given by cooperative learning model TGT, NHT,  and PBL with scientific approach had the same result. (4.a) For category cooperative learning model TGT and PBL with scientific approach, the students’ learning achievement with high,  medium and low learning activities had the same learning achievement. (4.b) For category cooperative learning model NHT with scientific approach the students’ learning achievement with high learning activity had better learning achievement than medium and low learning activities. For students having medium and low learning activities had the same learning achievement.Keywords: Team Games Tournament (TGT), Numbered Head Together (NHT),  Problem Based Learning (PBL), Learning Activity.
PROFIL SISWA SMP DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH YANG BERKAITAN DENGAN LITERASI MATEMATIS DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) Rahmawati, Novia Dwi; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (241.864 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research aims to describe the profile of junior high school students with climber’s, camper’s, and quitter’s type in problem solving from related with mathematics literacy using Polya steps. This research was a qualitative descriptive research. The subjects of this research were taken by using a combined technique of stratified sampling and Snowball sampling. The subjects of this research were seven 9th grade students of SMP Negeri 6 Surakarta regency, which consisted of three students with climber’s type, two students with camper’s type, and two students with quitters’s type. The data were collected through questionnaire and task-based interview technique on subject matter of space and shape mathematics literacy third level. The data were analyzed using a Miles and Huberman’s concept, that was data reduction, presentation, and conclusion. The results of this research are as follows: (1) climber’s students in understanding the problem, devising a plan, carrying out the plan, and looking back the answer aspects have reached all aspects needed, those are reasoning, argumentation, communication, modelling, connection, and representation aspect; (2) camper’s students in understanding the problem, devising a plan, and looking back the answer aspects have reached all aspects, those are reasoning, argumentation, communication, modelling, connection, and representation aspect, but in carrying out the plan, they have only reached reasoning, argumentation, communication, modelling and connection aspects, not representation aspect; (3) quitter’s students understanding the problem and looking back the answer aspects have reached all aspects, those are reasoning, argumentation, communication, modelling, connection, and representation aspect, but in devising a plan, they have only reached communication, modelling, and connection aspects, not reasoning, argumentation, and representation aspect. Whereas in carrying out the plan, they have only reached reasoning, argumentation, communication, modelling and connection aspects, not representation aspect.Keywords: Profile, problem solving, mathematics literacy, Polya’s steps, Adversity Quotiont (AQ) 

Page 22 of 37 | Total Record : 369

 20   21   22   23   24 

Filter by Year

2013 2016


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 4, No 10 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 9 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 8 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 7 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 6 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika More Issue