cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Education Mathematics
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 369 Documents
 21   22   23   24   25 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENTS DAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION PADA MATERI GARIS DAN SUDUT DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN MAGETAN Annurwanda, Pradipta; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (294.143 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This aim of the research was to know the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the student emotional intelligences. The learning model compared were TGT, TAI and direct learning. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental. The population was all of student seventh grade of junior high school in Magetan regency on academic year 2013/2014. The sampling technique by using a stratified cluster random sampling. The size of the sample was 252 students with 85 students as experimental class I, 86 students as experimental class II, 81 students as control class. The data collections were taken by document, questionnaire and test method. Hypothesis testing was performed by using an unbalanced two way analysis of variance. The conclusions of  the research were as follows: (1) TGT learning model give better mathematics achievement than TAI and direct learning model, TAI learning model give an equal mathematics achievement to direct learning model, (2) the high level emotional intelligence students have an equal mathematics achievement to the middle level emotional intelligence students, the high level emotional intelligence students have better mathematics achievement than the low level emotional intelligence students, the middle level emotional intelligence students have better mathematics achievement than the low level emotional intelligence students, (3) for the high level emotional intelligence students, TGT, TAI and direct learning models give the same mathematics achievement, for the middle level emotional intelligence students, TGT learning model give the same mathematics achievement as TAI and direct learning model, direct learning model give better mathematics achivement than TAI learning model, for the low level emotional intelligence students, TGT learning model give the same mathematics achievement as TAI learning model, TGT learning model give better mathematics achievement than direct learning model, TAI learning model give the same mathematics achievement as direct learning model, (4) on the TGT and TAI learning models, students in each level of emotional intelligence have the same mathematics achievement, for student with direct learning model, the high level emotional intelligence students have the same mathematics achievement as middle and low level emotional intelligence students, the middle level emotional intelligence students have better mathematics achievement than low level emotional intelligence students.Keywords: Teams Games Tournaments, Team Assisted Individualization, direct learning, emotional intelligence.
PROSES PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA UNTUK SISWA SLOW LEARNER DI KELAS INKLUSI SMP NEGERI 7 KLATEN KELAS VIII Pramitasari, Karina; Usodo, Budi; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (201.996 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this research are intended to describe (1) teacher’s strategy in teaching learning activity for slow learner in the inclusive class  of SMPN 7 Klaten, (2) the teaching learning process in the inclusive class  of SMPN 7 Klaten, (3) teacher’s problems in Mathematics teaching learning process in the inclusive class of SMPN 7 Klaten. This research used a qualitative approach in the form of field research. The  subjects of the research are  four participants choosen by using  purposive sampling. They are  a mathematics teacher, a slow learner having special needs and two normal students. The research instruments consist of the researcher as the main instrument, observation sheet as the first supplementary instrumen and interview basic as the second supplementary instrumen. Based on the results of the research, it can be concluded that, as follows: (1) teacher conducted the planning step by designing lesson plan, the teaching learning step and the evaluation/follow up step in the inclusive class as same as what the teacher conducted in the regular class. The difference is situated only at the giving of special attention and the special guidance for slow learner who have special need during teaching learning process in the class, (2) the slow learner having special needs tend to participate passively in the matematics teaching learning process, they prefer to write the materials given by teacher rather than pay more attention, they prefer to like a calm class situation as same as the normal students’ class, and they have more learning time than normal students about three hours a day and they are helped by their mother when they got and finished their duties or homework, (3) teacher’s problems in mathematics teaching learning process in inclusive class is caused by two factors that are internal factor and external factor. Internal factors refers to the lack of the mathematics teacher’s understanding about the inclusive education and having less capability to teach the slow learner who have special need. External factors deals with there are no the special guide teachers and there are no special facilities which being prepared in mathematics teaching learning process for slow learner who have special needs.Keywords: mathematics learning process, inclusive class, slow learner.
PROSES BERPIKIR KREATIF SISWA DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN MATEMATIKAPADA SISWA KELAS X MIA SMAN 6 SURAKARTA Wulantina, Endah; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (200.044 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The research aims to describe the students’ creative thinking process of tenth grade of MIA of SMAN 6 Surakarta in solving mathematics problems towards students who have high, medium and low ability in mathematics. The researcher choosed qualitative research in case study design. The results showed that 1). Students’ creative thinking process in the tenth grade of MIA of SMAN 6 Surakarta with high ability in Mathematics are (a) Preparation, the students identify the prior knowledge about the assignment carefully than the students select the information in solving the problem appropriately; (b) Incubation, the students turn silent when they are thinking about how to solve the problem, the students memorize the way to solve the problem; (c) Illumination, the students continue the first idea which is found before; (d) Verification, the students recheck the problem solving before taking the conclusion, the students test the result by suiting to the data from the assignment. 2) The students’ creative thinking process in the tenth grade of MIA of SMAN 6 Surakarta with medium ability in Mathematics are (a) preparation, the students identify well the problem which is being asked select the information appropriately but they need some stimulus from another person; (b) Incubation, the students turn silent when they are thinking about how to solve the problem, the students memorized the way to solve the problem; (c) Illumination, the students only focus on the relevant information and could not explore the idea to find out the idea, here students also need the stimulus from another person; (d) verification, the students recheck the result before taking conclusion; 3) the students’ creative thinking process in the tenth grade of MIA of SMAN 6 Surakarta with low ability in Mathematics are: (a) Preparation, the students identify well the problem which is being asked, the students select the information recursively by comprehending the assignment. They also still need the stimulus in the form of question; (b) Incubation, the students memorize the appropriate pattern to solve the problem but sometimes they hesitate so they ask the problem to the researcher; (c) Illumination, the students solve the problem from what they already learnt from the previous way, the students focus on the relevant information and tent to avoid the complex information so that the student could not explore the idea to find out another idea, they tent to solve the problem with one idea; (d) Verification, the students recheck the result before taking conclusion but there are many corrections in the final answer.Keywords: Ability in Mathematics,  Creative Thinking Process, Mathematics Problem Solving.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) PADA MATERI PELUANG DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA Faqihi, Ahmad; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (204.596 KB)

Abstract

models on learning achievement viewed from learning style types of the students. The learning models compared were PBL, GI, and classical with scientific approach model. The type of the research was quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population of this research was the students in grade X1 higher Secondary School in Lombok East on academic year of  2014/2015. The size of the sample was 282 students, which was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used for data collection were learning style questionnaire and mathematics achievement test. The hypothesis test used unbalance two ways analysis of variance. The results of the research were as follows. (1) the problem based learning model (PBL) and the cooperative learning model of the  group investgation (GI) type with scientific approach result in equal learning achievement in mathematics, buth both problem based learning model (PBL) and the cooperative learning model of the group investgation (GI) type give better result in learning achievement in mathematics than the classical with scientific approach. (2) the student with the high, medium, and ow independent learning levels have equal learning achievement. (3) in each of the learning models, the high, medium, and, low independent learning levels, result in the equal learning achievement. (4) in each of the independent learning levels, the problem based learning model (PBL) and the cooperative learning model of the  group investgation (GI) type with scientific approach result in equal learning achievement in mathematics, buth both problem based learning model (PBL) and the cooperative learning model of the  group investgation (GI) type give better result in learning achievement in mathematics than the classical with scientific approach.Keywords: : learning model, PBL, GI, Classical learning model, Scientific Approach,  independent learning levels, Achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL), NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER (NHT) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATERI HIMPUNAN SMP NEGERI KABUPATEN KEBUMEN Putri, Prihastini Oktasari; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (274.578 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this research are to know: (1) which one was better result in learning achievement of mathematics among PBL, NHT, and TPS, (2) which one was better learning achievement among students in high, middle, and low creativity categories of  mathematics, (3) in each learning model, which one was better learning achievement among students’ creativity categories, students having high, middle, or low; and (4) in each creativity categories, which one was better learning achivement among students of PBL, NHT, or TPS. This research used quasi-experimental research. The population was all of the students in Grade VII of State Junior High School in Kebumen. The samples of research were taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique and consisted of 268 students. They divided into three groups. They were 92 students in the group of first experiment, 88 students in the group of second experiment, and 88 students in the group of third experiment. The instruments to collect the data were test of learning achievement and the questionnaire of learning creativity in mathematics. The data were examined by using two-way ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows. (1) Student in the model of PBL model result in a better learning achievement than NHT and TPS learning models. Student in NHT learning model results in a better learning achievement than TPS learning model. (2) Learning creativity gives students a different effect on mathematics’ learning achievement in the subject of set. The students with the high creativity have a better learning achievement than those with the middle and low categories, and student with the middle creativity have a better learning achievement than those with the low creativity categoriy. (3) In each learning model, students with the high creativity category have learning achievement as good as those with the middle or low categories. (4) In each of the creativity categories of students, students with the high creativity category of PBL have learning achievement as good as those in NHT and TPS, students with the middle creativity category of PBL have better learning achievement than those in TPS, then learning models of NHT and TPS have same learning achievement, and students in PBL and NHT have same learning achievement; last, in the low learning category, student in PBL have better learning achievement than those in TPS, student in NHT and TPS have same learning achievement and the student in PBL and NHT have same learning achievement.Keywords:    Problem Based Learning, Numbered Head Together, Think Pair Share, and learning creativity.
STRATEGI MEMBELAJARKAN MATEMATIKA PADA KELAS VII INKLUSI DI SMP PGRI 1 SAMPIT KABUPATEN KOTA WARINGIN TIMUR Shaliha, Nurul Hidayati; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (276.401 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to describe inclusive learning system and teacher strategy in teaching mathematics from the teacher’s ability in explaining in accordance with conceptual and procedural knowledge of 7th grade students of SMP PGRI 1 Sampit. This research was a qualitative descriptive using a single case study method, in depth study of learning system and Mathematics learning in inclusive school. The subject of the research was the Headmaster of SMP PGRI 1 Sampit to obtain information about learning system and Mathematics teacher assistant of the 7th grade in order to know the Mathematics learning strategy in inclusive class of SMP PGRI 1 Sampit. The information of inclusive learning systems were taken by documenting, observation and interview. The validity technique of learning system data used in this research was Triangulation Method. The information of Mathematics learning strategy including the teacher’s ability in explaining the conceptual and prosedural knowledge. The data was taken from the transcription of six recording Mathematics learning activity and two best observations. The validity technique of learning system data used was member check technique. The research result shows as follows : 1) The learning system of inclusive students of the 7th grade of SMP PGRI 1 Sampit was different with the regular learning system. However, it was found that there is no individual learning program especially for slow learner students and the lack of computer technology used in the learning process. 2) The Mathematics learning strategy in the inclusive 7th grade of SMP PGRI 1 Sampit observed from the teacher’s ability in explaining the subject in accordance with the delivering explanation indicators which were planning the explanation, clarity of delivering the explanation, the use of examples and illustrations, the use of intonation in delivering the explanation, and giving the feed back to the students. The teacher used Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) to teach the concept of mathematics and Discovery Learning methods to teach the procedure of mathematics.Keywords: learning system, Mathematics learning strategy, inclusive
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DAN GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) DITINJAU DARI KATEGORI KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL PESERTA DIDIK TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR MATEMATIS TINGKAT TINGGI KELAS VII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN SRAGEN Mutmainah, Siti; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (488.307 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of learning models on the high order mathematical thinking skill viewed from the emotional quotient of the students. The learning models compared were PBL model, GI learning model, and direct learning model. This research used the quasi experimental research. Its population was all of the students in Grade VII of State Junior Secondary Schools in Sragen. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique and consisted of 269 students. They were grouped into three classes, namely: 90 students in Experimental Class 1, 90 students in Experimental Class 2, and 89 students in Control Class. The instruments to collect the data were test of high order mathematical thinking skill, and emotional quotient questionnaire. The proposed hypotheses of the research were analyzed by using the two way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows. (1) PBL model results better high order mathematical thinking skill than GI learning model, and direct learning model, GI learning model results better high order mathematical thinking skill than direct learning model. (2) Emotional quotient gives students different effect on high order mathematical thinking skill of students. The students with the high emotional quotient have better high order mathematical thinking skill than those with the moderate emotional quotient and those with the low emotional quotient, the students with the moderate emotional quotient have better high order mathematical thinking skill than those with the low emotional quotient. (3) There was not an interaction of the aforementioned learning models and the categories of the emotional quotient on the high order mathematical thinking skill of the students.Keywords: PBL model, GI learning model, direct learning model, high order mathematical thinking skill and emotional quotient
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE DENGAN PENDEKATAN ILMIAH PADA POKOK BAHASAN LIMIT FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT PESERTA DIDIK SMA NEGERI KABUPATEN BANYUMAS TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Ariyani, Dian Ratna; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari S, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (270.076 KB)

Abstract

Abstract : The purposes of the  research  were  to  know:  (1)  which  learning  models  -think pair share cooperative learning model with scientific approach (TPS SA), think pair share cooperative learning (TPS), and direct learning model (DL)-that will give the best learning mathematics result;  (2)  which level of students adversity  quotient  (AQ) -quitter, camper, and climber-that will give the best mathematics learning result; (3) which learning models -TPS SA, TPS, and DL- that will give the best learning mathematics result at categories AQ; (4) which level of students AQ -quitter, camper and climber- that will give the best learning mathematics result at categories learning models. The research used a quasi-experimental designed with population was all students of eleventh grade science in Banyumas in the academic year 2013/2014. The technique sampling was stratified cluster random sampling. The instrument used to collect the data was a questionnaire of AQ and math achievement tests. Hypothesis test used two way analysis of variance with unequal cells. Based on the analysis we concluded: (1) TPS SA provided a better learning achievement than only TPS and direct learning, TPS provided a better learning achievement than direct learning; (2) climber students had a better learning achievement than camper and quitter, camper had a better learning achievement than a quitter; (3) for climber students, TPS SA, TPS, and  direct learning provided the same good learning performance, for camper students, TPS SA provided a better learning achievement than TPS and direct learning, TPS provided a better learning achievement than direct learning, for quitter students, TPS SA, TPS, and  direct learning provided the same good learning performance; (4) in TPS SA, climber students had an academic achievement as good as camper students, climber students had a better learning achievement than quitter students, camper students had a better learning achievement than quitter students, in TPS, climber students had a better learning achievement than quitter and camper, camper students had a better learning achievement than quitter, in direct learning, climber students had a better learning achievement than quitter and camper, camper students had academic achievement as good as quitter.Keywords: Cooperative  Learning,  Scientific  Approach,  Think  Pair  Share  with scientific approach, Adversity Quotient (AQ).
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISCOVERY LEARNING, PROBLEM BASED LEARNING, DAN THINK PAIR SHARE DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK TERHADAP KOMPETENSI PENGETAHUAN DAN SIKAP SOSIAL DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA Pinahayu, EK Ajeng Rahmi; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (439.854 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this research was to find out the different effects of Discovery Learning (DL), Problem Based Learning (PBL), and Think Pair Share (TPS) models with scientific approach towards students knowledge and social attitude competency viewed from the students learning styles. This study was a quasi-experimental research. The population of research was all of the 8th grade of the State Junior High School in Puworejo Regency on the second semester of 2014/2015 academic year. The hypothesis testing of research were conducted using a two-ways multivariate analysis of variance with different cells. The conclusions of this research were as follows. (1) DL provided better knowledge competency than PBL and TPS, while PBL and TPS was same. (2) DL and TPS provided same social attitude competency, and both provided better social attitude competency than PBL. (3) The knowledge competency of visual students was better than auditory and kinesthetic, and the knowledge competency of students in those types was same. (4) The social attitude competency of visual and auditory students was same, the social attitude competency of visual students was better than kinesthetic, the social attitude competency of auditory and kinesthetic students was same. (5) In DL, the knowledge competency of visual students was better than auditory, the knowledge competency of visual students was better than kinesthetic, the knowledge competency of auditory and kinesthetic students was same. In PBL and TPS, the knowledge competency of visual, auditory, and kinesthetic students was same. (6) In DL and TPS, the social attitude competency of those three types was same. In PBL, the social attitude competency of visual students was better than auditory, the social attitude competency of visual and kinesthetic students was same, the social attitude competency of auditory and kinesthetic students was same. (7) In visual, DL provided better knowledge competency than PBL and TPS, PBL and TPS  provided same knowledge competency. In auditory and kinesthetic, DL, PBL, and TPS provided same knowledge competency. (8) In visual and kinesthetic, DL, PBL, and TPS provided same social attitude competency. In auditory, DL and PBL provided same social attitude competency, DL and TPS was same, and TPS provided better social attitude competency than PBL.Keywords: Discovery Learning, Problem Based Learning, Think Pair Share, Scientific Approach, Knowledge Competency, Social Attitude Competency, Learning Styles.
ANALISIS PROSES PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH (PROBLEM BASED LEARNING) MATEMATIKA DENGAN PENDEKATAN ILMIAH (SCIENTIFIC APPROACH ) DI SMA NEGERI 1 JOGOROGO KELAS X KABUPATEN NGAWI Rahmawati, Arum Dwi; Riyadi, Riyadi; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (201.13 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this research was to describe the planning, implementation process of learning undertaken by teachers of mathematics and constraints experienced during the process of mathematical problem-based learning with a scientific approach in class X SMAN 1 Jogorogo. This research was a qualitative study. These subject are taken using purposive sampling. The subjects of this study were the teacher math in class X. Data collection techniques in this study were documentation, interviews and observations. Techniques to validate that the data source triangulation and triangulation time. The data analysis technique used was the concept of Miles and Huberman consists of data reduction, data display, and conclusion. The results showed that the planning process of mathematical problem-based learning with a scientific approach was not maximal yet, seen in the preparation of lesson plans which teachers only see examples of other schools and only see a reference to the syllabus. Implementation of the learning process is done the math teacher in class X SMAN 1 Jogorogo was not maximal yet. Visible in the indicator 5M on core activities are observing, asking, gather information, and communicate their associates have not done all. In observing the activities of students had no difficulty, however, go into the next phase indicator and students are still difficulties in doing so. In the event of  problem making students ask questions, lack of motivation and imagination. Collect information on the activities of students also have difficulty in learning resources are used only for math books grade students associate X. At this stage also looks still difficulty in processing information, although sometimes the teacher has given direction that the students tried to process the information that has been obtained. At that last stage  quite well in communicating the results, good enough student responses revealed the results even though the teacher had to call one of the students without first. Overcoming the problems found in the process of mathematical problem-based learning with a scientific approach to teacher always gives motivation at any stage of learning and trying to develop a problem-based learning with a scientific approach.Keywords: PBL, Scientific Approach 

Page 23 of 37 | Total Record : 369

 21   22   23   24   25 

Filter by Year

2013 2016


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 4, No 10 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 9 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 8 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 7 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 6 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika More Issue