cover
Contact Name
AGRIVITA Editorial Team
Contact Email
agrivita@ub.ac.id
Phone
+62341-575743
Journal Mail Official
agrivita@ub.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Veteran Malang 65145 Jawa Timur, Indonesia
Location
Kota malang,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
AGRIVITA, Journal of Agricultural Science
Published by Universitas Brawijaya
ISSN : 01260537     EISSN : 24778516     DOI : https://doi.org/10.17503
Core Subject : Agriculture,
AGRIVITA Journal of Agricultural Science is a peer-reviewed, scientific journal published by Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Brawijaya Indonesia in collaboration with Indonesian Agronomy Association (PERAGI). The aims of the journal are to publish and disseminate high quality, original research papers and article review in plant science i.e. agronomy, horticulture, plant breeding, soil sciences, plant protection and other pertinent field related to plant production. AGRIVITA is published three times per year. The Journal has been indexed in SCOPUS, Scimago Journal Ranks (SJR), Emerging Source Citation Index ( ESCI-Web of Science), EBSCO, ProQuest, Google Scholar and others international indexing. AGRIVITA is accredited first grade (Sinta 1/S1) for five years (2018-2023) based on Decree No: 30/E/KPT/2018 by Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education (Ristek Dikti), The Republic of Indonesia. We accept submission from all over the world. All submitted articles shall never been published elsewhere, original and not under consideration for other publication.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 933 Documents
Soybean Adaptation Mechanisms to Drought Through Stomatal Regulation, Carbon Assimilation, and Water Use Efficiency in Sustainable Farming Systems Aminah, Aminah; Saida, Saida; Edy, Edy; Palad, Marliana S.; Nuraeni, Nuraeni; Haris, Abdul; Robbo, Anwar; Boceng, Annas; Fadel, Muh.; Akbar, Abd.
AGRIVITA Journal of Agricultural Science Vol 48, No 1 (2026): IN PRESS
Publisher : Faculty of Agriculture University of Brawijaya in collaboration with PERAGI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17503/agrivita.v41i0.5002

Abstract

Unlike other crops, soybeans can be produced for both direct human consumption and industrial use. However, soybean production is highly sensitive to drought. This is because drought conditions can reduce photosynthesis and crop yield. This study aimed to investigate drought adaptations in soybean plants, including stomatal control, drought-induced carbon assimilation, and avoidance. The study was conducted in a greenhouse under controlled conditions using a split-plot design with 3 stress levels (100%, 50%, and 30% of field capacity), 4 varieties (Dering-1, Dering-2, Detap-1, and Argomulyo), and 2 stress periods (vegetative and generative). Strong variation in yield was observed across all drought-affected plant growth factors, including photosynthetic rate and grain yield. Under moderate stress conditions (achieving a 0.8 t/ha yield), the Detap-1 variety fully maintained photosynthetic capacity and appropriately modulated stomatal closure and stomatal regulation to achieve the most efficient water control. This leads to the conclusion that Detap-1 is best suited to the dryland conditions of the varieties studied due to its strong physiological adaptability.
In Vitro Somatic Embryogenesis and Regeneration of Cayenne Pepper (Capsicum frutescens) from West Sumatra Renfiyeni, Renfiyeni; Yora, Muharama; Meyuliana, Aulia
AGRIVITA Journal of Agricultural Science Vol 48, No 1 (2026): IN PRESS
Publisher : Faculty of Agriculture University of Brawijaya in collaboration with PERAGI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17503/agrivita.v48i1.4928

Abstract

The development of superior cultivars and the availability of high-quality seedlings require stable in vitro propagation. This study evaluated the effectiveness of different culture media for the in vitro propagation of local West Sumatra cayenne peppers using a Completely Randomized Design with eight treatments and six replications. Further testing used the Duncan Multiple Range Test. This research was conducted in the tissue culture laboratory of Mahaputra Muhammad Yamin University, Solok, West Sumatra. Callus initiation and shoot regeneration were conducted on MS medium with various auxin–cytokinin combinations, while root induction was tested on MS and WPM supplemented with auxins. Explants consisted of the first leaf and epicotyl from 21-day-old chili seedlings. The highest callus induction (100%) was observed on MS medium supplemented with 3 mg/l BAP + 0.5 mg/l IAA and MS medium supplemented with 4 mg/l 2,4-D for both types of explants. The highest embryogenic callus formation (98.45%) was obtained on MS + 3 mg/l BAP + 0.5 mg/l IAA. Optimal shoot regeneration (5.29 shoots) was achieved on MS + 2 mg/l BAP + 1 mg/l NAA, whereas the best root induction occurred on WPM + 1 mg/l NAA.
Analyzing the Impact of Land Resource Dimension on Konjac (Amorphophallus onchophyllus) Yield and Land Suitability Criteria Using PLS-SEM and Boundary Line Methods In Gorontalo, Indonesia Nurdin, Nurdin; Pembengo, Wawan; Adam, Echan; Moonti, Agustinus; Rahman, Rival; Suparwata, Dewa Oka; Angelia, Ika Okhtora; Azis, Muhammad Arief; Arsyad, Silviana; Dude, Suyono; Zakaria, Fauzan; Bagu, Fitria S.; Apriliani, Silvana; Mokoginta, Meity M.; Pade, Satriawati; Rajib, Md. Mijanur Rahman; Hakiman, Mansor
AGRIVITA Journal of Agricultural Science Vol 48, No 1 (2026): IN PRESS
Publisher : Faculty of Agriculture University of Brawijaya in collaboration with PERAGI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17503/agrivita.v41i0.4861

Abstract

The current land suitability criteria for konjac are incomplete and fail to consider land dimensions and quality, which influence optimal yield. This research aims to develop criteria for konjac land suitability based on the dimensions, quality, and characteristics of selected land. In Gorontalo Province, Indonesia, 131 land units were surveyed to obtain data on the quality and characteristics. Selection of land dimensions, quality, and characteristics using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with Partial Least Squares (PLS). Meanwhile, the optimum yield and distinguished land suitability criteria for konjac plants using the boundary line method. The results indicated that intrinsic and extrinsic dimensions determined the new land suitability criteria. In the intrinsic dimension, land quality was assessed based on root conditions, oxygen availability, nutrient availability, nutrient retention, and sodicity. For the extrinsic dimension, land quality only comprised temperature, water availability, land preparation, and erosion hazard. Land characteristics in the intrinsic dimension consisted of soil drainage, texture, bulk density, particle density, porosity, pH, organic C, CEC, base saturation, total N, available P, and exchangeable K. For the extrinsic dimension, land characteristics included slope, soil erosion, surface rocks, and rock outcrops. The highest optimum yield of konjac was 9.17 t/ha, and the lowest was 6.69 t/ha, respectively.

Filter by Year

2010 2026


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 48, No 1 (2026): IN PRESS Vol 47, No 3 (2025) Vol 47, No 2 (2025) Vol 47, No 1 (2025) Vol 46, No 3 (2024) Vol 46, No 2 (2024) Vol 46, No 1 (2024) Vol 45, No 3 (2023) Vol 45, No 3 (2023): IN PRESS Vol 45, No 2 (2023) Vol 45, No 1 (2023) Vol 45, No 1 (2023): IN PRESS Vol 44, No 3 (2022) Vol 44, No 2 (2022) Vol 44, No 1 (2022) Vol 43, No 3 (2021) Vol 43, No 2 (2021) Vol 43, No 2 (2021): ARTICLE IN PRESS Vol 43, No 1 (2021) Vol 42, No 3 (2020) Vol 42, No 2 (2020) Vol 42, No 1 (2020) Vol 41, No 3 (2019) Vol 41, No 2 (2019) Vol 41, No 1 (2019) Vol 40, No 3 (2018): OCTOBER Vol 40, No 2 (2018): JUNE Vol 40, No 1 (2018): FEBRUARY Vol 39, No 3 (2017): OCTOBER Vol 39, No 2 (2017): JUNE Vol 39, No 1 (2017): FEBRUARY Vol 38, No 3 (2016): OCTOBER Vol 38, No 2 (2016): JUNE Vol 38, No 1 (2016): FEBRUARY Vol 37, No 3 (2015): OCTOBER Vol 37, No 2 (2015) Vol 37, No 2 (2015): JUNE Vol 37, No 2 (2015): JUNE Vol 37, No 1 (2015) Vol 37, No 1 (2015): FEBRUARY Vol 36, No 3 (2014) Vol 36, No 3 (2014) Vol 36, No 2 (2014) Vol 36, No 2 (2014) Vol 36, No 1 (2014) Vol 36, No 1 (2014) Vol 35, No 3 (2013) Vol 35, No 3 (2013) Vol 35, No 2 (2013) Vol 35, No 2 (2013) Vol 35, No 1 (2013) Vol 35, No 1 (2013) Vol 34, No 3 (2012) Vol 34, No 3 (2012) Vol 34, No 2 (2012) Vol 34, No 2 (2012) Vol 34, No 1 (2012) Vol 34, No 1 (2012) Vol 33, No 3 (2011) Vol 33, No 3 (2011) Vol 33, No 2 (2011) Vol 33, No 2 (2011) Vol 33, No 1 (2011) Vol 33, No 1 (2011) Vol 32, No 3 (2010) Vol 32, No 3 (2010) More Issue