cover
Contact Name
jurnalius
Contact Email
jurnaliusunram@yahoo.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnaliusunram@yahoo.com
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota mataram,
Nusa tenggara barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan)
Published by Universitas Mataram
ISSN : 23033827     EISSN : 2477815X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Jurnal IUS established December 2012, is an institution that focuses on journal development for post graduate students and all law activists in general and specialised topics. Journal IUS publishes three times a year and articles are based on research with specific themes. Jurnal IUS was founded by a group of young lecturers who had a passion to spread their ideas, thoughts and expertise concerning law. Jurnal IUS focuses on publishing research about law reviews from law students, lecturers and other activists on various topics. As an academic centre, we organize regular discussions around various selected topics twice a month. Topics of interest: the battle of legal paradigm legal pluralism law and power
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 702 Documents
IUS Constituendum of Suistainable Agricultural Policy: The Aftermath of Job Creation Act Fahamsyah, Ermanto; Chansrakaeo, Ruetaitip
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 10 No. 3: December 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v10i3.1091

Abstract

Agriculture is an important aspect of the life of the Indonesian people. Apart from being a commodity, agriculture is also a part of Indonesian social lives. In this case, the state needs to enact legal policies related to sustainable agriculture. This study seeks to discuss legal issues in the form of legal disharmony related to sustainable agricultural legal policies. The study results confirm that the disharmony of legal policies related to Sustainable Agriculture has only become “ineffective,” which means that the rules exist but cannot be implemented because they do not have the implementing regulations. This happens because the respective laws, particularly those related to sustainable agricultural cultivation systems and job creation, which substantially regulate sustainable agriculture, do not refer to each other. That affects the lack of coordination and horizontal harmonization between laws that substantially regulate sustainable agriculture. Harmonization was not carried out vertically, between laws and government regulations. This occurs when government regulations related to the administration of the agricultural sector do not refer to, and vertically disharmony with the Law relating to sustainable agricultural cultivation systems. The results of this study suggest that in the future, in this case, the government requires to revise the Government Regulations on the implementation of the agricultural sector by incorporating the substance of the sustainable agriculture policy as well as being more thorough in harmonizing both vertically and horizontally in drafting legislation.
Paralyzing the WTO from the Inside: The Deadlock of the Appointment of Appellate Body Judges and its Repercussions I Gusti Ngurah Parikesit Widiatedja; Mohammad Qadam Shah
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 10 No. 2: August 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v10i2.1093

Abstract

The establishment of the dispute settlement procedure that consists of the Panel Report and the Appellate Body has been the most remarkable characteristic of the World Trade Organization. Aside from the most productive international dispute resolution process, it has consistently adopted a rule-oriented procedure in enforcing the commitments made during trade negotiations. Since the last five years, however, the dispute settlement process has confronted an existential crisis. While conflict resolution through consultations and panels continues, the process under the Appellate Body is forced to stop. The United States has impaired the appointment of additional judges to this body, preventing it from obtaining the quorum required to hear appeals. This paper aims to identify and analyze the deadlock of the appointment of the Appellate Body judges and its repercussions for international trade governance, including Indonesia. This deadlock could jeopardize the viability of the global trading system as there would be no proceeding to hear the dispute at the appellate level. Some cases that involved Indonesia would also be affected, particularly if the parties are willing to continue this process to the Appellate Body.  
The Urgency Of Mediator’s Good Faith In Mediating Legal Disputes: The Critical Analysis Study Jasmaniar, Jasmaniar; Zainuddin, Zainuddin
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 10 No. 3: December 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v10i3.1094

Abstract

This study aims to explore the concept and urgency of mediator’s good faith in mediating civil law. It is a normative juridical study (doctrinal) with secondary data from primary and secondary legal materials, using bibliography technique. Those materials are analyzed with a qualitative descriptive method. Further, good faith is put as the highest principle in agreement, including mediation and expecting to be implemented by all dispute parties and mediators as well. A mediator’s good faith should be carried out with earnest effort and intention formerly, instead of pushed by constitution to mandatory mediating dispute parties. This study has shown that good faith visibly implements if the mediator actively conducts the functions and responsibilities with confidentiality, volunteer, empowerment, neutrality, and exclusive solutions as the principles.  
Policies, Laws and Strategies for Responding to Cyberterrorism in Thailand Natthamon Petchkla; Sumonthip Chitsawang
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 10 No. 2: August 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v10i2.1095

Abstract

This article explains the policies and strategies currently used in Thailand for responding to terrorism. This study uses in-depth interviews with technicians and policy analysis experts in the area of cyber-attack, including more than 30 people in 15 governmental agencies. Specifically, the study begins by exploring the definition of cyberterrorism. Moreover, the study uses document research in both Thai and English and concludes that Thailand’s governmental agencies understand the concept of cyberterrorism and have already established policies and strategies for responding to it in the future.
Dillemas of Bad Loan Settlement of Village Credit Institution (Lembaga Perkreditan Desa) in The Covid-19 Pandemic Situation I Nyoman Sujana; Leonito Ribeiro
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 10 No. 2: August 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v10i2.1104

Abstract

This paper analyzes the dilemma of resolving bad loans of the Village Credit Institution (LPD) in the Covid19 Pandemic Era. The focus of the study is the problems faced by the Village Credit Institution (LPD) in resolving bad loans in Bali Province during the COVID-19 pandemic era. This study was conducted because LPDs in Bali experienced difficulties in securing credit even though the collaterals or guarantees were imposed with a mortgage as well as a Fiduciary during the Covid 19 period. As an analytical device on the legal issues studied, the author applied the theory of the welfare state with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, a sociological approach, and a case approach. Based on the results of the study, it is found that the settlement of bad loans at the LPD is in a dilemma. “Internally“ the LPD noticed that the debtors, members of the traditional village, are taking refuge behind the Covid-19 pandemic situation, and denied their obligations. In the collateral cases, even though Mortgage Rights have been imposed with a fiduciary, settlement is about to be carried out, it turns out to be controlled by a third party who is a member of the Customary Village to execute loan settlement through the expropriation of the collateral by execution parate. This type of action is not allowed based on the principles of Balinese customary law paras, parosegilikseguluk, sarpanayasabayantaka. In this case, the LPD should go back to court. Meanwhile, “externally” the economic atmosphere affected by the Covid-19 pandemic has not yet recovered. Therefore, LPD faces a difficult choice between settling bad loans to recover the cash flow of a company, and taking measures to save credit by rescheduling, restructuring, and reconditioning. This rescue measure has become a heavy burden for LPDs to fulfill their obligations to credit customers.
Problematic of Implementation of Electronic GMS on Deeds Made by Notaries Tsary, Syifa Rana; Absori, Absori; Azhari, Aidul Fitriciada; Wardiono, Kelik; Emovwodo, Silaas Oghenemaro
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 10 No. 3: December 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v10i3.1106

Abstract

The study reviewed the development of the digital era in the legal field, especially The Electronic General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS), which is ruled by law. The problem formulation was how the electronic GMS, according to positive law in Indonesia, and how the impact on the notarial deed related to its implementation. The method used by the researcher was normative and library study based on the primary material (legislation), secondary material (scientific works, journals, books, documents, and other literature), and tertiary legal materials (legal dictionaries). The study results were that E-GMS is effective today, then regulated in Art 77 UUPT and PJOK Number 16/Pojk.04/2020, so that the Limited Liability Company members can carry out the GMS as usual without being physically present to break the chain of the Covid-19 pandemic. Although the e-GMS arrangements have been regulated in the legislation, the lex specialist derogat lex generalist principle cannot be ignored; article 16 paragraph (1) letter (m) and Article 18 UUJN are still prioritized so that the electronic deed of the GMS cannot be carried out or will resulting in the legal force of the proof being a private deed.
Interpretasi Dan Implikasi Yuridis Pengaturan Bentuk Badan Hukum Badan Usaha Milik Desa Amelia Sri Kusuma Dewi
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 9 No. 2: August 2021 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v9i2.1109

Abstract

Pasal 78 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa mengatur bahwa Pembangunan Desa bertujuan meningkatkan kesejahteraan masyarakat Desa dan kualitas hidup manusia serta penanggulangan kemiskinan melalui pemenuhan kebutuhan dasar, pembangunan sarana dan prasarana Desa, pengembangan potensi ekonomi lokal, serta pemanfaatan sumber daya alam dan lingkungan secara berkelanjutan. Dalam rangka melaksanakan pembangunan Desa, Desa dapat mendirikan Badan Usaha Milik Desa. Pasca keberlakuan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja yang telah menegaskan kedudukan BUM Desa sebagai badan hukum. Penulis selanjutnya melihat adanya isu hukum yaitu apakah Interpretasi Bentuk Badan Usaha Milik Desa Pada Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja peraturan pelaksanaannya, serta implikasi yuridis pengaturan tersebut. Berdasarkan isu hukum tersebut di atas, maka penelitian ini bersifat “normatif” (dogmatik), dengan menggunakan pendekatan yakni : statute approach (pendekatan perundang-undangan). Hasil pembahasan pada penelitian ini adalah bahwa Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja dan peraturan pelaksananya yaitu Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 11 Tahun 2021 Tentang Badan Usaha Milik Desa telah menegaskan kedudukan BUM Desa sebagai badan hukum, tetapi mengenai apa bentuk badan hukumnya hal ini belum diatur secara jelas dan tegas. Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja justru memuat norma yang membuka ruang multi tafsir mengenai bentuk badan usaha dari BUM Desa dan mengaburkan status BUM Desa sebagai badan hukum publik.
The Moving of Indonesia’s Capital City and Its Legality Within Its Constitutional System Farhan Farhan; Angelia Gunawan; Krisna Ananda Putra; Khanza Inas Az Zahra Fikry; Tengku Mahathir Mas'ud
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 10 No. 2: August 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v10i2.1111

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the projected status of the Special Capital Region (DKI) Jakarta after the on-going move of Indonesia’s Capital City from Jakarta to Nusantara, and to analyze the legality status of the government’s decision regarding the move within Indonesia’s constitutional system. Through normative legal method, this study demonstrates that the status of DKI Jakarta as the capital city will change after the capital city move based on several articles in Law Number 3 of 2022 on Capital City; hence, the function and role of the capital city of the Republic of Indonesia will be transferred from DKI Jakarta to the National Capital City (IKN) after the president releases a presidential decree on the matter. Prior to the move, all positions, functions and roles of the capital city will remain in DKI Jakarta. Once the presidential decree related to the transfer of the capital city is released, the Law Number 29 of 2007 on the Provincial Government of Jakarta as the capital city of Indonesia will no longer be valid. However, Jakara’s function as an autonomous region will still apply. There are several steps that need to be done; firstly, compiling academic manuscript in drafting the academic text of Law Number 3 of 2022 on Capital City; secondly, conducting more discussions regarding Law Number 3 of 2022 on Capital City and the status of Law Number 29 of 2007 regarding the Provincial Government of Jakarta as the Capital City of Indonesia; thirdly, providing opportunity for public participation in the preparation and discussion in the making of Law Number 3 of 2022 on Capital City.
Granting of Mortgage Loans With Guarantees of Land Right Owned by Third Parties in Banking Agreements Cahya Khaerani; Budi Santoso; Hanif Nurwidhiyanti
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 10 No. 2: August 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v10i2.1112

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the process of implementing an agreement between a bank and a third party as a collateral owner/which does not belong directly to the debtor, and analyze the legal protection for the owner of the object of mortgage rights pledged by the debtor. The method of approach used in this research is the juridical empirical approaching method. In the implementation of the agreement between the Bank and the collateral owner third party, it is carried out through the Mortgage Rights mechanism. In the event of default by the debtor. Then, the creditor (bank) can still execute the object of collateral pledged by the debtor in accordance with applicable regulations. Second, the UUHT does not provide enough protection to the collateral owner/third party, considering that the third party/collateral owner is not the direct debtor in the credit agreement. In addition, between the third party and the creditor (Bank) also do not have a direct legal relationship, because the third party only has a direct legal relationship with the debtor. So that the third party will only get legal protection from the debtor in accordance with the agreement made with the third party.
Renewal of the Criminal Justice System Through the Constante Justitie Principle That Guarantees Justitiabelen's Satisfaction Wantu, Fence M.; Puluhulawa, Jufryanto; Bajrektarevic, Anis H.; Towadi, Mellisa; Swarianata, Vifi
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 10 No. 3: December 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v10i3.1115

Abstract

The Principle of Constante Justitie, or the principle of a simple, fast, and light trial, is intended so that handling cases can be resolved in a short time. It does not need to take a long time. The problem in this paper is: (1). how is the application of the Constante Justitie principle or the simple, fast, and low-cost principle as expected by justitiabellen? (2). How to renew the criminal justice system through the principle of Constante Justitie, which can guarantee justitiabellen satisfaction. This research is normative juridical research, namely legal research that aims to find methods, norms, or das sollen. The results showed that the application of the principles of justice, speed, and light costs that guarantee justitiabellen satisfaction has not been following the mandate of laws and regulations. The renewal of the criminal justice system, especially the Principle of Constante Justitie, which can guarantee justitiabellen satisfaction, has now been pursued by the Supreme Court by issuing various regulations such as the Supreme Court Rules or PERMA or Supreme Court Circulars or SEMA, but it has not been successful.

Filter by Year

2013 2025


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 12 No. 3 (2024): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 12 No. 1: April 2024: Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 11 No. 3: December 2023 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 11 No. 2: August 2023 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 11 No. 1: April 2023 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 10, No 3: December 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 10 No. 3: December 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 10, No 2: August 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 10 No. 2: August 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 10 No. 1: April 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 10, No 1: April 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 9 No. 3: December 2021 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 9, No 3: December 2021 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 9 No. 2: August 2021 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 9, No 2: August 2021 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 9, No 1: April 2021 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 8 No. 3: December 2020 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 8, No 3: December 2020 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 8, No 2: August 2020 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 8, No 1: April 2020 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 8 No. 1: April 2020 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 7, No 3 (2019) Vol 7, No 2 (2019) Vol 7, No 1 (2019) Vol 6, No 3 (2018) Vol 6, No 3 (2018) Vol 6, No 2 (2018) Vol 6, No 1 (2018) Vol 5, No 3 (2017) Vol 5, No 2 (2017) Vol 5, No 1 (2017) Vol 4, No 3 (2016): HUKUM YANG BERKEADILAN Vol 4, No 2 (2016): HAK DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM Vol 4, No 1 (2016): HUKUM DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB Vol 3, No 9 (2015): HAK MENGUASAI (Monopoli) NEGARA Vol 3, No 8 (2015): POLEMIK PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA Vol 3, No 7 (2015): LOGIKA DAN TEROBOSAN HUKUM Vol 3, No 3 (2015): HAK MENGUASAI (Monopoli) NEGARA Vol 3, No 2 (2015): POLEMIK PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA Vol 3, No 1 (2015): LOGIKA DAN TEROBOSAN HUKUM Vol 2, No 6 (2014): PLURALISME HUKUM Vol 2, No 5 (2014): HUKUM DAN TATA KUASA Vol 2, No 4 (2014): UTOPIA HUKUM - KESEJAHTERAAN Vol 2, No 3 (2014): PLURALISME HUKUM Vol 2, No 2 (2014): HUKUM DAN TATA KUASA Vol 2, No 1 (2014): UTOPIA HUKUM - KESEJAHTERAAN Vol 1, No 3 (2013): APAKAH HUKUM SUDAH MATI? Vol 1, No 3 (2013): APAKAH HUKUM SUDAH MATI? Vol 1, No 2 (2013): REALITA HUKUM DALAM MASYARAKAT Vol 1, No 2 (2013): REALITA HUKUM DALAM MASYARAKAT Vol 1, No 1 (2013): DIALEKTIKA KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN KEADILAN Vol 1, No 1 (2013): DIALEKTIKA KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN KEADILAN More Issue