cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
jurnalius
Contact Email
jurnaliusunram@yahoo.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnaliusunram@yahoo.com
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota mataram,
Nusa tenggara barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan)
Published by Universitas Mataram
ISSN : 23033827     EISSN : 2477815X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal IUS established December 2012, is an institution that focuses on journal development for post graduate students and all law activists in general and specialised topics. Journal IUS publishes three times a year and articles are based on research with specific themes. Jurnal IUS was founded by a group of young lecturers who had a passion to spread their ideas, thoughts and expertise concerning law. Jurnal IUS focuses on publishing research about law reviews from law students, lecturers and other activists on various topics. As an academic centre, we organize regular discussions around various selected topics twice a month. Topics of interest: the battle of legal paradigm legal pluralism law and power
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 702 Documents
 57   58   59   60   61 
Analisis Unsur Diskresi Dalam Instruksi Presiden Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 Kaharudin Kaharudin; Riska Ari Amalia
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 10 No. 1: April 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v9i3.1118

Abstract

Melalui Instruksi Presiden Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 tentang Optimalisasi Pelaksanaan Program Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional, Pemerintah menginstruksikan kepada 30 (tiga puluh) Kementerian/Lembaga untuk menindaklanjuti agar kepesertaan BPJS menjadi syarat wajib dalam pelayanan publik. Instruksi tersebut merupakan peraturan kebijaksanaan yang berisi diskresi dalam menafsirkan UU SJN dan UU BPJS.  Tujuan dari penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui diskresi memiliki Batasan dan untuk mengetahui instruksi presiden tersebut memenuhi syarat diskresi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep yang ditunjang oleh bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian bahwa diskresi dibatasi AAUPB dan asas legalitas, serta Inpres Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 tidak memenuhi syarat diskresi karena bertentangan dengan ketentuan dalam UU No. 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik.
Implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/Puu-Xviii/2020 Toward Job Creation Law in The Mineral and Coal Mining Sector Lelisari, Lelisari; Tanjung, Ridho Aulia; Pakpahan, Zainal Abidin; Imawanto, Imawanto; Hamdi, Hamdi
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 10 No. 3: December 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v10i3.1132

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and examine the juridical implications of the decision of Constitutional Court Number 91/PUU XVII/2020 on the job creation law in the mineral and coal mining sector. The research method used is a normative legal research method with approach legislation. The results illustrate that the juridical implication of the Job Creation Act in the mineral and coal mining sector is that in its decision the Constitutional Court stated that the Job Creation Act was still valid as long as the law-makers made improvements in the procedures for establishing Job Creation Law. In this case, the Constitutional Court has given two years for the legislators to revise the procedure for the formation of the Job Creation Law since the decision was pronounced. If no improvements are made, the Law can be declared unconstitutional permanently. Thus, if Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning job creation is unconstitutional, namely permanently removing coal incentive opportunities, the elimination of coal incentive opportunities must indeed be carried out due to the targets of coal utilization in Article 128A, not power optimization towards clean energy and will increase the portion of coal in the national energy mix and overall will systematically overlap with climate adaptation and mitigation targets and programs as well as the Articles in the Job Creation Act are also infiltrated by the interests of mining and dirty energy businesses.
The Comparative Law on the Distribution of Power in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and the Constitution of the Republic Timor Leste Rumiartha, I Nyoman Prabu Buana; Astariyani, Ni Luh Gede; Amaral, Armindo Moniz
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 10 No. 3: December 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v10i3.1134

Abstract

The research purposes is to explain the comparison of the legal division of powers in the constitution in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and in the Constitution of the Republic Democratic Timor Leste. The division of powers within a country, both in Indonesia and in Timor Leste, are stipulates in a constitution, in this case a state that protects and guarantees the implementation of human rights and other civil rights and limits its powers in a balanced manner between the interests of state administrators and their citizens. The research method used in this study was normative legal research. In addition, this research also applied comparative legal research method is a research methodology carried out by comparing one legal system to another, an activity in which experts compare the positive legal system of a nation to that of other nations. In this case, legal comparison of Indonesia and Timor Leste. The novelty of this research is to examine and analyze comparative law on the distribution of power in the constitutions of Indonesia and Timor Leste, it can be explained that there is a difference in the division of power. In Indonesia there is constitutive power, executive power, legislative power, judicial power, examining/inspective power, and monetary power, while in Timor Leste it is based on the constitution of the Democratic Republic of Timor Leste division of power consisting of the power of the president, the power of the national parliament, the power of the government and the power of the court.
Effectiveness of Islamic Law in Protecting The Copyright of Indigenous Peoples of Indonesia in The Form of Traditional Knowledge & Traditional Cultural Expressions Mulhimmah, Baiq Ratna; Olagunju, Ridwan
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 10 No. 3: December 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v10i3.1141

Abstract

Copyright Protection of Indonesian Indigenous Peoples in the form of Traditional Knowledge (TK) &Traditional Cultural Expression (TCE) currently does not meet the sense of justice. The state is obliged to provide comprehensive protections capable of guarding the rights of Indigenous peoples under an adequate legal umbrella. Because the existence of Indigenous peoples, along with copyrights in the form of TK & TCE is part of the wealth and identity of the nation, this research focuses on how the view of Islamic law (Legal Opinion of Indonesian Ulama Council No.1 of 2003 concerning Copyright and Legal Opinion Of Indonesian Ulama Council No.1 of 2005 concerning Intelectual Property Right) with the maqasid al Shari’ah approach in protecting the rights of indigenous peoples. Islamic law is one of the secondary legal materials in determining state law and is expected to strengthen in providing solutions to this problem. The research method is normative with a concept and case approach to conclude that Islamic law (legal Opinion Of Indonesian Ulama Council) with the Maqasid al Shari’ah approach in protecting Traditional Knowledge (TK) &Traditional Cultural Expression (TCE) is a must. This is based on an obligation order covering several matters, including; the protection of life and hifzul nafsi/hifzul ‘irdhi, protection of reason (hifzul aqli), and protection of property (hifzul maal).
The Implementation of Notary Inclusive Rights in The Frame of Law Enforcement As a Public Official Lubis, Ikhsan; Siregar, Taufik; Koto, Ismail; Chansrakaeo, Ruetaitip; Sari Lubis, Duma Indah
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 10 No. 3: December 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v10i3.1160

Abstract

This article aims to describe the implementation of a notary’s inclusive rights within the framework of carrying out his duties as a public official. The granting of attribution authority to a notary as a public official is a special assignment that is intentionally made based on laws and regulations with certain roles, functions, and authorities to provide legal services (law enforcement) to the public who need authentic written evidence and the other civil laws authorities, along with inclusive legal protection in the enforcement of duties of a notary. The research method used is juridical normative, in which analyzing a legal event occur and followed by the comparative study between the legal source material and the legal rules that govern it in practice. This study aims to find out what, how, and why the position of a notary is attached to inclusive rights in terms of various legal aspects according to the research topic. The results showed that the form of legal protection that is inclusive of notaries as general officials have been sufficiently regulated in the constitution of the Notary Commission as well as the right to disobey and the obligation to disobey notaries. In addition, the existence of the Notary Honorary Council as a tool for the organization of the Indonesian Notary Association as well as the Notary Supervisory Board and the Notary Honorary Council has strengthened the position of an inclusive notary through preventive measures in the context of fostering and supervising the ethics of notary behavior and the practice of carrying out the duties of the notary commission under the rules in UUJN and UUJN-P.
Single Executive in The Indonesian Presidential System Sudirman, Sudirman
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 11 No. 1: April 2023 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v11i1.962

Abstract

This article discusses a single executive in the Indonesian presidential system. A single executive is power as head of state and power as head of government depends, on one hand, on the President. However, the 1945 Constitution does not explicitly discuss the concept of a single executive, so information about this concept is not collected properly, so this article discusses in depth the concept of a single executive in the Indonesian presidential system based on the 1945 Constitution. This study uses normative legal methods. The finding indicated that the single executive in the Indonesian presidential system was based on the 1945 Constitution, which can be seen from the position of the president hold the inherent power of a head of state; the chief of the army, holds the pardon power, making government regulations and presidential regulations; appointing and dismissing ministers; holding the administrative power; and holding the diplomatic power.
Child Protection Post the New Marriage Law: How Indonesian Religious Court Interpreting the Urgency in Child-age Marriage Ilhami, Haniah; Nugraheni, Destri Budi; Wijayanta, Tata
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 11 No. 1: April 2023 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v11i1.1054

Abstract

The amendment of the Law of Marriage in 2019 introduces the new concept of Dispensation of Marriage by providing some additional provisions: the obligations to provide the urgency of marriage and the specific supporting evidence in proving the urgency. This article aims to examine the interpretations of judges in Religious Court on defining the urgency of child-age marriage and the implementation of the supporting evidence in cases of Dispensation of Marriage. Based on the identification, the author analyzes the main questions about the protection of children's rights on those interpretations. Based on the normative legal research that examines the Rulings of Religious Court on the case of Dispensation of Marriage, this article uses the Nonprobability Sampling techniques, specifically the purposive sampling which refers to certain criteria, the author finds the inconsistencies in the interpretation of the urgency of marriage and the implementation of providing the supporting evidence, which influenced by 2 (two) factors,  the Formal Regulation and the principle of judge’s independence. As a result, the author suggests detailed regulations regarding the supporting medical evidence, as well as the improvement of comprehensive and equal understanding for judges about the concept of child protection. Comparing to previous studies, this article shows its originality through a broader object study and comprehensive research analysis with more emphasis on juridical aspect, therefore that arguments and conclusions are built on a strong analytical foundation.
Problems of Criminal Applications Law in The Life of Indonesian Communities and Cultures Rohayu Harun, Rina; Sahid, Mualimin Mochammad; Yamin, Bahri
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 11 No. 1: April 2023 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v11i1.1144

Abstract

Early January 2023, the President of the Republic of Indonesia ratified the R-KUHP to become Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code. The new Criminal Code will be enforced in three years, with the agenda of socializing it to all law enforcement officials, and also to all Indonesian people. This study wants to explore the use of the Criminal Code with the various problems that accompany it, during an independent nation. The enactment of the Criminal Code raises its own problems for Indonesian religious people based on the first precepts of Pancasila and having an eastern culture. The method used in this research is doctrinal research or normative legal research and is supported by empirical legal research. The novelty of this study is an analysis of the problems with the application of the Criminal Code so far to strengthen the enforceability of the new Criminal Code which will be implemented in the next three years. Research results are, the problem with the application of the Criminal Code as a form of material criminal law has an impact on all aspects. First, the aspect of legal education where knowledge about criminal law reform is not beneficial due to the maintenance of the Criminal Code, from the judicial or law enforcement aspect, the Criminal Code also continues to be used and even becomes the basis for considering the general rules of Book I of the Criminal Code, as long as it is not regulated in laws and regulations outside the Criminal Code. The validity of the Criminal Code from the perspective of religious law and customary law has gaps that cause problems, such as the adultery article in the Criminal Code which has different meanings and principles from those stipulated in religious law and customary law. The principle of “no excuse”, which is implied in the Criminal Code, does not reflect the religious and cultural character of the Indonesian people by prioritizing the concept of forgiveness.
The Orientation and Implications of New Criminal Code: An Analysis of Lawrence Friedman's Legal System Flora, Henny Saida; Thuong, Mac Thi Hoai; Erawati, Ratna Deliana
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 11 No. 1: April 2023 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v11i1.1169

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the orientation and implications of the legalization of the Draft Criminal Code (RKUHP) to become Law No. 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (New Criminal Code) regarding the legal system theory of Lawrence M. Friedman. This research is normative legal research by prioritizing conceptual and statutory approaches. The results of the study confirm that the orientation of Lawrence Friedman’s legal system regarding the ratification of the Draft Criminal Code is that the aspects of legal substance in the New Criminal Code have adopted Indonesian legal values and culture by applying the concept of restorative justice. From the aspect of legal structure, implementing the New Criminal Code in a transitional manner for three years has an orientation to provide socialization. From the aspect of legal culture, the orientation of restorative justice involves the public in the criminal justice process. The implication of Lawrence Friedman’s legal system puts forward the substance of customary law as the applicable law, related to the idea of restorative justice to the affirmation that imprisonment is a last resort. That has implications for the need for judges to understand customary law. From the aspect of the legal structure, the roles of judges, prosecutors and other law enforcement officials are also prioritized to provide the essence of justice in implementing the New Criminal Code. From the aspect of legal culture, the role and participation of the community are essential in efforts to prevent and enforce criminal law in society.
IUS Constituendum Of Expert Advisor In Commodity Futures Trading: A Legal Certainty Kurniawan, I Gede Agus; Mau Lulo, Lourenco de Deus; Disantara, Fradhana Putra
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 11 No. 1: April 2023 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v11i1.1170

Abstract

This study aims to construct further arrangements regarding Expert Advisors in commodity futures trading. The legal issue being studied is the legal vacuum of regulating trading robot software or commonly known as an Expert Advisor in commodity futures trading. The novelty of this research is legal discovery through the legal construction of the development of Expert Advisors in commodity futures trading. The study confirmed that the urgency setting up an Expert Advisor as a futures adviser in commodity futures trading is needed in order to provide legal certainty for commodity futures transaction actors. Legal certainty related to the arrangement of Expert Advisors as futures advisers in commodity futures trading is also needed for CoFTRA as a supporting element of the Ministry of Trade as well as being a supervisor and enforcer of various legal provisions in the practice of commodity futures trading. Therefore, the supervision and enforcement process can be more optimal and guarantee legal certainty, benefits, and fairness for commodity futures trading actors. The Ius constituendum of expert advisor as an adviser in commodity futures trading to ensure legal certainty can be carried out by revising the Law on commodity futures trading, including conducting a judicial review at the Constitutional Court regarding the provisions in the Law on commodity futures trading.

Page 59 of 71 | Total Record : 702

 57   58   59   60   61 

Filter by Year

2013 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 12 No. 3 (2024): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 12 No. 1: April 2024: Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 11 No. 3: December 2023 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 11 No. 2: August 2023 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 11 No. 1: April 2023 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 10, No 3: December 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 10 No. 3: December 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 10, No 2: August 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 10 No. 2: August 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 10 No. 1: April 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 10, No 1: April 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 9, No 3: December 2021 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 9 No. 3: December 2021 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 9 No. 2: August 2021 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 9, No 2: August 2021 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 9, No 1: April 2021 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 8 No. 3: December 2020 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 8, No 3: December 2020 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 8, No 2: August 2020 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 8, No 1: April 2020 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 8 No. 1: April 2020 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 7, No 3 (2019) Vol 7, No 2 (2019) Vol 7, No 1 (2019) Vol 6, No 3 (2018) Vol 6, No 3 (2018) Vol 6, No 2 (2018) Vol 6, No 1 (2018) Vol 5, No 3 (2017) Vol 5, No 2 (2017) Vol 5, No 1 (2017) Vol 4, No 3 (2016): HUKUM YANG BERKEADILAN Vol 4, No 2 (2016): HAK DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM Vol 4, No 1 (2016): HUKUM DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB Vol 3, No 9 (2015): HAK MENGUASAI (Monopoli) NEGARA Vol 3, No 8 (2015): POLEMIK PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA Vol 3, No 7 (2015): LOGIKA DAN TEROBOSAN HUKUM Vol 3, No 3 (2015): HAK MENGUASAI (Monopoli) NEGARA Vol 3, No 2 (2015): POLEMIK PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA Vol 3, No 1 (2015): LOGIKA DAN TEROBOSAN HUKUM Vol 2, No 6 (2014): PLURALISME HUKUM Vol 2, No 5 (2014): HUKUM DAN TATA KUASA Vol 2, No 4 (2014): UTOPIA HUKUM - KESEJAHTERAAN Vol 2, No 3 (2014): PLURALISME HUKUM Vol 2, No 2 (2014): HUKUM DAN TATA KUASA Vol 2, No 1 (2014): UTOPIA HUKUM - KESEJAHTERAAN Vol 1, No 3 (2013): APAKAH HUKUM SUDAH MATI? Vol 1, No 3 (2013): APAKAH HUKUM SUDAH MATI? Vol 1, No 2 (2013): REALITA HUKUM DALAM MASYARAKAT Vol 1, No 2 (2013): REALITA HUKUM DALAM MASYARAKAT Vol 1, No 1 (2013): DIALEKTIKA KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN KEADILAN Vol 1, No 1 (2013): DIALEKTIKA KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN KEADILAN More Issue