cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA
Published by Universitas Udayana
ISSN : 25023101     EISSN : 2302528X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana adalah jurnal ilmiah hukum yang mempublikasikan hasil kajian bidang hukum yang diterbitkan secara online empat kali setahun (Februari-Mei-Agustus-Nopember). Redaksi menerima tulisan yang berupa hasil kajian yang berasal dari penelitian hukum dalam berbagai bidang ilmu hukum yang belum pernah dipublikasikan serta orisinal. Jurnal ini selain memuat tulisan / kajian dari para pakar ilmu hukum (dosen, guru besar, praktisi dan lain-lain.) juga memuat tulisan mahasiswa Magister Ilmu Hukum baik yang merupakan bagian dari penulisan tesis maupun kajian lainnya yang orisinal. Tulisan yang masuk ke Redaksi akan diseleksi dan direview untuk dapat dimuat
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 16 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 14 No 2 (2025)" : 16 Documents clear
Cooperation Based on The Mudharabah bil Mukhabarah Contract as an Effort to Maintain Food Security Susanti, Dyah Ochtorina; Sari, Nuzulia Kumala; Adonara, Firman Floranta; Tektoka, Rahmadi Indra; Putri, Auliya Safira
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 14 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2025.v14.i02.p11

Abstract

The issue of food security in Indonesia through the Department of Agriculture has been designated as a policy priority in agricultural development. This is due to the lack of adequate food availability for the community as shown d by the continued import of staple food ingredients from other countries, especially rice that is the main food source for the Indonesian people. The price of rice is increasing due to the decline in rice harvest area and also driven by the impact of El Nino, so that efforts are needed to maintain food security. This research is based on the concept of mudharabah bil mukhabarah which combines the rules of Islamic law and positive law in Indonesia that are applied to agricultural cooperation as an effort to maintain food security. The research method used in this research is a normative legal research type with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of the research are that cooperation based on a mudharabah bil mukhabarah agreement combines three parties, namely (1) the Government (BULOG) as a provider of capital in the form of fertilizer, superior plant seeds and agricultural equipment, (2) the land owner who provides agricultural land, and ( 3) Cultivator farmers who manage agricultural land using the expertise, energy and time they have. The harvest results in this collaboration are sold back to BULOG and the profits are distributed to the parties according to the ratio agreed at the beginning of the agreement, so that food supplies can be met with fairness, transparency and sustainability in every transaction and relationship between the parties in maintaining national food security.
Interpretation of Analogy in the Crime of Possession of a New Psychoactive Substance Zhafirah, Carissa Tita; Noerdajasakti, Setiawan; Madjid, Abdul
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 14 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2025.v14.i02.p02

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of analogy interpretation by judges in the case of possession of new psychoactive substances, especially in Decision Number 1352/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Mdn on behalf of the Defendant Lindawati. The background of this research departs from the delay of the Indonesian legal system in responding to social changes, especially related to the phenomenon of the spread of new psychoactive substances that have not been explicitly regulated in laws and regulations. This study uses a normative juridical method with a legislative approach, a case approach, and a conceptual approach. Analysis was carried out on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials using anticipatory and teleological interpretation methods. The results of the study showed that the Panel of Judges used Article 62 of the Psychotropic Law to punish the Defendant, even though the substance ketamine was not listed in the official psychotropic appendix. This action reflects the findings of the law through analogy, which is doctrinally contrary to the principle of legality in criminal law. Nevertheless, from a progressive legal perspective, the application reflects a response to rapidly changing social realities as well as the need for adaptive legal protection. This study concludes that although analogies in criminal law are prohibited, their application in the context of a legal vacuum for psychoactive substances can only be understood as an effort to realize substantive justice and public protection through a progressive approach in criminal law enforcement. Keywords: New Psychoactive Substances; Legal Discovery; Analogy
Akad Murabahah pada Pembiayaan Modal Usaha dalam Perspektif Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Hanifah, Mardalena; Pascadinianti, Meidana
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 14 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2025.v14.i02.p16

Abstract

Murabahah financing is structured as a sale–purchase agreement in which the financier discloses its acquisition cost and agreed profit margin to the purchaser. In practice at PT Permodalan Nasional Madani Mekaar Syariah, however, funding is disbursed as cash rather than via the delivery of specific goods, raising questions about the fulfillment of shariah-mandated sale conditions. This study examines the implementation of the murabahah contract in Mekaar Syariah’s business-capital financing through a sociological, descriptive approach. Primary data were collected via in-depth interviews with branch managers, officers, and clients; secondary data were drawn from organizational documents and DSN-MUI fatwas. Findings reveal that at the Kuantan Mudik branch, financing is provided in monetary form prior to any actual acquisition or transfer of goods, thereby failing to satisfy the essential sale elements prescribed by Islamic law and DSN-MUI Fatwa No. 04/DSN-MUI/IV/2000. Although clients are formally authorized under a wakalah (agency) arrangement to purchase assets for their enterprises, many divert funds to non-productive, consumptive expenditures. The murabahah contract is executed only at disbursement, concurrently with a wakalah contract, without subsequent verification of goods procurement or ownership transfer.These practices contravene the fundamental requirements of murabahah, namely, the existence of a tangible asset, pre-contract negotiation of profit margin, and clear transfer of ownership. To align Mekaar Syariah’s operations with shariah principles, the institution must strengthen its operational protocols and internal controls, ensuring that financing transactions genuinely reflect a sale, purchase of specified goods
Regulations, Problems, and Legal Solutions for Online Loan Agreements in Indonesia Agustini, Shenti; Karo Karo, Rizky Pratama; Tan, Winsherly; Syarief, Elza; Ahmad, Faradina Binti
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 14 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2025.v14.i02.p07

Abstract

The aim of this research is first to analyze regulations regarding online loans, identify legal problems arising from online loans, and find an appropriate legal solution to resolving legal issues with online loans. The method used is normative juridical. The research results found that Indonesia already has written laws to regulate online loans, namely financial services authority regulations. However, this regulation is insufficient in resolving online lending legal problems. Normative inconsistencies, especially regarding capital sourcing regulations, Lack of technical clarity, such as in the implementation of lenders' general meetings, Heavy regulatory burdens for new market entrants (e.g., high equity requirements), Unregulated areas, including lender protection, AI/technology ethics, and secondary market mechanisms. Recommended Legal Solutions: 1) Clarification via OJK Circular Letters (SEOJK); 2) Issuance of Fintech Ethics & Technology Guidelines; 3) Establishment of Credit Risk Protection Schemes; 4) Progressive Evaluation and Stakeholder Dialogues; 5) Harmonization with Other Regulations and the P2SK Law.
Perlindungan Whistleblower sebagai Pilar Penegakan Hukum Anti-Korupsi: Studi Perbandingan Indonesia, Filipina, dan Australia Alhakim, Abdurrakhman; Tan, David
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 14 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2025.v14.i02.p12

Abstract

Legal protection for whistleblowers constitutes a crucial element in efforts to combat corruption. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the legal frameworks in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Australia in providing protection for whistleblowers. A normative legal research method and a comparative approach were employed. The study examined key regulations and complementary legal instruments in each country. The findings reveal that Australia has the most comprehensive and structured legal framework for whistleblower protection. Indonesia possesses an adequate normative foundation but lacks a consistent and integrated system. The Philippines, meanwhile, does not yet have explicit legal provisions safeguarding whistleblowers. These findings highlight that all three countries continue to face various challenges in ensuring adequate legal protection. The study recommends strengthening regulatory systems and enhancing institutional support to ensure that the courage of whistleblowers does not lead to vulnerability, but rather becomes an integral part of the social control mechanism in law enforcement. Perlindungan hukum terhadap whistleblower menjadi bagian penting dalam upaya pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis efektivitas kerangka hukum di Indonesia, Filipina, dan Australia dalam memberikan perlindungan terhadap whistleblower. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dan pendekatan komparatif. Kajian dilakukan terhadap regulasi utama dan perangkat hukum pelengkap yang berlaku di masing-masing negara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Australia memiliki sistem perlindungan paling menyeluruh dan terstruktur dalam peraturan perundang-undangannya. Indonesia telah memiliki dasar normatif yang cukup, tetapi belum membentuk sistem yang konsisten dan terintegrasi. Filipina belum memiliki pengaturan hukum yang secara eksplisit melindungi whistleblower. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa ketiga negara masih menghadapi berbagai hambatan dalam memastikan perlindungan hukum yang memadai. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan penguatan sistem regulasi dan dukungan kelembagaan yang lebih responsif, agar keberanian pelapor tidak berujung pada kerentanan, melainkan menjadi bagian penting dari mekanisme kontrol sosial dalam penegakan hukum.
Legalisasi Supremasi Eksekutif? Studi Sosio-Legal terhadap Reformasi Kementerian di Indonesia Risky, Saiful; Ramadhan, Febriansyah; Esfandiari, Fitria
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 14 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2025.v14.i02.p03

Abstract

This article will explore how the amendment to Law No. 39/2008 on State Ministries that removed the maximum limit on the number of ministries, has significant constitutional and political implications for Indonesia’s presidential system. This study employs a socio-legal or interdisciplinary approach by analyzing the normative aspects of legislation alongside the political dynamics behind the policy revision. The findings indicate that the removal of ministerial limits is primarily driven by political accommodation rather than administrative efficiency. This increasingly expansive governance model risks creating a bloated bureaucracy that lacks effectiveness in executing governmental functions. The findings indicate that without a limit on the number of ministries, the institutional precedent is difficult to reverse due to mechanisms of path dependency, which reinforce resistance to bureaucratic reform. To address the risk of constitutional regression and the weakening of the principle of checks and balances, this article recommends policy reconstruction by revising the Law on State Ministries to explicitly set a maximum of 34 ministries, as well as a limited amendment to Article 17 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia so that the restriction is constitutionally enshrined. In this way, the reform is expected to uphold constitutional supremacy, improve bureaucratic efficiency, and maintain institutional stability within the framework of good governance. Artikel ini akan mengeksplorasi perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 2008 tentang Kementerian Negara yang menghapus batas maksimal jumlah kementerian menimbulkan implikasi konstitusional dan politik yang signifikan dalam sistem pemerintahan presidensial Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan socio-legal atau interdisipliner antara ilmu hukum dan ilmu politik, dengan menganalisis aspek normatif dalam peraturan perundang-undangan serta dinamika politik di balik revisi kebijakan tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penghapusan batas jumlah kementerian lebih didasarkan pada akomodasi kepentingan politik daripada pertimbangan efisiensi administrasi. Model tata kelola pemerintahan yang semakin ekspansif ini berisiko menciptakan birokrasi yang gemuk dan kurang efektif dalam menjalankan fungsi pemerintahan. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa tanpa pembatasan jumlah kementerian, 'preseden institusional' sulit dibalik akibat mekanisme 'path dependency', yang memperkuat resistensi terhadap reformasi birokrasi. Untuk mengatasi risiko 'constitutional regression' dan melemahnya prinsip 'checks and balances', artikel ini merekomendasikan rekonstruksi kebijakan melalui revisi UU Kementerian Negara yang menetapkan batas maksimal 34 kementerian secara eksplisit, serta amendemen terbatas Pasal 17 UUD NRI 1945 agar pembatasan bersifat konstitusional. Dengan demikian, reformasi ini diharapkan menegakkan supremasi konstitusi, meningkatkan efisiensi birokrasi, dan menjaga stabilitas kelembagaan dalam kerangka good governance.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 16

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14 No 2 (2025) Vol 14 No 1 (2025) Vol 13 No 4 (2024) Vol 13 No 3 (2024) Vol 13 No 2 (2024) Vol 13 No 1 (2024) Vol 12 No 4 (2023) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) Vol 12 No 2 (2023) Vol 12 No 1 (2023) Vol 11 No 4 (2022) Vol 11 No 3 (2022) Vol 11 No 2 (2022) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) Vol 10 No 4 (2021) Vol 10 No 3 (2021) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) Vol 10 No 1 (2021) Vol 9 No 4 (2020) Vol 9 No 3 (2020) Vol 9 No 2 (2020) Vol 9 No 1 (2020) Vol 8 No 4 (2019) Vol 8 No 3 (2019) Vol 8 No 2 (2019) Vol 8 No 1 (2019) Vol 7 No 4 (2018) Vol 7 No 3 (2018) Vol 7 No 2 (2018) Vol 7 No 1 (2018) Vol 6 No 4 (2017) Vol 6 No 3 (2017) Vol 6 No 2 (2017) Vol 6 No 1 (2017) Vol 5 No 4 (2016) Vol 5 No 3 (2016) Vol 5 No 2 (2016) Vol 5 No 1 (2016) Vol 4 No 4 (2015) Vol 4 No 3 (2015) Vol 4 No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 1 (2015) Vol 3 No 3 (2014) Vol 3 No 2 (2014) Vol 3 No 1 (2014) Vol 2 No 3 (2013) Vol 2 No 2 (2013) Vol 2 No 1 (2013) Vol 1 No 1 (2012) More Issue