cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA
Published by Universitas Udayana
ISSN : 25023101     EISSN : 2302528X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana adalah jurnal ilmiah hukum yang mempublikasikan hasil kajian bidang hukum yang diterbitkan secara online empat kali setahun (Februari-Mei-Agustus-Nopember). Redaksi menerima tulisan yang berupa hasil kajian yang berasal dari penelitian hukum dalam berbagai bidang ilmu hukum yang belum pernah dipublikasikan serta orisinal. Jurnal ini selain memuat tulisan / kajian dari para pakar ilmu hukum (dosen, guru besar, praktisi dan lain-lain.) juga memuat tulisan mahasiswa Magister Ilmu Hukum baik yang merupakan bagian dari penulisan tesis maupun kajian lainnya yang orisinal. Tulisan yang masuk ke Redaksi akan diseleksi dan direview untuk dapat dimuat
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 664 Documents
Economic Policy Formulation Risks to Existence Rural Creative Industry as a Form of Resilience Legal Protection Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku; Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini; Ni Ketut Sari Adnyani
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i02.p05

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out, among others: (1) the development of the creative industry rural areas in Buleleng district in their resilience to the Covid 19 Pandemic; (2) the obstacles faced by the rural creative industry in the Covid-19 Pandemic situation; (3) Strategy in the form of economic policy formulation rises to the existence of the creative industry rural areas as a form of resilience in the legal protection of Small and medium-sized enterprises, in the face of a pandemic Covid 19 in Buleleng Regency. This research is an empirical juridical research with nature with the field of public policy studies. This sociolegal research uses a socio-economic approach referring to laws and regulations relating to the economic development of rural areas and Small Industry, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. Technique research analysis is a legal hermeneutic technique which is presented in a qualitative descriptive manner. The results of the study indicate that it is important for the government to assist in restoring and revitalizing the rural creative industry in Buleleng Regency with various government assistance and policies that can support Small Industry businesses. A total of 1,785 cooperatives and 163,713 micro, small and medium enterprises were affected by the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic. Strategy The government's policy is divided into various short, medium and longterm strategies, including short term and urgent, the government focuses on reducing the addition of COVID-19 fatalities with an emphasis on health sector stimulus and welfare assistance for the affected people.
Pengendalian Tindakan Land Clearing Oleh Kesatuan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Menurut Hukum Positif di Indonesia Putu Ari Sagita; I Gede Pasek Pramana
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i02.p10

Abstract

Land clearing action by customary law community units (hereinafter referred to as KMHA) always intersects with the concept of environmental protection and management. Even though the existence of the KMHA is clearly recognized by the constitution and its origins. The purpose of this paper is to identify and analyze the authority and limits of the KMHA authorities in context of land clearing. The method used in this article is the normative legal research by using the statute approach and the conceptual approach. Based on the analysis, it is known that the KMHA has the authority to carry out land clearing or clearing land by burning as stated in Article 61 paragraph 1 letter h of the PPLH Law, however, there are limitations that must be considered by KMHA in carrying out land clearing by burning. Neverthless, it can be done a maximum of 2 (two) hectares per family head as regulated in Article 4 paragraph 1 Regulation of the Minister of LHK No.10/2010. Tindakan land clearing oleh kesatuan masyarakat hukum adat (selanjutnya disebut KMHA) senantiansa bersinggungan dengan konsep perlindungan dan pengelolaan lingkungan hidup. Padahal keberadaan KMHA jelas diakui oleh konstitusi beserta hak asal-usulnya. Adapun tujuan penulisan ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganlisis tentang kewenangan dan batasan kewenangan dari KMHA dalam konteks land clearing. Metode yang digunakan dalam artikel ini adalah metode hukum normatif dengan turut menggunakan pendekatan Undang-Undang dan pendekatan Konseptual. Berdasarkan hasil analisis, diketahui bahwa KMHA berwenang untuk melakukan land clearing atau membuka lahan dengan cara membakar sebagaimana dinyatakan dalam Pasal 61 ayat 1 huruf h UU PPLH, Namun demikian, ada batasan yang wajib diperhatikan oleh KMHA dalam melaksanakan land clearing melalui pembakaran lahanyakni dapat dilakukan pada lahan dengan luas maksimal 2 (dua) hektar per kepala keluarga sebagaimana yang diatur dalam Pasal 4 ayat 1 Permen LHK No.10/2010.
The Legal Problems on Occupational Accidents Insurance Policy for State Civil Apparatus Ariel Gerson Oktavian; Kadek Cahya Susila Wibawa; Sonhaji Sonhaji
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i02.p01

Abstract

Initially, Employment and social protection was based on National Social Security System Law and it is applied for public, includingState Civil Apparatus. According to the law, all employment social security should be implemented by Social Security Administration of Employment. Legal problems then emerged as a result of the stipulation of occupational accident insurance rules for State Civil Apparatus that were managed by PT Taspen as mandated by Government Regulation No. 70/2015. This research aimed to describe and analyze the legal construction of Occupational Accident Security and Death Security regulations for State Civil Apparatus. This research uses doctrinal legal research as part of qualitative research with conceptual and statue approach. The analysis was carried out descriptively by processing primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The results of the research showed that legal problems were in the form of disharmony and regulatory inefficiency in the Occupational Accident Security and Death Security policies. A clash occurred between the State Civil Apparatus Law, the Social Security Administration Law and Government Regulation No. 70/2015. The problems occurred were related to the authority of PT Taspen as the organizer of Occupational Accident Security and Death Security for State Civil Apparatus as well as violations of the National Social Security System principles in the management of Occupational Accident Security and Death Security for ASN based on Government Regulation No. 70/2015.
Restorative Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Cyberbullying Anak Agung Ngurah Adhi Wibisana; I Ketut Rai Setiabudhi
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i02.p15

Abstract

Tujuan penulisan/penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui jawaban mengenai penyelesaian suatu sengketa cyberbullying dan langkah-langkah yang diterapkan dalam meminimalisir terjadinya suatu perbuatan melawan hukum di masa mendatang. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Jenis pendekatan yang digunakan yakni pendekatan terhadap ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. data yang digunakan adalah studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa permasalahan terhadap cyberbullying yang terjadinya hendaknya dapat diselesaikan diluar jalur peradilan tanpa harus diselesaikan secara jalur hukum yang dikarenakan hanya mementingkan kepentingan pribadi saja. Maka dari itu, perlu halnya penerapan konsep Restorative Justice dalam menangani perkara tersebut, guna mempertemukan kedua belah pihak yang berselisih agar dapat menyelesaikan perkara tanpa harus ada dendam pribadi kedepannya.
Prajuru Desa’s Role in Mediating Inheritance Right Disputes for Men “Nyeburin” after Divorce in Tabanan Regency Putu Sekarwangi Saraswati; Ida Bagus Gede Subawa; Kt. Sukawati Lanang P. Perbawa
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i02.p06

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the role of traditional village prajuru in mediating inheritance rights disputes for men nyeburin after divorce in Tabanan Regency. The research method used is an empirical research method. Data collection techniques using document study techniques and interview techniques. The results showed that the role of the traditional village prajuru in mediating the inheritance rights dispute of men nyeburin after divorce in Tabanan Regency as one of the obligations of the adat prajuru as the party who has legal authority in the Adat Village in resolving customary problems, the initial stage is carried out case analysis which was followed by a joint meeting with the disputing parties, then related to inheritance rights as stated in awig-awig, in fact, was directed to conduct deliberations for consensus in a family manner by upholding the principle of kinship and the principle of parimatma as the main principle of inheritance distribution so as to obtain a fair and equitable agreement. does not cause problems between siblings.
Perlindungan Hukum Konten Parodi Dalam Dimensi Kekayaan Intelektual A A Gede Cahya Pratama; I Wayan Novy Purwanto
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i02.p11

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to identify, analyze and elaborate the legal protections for parody content based on Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright (hereinafter Copyright Law) and Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications (hereinafter the Trademark Law and Geographical Indications), as well as sanctions that can be given to parties who violate the intellectual property of parody content groups. This paper uses a normative legal research method using a statutory approach, a concept approach and an analytical approach. The results of the study show that Warkop DKI gets protection under the Copyright regime as well as Trademarks. Protection in the Copyright regime is given automatically starting from the time a Work is manifested in a tangible form. Protection is also provided in the Trademark regime considering that Warkop DKI through the Dono Kasino Indro Coffee Shop Institute has registered the “Warung Kopi Dono Kasino Indro” brand in 2014. Tujuan penulisan ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi, menganalisis dan mengelaborasi perlindungan hukum atas konten parodi berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta (selanjutnya UU Hak Cipta) dan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis (selanjutnya UU Merek dan Indikasi Geografis), serta sanksi yang dapat diberikan kepada para pihak yang melakukan pelanggaran atas kekayaan intelektual grup konten parodi . Tulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konsep dan pendekatan analisis. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa Warkop DKI mendapatkan perlindungan dalam rezim Hak Cipta dan juga Merek. Perlindungan dalam rezim Hak Cipta diberikan secara otomatis terhitung sejak suatu Ciptaan diwujudkan dalam bentuk nyata. Perlindungan juga diberikan dalam rezim Merek mengingat pihak Warkop DKI melalui Lembaga Warung Kopi Dono Kasino Indro telah mendaftarkan merek “Warung Kopi Dono Kasino Indro” pada tahun 2014.
Principle of Impartiality: Air Transport Restriction Policy During the Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia Annalisa Y; Murzal Murzal; Firman Muntaqo; M. Syaifuddin
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i02.p02

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze and identify policies issued by the government related to air passenger transportation restrictions during the Covid-19 pandemic. In addition, this study also examines the application of the principle of impartiality to passengers and airlines in the policy. This study uses a normative research method with secondary data in the form of a Circular issued by the Minister of Transportation and the Task Force for the Acceleration of Handling Covid-19 from 2020 to 2021. The results show that the policies issued by the Minister of Transportation during the Covid-19 Pandemic are by limiting the number of passengers ranging from 50% to 70% of the carrying capacity was made based on policies in order to minimize the transmission of Covid-19 passengers in the aircraft cabin by applying the principle of social distancing. The policy regulations issued are in the form of a Circular from the Ministry of Transportation and the Covid-19 Handling Acceleration Task Force related to passenger restrictions while still paying attention to the principle of impartiality. This restriction is an appropriate action, not discriminatory treatment for airlines where restrictions on passenger transportation can have an effect on reducing revenue. However, the restriction policy is implemented in the context of the state protecting the health of its citizens (passengers).
Pemberantasan Mafia Hukum di Pengadilan Putu Tresna Nararya Indranugraha; I Gede Artha
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i02.p16

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out and analyze the occurrence of judicial mafia actions in court institutions and to review and provide solutions to overcome judicial mafia actions in courts. The above phenomena will be studied based on normative legal research. With a statutory approach, a legal concept approach, and a case approach. The analysis used is technical evaluative, argumentative, and descriptive. Problem are studied and analyzed based on theoretical foundations such as legal principles, legal concepts, doctrine, jurisprudence and legal theory. The results of the study explained that the judicial mafia that occurs in Indonesian criminal justice does not only occur in legal courts and law enforcement regarding the judicial mafia that occurs in the courts requires strategies and strict actions for the perpetrators, so far the occurrence of lawlessness by judges is still difficult to control, stemming from low morals, a consumptive lifestyle easily tempted by the lure of bribes, gratification that results in abuse of authority, until it leads to the emergence of legal mafia actions in court Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis terjadinya Tindakan mafia peradilan pada Lembaga pengadilan serta mengkaji dan memberi solusi guna mengatasi Tindakan mafia peradilan di pengadilan. Terhadap fenomena diatas akan diteliti berdasar penelitian hukum normatif. Dikaji melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konsep hukum serta pendekatan kasus. Analisis yang digunakan dengan teknis evaluatif, argumentatif dan deskriptif. Permasalahan dikaji dan dianalisis berdasar Landasan teoritis seperti asas-asas hukum, konsep hukum, doktrin, yurisprudensi dan teori hukum. Hasil penelitian menjelaskan bahwa mafia peradilan yang terjadi dalam peradilan pidana Indonesia bukan saja terjadi di pengadilan hukum serta penegakan hukum menyangkut mafia peradilan yang terjadi di pengadilan memerlukan strategi dan tindakan tegas bagi pelakunya, selama ini terjadinya pelanggaran hukum oleh oknum hakim masih sulit dikendalikan, bersumber dari moral yang rendah, gaya hidup konsumtif dengan mudah tergoda iming-iming suap, gratifikasi yang mengakibatkan penyalahgunaan kewenangan, sampai berujung munculnya tindakan mafia hukum di pengadilan.
Akta Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti: Urgensi Harmonisasi Kebijakan Bella Kharisma; I Gede Agus Kurniawan
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i02.p07

Abstract

The development of the 5.0 era, namely the era of the internet of things, made Land Deed Maker Officials required to follow the development of digitalization, one of which was by making an electronic Land Deed Making Official deed. The purpose of this research is to examine and analyze the arrangement and strength of the proof of the deed which is made electronically. This study uses a normative legal research method with statute approach and an analytical approach. The study indicates that the arrangement for the deed of granting mortgage rights is made by the Land Deed Making Officer submitted in electronic form as stipulated in Article 9 paragraph (4) of the Minister of ATR/KBPN No. 5 of 2020 which is related to Article 86 of PP 18/2021, but is still experiencing a blurring of norms because it is not clear what PPAT deeds are made electronically so that they do not provide legal certainty, and the power of proof of deeds made electronically does not have the power of proof which is perfect as an authentic deed and cannot be used as legal evidence in court so that it cannot be enforced because it is not in accordance with the provisions of Article 5 paragraph (4) letter b of the ITE Law. Therefore, it is urgent to harmonize policies related to electronic deeds Perkembangan zaman era 5.0 yaitu era internet of things membuat Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah dituntut harus mengikuti perkembangan digitalisasi salah satunya dengan membuat akta Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah secara elektronik. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengkaji dan menganalisa pengaturan dan kekuatan pembuktian akta tersebut yang dibuat secara elektronik. Studi ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan Perundang-Undangan dan pendekatan Analisis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan akta pemberian hak tanggungan dibuat oleh Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah disampaikan dalam bentuk elektronik sebagaimana ketentuan Pasal 9 ayat (4) Permen ATR/KBPN No. 5 Tahun 2020 yang memiliki keterkaitan dengan Pasal 86 PP 18/2021, namun masih mengalami kekaburan norma karena belum jelasnya akta-akta PPAT apa saja yang dibuat secara elektronik sehingga tidak memberikan kepastian hukum, serta kekuatan pembuktian akta yang dibuat secara elektronik tidak memiliki kekuatan pembuktian yang sempurna selayaknya akta otentik serta tidak dapat dijadikan alat bukti yang sah di pengadilan sehingga tidak dapat diberlakukan karena tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 5 ayat (4) huruf b UU ITE. Oleh karenanya, urgen harmonisasi kebijakan yang terkait dengan akta elektronik.
Registrasion of Sound Marks in Indonesia Ni Desak Made Eri Susanti; Kadek Agus Sudiarawan
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i02.p12

Abstract

Sound marks is one of the most popular technical methods today which comprises an important part of forming a well-known mark. Regarding the registration of sound marks in the Indonesian Regulations Law of Marks and Geographical Indications as well as the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia No. 12 of 2021 concerning Amendments to No. 67 of 2016 concerning trademark registration does not provide a definition of sound mark and without an explanation of an example of a creation. This causes errors in registration. Considering that sound is a non-visual sign, but the absence of a sound mark definition and the lack of clarity on the specific requirements. This research method uses normative legal research methods related to using a statutory approach. The results of this paper indicate that the regulation of sound mark registration in Indonesia follows the general trademark registration requirements and in the case of sound mark registration in Indonesia it does not provide a clear definition so that it can lead to legal uncertainty and even multiple interpretations. In contrast to Australia, the regulation of sound mark registration guidelines is more strict, detailed and restrictive. Registration of a Sound Mark in Indonesia can be carried out by submitting an application for registration the label attached by the applicant is in the form of a notation and a sound recording, or a sonogram