Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.915
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Al-Daulah : Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Jurnal Nuansa Kenotariatan Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH International Journal of Social Service and Research Jurnal Komunikasi Islam Journal Evidence Of Law Jurnal Hukum Pelita POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI) SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah ARMADA : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Jurnal Review Politik Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research National Journal of Law
Sinaulan, Ramlani Lina
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 22 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Pertanggung jawaban Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta Pernyataan Nominee Pemegang Saham oleh Warga Negara Asing dalam Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas Sudiana, Nana; Sinaulan, Ramlani Lina; Koto, Zulkarnain
Jurnal Nuansa Kenotariatan Vol 9, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Postgraduate of Jayabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31479/jnk.v9i1.254

Abstract

Discussion on the responsibility of a notary for making a deed of statement of a shareholder Nominee by a foreign national in the establishment of a limited liability company. Research conducted using normative juridical methods. In Nominee agreements/statements between foreigners and Indonesian citizens it is closely related to the notary as the authorized official in making the Nominee agreement/statement deed, which as stated in UUJN that every deed made by the interests of the parties appear before the notary, then the deed has the power as authentic deed, but in reality the purpose of making this Nominee agreement/statement is to safeguard the assets that are the object of the Nominee even though this practice is often motivated by bad intentions, one of which is to avoid laws and regulations that limit the ownership of foreign citizens or more furthermore as a form of money laundering practices.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN OLEH OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN DALAM HAL TERJADI INVESTASI ILEGAL DITINJAU DARI UU NO 8 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN Bintang, Tri Baskoro; Suadi, Amran; Sinaulan, Ramlani Lina
NATIONAL JOURNAL of LAW Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022): Volume 7, Nomor 2, September 2022
Publisher : Universitas Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47313/njl.v7i2.2020

Abstract

Perusahaan yang melakukan kegiatan sebagai lembaga keuangan bukanbank harus memperoleh izin dari OJK (Otoritas Jasa Keuangan) berdasarkanPasal 55 ayat (1) UU OJK. Ketentuan perlindungan konsumen dalam PeraturanOtoritas Jasa Keuangan dimulai dengan kewajiban-kewajiban pelaku usaha jasakeuangan, fasilitasi pengaduan konsumen dan pemberian fasilitas penyelesaianpengaduan oleh Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, pengendalian internal, pengawasanperlindungan konsumen jasa keuangan, dan sanksi. Otoritas Jasa Keuanganmemang secara khusus telah memberikan layanan penyelesaian aduan sengketakonsumen lembaga jasa keuangan melalui Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan No.1/POJK.07/2013 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Sektor Jasa Keuangan.Namun, dengan adanya Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan No. 1/POJK.07/2014tentang Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Sektor Jasa Keuangan,maka peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan yang dulunya dapat memberikan fasilitaspenyelesaian pengaduan konsumen kini bertindak menetapkan peraturan,melakukan pengawasan, dan penindakan terhadap pelaku usaha sektor jasakeuangan yang melanggar ketentuan Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan tersebut.Perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen diperlukan demi mewujudkan kepastiandan jaminan hukum dengan tujuan untuk melindungi masyarakat yang dalam halini merupakan konsumen yang ditanggung saat melaksanakan kegiatanberinvestasi, misalnya resiko terjadinya kejahatan pasar modal. Kejahatan pasarmodal atau capital market crime merupakan pelanggaran hukum yang adahubungannya dengan pasar modal baik pelanggaran peraturan perundangundangan di bidang pasar modal itu sendiri, maupun pelanggaran peraturanperundangundangan di luar bidang pasar modal tetapi perbuatan. Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Hukum, OJK, Perlindungan Konsumen  Companies that carry out activities as non-bank financial institutionsmust obtain permission from the OJK (Financial Services Authority) based onArticle 55 paragraph (1) of the OJK Law. Consumer protection provisions in theFinancial Services Authority Regulation begin with the obligations of financialservice business actors, facilitation of consumer complaints and the provision of 835NJL:Volume 7, Nomor 2, September 2022journal.unas.ac.id/law;nationallawjournal@civitas.unas.ac.idcomplaint resolution facilities by the Financial Services Authority, internalcontrol, supervision of consumer protection of financial services, and sanctions.The Financial Services Authority has specifically provided dispute resolutionservices for consumers of financial services institutions through the FinancialServices Authority Regulation No. 1/POJK.07/2013 concerning ConsumerProtection in the Financial Services Sector. However, with the FinancialServices Authority Regulation No. 1/POJK.07/2014 concerning AlternativeDispute Resolution Institutions in the Financial Services Sector, the role of theFinancial Services Authority, which used to be able to provide facilities forresolving consumer complaints, is now acting to establish regulations,supervise, and crack down on financial service sector business actors whoviolate the provisions of the Financial Services Authority Regulation. Legalprotection for consumers is needed in order to realize legal certainty andguarantees with the aim of protecting the public, which in this case is a consumerwho is covered when carrying out investment activities, for example the risk ofcapital market crimes. Capital market crime is a violation of the law that has todo with the capital market, both violations of laws and regulations in the capitalmarket itself, as well as violations of laws and regulations outside the capitalmarket but actions. Keywords: Legal Protection, OJK, Consumer Protection
Tinjauan Hukum terhadap Peran Pejabat Pembuat Komitmen Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Poniyah, Sri; Sinaulan, Ramlani Lina; Farhana, Farhana
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Vol 17, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Jayabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31479/jphl.v17i2.265

Abstract

Corruption in the procurement of goods and services is a serious concern in many countries, including Indonesia. In this context, the role of the Commitment Making Officer (PPK) has a significant impact on the integrity and transparency of the procurement process. This research provides a legal review of the role of PPK in corruption crimes in the procurement of goods and services in Indonesia. The method used in this research is the normative juridical approach method. The approaches used in this type of normative research are statutory approaches and conceptual approaches. Types and sources of data used as research materials primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials.  The results of the study found that Presidential Regulation No. 12 of 2021 authorizes PPK by prohibiting the practice of bribery, but the limits of PPK's authority are regulated by Article 52 Paragraph (2) and LKPP Circular Letter No. 8 of 2020. PPK's responsibilities include aspects of administrative and civil law, with the core of criminal liability focused on procurement law violations involving abuse of authority for personal or collective gain, harming the state. PPK's criminal liability involves individual fault, subjective fault, and the role of other parties in the procurement, including the Budget User (PA) and the Budget User Authority (KPA).
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN NOTARIS TERHADAP COVERNOTE YANG DIBUATNYA DALAM PERJANJIAN KREDIT Arizona, Renanda; Sinaulan, Ramlani Lina; Kencanawati, Erny
SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 2 No. 12 (2023): SENTRI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Desember 2023
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/sentri.v2i12.1890

Abstract

The use of notary covernotes in credit agreements can cause bank losses in the event of default while the process of binding mortgage rights has not been completed. This study raised two formulations of the problem, namely how the legal consequences of the use of cover notes on credit agreements? and what about the legal responsibility of Notaries related covernote in credit agreements?, using the theory of legal consequences and the theory of professional ethics of notaries. The method used in this study with this type of research juridical normative legal research literature or secondary data with sources of legal materials primary, secondary, tertiary and supported interview. The research approach used is legal approach, case approach, conceptual approach and analytical approach. Legal material collection techniques performed by identifying and intervening in the rule of Law positive, literature books, journals and other sources of legal materials. For technical analysis legal material is carried out by the interpretation of grammatical laws and methods construction of a legal analogy. The results showed that the legality of Covernote cannot be considered as an authentic deed in accordance with the authority of notary officials in making authentic deeds, because Covernote does not meet the requirements set forth in Article 1868 of the Civil Code. Covernote is not part of the law provided for in the law, it is only a practice or custom that develops in the performance of Notarial duties. The factors that encourage a notary to issue a Covernote are usually related to the unfinished work related to the duties and authority of the notary to issue an authentic deed. Covernote is used as a notification that the customer's land letters of credit application are still in the process of certification, royalty process, reverse name, or breakdown process if they have been certified. For example, in the application for a credit agreement, application for a building permit (IMB), application for a decree of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights (Kemenkumham), management of Rights applications, and others. The notary's responsibility related to the Covernote he made is related to the Supreme Court decision number 181/PDT/2019/PT MKS. The notary is responsible in the event that the Covernote is not implemented in accordance with the contents of the Covernote, and the notary may be subject to civil penalties in the form of reimbursement of costs, damages, and interest due to which the notary must pay to the party who suffered losses due to the violation. This is a form of Notarial responsibility in compensating for losses suffered by the injured party
Implikasi Dan Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/Puu-Xviii/2020 Terhadap Proses Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia Saputro, Julianto Dimas; Sinaulan, Ramlani Lina; Suganda, Atma
SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Vol. 9 No. 6 (2022)
Publisher : SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/sjsbs.v9i6.28924

Abstract

Legal certainty is the foundation of a rule of law to clarify legal laws. Despite public debate about Omnibus laws, the Indonesian House of Representatives plenary session adopted the Draft Law on Job Creation in less than a year. The analysis uses descriptive and qualitative methodologies. Descriptive writing analyzes facts by precisely detailing events related to this legislation. This thesis examines the consequences and execution of the Constitutional Court Judgment Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 on the Process of Establishing Legislation in Indonesia, so it applies legal theory and concepts to the Court's decision. Constitution. Dogmatic or doctrinal research follows normative legal research. The Court decided that the Job Creation Law violated the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD NRI 1945) and had no legal authority if "no modifications were made within two (two) years after the judgment was announced". Thus, the Job Creation Law applies until the status quo law is changed. If there is no improvement by the deadline, the Job Creation Law will be ruled unconstitutional permanently and all UUCK-altered or repealed laws would be reinstalled.Keywords: Constitutional Court Decision; Legal certainty; Job Creation Act AbstrakTerlepas dari segala Pro dan kontra masyarakat terhadap konsep Omnibus law, tidak butuh waktu lebih dari satu tahun Rancangan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja disahkan dalam sidang paripurna DPR RI. Metode yang digunakan untuk menganalisis adalah metode deskriptif sekaligus kualitatif. Permasalahan yang akan diteliti pada penelitian ini adalah terkait Implikasi dan Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 Terhadap Proses Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia sehingga penelitian dan penulisan tesis ini mengaitkan teori hukum dan konsep hukum terkait implikasi dan implementasi putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Mahkamah menyatakan bahwa UU Cipta Kerja bertentangan dengan UUD NRI 1945 dan tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum mengikat sepanjang dimaknai “tidak dilakukan perbaikan dalam waktu 2 (dua) tahun sejak putusan diucapkan. Dalam kata lain, UU Cipta Kerja masih tetap berlaku sampai dengan tenggat waktu perbaikan UU a quo yang telah ditentukan. Apabila hingga tenggat waktu yang diberikan tidak dilakukan perbaikan, maka UU Cipta Kerja dinyatakan inkonstitusional secara permanen dan seluruh Undang-Undang yang diubah dan dicabut oleh UUCK dinyatakan berlaku kembali.Kata Kunci: Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi; Kepastian Hukum; UU Cipta Kerja
Eksaminasi Hak Pemegang Saham pada Perseroan Terbatas dalam Berbagai Kondisi Menurut UUPT Pasal 72 Hardisurjo, Budihardjo; Sriwidodo, Joko; Sinaulan, Ramlani Lina
JURNAL HUKUM PELITA Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Hukum Pelita November 2024
Publisher : Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian (DPPM) Universitas Pelita Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37366/jh.v5i2.5204

Abstract

Struktur kepemilikan saham dalam PT sering menimbulkan ketimpangan hak dan tanggung jawab, yang berpotensi mengakibatkan ketidakadilan bagi pemegang saham minoritas. Ketidakseimbangan ini dapat memicu konflik internal, terutama saat perusahaan mengalami kerugian atau saat tindakan pengurus merugikan kepentingan pemegang saham tertentu. Pasal 72 UUPT memberikan hak kepada pemegang saham untuk menuntut ganti rugi dalam situasi di mana keputusan pengurus merugikan perusahaan, namun pemegang saham minoritas sering mengalami kesulitan dalam memperjuangkan hak-hak ini. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi sejauh mana hak-hak pemegang saham diatur dalam Pasal 72 UUPT dan bagaimana perlindungan terhadap kepentingan mereka dapat diterapkan dalam berbagai kondisi. Selain itu, penelitian ini menganalisis dampak perubahan dalam Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja terhadap pengaturan PT, terutama bagi usaha mikro dan kecil yang kini dapat mendirikan PT sebagai badan hukum perorangan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kajian hukum yuridis-normatif dengan analisis kualitatif terhadap data sekunder yang dikumpulkan dari studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan UUPT secara jelas mengatur hak dan tanggung jawab pemegang saham, termasuk hak suara dan hak untuk mendapatkan dividen. Ketimpangan antara pemegang saham mayoritas dan minoritas memerlukan perlindungan hukum terhadap ketidakadilan. Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja memfasilitasi badan hukum perorangan untuk usaha mikro dan kecil, tetapi menyoroti perlunya perlindungan hak pemegang saham yang lebih baik, akuntabilitas, dan transparansi
Analisis Yuridis Hak Pemegang Saham dalam Perseroan Terbatas : Studi Pasal 72 UUPT dalam Situasi Restrukturisasi Perusahaan Prasetya, Ahmad Fanani Eko; Sriwidodo, Joko; Sinaulan, Ramlani Lina
JURNAL HUKUM PELITA Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Hukum Pelita November 2024
Publisher : Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian (DPPM) Universitas Pelita Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37366/jh.v5i2.5205

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji perlindungan hukum terhadap hak pemegang saham minoritas dalam situasi restrukturisasi perusahaan, khususnya terkait pembagian dividen dan dampak terhadap kontrol serta kepemilikan saham. Berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 72 UU Perseroan Terbatas (UUPT), pembagian dividen interim dapat dilakukan dengan syarat tertentu, namun dalam praktik restrukturisasi, pemegang saham minoritas berisiko menghadapi kerugian berupa hilangnya hak dividen, dilusi saham, dan berkurangnya pengaruh dalam pengambilan keputusan perusahaan. Selain itu, kendala dominasi pemegang saham mayoritas seringkali mengurangi perlindungan bagi pemegang saham minoritas. Penelitian ini juga memberikan saran untuk meningkatkan transparansi dan mekanisme perlindungan hak minoritas melalui perubahan anggaran dasar atau perjanjian pemegang saham yang mengatur keputusan strategis dan restrukturisasi perusahaan
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Debitur Akibat Wanprestasi Terkait Pelaksanaan Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Dibawah Nilai Jual/Limit Terhadap Obyek Jaminan Nofiyanti, Dwi; Sinaulan, Ramlani Lina; Yuhelson, Yuhelson; Syarief, Vidi Galenso
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 4 No. 5 (2024): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v4i5.15135

Abstract

Dalam melakukan pelelangan untuk pemberlakuan hak tanggungan, bank menetapkan batasan harga lelang terhadap obyek hak tanggungan karena kreditur tidak memenuhi perjanjian pinjaman dengan bank, dalam hal permohonan Lelang Nasional yang di berikan Kewenangan dilelang oleh lembaga pelelangan negara yaitu KPKNL. Tesis ini membahas tentang pengaturan mengenai batas nilai jual/limit obyek jaminan dan melindungi debitur sesuai aturan yg berlaku. Pada penelitian ini Pengaturan mengenai batas nilai jual/limit obyek jaminan dalam eksekusi lelang hak tanggungan di laksanakan sesuai hukum yang berlaku . Namun kenyataanya, terjadi penetapkan batasan di bawah harga pasar yang merugikan debitur sehingga adanya fenomena hukum antara debitur dengan kreditur terhadap pelaksanan lelang tersebut. Dengan demikian, perlindungan hukum tersebut belum dapat tercapai terlihat dari adanya gugatan-gugatan kepada Kreditur (Bank). Debitur melakukan proses hukum Untuk melindungi harta debitur sebagai jaminan atas hipotek yang dilaksanakan sesuai dengan nilai batas yg di tentukan dapat di lakukan di pengadilan yg berwenang dalam melayangkan gugatan terhadap kreditur (bank) sesuai dengan Pasal 17 ayat (1), (2), dan (3) PMK 27/2016 jo. Pasal 13 ayat (1) huruf k-l PMK 213/2020.
Tindak Pidana Perkawinan Semu (Marriage Of Inconvenience) dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam Sinaulan, Ramlani Lina
Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Vol. 6 No. 2 (2016): Oktober 2016
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (140.811 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/ad.2016.6.2.477-503

Abstract

Abstract: Among the forms of quasi marriage is a temporary marriage between an Indonesian citizen or a foreigner holding stay permit with a foreigner who does not have a stay permit. This marriage is not a true marriage because it is meant to get stay permit in Indonesia. From legal perspective, this is a legal fraud. According article 135 Law 6/2011 on Immigration, those performing this marriage are punishable with imprisonment of maximum 5 (five) years or fined of maximum IDR 500.000.000,00 (five hundred million rupiahs). From Islamic perspective, a marriage is a fortified knot with the purpose of obeying God’s command and it is considered a devotion to God. A marriage is supposed to be forever, not temporary. Thus, this quasi marriage is forbidden and those to breach is punishable with ta’zir. Keywords: foreigner quasi marriage, Islamic law, crime Abstrak: Artikel ini membahas tentang tindak pidana perkawinan semu dalam perspektif hukum Islam. Perkawinan semu adalah perkawinan seorang warga negara Indonesia atau seorang asing pemegang izin tinggal dengan seorang asing lain dan perkawinan tersebut bukan merupakan perkawinan yang sesungguhnya, tetapi dengan maksud untuk memperoleh izin tinggal atau Dokumen Perjalanan Republik Indonesia. Dari sisi hukum, perkawinan itu merupakan bentuk penyelundupan hukum. Berdasarkan Pasal 135 Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2011 tentang Keimigrasian, pelaku perkawinan semu dipidana dengan pidana penjara paling lama 5 (lima) tahun dan pidana denda paling banyak Rp500.000.000,00 (lima ratus juta rupiah). Menurut Islam, pernikahan adalah akad yang sangat kuat atau mîtsâqan ghalîzhan untuk menaati perintah Allah dan melaksanakannya merupakan ibadah, bahwa suatu perkawinan memiliki spektrum jangka panjang dan bukan sementara. Dengan demikian, perkawinan semu hukumnya haram dan pelakunya bisa dihukum ta’zîr. Kata Kunci: Hukum Islam, tindak pidana, perkawinan semu.
Paradigma Filsafat Positivisme Hukum Di Indonesia Sinaulan, Ramlani Lina
Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Vol. 7 No. 2 (2017): Oktober 2017
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (444.545 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/ad.2017.7.2.322-341

Abstract

Abstract: The science of law has a unique and distinctive character where every country has its own peculiarities. The development of legal science is influenced by the views of the jurists. In issuing legal opinions, the jurists are often influenced by their education and scholarship that will always be subjective depending on the paradigm used. Nevertheless, Indonesia, through the fourth paragraph of the Preamble of the 1945 Constitution of RI affirmed that Pancasila is as a paradigm in all life of state and society. Pancasila is the only paradigm (philosophy) of law that is recognized in some legislations. Pancasila is one of the elements that characterize the uniqueness of the Indonesian state. As a positive science, the science of law contains a normative nature in practice based on social science strategy. So that, the science of law aims to providing alternative solutions to solve concrete social problems. The use of social science strategy is not intended to change the normative nature of the science of law, but adopts Pancasila as the legal paradigm (philosophy).Abstrak: Ilmu hukum memiliki sifat yang unik dan khas dimana setiap negara memiliki kekhasan sendiri yang mempengaruhi perkembangan ilmu hukumnya. Perkembangan ilmu hukum dipengaruhi oleh pandangan para ahli hukum di dalamnya. Ilmuwan hukum dalam mengeluarkan pendapat dipengaruhi oleh pendidikan dan keilmuannya dan akan selalu bersifat subjektif bergantung pada paradigma yang digunakan. Namun demikian, Indonesia melalui Alinea IV Pembukaan UUD RI 1945 menegaskan bahwa Pancasila sebagai paradigma dalam seluruh kehidupan bernegara dan bermasyarakat. Pancasila merupakan satu-satunya paradigma (filsafat) hukum yang diakui dan dinormatifkan pengakuan tersebut dalam beberapa peraturan perundang-undangan. Pancasila adalah salah satu unsur yang mencirikan keunikan dan kekhasan dari negara Indonesia. Adapun ilmu hukum sebagai ilmu positif mengandung sifat normatif yang dalam pengembanan praktisnya bergerak berdasarkan strategi ilmu sosial, sehingga ilmu hukum memiliki tujuan memberikan solusi alternatif penyelesaian masalah konkret dalam masyarakat. Penggunaan strategi ilmu sosial tersebut bukan dimaksudkan untuk mengubah sifat normatif dari ilmu hukum, namun mengadopsi Pancasila sebagai paradigma (filsafat) hukum.
Co-Authors Akkapin, Suphaporn Arizona, Renanda Barus, Artanta Basuki , Basuki Bintang, Tri Baskoro Chandra, Tofik Yanuar Ditisrama, Tinton Ditisrama Farhana, Farhana Fauzia, Khalida Galuh Hardisurjo, Budihardjo Heri Susanto ismail, ismail ismail Ismed, Mohamad Joko Widodo Kencanawati, Erny Koto, Zulkarnain Luter, Albertus Nana Sudiana Nofiyanti, Dwi Poniyah, Sri Prasetya, Ahmad Fanani Eko Renita Renita Sanjaya, Titus Adhi Saputro, Julianto Dimas Siahaan, Ricardho Suadi, Amran Sudirman, M. Suganda, Atma Syarief, Vidi Galenso Triatmoko, Ryo Guntur Triatmoko, Ryo Thunder Yuhelson Yuhelson