Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

Qirāʾāt Shādhdhah in Legal Verses: A Study of Usury in the Interpretation of Abū Ḥayyān Widayati, Romlah
AL-TAHRIR Vol 24 No 2 (2024): Islamic Studies
Publisher : IAIN Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/altahrir.v24i2.10824

Abstract

This study aims to highlight the impact of qirāʾah on Islamic law. This study also explains Ibn Ḥayyān's interpretation in interpreting the verse on usury so that it has an impact on Islamic law. This research is descriptive-analytic research using a literature study. This study describes the interpretation put forward by Abū Ḥayyān, which is then analysed by using qirāʾāt shādhdzah in interpreting legal verses, which is devoted to the verse that discusses usury. The findings of this study indicate that Abū Ḥayyān's interpretation of QS. al-Baqarah: 279-280 emphasises the compatibility between one verse and another, by understanding the causes of the revelation of the verse, and referring to the principle of al-ʿibrah bi-ʿumūm al-lafẓi lā bi-khuṣūṣ as-sabab. Differences in qirāʾah enrich the understanding of the verse linguistically. This study concludes that qirāʾāt shādhdhah can be used to support or strengthen legal understanding, thus adding depth to linguistic legal interpretation.
METODOLOGI TAFSIR AYAT-AYAT HUKUM K.H. AHMAD SANUSI (Studi Analisis Kitab Raudhatu al-’Irfân fî Ma’rifati Al-Qur‘an) -, Herliani; Widayati, Romlah; Naelul Huda, Ade
Darul Hikmah: Jurnal Penelitian Tafsir dan Hadits Vol 8 No 2 (2022): Darul Hikmah: Jurnal Penelitian Hadits dan Tafsir
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ushuluddin (STIU) Darul Hikmah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (456.293 KB) | DOI: 10.61086/jstiudh.v8i2.36

Abstract

K.H. Ahmad Sanusi, an early twentieth-century interpreter, wrote Raudhatu al-'Irfân fî Ma'rifati Al-Qur'an. In addition to being a prolific writer, he was well-known for his ability to argue and frequently served as a conflict arbitrator. Even in the political field, he entered the ranks of freedom fighters with his election as a member of BPUPKI. His activities and fiqh tendencies in his works encourage the writer to investigate how to interpret legal verses and the methodology of istinbath law in his tafsir. The author employs a descriptive analytical method in conjunction with a qualitative approach. Tafsir, which was also a form of contribution to the thoughts of K.H. Ahmad Sanusi on the interpretation of the Al-Qur'an in Indonesia, was written in the Pegon script, in Sundanese loma, and uses the ijmâlî method. Analysis of the use of the ijmâlî method with legal explanations in the form of pointers as a step to make it easy to understand, because this tafsir is not only taught in Islamic boarding schools, but it is also studied by the general public. As for the legal istinbath, the law is served instantly. By paying attention to the rules of tafsir and ushul fiqh, he refers to the books of classical tafsir. It occasionally displays the opinion of fiqh expert priests and judges Imam Shafi'i's opinion.
Abū Ḥayyān’s Legal Exegesis of QS al-Nisāʾ [4]:1: A Study of Qirāʾāt Syādhah and the Principle of Egalitarian Creation Widayati, Romlah
QOF Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Keiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30762/qof.v9i2.3112

Abstract

The interpretation of legal verses in the Qur’an has traditionally emphasized qirāʾāt mutawātirah, often overlooking qirāʾāt shādhah, which hold significant interpretive potential that has not been fully utilized in Islamic legal exegesis. This article examines Abū Ḥayyān al-Gharnāṭī’s interpretation of QS al-Nisāʾ [4]:1 through the analytical framework of qirāʾāt shādhah as the primary instrument of study. The research employs a descriptive-analytical methodology, using tafsīr al-Baḥr al-Muḥīṭ as the principal source, supplemented by critical engagement with other classical tafsīr works for contextualization. Findings indicate that Abū Ḥayyān critically rejects the traditional narrative of Ḥawwāʾ’s creation from Ādam’s rib, and by referencing qirāʾāt shādhah, he affirms the ontological equality of men and women, both created from the same substance. Furthermore, the verse is interpreted as an ethical directive to maintain familial relationships and social cohesion, integrating theological, linguistic, and moral dimensions. This study demonstrates how the diversity of qirāʾāt can enrich legal exegesis, offering inclusive and progressive perspectives, while creating space for alternative readings that support gender-equitable and contextually grounded understandings of Islamic law. It contributes to the broader discourse on Islamic legal hermeneutics and highlights the importance of integrating neglected recitations to advance ethical, gender-conscious, and contextually relevant interpretations
Al-Ikhtilaf Fi At-Tafsir: An Analysis of the Interpretations of Abdurrahman Ibn Nasir As-Sa’di and Muhammad Quraish Shihab Abdullah, Abdullah; Widayati, Romlah; Fitriana, Muhammad Azizan
Darul Hikmah: Jurnal Penelitian Tafsir dan Hadits Vol 11 No 2 (2025): Darul Hikmah: Jurnal Penelitian Hadits dan Tafsir
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ushuluddin (STIU) Darul Hikmah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61086/jstiudh.v11i2.93

Abstract

The interpretation of the Qur'an is a crucial element in understanding the meaning and message of its verses. However, in practice, differences in interpretation, or al-ikhtilaf fi at-tafsir, often occur among both early (salaf) and later (khalaf) scholars, and have existed even since the time of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). Al-ikhtilaf fi at-tafsir is divided into two main types: Disagreement that is reducible to a single meaning and Disagreement that is based on multiple meanings, each with its own forms and characteristics. This study uses a library research method and is qualitative in nature. The author found that As-Sa'di's method in interpreting verses containing al-ikhtilaf involves three approaches: not explaining the existence of a difference and choosing the opinion he deems correct; mentioning the difference without choosing one of the opinions; and explaining the difference, then selecting the opinion he deems correct. Meanwhile, Quraish Shihab uses two approaches: explaining the existence of a difference without choosing one of the opinions, and selecting the opinion he deems correct.
Kedudukan Perempuan dalam Islam (Studi Analisis Komparatif Kitab Tafsir Nazarat fi Kitabillah dan Tafsir Al-Munir) Adiba, Ratu; Widayati, Romlah; Safei, Abdullah
Kordinat: Jurnal Komunikasi antar Perguruan Tinggi Agama Islam Vol. 24 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Komunikasi antar Perguruan Tinggi Agama Islam
Publisher : Kopertais Wilayah I DKI Jakarta dan Banten

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/909pmr29

Abstract

This research aims to examine the status of women in Islam by analyzing Qur’anic verses through a thematic exegesis (maudhu’i) approach and by comparing the interpretations of the female exegete Zainab al-Ghazali in Nazarāt fī Kitābillāh and the contemporary exegete Wahbah al-Zuhaili in Tafsīr al-Munīr. The main focus of this study is to explore how both exegetes interpret verses related to women’s roles, rights, and positions within socio-religious contexts. This study complements previous research, such as Fitriya’s thesis, which exclusively examined Zainab al-Ghazali’s perspectives on gender equality, and Suparno’s thesis, which investigated the thoughts of Muhammad Abduh and Rashid Rida in Tafsīr al-Manār. This research offers a new contribution through a comparative approach between a female and a male exegete on Qur’anic verses concerning women, thereby enriching the field of Qur’anic exegesis and gender studies. The research employs a descriptive qualitative method with a library research approach. Primary data are drawn from the two main tafsir works, while secondary data are obtained from books, scholarly articles, and other supporting literature. The analysis involves comparing both exegetes’ interpretations of ten relevant verses regarding the status of women. The findings reveal that both Zainab al-Ghazali and Wahbah al-Zuhaili emphasize the significance of women’s roles in both domestic and public spheres. However, Zainab highlights the internal struggles and resilience of women, whereas Wahbah tends to offer a more normative and textual interpretation. This study concludes that both exegetes’ thoughts remain highly relevant in addressing contemporary issues such as gender equality, social roles, inheritance rights, women’s leadership, and the persistent social stigma attached to Muslim women. These findings underscore the importance of adopting diverse exegetical approaches to understanding the Qur’anic text in a contextual and responsive manner to contemporary challenges.