Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.607
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Language and Education Journal BAHASTRA Fon: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia KEMBARA PRASASTI: Journal of Linguistics Tarbawi : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Jurnal Kiprah Diksa : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya Genta Bahtera : Jurnal Ilmiah Kebahasaan dan Kesastraan International Journal of Social Science, Educational, Economics, Agriculture Research, and Technology (IJSET) JCP (Jurnal Cahaya Pendidikan) Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan ASEAN Journal of Educational Research and Technology
Indah Pujiastuti
Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia- Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 17 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : BAHASTRA

 1 
PENGARUH METODE DISKUSI BERBANTUAN MIND MAPPING TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MAHASISWA PADA MATA KULIAH SEMANTIK PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN BAHASA DAN SASTRA INDONESIA UMRAH TAHUN AKADEMIK 2014/2015 Pujiastuti, Indah
BAHASTRA Vol 37, No 2 (2017): Bahastra
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1671.094 KB) | DOI: 10.26555/bahastra.v37i2.6855

Abstract

This research aims to know the influence of the method of discussion-based mind mapping to learning outcomes of Semantics. Discussion and  mind mapping involves the right brain and left, as well as a focus on learning styles of students.  This study is about Praeksperimental Design Static Group Comparison. The population in this study was all student who became grade of 2013 amounthed to 68 people.  The test results are then analyzed by t-test. The result indicated that experimental classes have an average score of 66, while the control class has an average score of 44. T and t count comparison table of experimental groups showed that t count (6.708) > t table (3.21). T and t count comparison table the control group suggests that t count (6.713) > t table (0.678). The results of the Sig (2-tailed) any two groups indicating that the Sig (2-tailed) confidence level < (0.025). Those results indicated was Ho denied and Ha received, which means the discussion using mind mapping the positive effect to the learning outcomes of Semantics. 
PENGARUH METODE DISKUSI BERBANTUAN MIND MAPPING TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MAHASISWA PADA MATA KULIAH SEMANTIK PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN BAHASA DAN SASTRA INDONESIA UMRAH TAHUN AKADEMIK 2014/2015 Indah Pujiastuti
BAHASTRA Vol 37, No 2 (2017): Bahastra
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1671.094 KB) | DOI: 10.26555/bahastra.v37i2.6855

Abstract

This research aims to know the influence of the method of discussion-based mind mapping to learning outcomes of Semantics. Discussion and  mind mapping involves the right brain and left, as well as a focus on learning styles of students.  This study is about Praeksperimental Design Static Group Comparison. The population in this study was all student who became grade of 2013 amounthed to 68 people.  The test results are then analyzed by t-test. The result indicated that experimental classes have an average score of 66, while the control class has an average score of 44. T and t count comparison table of experimental groups showed that t count (6.708) > t table (3.21). T and t count comparison table the control group suggests that t count (6.713) > t table (0.678). The results of the Sig (2-tailed) any two groups indicating that the Sig (2-tailed) confidence level < (0.025). Those results indicated was Ho denied and Ha received, which means the discussion using mind mapping the positive effect to the learning outcomes of Semantics. 
Co-Authors Dadang S Anshori Dadang Sunendar DIAN LESTARI Dioni Lestari, Rien Nana Raihana Askurny Pradipta Agustina, Pradipta Sastromihardjo, Andoyo Siti Inganah Syihabuddin Syihabuddin Vismania S. Damaianti, Vismania S.