Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.713
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum Khairun Law Journal Unes Law Review Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Sang Pencerah: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton Ganesha Law Review JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Legal Spirit Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Jurnal Supremasi KHAIRUN LAW JOURNAL Administrative and Environmental Law Review Journal Of Human And Education (JAHE) Journal of Legal Contemplation
Malik, Faissal
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 31 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 31 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Legal Analysis of the Application of Article 363 of the Criminal Code in the Sekayu District Court Decision Number 70/Pid.B/2021/PN Sky Regarding Theft in a Plantation Area M. Saleh, Tri Wahyuni; Malik, Faissal; Hasan, Aslan
Journal of Legal Contemplation Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): Journal of Legal Contemplation
Publisher : Candela Edutech Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63288//jlc.v1i3.12

Abstract

This study aims to examine the suitability of the indictment with Article 363 paragraph (1) 4 of the Criminal Code used by the Public Prosecutor in decision Number 70/Pid.b/2021/PN Sky and whether the Judge's considerations in decision Number 70/Pi.B/2021/PN Sky were in accordance with the facts of the trial. The type of research used is normative legal research, which is a method of legal research conducted by examining library materials or secondary data. Based on research, it can be seen that there is a discrepancy between the indictment and Article 363 paragraph (1) point 4 of the Criminal Code used by the Public Prosecutor, as well as between the verdict and the judge's consideration, which does not or does not fully correspond with the facts of the trial, so that the article in the Public Prosecutor's indictment is still used. Both prosecutors and judges should apply the principle of lex specialis derogate lex generali in applying articles in indictments and in court decisions, so that justice can truly be upheld.
Co-Authors AA Sudharmawan, AA Abd. Wahab, Muhammad Zaki Abdulajid, Syawal Ambiya, Aulia Rahman Amriyanto Andika Adhyaksa Andrianto, David Anshar, Anshar Anwar, M. Afdal Hi Arief Budiono Arisa Murni Rada Faisal, Fatma Fathurrahim, Fathurrahim Gultom, Ambi Hanafi, Muhammad Amin Hasan, Aslan Heri setiawan J. Kotta, Ridjal Jafril, Muammar Kamel, Rusli Larumpa, Renaldi Markus M. Djafar, Muhammad M. Saleh, Tri Wahyuni Mufti, Ahmad Nam Rumkel Papuluwa, Nurlaila Kadarwati Rusdin Alauddin Sudarsono, M. Agus F Sulani, Jitro Suwarti Suwarti Syafari, Tri Tuanaya, Nurjanah