Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 27 Documents
Search

ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN HUKUM HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PADA TINGKATAN PENGADILAN YANG BERBEDA (STUDI PUTUSAN PERKARA TIPIKOR DANA DESA TUGUIS KABUPATEN HALMAHERA UTARA TAHUN 2022) Sulani, Jitro; Malik, Faissal; Anshar, Anshar
Khairun Law Journal Volume 7 Issue 2, March 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v7i2.7609

Abstract

This article discusses legal considerations in court decisions on corruption of village funds at two different court levels based on Decision Number 5/Pid.Sus-TPK/2022/PN Tte at the first level and Decision Number 6/Pid.Sus-TPK/2022/PT Tte at the appeal level. The legal issue lies in the difference in judges' legal considerations related to the application of Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 of the Corruption Eradication Law. This research uses normative legal research with secondary data sourced from primary and secondary legal materials. In the data collection process, data collection techniques are used by means of literature studies which are then processed and analyzed qualitatively. The panel of judges who examined and tried the case of corruption of village funds based on the Corruption Court Decision at the North Maluku High Court Number 6/Pid.Sus-TPK/2022/PT Tte after examining based on legal facts had a different view from the panel of judges at the previous level. The judge at the high court level after examining the case file and based on the legal facts in the trial at the first level concluded that what was proven was not the primary charge of Article 2 paragraph (1) but the secondary charge of Article 3 with all legal considerations. However, in relation to the punishment imposed by the judge at the higher level, there is no difference with the form of punishment imposed by the judge at the first level. Both the imposition of imprisonment, fines and additional punishment in the form of payment of restitution.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pejabat Lelang dalam Hubungan Kedudukan dan Fungsinya Gultom, Ambi; Malik, Faissal; Syafari, Tri
Khairun Law Journal Vol 3, No 1 (2019): Volume 3 Issue 1, September 2019
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v3i1.2956

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perlindungan hukum terhadap Pejabat Lelang dalam kedudukan dan fungsinya. Penulis menganalisis suatu pelaksanaan lelang yang berujung pada penetapan tersangka, penangkapan, dan penahanan serta disidangkan dalam perkara pidana terhadap Pejabat Lelang Sdr. UAM sebagaimana tercantum dalam perkara pidana pada Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar Nomor 15/Pid.B/2016/Pn.Dps jo Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1250K/Pid/2016. Disamping menganalisis perkara pidana dimaksud, penulis juga melakukan kajian terhadap bentuk perlindungan hukum terhadap Pejabat Lelang dalam kedudukan dan fungsinya dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi.
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Ternate Nomor : 177/Pid.B/2018/PN.Tte Dalam Tindak Pidana Pengeroyokan Pada Prespektif Asas Legalitas. Anwar, M. Afdal Hi; Malik, Faissal; Alauddin, Rusdin
Khairun Law Journal Volume 3 Issue 2, March 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v3i2.2896

Abstract

Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Ternate Nomor : 177/ Pid.B/2018/PN.Tte, yang amar putusannya tidak mencantumkan perintah supaya terdakwa ditahan adalah putusan yang hanya didasarkan pada “kebiasaan hakim” dan dasar pertimbangan hakim tersebut tidak memiliki kekuatan  hukum yang mengikat untuk dieksekusi oleh Jaksa selaku eksekotor sebagimana ketentuan Pasal 30 ayat (1) huruf b UU. No 16/2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia. Akibat hukum dalam Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Ternate Nomor : 177/ Pid.B/2018/PN.Tte, yang amar putusannya tidak mencantumkan perintah supaya terdakwa ditahan merupakan putusan yang lemah dan berakibat fatal secara hukum sehingga putusan tersebut dinyatakan batal demi hukum sebagaimana ketentuan hukum yang diatur dalam Pasal 197 Ayat (1)Huruf a-ldan ayat (2) KUHAP serta Putusan tersebut juga telah menyimpangi prinsip-prinsip pokok dalam asas legalitas. Teori yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah  teori asas legalitas, teori tentang putusan dan teori Pemidanaan, yaitu Teori Absolut/Retribusi,  Tujuan/Relatif dan teori Gabungan
Optimization of the Imposition of Additional Compensation Penalties for Corruption Crimes that Harm State Finances Due to the Alternative Choice of Imprisonment as a Substitute (Study of Decision Execution in North Maluku in 2021) Setiawan, Heri; Malik, Faissal; Anshar, Anshar
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2840

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the optimization and effectiveness of imposing additional fines as a substitute for imprisonment in relation to the execution of judgments in North Maluku in 2021, specifically focusing on corruption offenses that harm the state finances. The study employs an empirical legal research approach, utilizing empirical data obtained from interviews and direct observations of human behavior. Three approaches are utilized in this research: legal, conceptual, and case-based approaches. The research findings indicate that the imposition of additional fines as a substitute for imprisonment in corruption cases that harm state finances is still not optimal. Out of the seven cases examined, only two cases resulted in the restitution of the state's financial losses. Furthermore, the research highlights the failure to achieve legal effectiveness due to the insufficient restitution of state financial losses resulting from the availability of the alternative option of imprisonment as a substitute for the additional fines.
Saksi Pelaku yang Bekerjasama pada Pengungkapan Kasus Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Studi Putusan Nomor: 798/PID.B/2022/PN.JKT.SEL) Larumpa, Renaldi Markus; Malik, Faissal; Anshar, Anshar
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1512

Abstract

This research aims to determine and analyze the regulations regarding cooperating perpetrator witnesses as the basis for judicial consideration in determining the status of cooperating perpetrator witnesses in the disclosure of premeditated murder cases in decision number 798/Pid.b/2022/PN.Jkt.Sel. Additionally, the study explores the extent of the involvement of cooperating perpetrator witnesses in general criminal offenses as a form of legal discovery. The research method employed is normative research using a case and legal approach to analyze primary legal materials, such as the court decision number 798/Pid.b/2022/PN.Jkt.Sel, and the Law No. 31 of 2014, SEMA 4 of 2011, and Joint Regulations of 2011. The results of the research indicate that, first: the regulation of cooperating perpetrator witnesses applies only to specific criminal offenses as mentioned. However, the judge's considerations in the a quo decision state that the Defendant Eliezer deserves to be designated as a cooperating perpetrator witness in the premeditated murder case based on the explanation in Article 5 Paragraph (2) of Law No. 31 of 2014 and later other conditions in Article 28 Paragraph (2). Second: Due to the complexity of disclosing serious and organized general criminal cases (casuistic), the conditions regarding the types of penalties are expanded for general criminal offenses with specified limitations.
Legal Analysis of the Application of Article 363 of the Criminal Code in the Sekayu District Court Decision Number 70/Pid.B/2021/PN Sky Regarding Theft in a Plantation Area M. Saleh, Tri Wahyuni; Malik, Faissal; Hasan, Aslan
Journal of Legal Contemplation Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): Journal of Legal Contemplation
Publisher : Candela Edutech Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63288//jlc.v1i3.12

Abstract

This study aims to examine the suitability of the indictment with Article 363 paragraph (1) 4 of the Criminal Code used by the Public Prosecutor in decision Number 70/Pid.b/2021/PN Sky and whether the Judge's considerations in decision Number 70/Pi.B/2021/PN Sky were in accordance with the facts of the trial. The type of research used is normative legal research, which is a method of legal research conducted by examining library materials or secondary data. Based on research, it can be seen that there is a discrepancy between the indictment and Article 363 paragraph (1) point 4 of the Criminal Code used by the Public Prosecutor, as well as between the verdict and the judge's consideration, which does not or does not fully correspond with the facts of the trial, so that the article in the Public Prosecutor's indictment is still used. Both prosecutors and judges should apply the principle of lex specialis derogate lex generali in applying articles in indictments and in court decisions, so that justice can truly be upheld.
Civil Forfeiture as a Legal Mechanism for Recovery of State Losses in Corruption Cases in Indonesia Malik, Faissal; Amriyanto; Syafari, Tri
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v8i1.8876

Abstract

The recovery of state financial losses from corruption remains a central challenge in Indonesia's anti-corruption framework. Despite the availability of various recovery mechanisms, questions persist regarding their effectiveness and conformity wth the principle of proportionality and national legal policy.   This study examines the application of proportionality in state loss recovery policies and formulates a future-oriented legal policy to enhance recovery effectiveness.   Employing a normative legal research method, this study applies Robert Alexy's proportionality test, suitability, necessity, and proportionality in the strict sense to assess criminal restitution, post-conviction asset confiscation, and administrative and civil forfeiture mechanisms.   The findings reveal that Indonesia's current recovery framework is fragmented and predominantly reliant on repressive, criminal-based approaches, resulting in limited asset recovery.   The novelty of this study lies in its proportionality-based formulation of civil forfeiture as an integrated administrative recovery model that prevents asset dissipation while safeguarding due process and property rights.   This study argues that proportionality does not weaken anti-corruption efforts, but rather provides a normative foundation for designing recovery policies that are effective, balanced, and capable of delivering measurable public benefits.