Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Protection: Journal Of Land And Environmental Law

Determination Of The Judges Freedom In Indonesia On The Straf Minimum Rules IMRAN, Suwitno Y; APRIPARI, Apripari
Protection: Journal Of Land And Environmental Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): Protection: Journal Of Land And Environmental Law. (July – October 2022)
Publisher : Indonesia Strategic Sustainability

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (285.6 KB) | DOI: 10.38142/pjlel.v1i1.281

Abstract

Limiting the freedom of judges in expressing legal logics in each particular case will only hinder the process of seeking true values of justice. This freedom does not mean being free without being accompanied by legal responsibilities. the philosophical aspect of the principle of freedom of judges, and the ideal model for the application of the principle of freedom of judges in Indonesia in the minimum rules straf system, is the subject that will be discussed in this article. The normative research method used in this article uses a statutory, historical and conceptual approach and uses primary and secondary legal materials that are presented descriptively. The conclusion obtained confirms that the aspect of judges' freedom philosophically in principle begins with the application of the division of powers namely, legislative, executive and judicial which is the philosophical basis that the judicial branch of power is an independent branch of power and judges have the freedom to make interpretations, legal findings based on the conscience and conviction of the judge. As for the straf minimum rules case, the ideal model for implementing the principle of judge freedom can be realized through the theory of balance, namely that judges in deciding cases are not based on the context of laws and regulations and must consider aspects of the judge's belief even though the decision is contrary to the law, but as long as it is related to the judge's belief, then it can be justified on the basis of the judge's freedom.
Co-Authors Abdul Hamid Tome Abdul Madjid Abdullah, Nikmal A. Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara Adriani A.L Gula Afini Maulana Ahmad Ahmad Ahmad Ahmad Aristama Mega Jaya Badu, Lisnawaty W. Bahua, Salwa Salsabilah Cahyani Tute Churniawan, Erifendi Dewi Nuramanah Matte Dian Ekawaty Ismail Dolot Alhasni Bakung Erifendi Churniawan Farida Tuharea Fatmawaty Thalib Fence M Wantu Fenty U. puluhulawa Fikri, Moh. Gita Septiani Abdullah Hadju, Zainal Abdul Aziz Ibrahim, Erni R. Ilawadini, Nengah Imran, Switno Yutye Inayah Dzulhijjah Asril Irlan Puluhulawa Irsan Irsan Ishwara, Ade Sathya Sanathana Jahati, Nurdiana S.M. Jaya, Aristama Mega Jufryanto Puluhulawa Julisa Aprilia Kaluku Kaku, Rismanto Lisnawaty W. Badu Maku, Dwi Citra Maharani Mamu, Karlin Z Mantali, Avelia Rahma Y. Mantali, Avelia Rahmah Y Maria Yeti Andrias Moh Ikbal Moh. Elson I.M.Tandesa Moh. R.U. Puluhulawa Moh. Rusdiyanto Puluhulawa Moha, Rivaldi Mohamad Agil Monoarfa Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar Mohamad Nurul Hajj Dhuhakusuma Harun Mohammad AbdAllah Alshawabkeh Mohammad Hakim Pratama Rahim Mointi, Nurul Ananda Sahwa Muhamad Rusdiyanto Puluhuluwa Muhammad Fadlan Ali Mutia Cherawaty Thalib Nirwan Junus Novendri M Nggilu Nurikah, Nurikah Nurul Fazri Elfikri Nurwahyudin, Dindin S Pakaya, Putri Regina S Piloto, Ainun Potale, Mutiara Rasyid, Rahmat Eka Putra Sabihi, Abdul Rizky Sarson, Moh Taufiq Zulfikar Siti Nurlaila A. Imani Sri Devi, Sri Sri Nanang Meiske Kamba Sri Olawati Suaib Suwitno Yutye Imran Swarianata, Vivi U. Puluhulawa, Moh. Rusdiyanto Vifi Swarianata Widitsani, Fiddar Bidawan Wirnangsi Puluhulawa Yassine, Chami Yulianus Payzon Aituru Zainal Hadju Zamroni Abdussamad Zulkifli Zulkifli Suratinoyo