Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 35 Documents
Search

Implications of Separation of Dispute Resolution of Election Results in Indonesia Siboy, Ahmad
Hang Tuah Law Journal VOLUME 9 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Hang Tuah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30649/htlj.v9i1.275

Abstract

Presidential, regional, and village head elections are forms of elections that stand on the principle of popular sovereignty. However, in terms of resolving disputes over election results, the pattern of resolution of the three types of elections is different from one another and does not show a pattern of handling that is fair and in harmony with one another. This research aims to explain the differences in the handling patterns of the settlement of disputes over the results of the Presidential Elections, Regional Head Elections, and Pilkades (Vllage Head Elections) and the implications caused. This research used normative juridical research with a conceptual approach, legislation, and case approach. The results showed that the Constitutional Court adjudicated the Presidential Election, the Regional Head Election was adjudicated by a Special Judicial Body, while the Pilkades did not have a judicial process but a settlement process carried out by the Regent, even though the Regent is an executive official or political position. The different patterns of settlement indicate that: (i) there is a disregard for the similar characteristics of disputes over election results and the handling of disputes over Pilkades results as a settlement process that is ruled out considering that there is no judicial institution authorized to adjudicate until the absence of procedural law. (ii) Prioritization. When the election result dispute resolution institution is separated into three different institutions, it certainly also reveals the different treatment of each result dispute resolution and ignores the principle of simple justice.
The Design of Preventive Control on Local Delegated Legislation: A Case Study of Regional Head Regulations Siboy, Ahmad; Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin
Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 8 Issue 1 (2025) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aimed to map the urgency and design of preventive controls against Regional Head Regulations. Delegated legislations are regulations issued to carry out primary legislation. In the context of regional-level legislation, the Regional Head Regulation has a function as a delegated legislation for Regional Regulations (in bahasa well known as Peraturan Daerah (Perda)) so that it must be monitored and controlled to make it not deviate from its primary legislation or not conflict with higher statutory regulations. However, the form of control over delegated legislations at the regional level still needs to be regressive, not preventive. Preventive controls are needed to ensure the enactment of a Delegated legislation that does not harm the rights of citizens. The research problem in this study was to understand the control mechanism for the current and future local regulations, especially on regional head regulations. The results showed that preventive controls must support the repressive control that applies to regional delegated legislations to prevent the enactment of delegated legislations that can harm people’s rights, ultra vires, and others. The preventive control over regional delegated legislations can be in the form of preventive control conducted by the legislative, executive, and judiciary bodies.
Menggali Potensi Sumber Daya Alam Menjadi Kawasan Pariwisata Guna Meningkatkan Pendapatan Desa Siboy, Ahmad
Jurnal Pembelajaran Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (JP2M) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33474/jp2m.v1i1.5009

Abstract

Desa Jambangan mempunyai banyak potensi alam salah satunya wisata air yang memiliki potensi untuk dikembangkan. Sumber bantal merupakan sumber kehidupan bagi masyarakat desa Jambangan, air yang mengalir ke rumah warga bersumber dari sumber bantal. Sumber bantal pada tahun 1980-an pernah menjadi tempat wisata bagi masyarakat desa Jambangan dan sekitarnya, tentunya karena sumber bantal dikelola dan dirawat dengan baik oleh penduduk sekitar, sehingga menjadikan sumber bantal. dijadikan tempat wisata yang menyenangkan. Teknik observasi atau pengamatan yang digunakan penulis untuk memperoleh gambaran yang tepat mengenai perilaku pemerintah dan masyarakat serta situasi-situasi yang berkaitan dengan topik di lokasi. Obyek wisata air sumber bantal menjadi potensi utama di desa Jambangan dengan suasana yang masih asri dan sejuk. Keindahan tersebut dapat dilihat dari pemandangan yang tercipta secara alami, tekstur tanah, dan kemurnian air. Jadi obyek wisata air sumber bantal ini sangat cocok sekali untuk para wisatawan baik anak muda atau yang sudah berkeluarga, baik wisatawan domestik maupun non-domestik. Wisata air sumber bantal memiliki potensi yang cukup besar sebagai tempat tujuan wisata. Untuk dapat mengembangkan obyek wisata air sumber bantal ini pemerintah desa Jambangan harus bekerjasama dan gotong royong dengan warga sekitar, memperbaiki fasilitas-fasilitas yang telah ada di obyek wisata air sumber bantal. Seperti menambah spot-spot foto yang menarik. Upaya untuk meningkatkan jumlah wisatawan yang berkunjung ke obyek wisata air sumber bantal salah satunya adalah dengan menggunakan sistem promosi melalui media sosial seperti instagram, facebook, whatapps, dan aplikasi sosial media lainnya.
The Duality of Administrative and Communicative Powers in Legislative Drafting: Evidence from East Java Bagijo, Himawan Estu; Siboy, Ahmad; Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin; Affan, Mohammad
Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): Navigating Legal Landscapes: Exploring Justice Development in Indonesia and the
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jils.vol9i1.4533

Abstract

The classical legal concept within executive and legislative scopes is no longer adequate to help understand the strategic measures taken by the Provincial Government of East Java and the potential of communicative actions of the DPRD of the Province of East Java. The making of autonomous regulations tends to be exclusive and overlooks the involvement of the public as the origin from which the procedures of legislative drafting began. The legal thought introduced by Habermas came as a solution to legislation-related issues, but it seems to be accepted only by the dialogue between legislators and the executive body. This article aims at analyzing the interaction that takes place between discourse theory and the duality of administrative and communicative powers by Habermas relating to the strategic measures taken by the Provincial Government of East Java. A normative-juridical method was used, involving the literature study of legal concepts and the data revealing the performance of the Legal Bureau of the Provincial Government of East Jav a. Communicative measures exist in the construction of autonomous regulations while facilitating measures and evaluations of autonomous regulations set by the regency or municipality represent a strategic example.
Desain Koalisi Permanen Partai Politik dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Indonesia Siboy, Ahmad
Jurnal Inovasi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik (JISoP) Vol 3 No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33474/jisop.v3i1.9716

Abstract

The pattern of political party coalitions that fluctuate ahead of the general election indicates that the coalitions are not built based on substantial interests but pragmatic interests. As a result, the status of each party becomes unclear, which one acts on the side of the government and which one acts as the opposition. This study aims to discuss the options of permanent coalition patterns that can be applied. The research problem of this study was “What is the permanent coalition design that can be applied in the Indonesian government system?”. This study used normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case-study approaches. The results indicated that a permanent coalition is needed to strengthen the coalition pattern of political parties as a support for the Indonesian government system. The permanent coalition design that can be applied is a two-pole model, in which there will only two coalition groups of political parties: parties supporting the government and parties opposing the government. This two-pole model can be balanced in terms of the power between a coalition of government parties and a coalition of opposition parties. Another design that can be adopted is the coalitions which are established based on the similarity of the ideology of each political party.
The Constitutionality of Appointment of Acting Regional Heads in Constitutional Court Judgment Siboy, Ahmad; Muhammad Nur
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 13, No. 2, December 2023
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v13i2.2794

Abstract

ABSTRACT  Purpose of the study: This research aimed to describe the ratio decindi of the Constitutional Court's judgment in terms of judicial review regarding the appointment of acting regional heads and its implications on the meaning of sovereignty in its implementation. Methodology: This research is normative legal research because it is based on the Constitutional Court Judgment Number 67/PUU-XIX/2021. The approaches used are the statutory regulations approach, the judge's decisoon approach, the conceptual approach, the case approach, and the philosophical approach. Results: The Constitutional Court stated that the appointment of acting regional heads as a result of the postponement of the Pilkada was a legal policy chosen by the legislators (People's Representative Council and President) which qualified as a constitutional legal alternative considering that the delay of the Pilkada had no impact on reducing the right to vote and the right to be candidate. Applications of this study: This research can be used to develop courses in general election law and regional head elections, especially in understanding how the Constitutional Court considers a decision. Apart from that, this research can also be used as a consideration in efforts to change the law regarding regional elections or can also be used as additional evidence if another judicial review of the regulations regarding the postponement of regional elections. Novelty/ Orginalty of this study: There has been no previous research that specifically analyzes the Constitutional Court's judgment regarding the appointment of acting regional heads in terms of the legitimacy of the meaning of popular sovereignty and its implications for the practice of appointing acting regional heads. The legitimacy of the appointment of acting regional heads in the Constitutional Court’s judgment is an interpretation that has degrade the challenge of the meaning or position of regional heads, in which the status has experienced shifting in meaning from a political position to a career position. As a result, the people's right to determine their own regional heads is taken over by the central government. The shift from the people's right to choose to the right of the President and Ministers to appoint regional heads is a shift that leads to a shift in sovereignty, namely, from the sovereignty of the people to the sovereignty of the ruler. Keywords: Regional head, Ratio decidendi, Popular sovereignty.   ABSTRAK Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguraikan ratio decindi putusan MK dalam hal uji materi tentang penunjukkan penjabat kepala daerah serta implikasinya terhadap makna kedaulatan rakyat dalam implementasi penunjukkan kepala daerah. Metodologi: Penelitian ini termasuk dalam jenis penelitian yuridis normatif karena berpijak pada putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 67/PUU-XIX/2021. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, pendekatan putusan hakim, pendekatan konsep, pendakatan kasus dan pendekatan filosofis. Temuan: Mahkamah Konstitusi menyatakan bahwa penunjukkan penjabat kepala daerah sebagai akibat dari penundaan penyelenggaraan Pilkada merupakan politik hukum yang dipilih pembentuk undang-undang (DPR dan Presiden) yang terkualifikasi sebagai pilihan hukum yang konstitusional mengingat penundaan Pilkada tersebut tidak berdampak terhadap pengurangan hak untuk dipilih (right to vote) dan hak untuk memilih (right tobe candidate). Kegunaan: Penelitian ini dapat dimanfaatkan bagi pengembangan mata kuliah hukum pemilihan umum dan pemilihan kepala daerah khususnya hal mengetahui bagaimana MK membuat pertimbangan dalam suatu putusan. Disamping itu, penelitian ini juga dapat dijadikan pertimbangan dalam upaya perubahan undang-undang tentang Pilkada atau dapat pula dijadikan sebagai tambahan dalil apabila akan dilakukan uji materi lagi terhadap aturan tentang penundaan Pilkada. Kebaruan/Orisinalitas: Belum terdapat penelitian terdahulu yang menganalisis secara khusus putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tentang penunjukkan penjabat kepala daerah dari sisi legitimasi makna kedaulatan rakyat dan implikasinya dalam praktek penunjukkan penjabat kepala daerah. Legitimasi penunjukkan penjabat kepala daerah dalam putusan Mahkamah konstitusi merupakan tafsir yang telah mereduksi tantang makna atau kedudukan kepala daerah dimana kedudukan kepala daerah mengalami pergeseran makna dari jabatan politis menjadi jabatan karir. Akibatnya, hak rakyat untuk menentukan sendiri kepala daerahnya diambil alih oleh pemerintah pusat. Pergeseran hak untuk memilih dari rakyat secara langsung menjadi hak Presiden dan Menteri dalam hal penunjukkan kepala daerah merupakan pergeseran yang menyebabkan terjadinya peralihan kedaulatan. Yakni, dari kedaulatan rakyat menjadi kedaulatan penguasa. Keywords: Penjabat kepala daerah, ratio decidendi, Kedaulatan Rakyat.
Decentralized Design of Dispute Resolution for Regional Head Elections in Indonesia Siboy, Ahmad
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Advancing Justice, Rights, and Governance in a Digital and Decentralized World
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v8i2.14770

Abstract

The pattern of resolving disputes in regional head elections still adheres to a centralistic system or is carried out by institutions at the central level even though regional head elections are a regime of regional government not central government. This study aims to outline the urgency and challenges of decentralizing dispute resolution of regional elections. At the same time, an ideal design form for election dispute resolution with a decentralized model is also offered ranging from relief, competence to procedural law. This research uses a normative type of research with an approach to the provisions of laws and regulations, concepts, and cases. The centralization of electoral dispute resolution has implications for regime misalignment, making for a corrupt judicial process and requiring high accommodation costs. The antithesis to the centralization model of dispute resolution is through decentralization, which is an election dispute resolution that is tried at the regional level according to the location of the election so that there is a harmony of the regime model between the dispute resolution regime and the electoral regime. The decentralization model starts from the judicial institutions that stand at the regional level, their absolute and relative competence and procedural law starting from subjectum letis, objectum letis and verdicts.
The Logic Position of State Emergency Law in the Implementation of Regional Head Elections during the Covid-19 Pandemic Ahmad Siboy; Sholahuddin Al-Fatih
Unnes Law Journal Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022): April, 2022
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v8i1.37358

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe the position of the state emergency law as the basis for the issuance of the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law and to examine the consistency of the position of the state emergency law in the implementation of regional elections during the pandemic. This study used normative juridical research with conceptual, statutory, philosophical, and case-study approaches. Sources of legal materials in this study consisted of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results showed that the Covid-19 pandemic is declared a non-natural disaster to be qualified as coercive urgency, which is a requirement for enacting the state emergency law. However, there is a logical inconsistency about the Covid-19 pandemic concerning regional elections. On the one hand, the Covid-19 is used as an argument to declare the state in an emergency so that it is necessary to issue a state emergency law in the form of the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law. On the other hand, the regional head election is still be held during the pandemic. If the Covid-19 pandemic is considered a state emergency, the regional head election must be postponed until the pandemic is over.
Reinforcing Central Government’s Authority over Regional Governments in the System of Indonesian Governance Ahmad Siboy
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 21 No. 1 (2022): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v21i1.1998

Abstract

Principally, a regional government represents the extended hands of the central government in controlling a regional area. Regional governments are not supposed to run activities not congruent with the policies set by the central government. However, regional governments are often found in contravention of the policies of the central government. This research maps what causes this contravention and the reasons for reinforcing the authority of the central government regarding its connection with regional governments. This research employed normative-juridical methods, statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, revealing that this noncompliance with the central government is sparked by the conditions where a regional head is elected by the members of the public, the president has no right to eject a regional head from his/her tenure, and a regional head is fully authorized to run a regional area, including the regional budgeting. The design of the reinforcement of the authority of the authority of the central government over regional governments is required based on the principle of the unitary state and to guarantee the harmonious policies set by those the regional governments and central government. This design may involve the policy of the central government to take over the governance of regional areas following the deadlock, permit issuance, and the authority of the central government to impose sanctions on regional heads.
Indonesian Presidential Election on Presidential Threshold Policy: Evidence from Various Countries Siboy, Ahmad; Sholahuddin Al-Fatih
Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/jhcls.v5i3.639

Abstract

The study develops a constitutional design to regulate the number of presidential and vice-presidential candidates following the Constitutional Court’s annulment of the presidential threshold. It observes that the absence of a model framework from the Court creates a regulatory vacuum that may expose the presidential election to political fragmentation, heightened polarization, and procedural inefficiencies. To address this issue, the research aims to construct a constitutional framework capable of enhancing electoral stability while sustaining democratic competitiveness. The study employs a normative juridical method supported by statutory analysis, case studies, and comparative assessment to identify feasible regulatory alternatives. The analysis demonstrates that the most effective approach to limiting the number of candidates is to regulate the number of political parties eligible to participate in general elections, given their role as the primary gatekeepers of nomination. The findings propose several regulatory instruments, including a moratorium on the establishment of new political parties, stricter requirements for party formation, enhanced eligibility criteria for electoral participation, a minimum age requirement for political parties, a maximum threshold for the number of qualified parties, and the disqualification of previously registered parties that fail to meet revised standards. The study concludes that these mechanisms collectively form a coherent constitutional strategy for maintaining a manageable number of presidential candidates and ensuring the continuity, integrity, and effective governance of the electoral process.