Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.324
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DE JURE Bestuur FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Arena Hukum Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Pembaharuan Hukum Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi Jurnal Inovasi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Jurnal Pembelajaran Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (JP2M) Unnes Law Journal Keadilan JHCLS Jurnal Abdiraja Jurnal Konstitusi Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Perspektif Hukum Hang Tuah Law Journal Ahmad Dahlan Legal Perspective Keadilan Lex Scientia Law Review JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) Jurnal Jurisprudence Unnes Law Journal : Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang
Ahmad Siboy
Universitas Islam Malang
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Dentistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 32 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 32 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
PENEGASAN DAN PERLUASAN OBJEK DAN SUBJEK SENGKETA ANTAR PESERTA DALAM PROSES PEMILIHAN UMUM Jamil Jamil; Ahmad Siboy
HUKUM PEMBANGUNAN EKONOMI Vol 10, No 1 (2022): Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/hpe.v10i1.62768

Abstract

This article analyzes the dispute settlement in general elections, especially on the norms of Article 466 of Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections, which regulates the formulation of electoral process disputes which do not emphasize the object of dispute between election participants or there has been a vacuum of the norm. On the object of dispute between election participants. This research is normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that the object of the dispute between election participants and the election organizers (KPU) is a decree issued by the election administrator, who is a state administrative official. Meanwhile, the disputes between election participants are civil disputes whose object of the dispute is an unlawful act. Thus it needs to be an affirmation of the object of the dispute because disputes do not only occur between election participants and election organizers but can also occur between election participants. with people (naturlijk persoon) and legal entities
Implikasi Pola Koalisi Partai Politik terhadap Dinamika Penyelenggaraan Pemilihan Presiden Indonesia Ahmad Siboy
Perspektif Hukum VOLUME 21 ISSUE 1
Publisher : Faculty of Law Hang Tuah University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The coalition of political parties in nominating the presidential and vice-presidential candidate pair is a necessity. This is because none of the political parties received a majority vote, making them need support from other parties to meet the presidential threshold requirement. However, the established coalition mostly is not based on the same vision, mission, and ideology. The coalition is based on the developed political situations and conditions or for power-sharing such as sharing ministerial seats. As a result, the composition of the coalition in each presidential election always changes. This is obviously a coalition pattern that is oriented only to pragmatism. The research problems in this study were as follows. (1) What is the basis of the coalition of political parties in Indonesia? (2) What is the pattern of political party coalitions in Indonesia? (3) Why does a permanent coalition pattern between political parties need to occur? This study analyzed the coalition pattern of political parties and its implications for the implementation of the presidential election in Indonesia. The results showed that the coalition pattern of political parties in Indonesia occurred because most of the political parties do not make their vision, mission, and ideology become the basis for determining the direction of the coalition. Political parties build coalitions based on the agreement for a certain number of ministerial seats promised by the presidential and vice-presidential candidate pairs that they nominate. Political parties that were previously rivals (from the winning presidential and vice-presidential candidate pairs) can transfer their supporting positions to the elected presidential and vice-presidential candidate pairs. In fact, a permanent coalition is highly needed to ensure a check and balance of the winner of the general election. This means that the composition of political parties supporting the losing presidential and vice-presidential candidate pairs must be ready to become parties in the opposition ranks, not to become government coalition parties.
The Relationship between DKPP and PTUN Decisions regarding Ethical Violation by General Election Administrators Ahmad Siboy; Dewi Cahyandari
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 3 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1936

Abstract

The commissioner of the general election administration was discharged through the decision of the General Election Administrator Honorary Council (DKPP). The decision is not final and binding at the executive branch, considering that the decision can be cancelled by the Administrative Court. This study aims to define the authority of DKPP and PTUN in resolving ethical violations committed by election administrators and parse the implications and relationships of the decisions of the two institutions. This paper also proposes an ideal concept for the design of solving ethical violations of election administrators in the future. This study uses normative juridical methods. The results showed that the DKPP and PTUN have overlapping authority but with different decisions. DKPP purely adjudicates ethical issues, and the Administrative Court adjudicates the Presidential Decree, which is a follow-up to the DKPP decision. To avoid conflicting decisions on cases that intersect, violations of the code of ethics in the future must be resolved with a settlement mechanism by the judiciary.
The Relationship between DKPP and PTUN Decisions regarding Ethical Violation by General Election Administrators Ahmad Siboy; Dewi Cahyandari
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 19, No 3 (2022)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (338.65 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1936

Abstract

The commissioner of the general election administration was discharged through the decision of the General Election Administrator Honorary Council (DKPP). The decision is not final and binding at the executive branch, considering that the decision can be cancelled by the Administrative Court. This study aims to define the authority of DKPP and PTUN in resolving ethical violations committed by election administrators and parse the implications and relationships of the decisions of the two institutions. This paper also proposes an ideal concept for the design of solving ethical violations of election administrators in the future. This study uses normative juridical methods. The results showed that the DKPP and PTUN have overlapping authority but with different decisions. DKPP purely adjudicates ethical issues, and the Administrative Court adjudicates the Presidential Decree, which is a follow-up to the DKPP decision. To avoid conflicting decisions on cases that intersect, violations of the code of ethics in the future must be resolved with a settlement mechanism by the judiciary.
URGENSI PEMISAHAN KEWENANGAN MENGADILI PERSELISIHAN HASIL PEMILIHAN UMUM SERENTAK Dewi Cahyandari; Ahmad Siboy; Sudarsono Sudarsono
Arena Hukum Vol. 13 No. 1 (2020)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2020.01301.4

Abstract

AbstractProblems arises in the implementation of elections between the election of the President / Vice President who are no longer held separately such as previous Elections. The technical implications are related to the ability of the Constitutional Court to adjudicate disputes over the legislative and presidential elections which are certainly unbalanced with the number of justices and the limited time. This study aims to map the problems experienced by the Constitutional Court in adjudicating disputes over simultaneous election results. The research method used is normative legal research using conceptual, legislation, history and case approach. The results shows that a separation of authority is needed between the disputes over the results of the presidential / vice presidential election with disputes over the results of the DPR, DPD and DPRD elections. The separation is needed to ensure that the election dispute resolution process does not accumulate in one judicial institution and results in a decision which passes the time limit given. With the separation of authority in adjudicating disputes over the results of the presidential election and legislative elections, the Constitutional Court will only focus on adjudicating cases of outcome disputes and other institutions will also focus on prosecuting thousands of legislative electoral disputes. AbstrakTerdapat permasalahan dalam penyelenggaraan pemilihan antara pemilihan Presiden/wakil Presiden yang tidak lagi digelar terpisah. Implikasi teknis berkaitan dengan kemampuan MK dalam mengadili perselisihan pemilu legislatif dan Pilpres yang tentu tidak berimbang dengan jumlah hakim konstitusi dan limitasi waktu yang dimiliki. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memetakan problematika yang dialami oleh MK dalam mengadili perselisihan hasil pemilu serentak. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konsep, peraturan perundang-undangan, sejarah dan kasus. Hasilnya, diperlukan pemisahan kewenangan mengadili antara perselisihan hasil pemilihan umum Presiden/wakil Presiden dengan perselisihan hasil pemilihan umum DPR, DPD, dan DPRD demi menjamin proses penyelesaian perselisihan hasil pemilihan yang tidak menumpuk disatu lembaga peradilan dan berakibat pada putusan yang melewati batas waktu yang diberikan. Pemisahan ini akan membuat Mahkamah Konstitusi hanya fokus mengadili perkara perselisihan hasil saja dan lembaga lain juga fokus mengadili perselisihan Pileg yang jumlahnya ribuan. 
Alternatif Desain Penyelenggaraan Pemilihan Umum Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Ahmad Siboy
Arena Hukum Vol. 15 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2022.01501.10

Abstract

Pilihan penyelenggaraan Pemilu serentak untuk memilih anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Daerah, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah, dan Presiden/Wakil Presiden dalam satu hari yang sama telah menyebabkan banyaknya masalah pada tataran regulasi dan teknis sehingga menjadikan Pemilu tidak demokratis, efektif dan efisien. Oleh karenanya, perlu dikaji kembali tentang makna dan alternatif desain penyelengaraan Pemilu serentak yang tepat. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan konsep, pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, pendekatan sejarah dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Pemilu harus digelar serentak namun bukan berarti tidak dapat dipisah dalam beberapa tahapan penyelenggaraan. Terdapat banyak model pemisahan penyelenggaraan Pemilu serentak yang tetap dinyatakan konstitusional seperti Pemisahan penyelenggaraan berdasarkan kepada pembagian Pemilu Lokal dan Nasional, pemisahan penyelenggaraan berdasarkan tingkatan wilayah dan pemisahan penyelenggaraan kualifikasi cabang kekuasaan. Dengan berbagai tawaran desain tersebut maka penyelenggaraan Pemilu serentak tidak lagi dilaksanakan dalam waktu satu hari untuk pemungutan suaranya sehingga dapat mencegah banyaknya penyelenggara Pemilu yang meninggal dunia dan membuat keseluruhan proses Pemilu dan Penyelesaian sengketa Pemilu berjalan sesuai dengan prinsip-prinsip Pemilu yang diamanatkan oleh konstitusi.
Legal Social Justice in Appointment Non-Definitive Regional Heads toward Welfare State Ahmad Siboy; Sholahuddin Al-Fatih; Devi Triasari; Hilaire Tegnan
BESTUUR Vol 11, No 1 (2023): Bestuur
Publisher : Administrative Law Departement Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Mare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/bestuur.v11i1.71055

Abstract

The process of resolving administrative violations in the appointment of non-definitive regional heads that have not been regulated can threaten democratic values. Likewise, there has not been a judicial institution that has been given special authority to try it. This study aims to provide a regulatory model or settlement of administrative violations in the appointment of non-definitive regional heads in the welfare state. This study is a normative legal research that uses legal theory to settle administrative violations, legal protection, the welfare state, and Pancasila democracy. The study results show that the judicial mechanism for appointing non-definitive regional heads has a specificity that cannot be resolved through general State Administrative dispute resolution. In the USA, election disputes were resolved through the courts, whereas, in Australia, the Electoral Management Bodies determine the mayoral elections dispute. A design that can be chosen for the judicial process for appointing a non-definitive regional head is proposed, namely by granting authority to Bawaslu to resolve administrative violations through the Special Court mechanism. The granting of judicial authority can fulfill the basic principles of fast, open, and constitutional non-definitive regional head appointment dispute resolution.
The Logic Position of State Emergency Law in the Implementation of Regional Head Elections during the Covid-19 Pandemic Ahmad Siboy; Sholahuddin Al-Fatih
Unnes Law Journal Vol 8 No 1 (2022): Promoting Law, Justice and Security in Indonesia and the World
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v8i1.55354

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe the position of the state emergency law as the basis for the issuance of the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law and to examine the consistency of the position of the state emergency law in the implementation of regional elections during the pandemic. This study used normative juridical research with conceptual, statutory, philosophical, and case-study approaches. Sources of legal materials in this study consisted of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results showed that the Covid-19 pandemic is declared a non-natural disaster to be qualified as coercive urgency, which is a requirement for enacting the state emergency law. However, there is a logical inconsistency about the Covid-19 pandemic concerning regional elections. On the one hand, the Covid-19 is used as an argument to declare the state in an emergency so that it is necessary to issue a state emergency law in the form of the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law. On the other hand, the regional head election is still be held during the pandemic. If the Covid-19 pandemic is considered a state emergency, the regional head election must be postponed until the pandemic is over.
DESAIN PENGUATAN KUALITAS POLITIK DINASTI DALAM PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH Ahmad Siboy
Keadilan : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tulang Bawang Vol 19 No 1 (2021): Keadilan : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tulang Bawang
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tulang Bawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37090/keadilan.v19i1.350

Abstract

The purpose of this reseach is to describe the factors and implications of the proliferation of political dynasties and to find designs to create dynastic politics that do not conflict with the spirit of local democracy in Indonesia. The problem of this research is the factors and implications that make politics flourish in simultaneous Pilkada and the ideal dynastic political design. The research method used is normative juridical through the concept of an approach, legislation, case approach and historical approach. The results showed that dynastic politics mushroomed because the regional head as the ruler was unable to run again, the ruler at the national level wanted to use his power to place family members as rulers at the regional level. As a result, many candidates for regional heads are nominated without the competence and willingness to become regional heads. The ideal dynastic political design can be achieved with the requirements to be declared valid as a candidate for regional head as well as regulations that prevent unqualified regional head candidates from fulfilling formal or legal requirements as regional head candidates.
The Islamic Law-based design of regional head post-filling Siboy, Ahmad; Permadi, Iwan; Karim, Zahlul Pasha; Karim, Firmansyah Abdul
Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 32 No. 1 (2024): March
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ljih.v32i1.31261

Abstract

This research aims to elaborate on the standing of Islamic law regarding regional head post-filling and how this post-filling is designed to conform with the principle of Islamic law. This research employed mixed methods and statutory, conceptual, case, and normative-theological approaches. The research results reveal that Islam holds the principles that can be adopted into the constructions of the national law in the matter of regional head post-filling. In the time to come, this post-filling should conform to the principle of al muhafadhotu ala qodimis sholih wal akhdzu bil jadidil ashlah, in which this post-filling should refer to the applicable model coupled with the development of this model with an asymmetric post-filling system. With this approach, areas with direct regional head elections will face reduction. Consequently, the areas not eligible to establish direct elections should consider another election model.
Co-Authors Bastomi, Ahmad Devi Triasari Dewi Cahyandari Dewi Cahyandari Dewi Setyowati Hilaire Tegnan Himawan Estu Bagijo . Iwan Permadi Jamil Jamil Karim, Firmansyah Abdul Mohammad Affan Muhammad Nur Muslim, Shohib Nur Putri Hidayah Retno Wulan Sekarsari Setiawan Noerdajasakti, Setiawan Sholahuddin Al-Fatih Sudarsono Sudarsono Sulistyani Eka Lestari Tinuk Dwi Cahyani Virga Dwi Efendi Zahlul Pasha