Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 32 Documents
Search

Legal Social Justice in Appointment Non-Definitive Regional Heads toward Welfare State Siboy, Ahmad; Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin; Triasari, Devi; Tegnan, Hilaire
BESTUUR Vol 11, No 1 (2023): Bestuur
Publisher : Administrative Law Departement Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Mare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/bestuur.v11i1.71055

Abstract

The process of resolving administrative violations in the appointment of non-definitive regional heads that have not been regulated can threaten democratic values. Likewise, there has not been a judicial institution that has been given special authority to try it. This study aims to provide a regulatory model or settlement of administrative violations in the appointment of non-definitive regional heads in the welfare state. This study is a normative legal research that uses legal theory to settle administrative violations, legal protection, the welfare state, and Pancasila democracy. The study results show that the judicial mechanism for appointing non-definitive regional heads has a specificity that cannot be resolved through general State Administrative dispute resolution. In the USA, election disputes were resolved through the courts, whereas, in Australia, the Electoral Management Bodies determine the mayoral elections dispute. A design that can be chosen for the judicial process for appointing a non-definitive regional head is proposed, namely by granting authority to Bawaslu to resolve administrative violations through the Special Court mechanism. The granting of judicial authority can fulfill the basic principles of fast, open, and constitutional non-definitive regional head appointment dispute resolution.
PENEGASAN DAN PERLUASAN OBJEK DAN SUBJEK SENGKETA ANTAR PESERTA DALAM PROSES PEMILIHAN UMUM Jamil, Jamil; Siboy, Ahmad
HUKUM PEMBANGUNAN EKONOMI Vol 10, No 1 (2022): Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/hpe.v10i1.62768

Abstract

This article analyzes the dispute settlement in general elections, especially on the norms of Article 466 of Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections, which regulates the formulation of electoral process disputes which do not emphasize the object of dispute between election participants or there has been a vacuum of the norm. On the object of dispute between election participants. This research is normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that the object of the dispute between election participants and the election organizers (KPU) is a decree issued by the election administrator, who is a state administrative official. Meanwhile, the disputes between election participants are civil disputes whose object of the dispute is an unlawful act. Thus it needs to be an affirmation of the object of the dispute because disputes do not only occur between election participants and election organizers but can also occur between election participants. with people (naturlijk persoon) and legal entities