Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.745
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) Tasfiyah Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah Az Zarqa': Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Islam QOF: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir Shahih : journal of islamicate multidisciplinary MANUSKRIPTA
Mursyid, Achmad Yafik
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 9 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : QOF: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir

 1 
Discourse on the Best Interpretation Model: A Critical Review of Traditional Exegesis Products in the Early Era Mahdi Afandi; Abd. Kholid; Mursyid, Achmad Yafik
QOF Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Keiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30762/qof.v7i1.1014

Abstract

In addition to interpreting the Qur'an through rational reasoning (ra'yi), scholars also employ an interpretive approach based on narrations, known as the bi al-ma’thūr interpretation. This form of interpretation is esteemed by Ibn Taimiyah and Ibn Kathir and carries high validity and evidential support. To such an extent, outcomes from the bi al-ma'ṡur interpretation are obligatory and not to be disregarded. This study critically analyzes and validates the bi al-ma’thūr interpretation model that emerged in the mutaqaddimīn era. The focus is on two seminal interpretations, namely "Jāmi' al-Bayān an Ta’wīl Ȃyi al-Qur'ān" by Muhammad bin Jarīr al-Ṭabarī (d. 310 H.) and "Bahr al-‘Ulūm" by Naṣr ibn Muhammad al-Samarqandi (d. 375 H.). This research employs an analytical descriptive approach and falls under library research since primary data source originates from literature within libraries. The research includes verification, used to reevaluate principles and methods of interpretation in relation to contemporary relevance. Findings reveal that despite being considered the best, the bi al-ma’thūr interpretation model exhibits problematic deficiencies. Among these are weak and even questionable authenticity (munkar) in narrations, often with lacking isnads, making distinguishing between reliable (ṣaḥīḥ) and weak (ḍa'īf) challenging. Many narrations include israiliyat (Jewish and Christian narratives) sans commentary or selective narrators, citing negatively-viewed sources. Therefore, interpreting this model is advised to be avoided by audiences lacking expertise in riwayah and dirayah (methods of narration and interpretation).
Co-Authors Abd. Kholid Abdul Kadir Abdul Rozak Achmad Khudori Soleh Adeni, Adeni Agus Riyadi AlBaihaqi, Muhammad Dzilfikri Azami, Hadiana Trendi Fahrudi, Ah. Haris Febriyanto, Muhammad Bagus Irsyad, Mohamad Karim, Abdul Mahbub Ghozali, Mahbub Mahdi Afandi Maulana, Diky Faqih Murtafi'ah , Alvy Ra'isatul Muttaqin, Sabilil Syihabuddin, Muhammad