Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.914
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pandecta Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Akta SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Bina Hukum Lingkungan Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Perada: Jurnal Studi Islam Kawasan Melayu PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Jurnal Abdi Insani ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Law_Jurnal Jurnal Tunas Agraria Journal La Sociale Bina Hukum Lingkungan Journal of Public Representative and Society Provision Andalas Law Journal
Siregar, Taufik
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 33 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal La Sociale

 1 
Police Performance in Countering Narcotics Problems Wardana, Bagus Dwi Gangga; Siregar, Taufik; Pinem, Serimin
Journal La Sociale Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Journal La Sociale
Publisher : Borong Newinera Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v6i2.1979

Abstract

Countering narcotics crimes is one of the major challenges faced by the police, especially the Medan Police, considering the complexity of this crime which has an impact on various aspects of people's lives. This study aims to analyze the legal rules that underlie police performance, the role of the police in overcoming narcotics crimes, and the obstacles faced in the process. The research method used is a quantitative approach with data collection techniques through questionnaires, observations, and document studies. The sample consisted of Medan Police personnel and the local community. The results of the study show that the legal rules that underlie the role of the police, such as Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics and the Regulation of the National Police Chief Number 14 of 2012, have provided a strong foundation in the implementation of their duties. The role of the police includes law enforcement, prevention through education, and rehabilitation for victims of narcotics abuse. However, the police face obstacles in the form of limited human resources, increasingly complex modus operandi of perpetrators, lack of community cooperation, and limited budget. These results show the importance of increasing police capacity through technology training, more adequate budget allocation, and active community involvement in narcotics control efforts. Collaboration between the police, government, and the community is needed to create a safer and drug-free environment, especially in the Medan area.
Juridical Evaluation of Articles 112 and 127 of Law Number 35 of 2009 Concerning Narcotics Daulay, Cinthya Audi; Siregar, Taufik; Isnaini, Isnaini
Journal La Sociale Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Journal La Sociale
Publisher : Borong Newinera Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v6i2.1980

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the application of Articles 112 and 127 in Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics and analyze judges' considerations in the application of law and evidence in cases recorded in Decision Number: 154/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.Bnj and Decision Number: 294/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.Bnj. This research uses qualitative research methods with a normative juridical approach and case studies. The results of the study show that the application of Article 112 often does not distinguish between users and drug dealers, so that drug users are often sentenced to heavier penalties even if they are not involved in narcotics trafficking. Meanwhile, Article 127 which provides space for rehabilitation has not been consistently applied by judges in handling cases of narcotics users. Analysis of the two decisions shows that there are inconsistencies in the use of Articles 112 and 127, which have implications for justice for perpetrators of narcotics crimes. Therefore, it is recommended that judges consider the rehabilitation factor for drug users more and not only focus on prison sentences. This research is expected to contribute to the development of a fairer and more humane narcotics law policy in Indonesia.
Implementation of the Role of Ankum and Papera in the Process of Resolving Military Cases in the Jurisdiction Susanto, Arif; Siregar, Taufik; Amal, Ridha Haykal
Journal La Sociale Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Journal La Sociale
Publisher : Borong Newinera Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v6i2.1981

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of the role of Ankum (Superiors Who Have the Right to Sentence) and Papera (Case Submission Officers) in the process of resolving military crime cases in the jurisdiction of the Medan High Military Court I. The approach used is qualitative with descriptive-analytical methods through in-depth interviews, document studies, and observations. The focus of the research includes three main aspects, namely the case administration process in the military judicial environment, the application of fast, precise, and simple judicial principles after the integration of the one-stop system under the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, and the role of the unitary commander in case resolution. The results of the study show that the case administration process still faces obstacles, especially in terms of the completeness of documents and the accuracy of procedures by Ankum and Papera. Although the one-stop system provides an opportunity to speed up the case process, technological limitations and internal resistance are challenges in the application of the principle of fast, precise, and simple justice. In addition, the role of the unit commander as the initial decision-maker greatly affects the smooth process of resolving cases, even though there is a disparity in the understanding of military law among Ankum. This study recommends increasing legal training for Ankum and Papera, stricter supervision of the implementation of legal procedures, and accelerating the digitalization of the military judicial administration system. Thus, these findings make an important contribution to efforts to improve the military justice system to realize efficiency, transparency, and justice.
Factors Causing Disparity in Judges' Decisions in Narcotics Cases Rahayu, Dessy; Siregar, Taufik; Amal, Ridha Haykal
Journal La Sociale Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Journal La Sociale
Publisher : Borong Newinera Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v6i2.1983

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the factors that cause the disparity in judges' decisions in narcotics cases in Indonesia. The disparity of judges' decisions refers to the difference in the results of decisions between one judge and another in similar cases. The factors that cause this disparity can come from various aspects, both internal and external, that affect the objectivity of the judge in giving the verdict. Some of the factors found include differences in interpretation of the law, the social and cultural background of judges, as well as pressure from the public and the media. In addition, the subjectivity of judges and inconsistency in the application of legal provisions also play a role in creating injustice in the criminal justice system. This study uses a qualitative research method with a literature study approach and interviews with legal practitioners. The results of the study show that the disparity in judges' decisions in narcotics cases can be minimized by having clear standard operating procedures (SOPs), increasing the capacity of judges in understanding narcotics cases, and providing more intensive professional ethics training. The study also suggests the need for tighter supervision of judges' decisions to ensure that every decision taken is in accordance with the principles of justice and applicable law.
Co-Authors A. Nuzul, A. Nuzul Adawiyah, Rodiatun Amal, Ridha Haykal Anwar Sadat Harahap Berampu, Lailan Tawila Bunga Chintia Utami Chansrakaeo, Ruetaitip Daulay, Cinthya Audi Edi Warman Eka Intan Kumala Putri Hery Widijanto Hia, Hipotesa Hidayani, Sri Humairah, Nabila Isnaini Jelly Leviza Julianty Siregar, Riana Koto, Ismail Kurniawan, M. Yundha Kusuma, Juanda Limutra, William Leonardy Lubis, Andi Hakim Lubis, Duma Indah Sari Lubis, Ikhsan Mahmud Mulyadi Marlina Marlina Mayla Khoiriyah Mhd. Ansor Lubis Milhan Milhan, Milhan Muhammad Citra Ramadhan Mulyono, Hardi Munawir, Zaini Prayuda, Chandra Purba, Ardiansyah Purba Purba, Nelvitia Rahayu, Dessy Rizkan Zulyadi Saragih, Denny Hardi Pranata Sari Lubis, Duma Indah Serimin Pinem Sianturi, Jon Efendi Sibarani, Anggiat Sormin, Anggreana Elisabeth Roria Suwandi, Muhammad Ichsyan Syamsiar, Syamsiar Tanjung, Master Sahat Maruli Tuah Purba Tarigan, Edi Syahjuri Utary Maharany Barus Wardana, Bagus Dwi Gangga Wenggedes Frensh Zai, Kelvin Putra