Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

IMPLEMENTASI PRINSIP EKONOMI ISLAM DALAM PERILAKU PEDAGANG KULINER DI PASAR KULINER KOTA PADANG PANJANG Evina Aura Exa Putri; Yefri Joni; Ali Rahman; Rahmi
JSE: Jurnal Sharia Economica Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): Oktober
Publisher : LPPM STAI Muhammadiyah Probolinggo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46773/jse.v4i4.2635

Abstract

Many culinary traders in Padang Panjang Culinary Market pay little attention to blessings in their production, provide inadequate service to consumers, and lack understanding of the importance of halal certification. The main problem in this study is how the implementation of Islamic economic principles in the behavior of culinary traders in Padang Panjang Culinary Market. This study aims to analyze the implementation of Islamic economic principles in the behavior of culinary traders in the food and beverage sector in Padang Panjang City, especially in the culinary market. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach that produces descriptive data and utilizes a theoretical basis so that the focus of the research is in accordance with field facts with data collection techniques through interviews, observations, and documentation. The results of the study indicate that most culinary traders have not fully implemented Islamic economic principles such as monotheism, justice, honesty, responsibility, prophecy, halal and thayyib, and anti-riba in their business activities.
Reformasi Sistem Perundang-Undangan Indonesia: Strategi Pembentukan Lembaga Independen untuk Menangani Hiper-Regulasi: Reform of Indonesia's Legal System: Strategies for Establishing Independent Institutions to Address Hyper-Regulation Imran Eka Saputra; Ali Rahman
APHTN-HAN Vol 3 No 1 (2024): JAPHTN-HAN, January 2024
Publisher : Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara dan Hukum Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55292/japhtnhan.v3i1.159

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menggambarkan konsep ideal dalam pengendalian proses pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia yang mampu mendukung pembangunan nasional. Saat ini, sistem perundang-undangan di Indonesia menghadapi masalah mendasar berupa ketidaksinkronan antara peraturan perundang-undangan, baik di tingkat pusat maupun daerah, dengan kebijakan perencanaan pembangunan. Selain itu, terdapat kondisi hiper-regulasi akibat ketidaktaatan terhadap materi muatan peraturan, yang menyebabkan tumpang tindih pengaturan baik secara vertikal maupun horizontal, serta membebani proses harmonisasi regulasi. Kegagalan dalam membentuk sistem perundang-undangan yang baik berdampak pada beralihnya fungsi regulasi menjadi penghambat dalam pelaksanaan pembangunan nasional. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode studi hukum normatif dengan tiga pendekatan utama, yaitu pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach), dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Ketiga pendekatan ini digabungkan untuk menghasilkan analisis komprehensif terhadap masalah ketidaksinkronan dan hiper-regulasi dalam sistem perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa reformulasi pengendalian proses pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan sangat diperlukan. Reformulasi ini dapat diwujudkan melalui simplifikasi, harmonisasi, dan sinkronisasi peraturan, serta pembentukan lembaga independen yang berfungsi untuk mengintegrasikan seluruh proses pengendalian regulasi tersebut. Kesimpulannya, penerapan strategi ini dapat mengatasi masalah hiper-regulasi dan ketidaksinkronan, sehingga mendukung penerapan good regulatory practice dalam mencapai tujuan pembangunan nasional.
ANALYSIS OF A GOOD GOVERNANCE-BASED PUBLIC COMPLAINT SYSTEM: A NORMATIVE-EMPIRICAL APPROACH TO REALIZE INCLUSIVE AND ACCOUNTABLE JUDICIAL SERVICES Khaerulnisa; Ali Rahman
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v8i1.1808

Abstract

Public service in the judicial sector is a key indicator of state accountability as well as a reflection of public trust in legal institutions. However, the complaint system at the Makassar District Court still faces various normative and structural obstacles that hinder the realization of good governance principles. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the public complaint system within the judiciary and to identify the barriers that emerge in its implementation. The research employs a normative-empirical approach, combining legal analysis of public service regulations with field observations through interviews, documentation, and case studies. The findings reveal that although several digital innovations have been introduced, such as e-Court, SIPP, and e-Berpadu, the complaint system has not yet fully ensured transparency, accountability, and equal access for all justice seekers. The main challenges include regulatory harmonization, limited human resource capacity, cultural resistance, inadequate infrastructure, and fragmented complaint channels that lack integration. These results highlight the need for a policy model that integrates top-down regulations with bottom-up community participation, in order to create an inclusive, transparent, and accountable complaint mechanism in line with the principles of good governance.
ADDRESSING HEALTH LAW CHALLENGES IN ELECTIONS: POLICY INNOVATIONS TO IMPROVE ACCESSIBILITY FOR VULNERABLE VOTERS Hartono Tasir Irwanto; Imran Eka Saputra; Ali Rahman
Sawerigading Law Journal Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Maret 2026 - September 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Sawerigading Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62084/slj.v5i1.455

Abstract

Elections as the foundation of democracy should ensure inclusive participation for all citizens, including vulnerable groups such as the elderly, people with disabilities, and individuals with chronic health conditions. However, the implementation of electoral regulations in Indonesia often fails to address the health needs of these groups. The gap between the ideal national policy and the reality of implementation on the ground remains a serious challenge that has yet to be resolved. This study evaluates the effectiveness of health regulations in supporting vulnerable voters' access during elections. Using a literature review-based qualitative approach, data was collected from academic literature, national policies, as well as previous research reports. Findings show that although some health protocols have been implemented, barriers such as limited medical facilities at polling stations, lack of budget, and low levels of socialization still prevent vulnerable groups from fully participating. One important innovation proposed is the integration of information technology to facilitate access to health information, especially for voters with special needs. This technology can help voters plan their attendance at polling stations in a more health-friendly manner. On the other hand, more concrete solutions include strengthening regulations with clear technical guidelines, specialized training for polling station officers to understand the needs of vulnerable groups, and synergy between central and local governments to ensure adequate resource allocation.
The Legal Position of the Papuan People's Assembly in the Review of the Papuan Special Autonomy Law at the Constitutional Court Ali Rahman; Natasya Wulandari
As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/as-siyasi.v61.29562

Abstract

This article challenges the Constitutional Court's rigid formalist doctrine of legal standing by critically analysing the position of the Papuan People's Assembly (MRP) in judicial reviews of the Papua Special Autonomy Law. Currently, the Court's strict taxonomy of applicants paradoxically disenfranchises the MRP, creating a dogmatic tension between the asymmetric constitutional guarantees of indigenous rights (Article 18B of the 1945 Constitution) and actual access to constitutional justice. This study aims to expand existing standing doctrines by proposing a theoretical reconstruction of the MRP. Using normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, the study demonstrates that the MRP cannot be treated as a mere product of ordinary legislation. The analysis reveals that the MRP operates as a "functionally constitutional state institution" and a "hybrid constitutional proxy." Its authority is not merely delegated statutory power, but constitutionalised authority essential for protecting the collective rights of Indigenous Papuans (OAP). Restricting its access based on structural formalism constitutes a direct impairment of these constitutional rights. The study concludes with specific policy implications: de lege lata, the Constitutional Court must progressively reinterpret Article 51 of the Constitutional Court Law to accommodate hybrid cultural organs; de lege ferenda, targeted amendments to the Constitutional Court and Special Autonomy Laws are required, alongside the introduction of a limited constitutional complaint mechanism, to permanently secure the MRP's standing and institutionalize a constitutional pathway for indigenous peoples' defense