Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.367
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Respublica Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris TERAJU : Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Humantech : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia Collegium Studiosum Journal Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR) Jotika Research in Business Law
Yetti
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 18 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 18 Documents
Search

 1   2 
TANGGUNG JAWAB HUKUM PELAKU USAHA ATAS PRODUK CACAT TERSEMBUNYI Setiawan, Jetmiko; Yetti; Afrita, Indra
The Juris Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v9i1.1676

Abstract

Business actors, as parties with stronger bargaining positions, ethically have the obligation to ensure that the products they manufacture and distribute are safe for use. Moral responsibility should drive business actors to actively ensure product quality and refrain from concealing defects or hidden faults that may harm consumers. Therefore, it is important to examine how the Consumer Protection Law regulates the legal responsibilities of business actors for hidden defective products, and how moral responsibility can strengthen their commitment to upholding consumer rights. This study employs normative legal research methods. Based on the findings, the legal responsibility of business actors for hidden defective products, as governed by Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, serves as a concrete form of consumer rights protection. A hidden defective product is one that appears normal at the time of purchase but contains a defect that is not immediately visible and only causes damage or harm after use. The Consumer Protection Law requires business actors to be fully responsible for the products they produce or trade, including their quality, safety, and the accuracy of the information provided to consumers. Article 19 of Law No. 8 of 1999 stipulates that business actors must provide compensation for damages caused by defective products, including physical harm, contamination, or financial losses. This form of liability is strict, meaning that even if the business actor was unaware of the defect, they are still held accountable for introducing a defective product into the market. This obligation reflects the principle of due diligence in business and reinforces protection for consumers, who are generally in a weaker position in legal and commercial relationships. The legal consequences faced by business actors who neglect or evade this responsibility are also regulated by the Consumer Protection Law.
IMPLEMENTASI ASAS PRUDEN BANKING DALAM PEMBERIAN PINJAMAN KREDIT USAHA RAKYAT (KUR) KEPADA PELAKU USAHA MIKRO KECIL DAN MENENGAH (UMKM) OLEH PT BANK RAKYAT INDONESIA (PERSERO)TBK KANTOR CABANG KC DURI Sakdiah Purba, Halimatun; Iriansyah; Yetti
TERAJU: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 7 No 01 (2025)
Publisher : P3M dan Jurusan Syariah dan Ekonomi Bisnis Islam STAIN Sultan Abdurrahman Kepulauan Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35961/teraju.v7i01.1877

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implementasi asas prudensial dalam pemberian Kredit Usaha Rakyat (KUR) kepada Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah (UMKM) di Bank Rakyat Indonesia (BRI) Kantor Cabang KC Duri, serta mengidentifikasi hambatan yang muncul dalam proses penyaluran kredit. Asas prudensial, yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Perbankan, mengharuskan pemberian kredit dilakukan dengan prinsip kehati-hatian untuk mengurangi risiko kerugian bagi bank dan nasabah. Pendekatan kualitatif digunakan dalam penelitian ini dengan metode wawancara, survei, dan observasi langsung di lapangan, melibatkan manajer kredit serta nasabah UMKM sebagai informan utama. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun BRI KC Duri telah berupaya mengimplementasikan prinsip kehati-hatian dalam penyaluran KUR, hambatan signifikan tetap ditemukan. Hambatan utama meliputi kesulitan administratif, seperti ketidakmampuan pelaku UMKM dalam menyediakan dokumen lengkap dan laporan keuangan yang memadai. Kendala lain terkait analisis kelayakan kredit yang rumit, terutama bagi UMKM tanpa catatan keuangan yang jelas, serta risiko kredit bermasalah akibat ketidaksanggupan debitur dalam memenuhi kewajiban pembayaran. Solusi yang diajukan meliputi penyederhanaan prosedur administrasi, pendampingan keuangan bagi pelaku UMKM, serta penyempurnaan regulasi untuk mendukung penerapan asas prudensial yang lebih fleksibel. Implementasi solusi ini diharapkan dapat meningkatkan efektivitas penyaluran KUR, sekaligus menjaga keseimbangan antara perlindungan hak-hak pelaku UMKM dan kepentingan bank dalam menjaga kesehatan portofolio kredit
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PERJUDIAN Monarchi, Try Krisna; Yetti; Triana, Yeni
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v8i1.1651

Abstract

The Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations Law (UUK-PKPU) provides space for debtors to postpone debt payments and restructure their obligations. However, the existence of a 90-day stay provision in the PKPU process has caused serious problems with the rights of creditors holding mortgage rights, especially in efforts to carry out collateral execution. This study aims to analyze the application of the provision in the context of legal protection of creditors, review its compatibility with the principles of legal certainty and justice, and criticize the potential for legal smuggling that may occur in practice. Through a normative approach and literature study, including linking the conflict of norms between UUK-PKPU and the Mortgage Rights Law (UUHT), this article shows that the dominance of the lex posterior derogat legi priori principle in this context often ignores substantive justice for creditors. The results of this study emphasize the need for legal reform of the PKPU stay period and the balancing of protection between debtors and creditors in the process of postponing debt payment obligations. These findings reinforce the urgency of regulatory reorganization to prevent irregularities in the implementation of bankruptcy law in Indonesia.
PROSPECTIVE LEGAL CONCEPT ON THE FULFILLMENT OF SUPPORT OBLIGATIONS FOR CONVICTED PERSONS Wiyarso, Ardi; Yetti; Putra, Anggara
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), June 2025
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v6i3.458

Abstract

In many cases, prisoners serve as the primary breadwinners of their families, working to fulfill the needs of their wives and children before incarceration. When they begin serving their sentences, the families they leave behind often face severe economic hardship, which can lead to further social issues such as poverty, school dropouts, and even divorce. Although correctional institutions currently offer work training programs for inmates, these programs are generally not designed as productive work systems that guarantee fair wages or enable inmates to financially support their families. In cases where wages are provided, they are often symbolic or extremely minimal, with no systematic regulation within the national legal framework. Therefore, a legal breakthrough is needed in the form of regulation that affirms the rights of prisoners to work, receive fair compensation, and allocate their earnings to fulfill their family obligations. This study aims to analyze the concept of legal regulation concerning the obligation of prisoners to provide financial support, as well as to identify legal obstacles to the implementation of this obligation. The research method used is normative legal research. The findings indicate that the legal concept regarding the obligation of inmates to provide financial support remains largely unregulated under Indonesian law. Although prisoners retain responsibilities as heads of households, there is no binding legal mechanism requiring them to support their families during incarceration. While some correctional facilities offer work training and handicraft production programs, there is no structured system linking the income generated to the legal obligation of supporting their families. This highlights the urgent need for more operational, progressive, and socially just legal regulations. The legal perspective on the obligation of inmates to provide support holds that incarceration does not nullify this duty. Both marriage law and the Compilation of Islamic Law continue to require husbands or parents to provide financial support. However, there are currently no specific norms or provisions in Indonesian positive law that directly regulate or enforce this obligation in the context of incarceration. As a result, the families of inmates often lose their primary source of income without adequate legal protection. An ideal legal framework should align inmates’ rights as correctional residents with their social obligations as family heads, materialized through fair and responsive legal arrangements that reflect social realities.
KEWENANGAN PENYIDIK POLRI DALAM PEMANGGILAN NOTARIS SEBAGAI SAKSI DALAM PERSPEKTIF KEPASTIAN HUKUM Delfit; Yetti; Dewi, Sandra
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v7i2.1392

Abstract

Pasal 66 Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris ini mengatur bahwa untuk kepentingan proses peradilan, baik penyidik, penuntut umum, maupun hakim dapat mengambil fotokopi minuta akta dan/atau memanggil notaris untuk hadir dalam pemeriksaan yang berkaitan dengan akta yang dibuat oleh notaris, tetapi harus terlebih dahulu mendapatkan persetujuan dari Majelis Kehormatan Notaris (MKN). Pasal ini bertujuan melindungi notaris dalam menjalankan tugasnya agar tidak sembarangan dipanggil atau diminta dokumen terkait akta yang dibuatnya tanpa prosedur yang jelas. Namun, dalam praktiknya, terdapat masalah terkait dengan norma ini, di mana penyidikan terhadap notaris dapat terganggu atau tertunda karena proses perizinan dari MKN. Beberapa pihak menganggap proses ini bisa memperlambat penyidikan pidana, sementara pihak lain menganggap bahwa hal ini penting untuk melindungi independensi notaris. Tujuan dilakukannya penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis pengaturan dan kepastian hukum kewenangan penyidik polri memanggil notaris sebagai saksi dalam perkara pidana, untuk menganalisis pengaturan yang ideal kewenangan penyidik polri memanggil notaris sebagai saksi dalam perkara pidana. Metode yang dipergunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa Pengaturan dan kepastian hukum kewenangan penyidik polri memanggil notaris sebagai saksi dalam perkara pidana bahwa pemanggilan notaris untuk memberikan keterangan atau menyerahkan protokol notaris dalam perkara pidana harus mendapat persetujuan dari Majelis Pengawas Daerah (MPD) atau Ketua Pengadilan Negeri. Kehadiran notaris sebagai saksi merupakan sesuatu yang penting terlebih jika MKN telah memberikan persetujuan atas pemeriksaan notaris karena meskipun salinan akta notaris merupakan representasi/perwakilan notaris yang membuatnya artinya dengan penyidik yang telah memegang salinan akta sudah cukup tanpa hadirnya notaris sebagai saksi akan tetapi hadirnya notaris dapat menjadikan semuanya jelas. Arti penting yuridis kehadiran notaris sebagai saksi di persidangan yaitu yang pertama memenuhi kewajiban sebagai warga negara baik dalam profesinya maupun pribadi karena pada dasarnya semua orang harus taat hukum tanpa terkecuali tidak ada yang kebal hukum atau memiliki hak imunitas begitu juga dengan notaris. Pengaturan yang ideal kewenangan penyidik polri memanggil notaris sebagai saksi dalam perkara pidana bahwa seharusnya mampu menjawab kebutuhan penegakan hukum secara efektif tanpa mengabaikan perlindungan terhadap notaris. Hal ini dapat dicapai melalui beberapa upaya perbaikan. Pertama, diperlukan sinergi yang lebih baik antara UUJN dan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP) untuk memastikan prosedur yang lebih cepat dan sederhana tanpa mengurangi akuntabilitas. Kedua, MPD sebagai institusi yang berwenang memberikan persetujuan seharusnya memiliki pedoman operasional yang jelas dan tenggat waktu yang tegas dalam memberikan keputusan, sehingga tidak menghambat proses penyidikan.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP SEDIAAN FARMASI YANG TIDAK MEMILIKI IZIN EDAR Amanda, Jelli Putra; Yetti; Dewi, Sandra
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v7i2.1435

Abstract

Article 143 of Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health stipulates that: (1) Any individual who produces and/or distributes pharmaceutical preparations, medical devices, and household health supplies (PKRT) must obtain business permits from the Central or Regional Government in accordance with their authority, based on norms, standards, procedures, and criteria as stipulated by applicable laws and regulations. (2) Any individual who produces and/or distributes pharmaceutical preparations, medical devices, and PKRT that have obtained business permits but are proven to not meet safety, efficacy, and quality requirements shall be subject to administrative sanctions in accordance with laws and regulations in the field of business licensing. (3) Business permits as referred to in paragraph (1) do not apply to traditional herbal medicine (jamu) sellers, herbal medicine makers, and facilities for the production of specially used drugs. (4) Business licensing related to pharmaceutical preparations, medical devices, and PKRT as referred to in paragraphs (1) and (2) shall be carried out in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. The research method used is sociological legal research. Based on the research results in Pekanbaru, it was found that the regulation has not been implemented as expected. This is evident from the widespread presence of pharmaceutical products, including cosmetics and drugs, that do not have the required permits in the city. In the context of law enforcement against unlicensed pharmaceutical preparations, although the law provides a clear legal framework to regulate and supervise the circulation of drugs and cosmetics, significant challenges remain in effective monitoring and enforcement on the ground. Many drugs and cosmetics are circulated without distribution permits, posing potential risks to public health. Legal action against perpetrators who market illegal drugs or cosmetics must be carried out firmly and consistently, with appropriate penalties to create a deterrent effect and prevent the circulation of harmful illegal goods.
PENGEMBALIAN BARANG BUKTI PASCA PUTUSAN BERKEKUATAN HUKUM DI RUPBASAN RENGAT Imelda, Rezky; Yetti; Dewi, Sandra
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v7i2.1446

Abstract

Rupbasan Kelas II Rengat sebagai salah satu UPT di bidang penyimpanan benda sitaan dan barang rampasan negara, memainkan peran penting dalam menjaga barang bukti yang diperoleh dari berbagai tindak kejahatan. Oleh karena itu, perlu dilakukan penelitian yang mendalam mengenai tanggungjawab pengembalian barang bukti pasca putusan berkekuatan hukum tetap di Rupbasan Rengat, guna memastikan bahwa lembaga ini berfungsi dengan baik sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Urgensi penelitian ini terletak pada kebutuhan untuk memperbaiki sistem pengembalian barang bukti pasca putusan berkekuatan hukum, agar dapat memaksimalkan sistem peradilan pidana. Selain itu, pengembalian barang bukti penting dilakukan guna memastikan keadilan bagi korban, serta mencegah potensi kerugian bagi negara. Metode yang dipergunakan adalah penelitian hukum sosiologis. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa Implementasi pengembalian barang bukti pasca putusan berkekuatan hukum tetap di Rupbasan Rengat bahwa implementasi pengembalian barang bukti sering kali menghadapi kendala teknis dan administratif, terutama terkait keterbatasan sumber daya manusia dan infrastruktur. Meskipun prosedur hukum telah ditetapkan melalui Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP), pelaksanaannya memerlukan upaya yang konsisten untuk memastikan barang bukti dikembalikan kepada pihak yang berhak sesuai dengan putusan pengadilan. Pengawasan pengembalian barang bukti pasca putusan berkekuatan hukum tetap di Rupbasan Rengat bahwa pengawasan dalam proses ini juga memegang peranan penting untuk memastikan transparansi dan akuntabilitas. Di Rupbasan Rengat, pengawasan internal dan eksternal perlu ditingkatkan agar setiap langkah dalam proses pengembalian barang bukti berjalan sesuai prosedur hukum. Namun, keterbatasan teknologi dan koordinasi antarlembaga masih menjadi hambatan yang perlu diatasi. Pertanggungjawaban pengembalian barang bukti pasca putusan berkekuatan hukum tetap di Rupbasan Rengat bahwa Rupbasan memiliki kewajiban penuh untuk menjaga barang bukti dalam kondisi baik selama penyimpanan dan memastikan barang tersebut dikembalikan sesuai dengan amar putusan pengadilan. Jika terjadi kerusakan atau kehilangan, tanggung jawab hukum dan moral harus ditegakkan.
TANGGUNG JAWAB HUKUM PEMERINTAH TERHADAP KERUSAKAN JALAN YANG MENGAKIBATKAN KECELAKAAN Siregar, Solhani Guntur; Fahmi; Yetti
The Juris Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v8i1.1271

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the Regulation of Government Legal Responsibility for Road Damage Resulting in Accidents Based on Law Number 22 of 2009 Concerning Traffic and Road Transportation, To analyze the Government's Legal Responsibility for Road Damage Resulting in Accidents Based on Law Number 22 of 2009 Concerning Traffic and Road Transportation. The method used is normative legal research, namely research based on applicable legal principles, in this case the research was conducted on the Government's Legal Responsibility for Road Damage Resulting in Accidents Based on Law Number 22 of 2009 Concerning Traffic and Road Transportation. Based on the results of the study, it is known that the Regulation of Government Legal Responsibility for Road Damage Resulting in Accidents Based on Law Number 22 of 2009 Concerning Traffic and Road Transportation that the Government is required to carry out road maintenance and repairs, provide warning signs during the repair process, and can be held legally accountable if proven negligent. However, the main challenge lies in the implementation in the field, where further efforts are still needed to ensure the safety and comfort of road users. Thus, it is expected that the government can be more serious in carrying out its responsibilities to reduce the risk of accidents due to road damage. Government's Legal Responsibility for Road Damage Causing Accidents Based on Law Number 22 of 2009 concerning Traffic and Road Transportation, the Government is required to carry out road maintenance and repairs, provide warning signs during the repair process, and can be held legally accountable if proven negligent. However, the main challenge is ensuring effective implementation in the field to reduce the risk of accidents due to road damage. It is expected that with the increased seriousness of the government in carrying out its responsibilities, the safety and comfort of road users can be more assured.
Co-Authors Afrita, Indra Amanda, Jelli Putra Armen Sosialisa Sihotang Cisilia Maiyori Dedy Felandry Delfit Fahmi Haq, Miftahul Imelda, Rezky Iriansyah Monarchi, Try Krisna Putra, Anggara Raihan Farras Rinaldi Syahputra Sakdiah Purba, Halimatun sandra dewi Sarina Uly Setiawan, Jetmiko Siregar, Solhani Guntur Triana, Yeni Wiyarso, Ardi Yelia Natassa Winstar