Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.185
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Qistie: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Perspektif : Kajian Masalah Hukum dan Pembangunan Jurnal Privat Law Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Widya Yuridika Jurnal Ius Constituendum Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus Unes Law Review Jurnal Jatiswara PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum SIGn Jurnal Hukum Journal of Law and Policy Transformation Sapientia Et Virtus Seminar Nasional Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Jurnal Esensi Hukum Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev) LEGAL BRIEF Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Administrative and Environmental Law Review Yuridika Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Indonesia Law Reform Journal (ILREJ) JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum Journal of Contemporary Law Studies Activa Yuris: Jurnal Hukum Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev) Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik
Astrid Athina Indradewi
Department Of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan, Surabaya Campus, Indonesia
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 44 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 44 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
Pertanggungjawaban Terhadap Perlindungan Konsumen atas Peredaran Emas Ilegal Kartiko, Nafis Dwi; Soegiono, Samuel Putra; Indradewi, Astrid Athina
Journal of Contemporary Law Studies Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): November
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/lawstudies.v2i1.3114

Abstract

Consumer protection law plays a crucial role in safeguarding the rights and interests of consumers in various sectors by ensuring fair trade practices, product safety, preventing fraud, and building trust between consumers and businesses. This research aims to analyse legal liability in the context of consumer protection against illegal gold circulation. This research uses a normative-dogmatic juridical research method. The results show that there is a significant violation of consumers' right to correct and accurate information, which affects their purchasing and investment decisions. The research suggests the need for greater transparency and the application of stricter sanctions to prevent similar incidents in the future. The theoretical implications of this research strengthen the understanding of the application of consumer protection law in real practice, while its practical implications emphasise the importance of industry compliance with legal standards to maintain consumer confidence and market integrity.
Quo Vadis Regulasi Dan Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Peredaran Roti Yang Mengandung Zat Berbahaya Mugiono, Mariana; Indradewi, Astrid Athina
JATISWARA Vol. 40 No. 1 (2025): Jatiswara
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jtsw.v40i1.1202

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengevaluasi tantangan yang dihadapi oleh Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan (BPOM) dalam memastikan keamanan produk sebelum dan sesudah beredar di pasar. BPOM bertanggung jawab untuk melakukan evaluasi yang menyeluruh dan berulang terhadap produk guna memastikan keamanannya bagi konsumsi masyarakat. Tanggung jawab ini tidak hanya terbatas pada tahap persetujuan awal, tetapi juga mencakup pengawasan pascapasar untuk mendeteksi dan menangani risiko yang ditimbulkan oleh produk yang tidak aman atau ilegal. Dalam menjalankan mandatnya, BPOM bekerja sama dengan instansi pemerintah serta melibatkan masyarakat guna mempercepat proses deteksi dan penarikan produk bermasalah. Apabila ditemukan produk yang berisiko tinggi terhadap kesehatan, BPOM wajib mengambil tindakan tegas, seperti mencabut izin edar, menarik produk dari peredaran, meninjau ulang keamanannya, memusnahkan produk, dan menerapkan sanksi hukum yang berlaku. Perlindungan konsumen yang efektif menuntut BPOM untuk senantiasa waspada dalam mengawasi produk yang sudah maupun belum beredar. Selain itu, BPOM juga memiliki kewajiban untuk secara berkala memberikan informasi terkini kepada publik mengenai status keamanan produk demi meningkatkan transparansi dan kepercayaan konsumen. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa BPOM harus secara konsisten melaksanakan pengawasan pra-pasar dan pascapasar untuk memastikan bahwa bahan yang digunakan sesuai dengan yang terdaftar, guna menjaga kepercayaan konsumen dan mencegah kelalaian pengawasan.
EDUKASI MEKANISME PENYUSUNAN SIMPULAN DAN REKOMENDASI SANKSI (MENAKAR SANKSI) KASUS KEKERASAN SEKSUAL DI LINGKUNGAN PERGURUAN TINGGI Ginting, Yuni; Astrid Athina Indradewi; Nicholine, Nicholine
J-ABDI: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Vol. 4 No. 11: April 2025
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53625/jabdi.v4i11.9897

Abstract

Kekerasan seksual, baik dalam bentuk verbal, nonfisik, fisik, maupun digital, dapat berdampak serius pada kesehatan penyintas, termasuk aspek nutrisi, fungsi otak, dan keseimbangan mental. Oleh karena itu, mekanisme penyusunan simpulan dan rekomendasi sanksi harus berorientasi pada perlindungan semua pihak yang terlibat dan berbasis keadilan serta transparansi. Prinsip Utama dalam Penyusunan Simpulan dan Rekomendasi Sanksi memberikan ruang aman bagi penyintas untuk berbicara tanpa rasa takut akan disalahkan atau diragukan, menyusun proses investigasi dan rekomendasi sanksi dengan mempertimbangkan dampak psikologis terhadap penyintas. Setiap keputusan harus didasarkan pada bukti yang kuat dan valid, bukan asumsi atau bias dan Tidak hanya melindungi penyintas, tetapi juga memastikan hak terlapor untuk mendapatkan proses yang transparan dan adil.
Penerapan Prinsip Tanggung Jawab dan Sanksi Pidana dalam Hukum Kesehatan terhadap Peredaran Kosmetik Ilegal Kartiko, Nafis Dwi; Soegiono, Samuel Putra; Indradewi, Astrid Athina; Ginting, Yuni Priskila; Boong, Vicariya Retnowati
Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/amandemen.v2i3.1018

Abstract

This research aims to conduct a juridical analysis of cases of circulation of illegal cosmetic products. The method used is normative-dogmatic juridical research, which focuses on relevant legal doctrines and principles. The approach used is a conceptual approach and a statutory approach, with primary legal sources including the Health Law, BPOM Regulations, the Criminal Code (KUHP), and the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). Secondary legal sources include journals, books, and other references that support the analysis. The results show that the distribution of illegal cosmetic products that do not meet safety and quality standards, as in the case of the defendant Megawati binti Rahmat alias Mega in verdict number 39/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Slr, is a serious violation of health law and consumer protection in Indonesia. Based on the principle of liability based on the element of fault, the defendant can be held legally responsible because it is proven that she distributed cosmetics without a distribution permit containing hazardous substances such as mercury. The Panel of Judges considered that the defendant's actions fulfilled the elements of unlawful acts in accordance with Article 1365 of the Civil Code and Article 196 of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 36 of 2009 concerning Health. The implications of this research emphasize the importance of strict law enforcement and the application of the principle of responsibility to protect public health from dangerous cosmetic products.
Unclear Public Policy: The Real Barrier in Recognizing Foreign Arbitration Awards? Sugianto, Fajar; Athina Indradewi, Astrid; Antonius Sanjaya, Robin; Yamamoto, Atsuko
Indonesian State Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Indonesian State Law Review, April 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/islrev.v8i1.21448

Abstract

In Indonesia, a foreign arbitral award refers to a decision issued by an arbitration institution or arbitrator outside the country or recognized as such under Indonesian law. This classification reflects Indonesia’s adherence to the principle of territoriality in distinguishing arbitration awards as "international." However, enforcement remains contentious due to courts' broad interpretation of public policy under Article 66(c) of Law No. 30 of 1999. Despite Constitutional Court Decision No. 100/PUU-XXII/2024, the lack of a clear definition of public policy persists, leaving courts to determine its scope on a case-by-case basis. Until further regulations provide clarity, Article 66(c) will remain ambiguous and continue to be a basis for challenging foreign awards. A comparison with Singapore highlights two key findings. First, Indonesia applies a broad and inconsistent interpretation of public policy, while Singapore’s approach is narrower and more predictable. Second, Indonesian courts lack uniformity, as shown in three patterns: (1) awards are rejected for allegedly breaching sovereignty by restricting access to local courts; (2) awards are annulled for contravening Indonesian laws; and (3) awards are refused for endangering national interests. Rather than redefining international arbitration awards, Indonesia needs clearer guidelines and consistent application of public policy to enhance investor confidence and its global arbitration competitiveness.
The Judge’s Role in the Effectiveness of Anti-Corruption Enforcement in Indonesia: A Juridical Analysis Behuku, Jitro Gianfranco; Kusuma, Jevine Ilonesia; Chasanah, Nabila Uswatun; Sugianto, Fajar; Indradewi, Astrid Athina
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 7 No 1: April - September 2025
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v7i1.464

Abstract

The effectiveness of anti-corruption law enforcement in Indonesia is facing a severe legitimacy crisis. This condition is characterized by a paradox between a robust legal framework on paper and its inadequate implementation in practice, thereby eroding public trust. This research aims to critically analyze the central role of judges in determining this effectiveness, with an analytical focus on the problematic interpretation of legal norms and the systemic challenges that impede judicial performance. Through a normative legal approach fortified by a case study, this research employs qualitative content analysis to dissect the legal reasoning in two key 2024 decisions from the Corruption Crimes Court. The findings reveal a diametrically different legal treatment of defendants. On one hand, the court was capable of convicting an individual defendant (a rogue judge) through a procedural application of the law. On the other hand, the court acquitted five large corporations of all legal charges in a corruption case that resulted in significant state economic losses. This acquittal was based on the legalistic argument that the proven act did not constitute a criminal offense. This dualism confirms that law enforcement effectiveness remains sporadic, undermined by a disparity in the professional capacity of judges to interpret the element of “unlawful act,” particularly in complex corporate crimes. It is concluded that without systemic judicial reform to standardize legal interpretation and strengthen accountability, anti-corruption law enforcement will remain blunted when confronting powerful economic actors.
Justice Collaborator at a Legal Crossroads: An Analysis of the Tension between Substantive Justice and Legal Certainty Firmansyah, Rizqy Adi; Widjaja, Matthew; Kusumawardani, Cesilia Elok; Sugianto, Fajar; Indradewi, Astrid Athina
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 7 No 1: April - September 2025
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v7i1.479

Abstract

This research examines the tension between substantive justice and legal certainty within the Indonesian criminal justice system, which arises from the legal ambiguity surrounding the Justice Collaborator. The case study focuses on the Justice Collaborator verdict in the premeditated murder case involving Irjen FS. Utilizing a normative juridical research method through statute, case, and conceptual approaches, this study aims to analyze how the legal vacuum regarding the Justice Collaborator in the Penal Code is addressed through judicial adaptation. The findings indicate that the Panel of Judges constructed a “parallel penal track” to grant a reward to Bharada E as the Justice Collaborator. This track refers to sectoral legal instruments such as Law Number 13 of 2006 and Supreme Court Circular Number 4 of 2011. Although this practice successfully realized substantive justice, it inherently creates a systemic implication in the form of tension between judicial discretion and the principle of legal certainty, a pillar of the civil law system. It is concluded that the absence of a codified norm for the Justice Collaborator potentially threatens the consistency and predictability of criminal law, which, if not promptly addressed through reform, could risk the systemic delegitimization of the criminal justice system in the future. Therefore, this research recommends the urgent need for a comprehensive codification of the Justice Collaborator doctrine into the Penal Code and Law Number 8 of 1981 to align the needs of law enforcement with the maintenance of the principle of legality.
Aspek Hukum Tanggung Jawab Orang Tua Terhadap Tindak Kejahatan Dan Perilaku Kriminal Anak Bawah Umur Mugiono, Mariana; Indradewi, Astrid Athina; Boong, Vicariya Retnowati
Esensi Hukum Vol 7 No 1 (2025): Juni - Jurnal Esensi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/esensihukum.v7i1.426

Abstract

A minor is under the legal responsibility of their parents or guardians, as regulated in the Civil Code, the Marriage Law, and the Child Protection Law. This responsibility includes the obligation to care for, educate, and supervise the child until they reach adulthood or enter into marriage. In the context of unlawful acts (tort) committed by a child, this research is a normative juridical study using a statutory approach. It highlights the importance of parental supervision and the possibility of exemption from liability if it can be proven that the parents have exercised proper supervision. Through the case involving the child "R", this article emphasizes that parental negligence in supervision may result in legal consequences in the form of compensation obligations to third parties.
Implementing Sustainable Development Goals To Achieve Community Welfare: Optimising Presidential Decree 111/2022 Ginting, Yuni Priskila; Indradewi, Astrid Athina; Kartiko, Nafis Dwi; Hanunisa, Salma Zhafira
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 12 No. 4 (2023): October: Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/legal.v12i4.880

Abstract

By Presidential Decree 59/2015, sustainable development targets with a global perspective were adopted in Indonesia. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have been implemented in Indonesia for the past 8 (eight) years, fulfilling a worldwide commitment. It is hoped that by enacting PRESIDENTIAL DECREE 111/2022 concerning the Implementation of Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals, the 2024 national Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), as outlined in the book Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, can be accomplished more quickly and with a more focused approach. A statutory approach and a normative juridical research methodology were adopted. The 2030 Plan for Sustainable Development is comprised of the Sustainable Development Goals. The advancement towards reaching the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) over the past 10 (ten) years has been undermined by a string of extraordinary global crises. To advance human development, technological mastery, a sustainable economy, equitable development, and strengthening of national resilience and governance, development pillars are required
Kedudukan dan Akibat Hukum Perjanjian Tambahan yang Tidak Diperbaharui dengan Perjanjian Pokoknya Achmad, Andyna Susiawati; Indradewi, Astrid Athina
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 6 (2024): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (September - Oktober 2024)
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v4i6.2602

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengkaji tentang kedudukan hukum dan keberlakuan antara perjanjian pokok dengan perjanjian tambahan, serta akibat hukum perjanjian jaminan yang tidak diperbaharui bersamaan dengan perjanjian pokoknya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah Yuridis Normatif dengan melakukan studi pustaka yang diperoleh dari berbagai teori hukum dan peraturan perundang-undangan. Hasil dari penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa dalam suatu perjanjian pokok sangat dimungkinkan untuk dilakukan suatu restrukturisasi, addendum, ataupun pembaharuan atas dasar berbagai macam alasan. Apabila terjadi restrukturisasi, addendum, ataupun pembaharuan dalam suatu perjanjian pokok maka haruslah diperhatikan esensinya terlebih dahulu. Dalam hal ini jika perjanjian tambahannya tidak di restrukturisasi, addendum, ataupun diperbaharui maka menyebabkan perjanjian tambahannya menjadi hapus. Sebaliknya apabila perjanjian ini di restrukturisasi, addendum ataupun diperbaharui dengan tanpa menyebabkan lahirnya perjanjian baru, baik dari sisi subjek, maupun objek, dan prasyarat yang baru, maka dalam hal ini perjanjian tambahan tetap berlaku dan tetap mengikuti perjanjian pokok yang telah di restrukturisasi, addendum ataupun diperbaharui tersebut.
Co-Authors Agustin Widjiastuti Anandita Zefanya Purba Andrian Nathaniel Andyna Susiawati Achmad Andyna Susiawati Achmad Angela, Melisa Antonius Sanjaya, Robin Arin Tri Arbawati Behuku, Jitro Gianfranco Boong, Vicariya Retnowati Carissa Amanda Siswanto Carissa Amanda Siswanto Carissa Amanda Siswanto Chasanah, Nabila Uswatun Fajar Sugianto Firmansyah, Rizqy Adi Ginting, Yuni Hanunisa, Salma Zhafira Haryono, Leonardo Caesar Jeffrey Hadi Soejono Joshua Evandeo Irawan Kartiko, Nafis Dwi Ketzia Xavier Emmanuella Pallo Kridawidyani, Widya Kusuma, Jevine Ilonesia Kusumawardani, Cesilia Elok Leonardo Caesar Haryono Mariana Mugiono Mariana Mugiono Meyfa Angelita Elisabeth Mangkang Mugiono , Mariana Mugiono, Mariana Nafis Dwi Kartiko Nicholine, Nicholine Paula Paula Salma Zhafira Hanunisa Sanjaya, Niki Sari Mandiana Siswanto, Carissa Amanda Soegiono, Samuel Putra Steven, Anthony Tokuyama , Shintaro Tomy Michael Widjaja, Dorantes Widjaja, Matthew Yamamoto, Atsuko Yuni Priskila Ginting