Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.687
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pendas : Jurnah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Conference on Innovation and Application of Science and Technology (CIASTECH) Language and Education Journal Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Pelita Bangsa TRIMAS: Jurnal Inovasi dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Abdi Kimia : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Qomaruna Journal of Excellence Humanities and Religiosity Jurnal Lantera Ilmiah Kesehatan
Alimin
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Qomaruna

 1 
Tahapan dan Langkah-Langkah Penerapan Mixed Method Research (MMR) dalam Penelitian Pendidikan Khabibullah, Muttaqin; Alimin; Sholahuddin, Gus Malik Imam
Jurnal Studi Multidisiplin Qomaruna Vol 2 No 1 (2024): 2024
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (LPPM), Universitas Qomaruddin, Gresik, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62048/qjms.v2i1.55

Abstract

Many academics believe that using questionnaires and interviews simultaneously, or combining statistical analysis and narrative interpretation, can be categorized as mixed method research (MMR). This view is not entirely correct, but it is not entirely wrong either. MMR involves integrating quantitative and qualitative methods in a study, including all related components. However, not all simultaneous uses of quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis techniques can be considered MMR, as several key factors, such as timing, weighting, and research objectives, must be taken into account. This article aims to elaborate on various MMR models and their implementation steps, using a literature review method. The study identifies six MMR models: Sequential Explanatory, Sequential Exploratory, Concurrent Triangulation, Concurrent Embedded, Sequential Transformative, and Concurrent Transformative. However, the last two models are not discussed in detail due to their lower popularity. The Sequential Explanatory model integrates quantitative and qualitative methods sequentially, with greater emphasis on quantitative methods to provide additional information. Similarly, the Sequential Exploratory model is conducted sequentially but places more weight on qualitative data to connect findings. The Concurrent Triangulation model integrates both methods simultaneously, with equal weighting to compare data, while the Concurrent Embedded model combines the methods simultaneously but prioritizes one as the primary method and the other as the secondary method, aiming to compare data. Our findings provide practical guidelines for researchers in implementing each MMR model, particularly by highlighting aspects that are often overlooked in previous literature. These guidelines are expected to help researchers select and apply models that align with their research needs.
Melampaui Paradigm Wars: Pragmatisme sebagai Meta-Framework untuk Integrasi Tradisi Filosofis dalam Mixed Method Research Khabibullah, Muttaqin; Alimin; Sholahuddin, Gus Malik Imam
Jurnal Studi Multidisiplin Qomaruna Vol 2 No 2 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (LPPM), Universitas Qomaruddin, Gresik, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62048/qjms.v2i2.81

Abstract

In recent decades, MMR has emerged as the third methodological movement due to the “paradigm wars” between quantitsative and qualitative. The philosophy of pragmatism is often associated with MMR because of its flexibility in integrating various methods to answer research needs. However, there are still major challenges in integrating the underlying philosophies, especially the aspects of ontology, epistemology, and methodology. This study aims to analyze how the philosophy of pragmatism can be used as a meta-framework in MMR; how pragmatism is able to accommodate positivism, constructivism, critical realism, and transformative-emancipatory in various MMR models; and to develop a conceptual framework to understand the ontological, epistemological, and methodological positions of this integration. The approach used in this study is literature synthesis with the narrative review method. This study produces findings that pragmatism in MMR acts as a meta-framework that can combine various research methods by accommodating various relevant philosophical views. The results of this study also found that pragmatism is able to accommodate various philosophical paradigms by accepting that both quantitative and qualitative (as well as other methods) have equal value and complement each other in producing scientific knowledge. Furthermore, the results of this study also present a conceptual framework that can position ontology, epistemology, and methodology in MMR integration.
Co-Authors Ainiyah, Maslakhatul Andriadin Auliah, Dwi Rezeki Auliah Auliah, Indah Annisa Bilqis Shofiyah Dewanti, Jelita Milenia Dwi Satriyanto, Muhammad Elizabet Matolisi, Elizabet HAPPY KUSUMA WARDANI Hidayah, Bariqotul Himyar Pasrizal Jefri Mahendra Jusniar Khabibullah, Muttaqin Melinda Puspita Sari Jaya Muammar Iksan Muhamad Idris Selviana, Renita Sholahuddin, Gus Malik Imam Suriati Eka Putri Syamsidah Wahyu, Kurniawan Wahyuningsi, Neneng Wahyuningsi Wardani, Happy Kusuma Zubair, Sakinah