Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Peranan Asas-Asas Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Dalam Mewujudkan Pemerintahan Yang Baik Dan Bersih Walinono, Andi Muhammad Iqbal; Fahmal, A. Muin; Hasyim, Satrih
Journal of Lex Theory (JLT) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Lex Theory (JLT)
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52103/jlt.v6i2.2208

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis penerapan Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik (AUPB) dalam konteks penyelenggaraan pemerintahan di Indonesia sebagai perwujudan negara hukum dan negara kesejahteraan. Berlandaskan hukum administrasi negara, penelitian ini menyoroti bagaimana AUPB yang termuat dalam berbagai regulasi seperti UU Administrasi Pemerintahan, UU ASN, dan UU Penyelenggaraan Negara Bersih dan Bebas KKN, berfungsi sebagai instrumen etis dan yuridis untuk mencegah penyalahgunaan wewenang, menjaga prinsip legalitas, dan melindungi hak-hak warga negara. Melalui studi putusan pengadilan dan analisis normatif, ditemukan bahwa pelanggaran terhadap AUPB seringkali menjadi dasar pembatalan keputusan administratif yang tidak cermat maupun tidak adil, sebagaimana terlihat pada Putusan PTUN Nomor 86/G/2024/PTUN.MKS dan 69/G/2022/PTUN.MKS. Oleh karena itu, konsistensi dalam penerapan AUPB, didukung mekanisme upaya hukum administratif dan yudisial yang efektif, menjadi kunci terciptanya pemerintahan yang bersih, akuntabel, dan responsif terhadap kepentingan publik. This study analyses the application of the General Principles of Good Governance (AUPB) in the context of government administration in Indonesia as a manifestation of the rule of law and the welfare state. Based on administrative law, the research highlights how AUPB—codified in various regulations such as the Law on Public Administration, the Law on Civil Servants, and the Law on Clean and Corruption-Free State Administration—serves as both an ethical and legal instrument to prevent abuse of power, uphold the principle of legality, and protect citizens' rights. Through the examination of judicial decisions and normative analysis, it is found that violations of AUPB often form the basis for the annulment of administrative decisions deemed careless or unjust, as demonstrated in Administrative Court Decisions No. 86/G/2024/PTUN.MKS and No. 69/G/2022/PTUN.MKS. Therefore, consistency in the application of AUPB, supported by effective administrative and judicial legal remedies, is crucial for the establishment of a clean, accountable government that is responsive to public interests.
Legal Review of Ship Certification After the Issuance of Law Number 11 of 2020 Concerning Job Creation: Case Study of The Issuance of Fish Vessel Safety Certificates Awwal, Farijs; Fahmal, A. Muin; Razak, Askari
Golden Ratio of Data in Summary Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): May - October
Publisher : Manunggal Halim Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52970/grdis.v4i2.775

Abstract

This research examines the shift in authority and processes related to the certification of fishing vessels in Indonesia after the enactment of Law No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation. The primary objective of this study is to analyze the legal force and implications of the transfer of authority from the Ministry of Transportation to the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (KKP) in issuing fish vessel certifications. Using a normative juridical approach, this study investigates the procedural changes, challenges, and impacts of the new regulatory framework on fishing vessel safety and compliance. The findings show that the Job Creation Law simplifies licensing procedures while ensuring the safety and seaworthiness of fishing vessels. However, the study also highlights the challenges posed by a shortage of qualified inspectors, leading to delays in the certification process. This research underscores the need for regulatory adjustments and additional inspector training to align the maritime sector with the law’s goal of promoting safety and business efficiency.
Tanggung Jawab Karyawan Atas Penggelapan Uang Koperasi Mukhtar, Sri Anita Pudjadi; Fahmal, A. Muin; Ahmad, Kamri
Journal of Lex Theory (JLT) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Lex Theory (JLT)
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian menganalisis perlindungan hukum bagi anggota koperasi dan memperkuat tata Kelola koperasi simpan pinjam. Penelitian ini menggunakan tipe penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini terkait tanggung jawab karyawan atas penggelapan uang koperasi bahwa Koperasi simpan pinjam bertanggung jawab untuk mengganti kerugian yang ditimbulkan akibat penggelapan dana nasabah. Jika dana nasabah hilang atau digelapkan oleh oknum anggota koperasi atau pihak yang bekerja di koperasi, koperasi bisa diminta untuk mengganti kerugian tersebut kepada nasabah yang dirugikan. Jika terjadi kelalaian dalam pengawasan internal, koperasi bisa dianggap tidak memenuhi tanggung jawabnya untuk menjaga keamanan dana nasabah dan bisa menghadapi tindakan hukum. Jika penggelapan dana dilakukan oleh oknum yang memiliki wewenang atau anggota koperasi, tindakan tersebut bisa dikenakan sanksi pidana sesuai dengan ketentuan yang berlaku, seperti dalam KUHP (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana).. The research objective is to analyse the legal protection for cooperative members and strengthen the governance of savings and loan cooperatives. This research uses a normative legal research type. The results of this study related to employee responsibility for embezzlement of cooperative funds, that savings and loan cooperatives are responsible for compensating for losses incurred due to embezzlement of customer funds. If customer funds are lost or embezzled by individual cooperative members or parties working in the cooperative, the cooperative can be asked to compensate the losses to the injured customers. If internal supervision is negligent, the cooperative can be deemed not to have fulfilled its responsibility to maintain the security of customer funds and can face legal action. Suppose embezzlement of funds is carried out by individuals who have authority or are cooperative members. In that case, such actions can be subject to criminal sanctions per applicable provisions, such as in the Criminal Code (KUHP).