Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

MASA JABATAN KEPALA DAN WAKIL KEPALA OTORITA IBU KOTA NUSANTARA Nabila Rohmaniar Amri; Slamet Suhartono
Transparansi Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): TRANSPARANSI HUKUM
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kadiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30737/transparansi.v8i1.6735

Abstract

Menganalisis permasalahan hukum yang berkaitan dengan masa jabatan Kepala serta Wakil Otorita Ibu Kota Nusantara (IKN) yang tidak diatur dengan jelas dalam peraturan perundang-undangan. Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 tentang IKN tidak mencantumkan batasan periodesasi jabatan bagi kedua posisi tersebut, yang menimbulkan pertanyaan mengenai kesesuaian dengan prinsip-prinsip hukum di Indonesia, termasuk prinsip demokrasi, akuntabilitas, dan transparansi pemerintahan. Kajian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan serta pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tidak adanya periodesasi jabatan bagi Kepala dan Wakil Kepala Otorita IKN berpotensi menimbulkan inkonsistensi dengan konsepsi demokrasi dan akuntabilitas pemerintahan yang diamanatkan oleh konstitusi Indonesia. Diharapkan dapat menjadi dasar pertimbangan untuk merevisi peraturan terkait, guna memastikan terciptanya mekanisme pemerintahan yang lebih transparan, akuntabel, dan sejalan dengan nilai-nilai demokrasi di Indonesia. Kata Kunci: Masa jabatan, Kepala Otorita, IKN, demokrasi, akuntabilitas, periodesasi.
PRINSIP TANGGUNG GUGAT MUTLAK DALAM HUKUM LINGKUNGAN PASCA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR. 6 TAHUN 2023 TENTANG CIPTA KERJA Alfiatu zanuba hanim; slamet suhartono
Transparansi Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): TRANSPARANSI HUKUM
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kadiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30737/transparansi.v8i2.6743

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas perubahan prinsip tanggung gugat mutlak (strict liability) dalam hukum lingkungan Indonesia setelah disahkannya Undang-Undang No. 6 Tahun 2023 yang mengubah UU No. 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja. Sebelumnya, UU No. 32 Tahun 2009 memungkinkan pihak yang dirugikan akibat pencemaran untuk menuntut ganti rugi tanpa perlu membuktikan kesalahan pelaku. Namun, dengan perubahan ini, pembuktian kesalahan kini menjadi syarat untuk menuntut ganti rugi, yang dianggap memperumit proses hukum dan bisa melemahkan perlindungan lingkungan. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan metode hukum normative dan menyimpulkan bahwa perubahan ini dapat mengurangi efektivitas penuntutan kasus pencemaran serta lebih menguntungkan perusahaan, dengan dampak terhadap perlindungan lingkungan dan hak-hak masyarakat. Kata Kunci: strict liability, hukum lingkungan, Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja, pembuktian kesalahan,
Doctors' Legal Protection of Midwives And Nurses Professionals In Medical Actions In Hospitals Yeni Vitrianingsih; Slamet Suhartono; Yovita Arie Mangesti; Budiarsih
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 19 No. 3 (2023): December
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v19i3.212

Abstract

The lack of legal understanding by the parties concerned and the lack of legal protection for both patients and health workers. So the results of the nurses' hard work in providing health services if they are not successful will be faced with the law and even categorized as malpractice with criminal sanctions. Focus problems, namely: Doctors' legal protection of midwives and nurses professionals in medical actions in hospitals.The method used in this study is normative juridical research, which is a study using legislation that includes three layers of legal science consisting of the study of legal science, legal theory and legal philosophy. The results of the discussion found that the delegation of Doctor's authority to the nurse profession in medical action from a legal perspective. Nurses are someone who plays a role in caring for and helping someone by protecting them from pain, injury and the process of aging. It is not in accordance with the regulations of Law No. 38 of 2014 concerning Nursing Article 32 Paragraph (1) and Minister of Health Regulation No. 2052 of 2011 Article 23 Paragraph (1). The nature of the act of giving a medical diagnosis and the determination of medical therapy should not be delegated to nurses of Law No. 17 of 2023. The authority of nurses is as follows: Article 30 paragraph 1 and 2. The two legal umbrellas can certainly make nurses' understanding and protection in carrying out medical duties.  
ADJUSTMENT OF THE BPK'S AUTHORITY IN AUDITING STATE FINANCES DURING EMERGENCY SITUATIONS Slamet Suhartono; Muhamad Alvan
Akrab Juara : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Vol. 10 No. 4 (2025): November
Publisher : Yayasan Azam Kemajuan Rantau Anak Bengkalis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Emergency situations such as global pandemics, natural disasters, and economic crises often compel governments to adopt fiscal measures that are both rapid and unconventional. In such conditions, the principles of transparency and accountability are frequently put to the test. Amid these dynamics, the Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia (Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan – BPK) plays a crucial role in ensuring that state financial management remains consistent with constitutional principles and public accountability values. This article examines how the constitutional authority of BPK can be effectively exercised during states of emergency, and how public audit mechanisms can be adapted without undermining the government’s flexibility in responding to crises. The study employs a juridical-normative approach, combined with conceptual analysis and a review of recent literature (particularly from academic publications between 2022 and 2025). The findings indicate that BPK’s authority is imperative and constitutionally entrenched, and thus cannot be disregarded even under extraordinary circumstances. Nevertheless, maintaining effective public oversight requires a reformulation of audit methodologies—such as the application of interim audits, risk-based audits, and institutional synergy among BPK, internal government auditors (APIP), and national crisis management bodies. Based on the author’s personal research experience on BPK’s auditing practices during the COVID-19 pandemic, the study highlights that the primary challenge does not lie in weak legal foundations but in institutional adaptation and technological capacity. Therefore, this article recommends strengthening the legal framework for auditing during emergencies, accelerating the digitalization of public audit systems, and establishing responsive inter-agency coordination networks to ensure that the principle of public accountability remains intact even amidst crises