Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LAW REFORM Jurnal Konstitusi SCLS
Zakiran, Asep Hakim
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
The SISTEM PRESIDENSIL DAN KEBANGKITAN NEO-OTORITARIANISME: KEGAGALAN REFORMASI KONSTITUSI DI INDONESIA? Dramanda, Wicaksana; Kabir, Syahrul Fauzul; Zakiran, Asep Hakim
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 21 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2131

Abstract

Artikel ini mencoba mengidentifikasi bagaimana peran desain sistem pemerintahan memberikan pengaruh terhadap pembusukan demokrasi dan kebangkitan otoritariansme di Indonesia.Terdapat dua identifikasi masalah yang akan coba dijawab, yakni Pertama, apakah desain sistem presidensil di dalam UUD 1945 memiliki pengaruh terhadap kemerosotan demokrasi dan kebangkitan otoritarianisme? Kedua, bagaimana aktor politik memanfaatkan celah di dalam sistem presidensil, untuk melemahkan demokrasi dan membangkitkan otoritarianisme? Artikel ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis sosiologis, yang memadukan pendekatan doktriner dengan pendekatan empiris. Artikel ini berhasil menyimpulkan bahwa desain sistem presidensil di dalam UUD 1945 pasca perubahan, gagal mencegah otoritarianisme untuk bangkit, akibat lemahnya pembatasan kekuasan presiden di level politik formal yang mengakibatkan pemusatan kekuasaan di tangan presiden. Di level informal, UUD 1945 gagal menghadirkan partai politik sebagai salah satu pranata demokrasi yang demokratis. Artikel ini juga berhasil mengidentifikasi penggunaan instrumen hukum untuk melemahkan demokrasi yang sekaligus memicu kebangkitan otoritarianisme oleh para aktor politik.
Law Enforcement in the Recovery of State Funds from Corruption Crimes Kartika, Arie; Jaya, Arizon Mega; Zakiran, Asep Hakim; Jastisia, Mentari; Ashady, Suheflihusnaini; Z.S, Edi Mulyadi; Sabatira, Febryani
LAW REFORM Vol 20, No 2 (2024)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v20i2.63799

Abstract

Corruption are not adequately addressed by the current legal framework, which fails to provide appropriate sanctions or follow the Constitution in dealing with such crimes. Simply imposing prison sentences is insufficient; efforts must also be made to recover state losses incurred due to corruption. there are still significant constraints in the implementation and enforcement of the law. This study aim to analyze how the applicable laws are enforced to recover financial losses incurred by the state in cases of criminal corruption; and identify the factors inhibiting the effective implementation of laws related to the recovery of these financial losses. This study employs both normative legal methods and empirical research. The research results suggest that to restore the country's economy affected by criminal corruption, it is necessary to undertake measures such as the foreclosure of assets owned by the convicted individuals. Sanctions should include not only monetary compensation equivalent to the value of the assets obtained through corruption but also criminal fines and decisions on the confiscation of goods. One major internal constraint in recovering state finances is the tendency of convicts to opt for prison sentences rather than paying damages as determined by the court.
ANALYSIS OF CORRUPTION ERADICATION COUNTERMEASURES AGAINST FLEEING CORRUPTORS UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW (CASE STUDY OF EXTRADITION TREATY BETWEEN INDONESIA AND SINGAPORE) Ramadhan, Athallah Ariq; Alim, Fikri Nur; Jaelani, Achmad; Fasyehhudin, Mohamad; Irawan, Benny; Zakiran, Asep Hakim
Sriwijaya Crimen and Legal Studies Volume 2 Issue 2 December 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law Sriwijaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/scls.v2i2.4044

Abstract

Extradition treaties are agreements between countries worldwide that involve the extradition of suspects or perpetrators of crimes, including economic crimes. Extradition treaties are between two countries to prevent transnational or cross-border crimes where the perpetrators flee to another country because they do not want to take responsibility for what they did. Extradition treaties have binding legal force following international law because they are international treaties. The extradition treaty made by Indonesia and Singapore is evidence of their positive cooperation in protecting law enforcement. Over the past few years, suspected Indonesian economic criminals have fled to Singapore with large amounts of money and capital. While Indonesian law cannot be applied to Singaporean territory, in the event of an extradition treaty between Indonesia and Singapore, it would have significant consequences. Suspected economic criminals can be brought back to Indonesia to be sentenced per applicable laws, while Singapore cannot. So this research aims to analyze the Extradition Treaty between Indonesia and Singapore According to International Law (Case Study of Tackling Corruption). 
Co-Authors Achmad Jaelani Alim, Fikri Nur Arie Kartika, Arie Ashady, Suheflihusnaini Benny Irawan Fasyehhudin, Mohamad Jastisia, Mentari Jaya, Arizon Mega Kabir, Syahrul Fauzul Ramadhan, Athallah Ariq Sabatira, Febryani Wicaksana Dramanda Z.S, Edi Mulyadi