Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.906
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum Kertha Patrika Buletin Udayana Mengabdi JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Unram Law Review Jurnal Akta Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA) Jurnal Health Sains Journal of Social Research Formosa Journal of Science and Technology (FJST) Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA) Pemuliaan Keadilan Kertha Wicara: Journal Ilmu Hukum
Ni Nengah Adiyaryani
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Computer Science & IT Dentistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA

 1 
The Role of the Prosecutor in Executing the Payment of Replacement Money I Gede Artha; Ni Nengah Adiyaryani
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 9 No 3 (2020)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2020.v09.i03.p05

Abstract

This research is about the role of the Prosecutor as an executor in executing the assets of the convicts of corruption, to recover the State financial losses from corruption. Besides that, this research aims to know about the returning of State financial losses through the payment of replacement money. Corruption is an extraordinary crime, veiled and endanger national stability and security and inhibiting Indonesian economic development. This research is a normative legal research with primary, secondary and tertiary legal material supported by data. This research is using statutory, case, and comparative approaches. The legal basis used in this research are Law No. 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law No. 20 of 2001, Law No. 16 of 2004 and Law No. 8 of 1981 (Indonesian Criminal Procedural Code). The corruption has become systematic and the scope enters into all aspect of life, start with the lower level with State Officers and law enforcers becomes the dominant actors. In imposing the sanction, The Judges are not only charge imprisonment but also charge additional fines and/or penalties to returning the State financial losses and ask the convicts of corruption to pay the replacement money to the State. The problem arises in this research related to the execution of the verdict about returning State financial losses which are the assets of the convicted person is already in the third party hands or have been depleted, dual population administration, the length of the judicial process, the convicted person prefers to take the subsidiary criminal charge and the hollow of norm regarding technical execution for the Prosecutors so that the execution cannot be carried out.
Surveillance Function in Law Enforcement in Indonesia: Integrated Criminal Justice System Perspective Ni Nengah Adiyaryani; Kadek Agus Sudiarawan
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 3 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i03.p04

Abstract

This study aims to determine the role of law enforcement officer in integrated criminal justice system and to find the concept of surveillance patterns that need to be established for law enforcement officer for the future integrated criminal justice system (ius constituendum). This is normative legal research using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Analysis using qualitative methods and the results are presented in descriptive analysis report. The results show that the integrated criminal justice system did not have an integrated surveillance system in a special form that was implemented by the law enforcement officers and its society yet. It still applying an internal and conventional surveillance pattern. Hence, empowering the existing surveillance pattern and creating an integrated surveillance pattern could be a solution to overcome the weakness of the surveillance system in the Integrated Criminal Justice System nowadays which caused by the fragmented surveillance system without any external-cross institutional surveillance.
Eksistensi Nilai Keadilan Persidangan Perkara Pidana Secara Elektronik Ni Nengah Adiyaryani; I Putu Rasmadi Arsha Putra; Ni Ketut Ngetis Megi Megayani
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 1 (2023)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i01.p06

Abstract

This research is legal research that discusses the nature of the trial of criminal cases electronically during the COVID-19 pandemic and the existence of the value of justice as the legal ideal of the Indonesian nation in the trial of criminal cases during the COVID-19 pandemic. The writing uses a normative research method using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The study results show that the first is essentially the implementation of electronic criminal case trials during the COVID-19 pandemic, which is an embodiment of protection and fulfillment of human rights regarding the right to obtain justice through judicial institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Second, regarding the existence of the value of justice, in the trial of criminal cases electronically during the COVID-19 pandemic, the value of justice still exists or is realized by the legal ideals of the Indonesian nation. PERMA No. 4 of 2020 has procedurally guaranteed the realization of a judiciary that can accommodate the interests of justice seekers in fulfilling their human rights in the form of obtaining justice through judicial institutions. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum yang membahas mengenai bagaimana hakikat persidangan perkara pidana secara elektronik pada masa pandemi COVID-19 dan bagaimana eksistensi nilai keadilan sebagai cita hukum bangsa Indonesia dalam persidangan perkara pidana secara elektronik pada masa pandemi COVID-19. Penulisannya menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual appoarch). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, yang pertama secara hakikat persidangan perkara pidana secara elektronik pada masa pandemi COVID-19 adalah sebuah perwujudan perlindungan dan pemenuhan hak asasi manusia mengenai hak untuk memperoleh keadilan melalui lembaga peradilan pada masa pandemi COVID-19. Kedua, mengenai eksistensi nilai keadilan, pada persidangan perkara pidana secara elektronik pada masa pandemi COVID-19, bahwa persidangan perkara pidana secara elektronik adalah untuk menjaga agar nilai keadilannya tetap eksis atau terwujud sesuai dengan cita hukum bangsa Indonesia. PERMA RI No. 4 Tahun 2020 secara prosedural telah menjamin terwujudkna peradilan yang mampu untuk mengakomodir kepentingan para pencari keadilan dalam memenuhi hak asasinya berupa memperoleh keadilan melalui lembaga peradilan.
Co-Authors A.A. N.Y. Darmadi Adia Pratistia Aditya, I Gede Prama Ayu Diah Pradnya Swari P.J Banu, Ida Wayan Bagus Abby Dewi, Kadek Sri Wahyuni Etik Jamsianah Gomes, Florindo Cardoso Handayani, Ni Wayan Restuti I Dewa Gede Agung Dwi Cahyadhi I Dewa Gede Dana Sugama I Dewa Gede Palguna I Dewa Made Suartha I Gde Satya Adhi Wicaksana I Gede Artha I Gusti Agus Yuda Trisna Pramana I Gusti Ayu Putri Kartika, I Gusti Ayu I Ketut Sudjana I Made Aryawan Saddewa I Made Dwikka Surya Pratama I Putu Rasmadi Arsha Putra I Wayan Bela Siki Layang I Wayan Parsa I Wayan Topik Widnyana Jayantiari, I Gusti Mas Rwa K. A. Sudiarawan Kadek Agus Sudiarawan Kadek Tegar Wacika Komang Ayu Trisna Cahya Dewi Lusiana Bida Made Wipra Pratistita Mulia, Moto Ni Ketut Ayu Suwandewi Ni Ketut Ngetis Megi Megayani Ni Luh Ayu Widhiarcani Laksmidewi Ni Luh Diah Febriyani Teja Santi Ni Made Diah Arista Ardiyantini Ni Made Rai Sukardi Ni Putu Inten Puspitasari Nyoman Arif Budiman Nyoman Trisna Sari Indra Pratiwi Putu Ria Purnami Sagung Putri M. E. Purwani Sagung Putri M.E.Purwani Saraswastini, Luh Putu Henny Suandika, I Nyoman Susiani, Ani Tyas Yuniawati Suroto Wulandani, Made Yussyta Yohanes Usfunan