Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 34 Documents
Search

Legal Protection of Customary Land Control by Communities through the Implementation of Agrarian Reform in Ternate City Ayni, Nurul; Alting, Husen; Suwarti, Suwarti
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Vol. 6 No. 4 (2025): Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains
Publisher : CV. Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jiss.v6i4.1689

Abstract

This study explores legal issues surrounding the protection of customary land ownership through the implementation of agrarian reform in Ternate City. Existing legal frameworks, particularly the Basic Agrarian Law, remain insufficient in providing explicit recognition and legal protection for customary land that continues to exist without formal documentation. This research identifies areas of customary land in Ternate that have not been registered or recognized with formal ownership rights and examines the position of customary land ownership from the perspective of legal protection theory. The findings reveal that agrarian reform has had limited impact in securing customary land rights due to the absence of legal clarity and institutional support. Moreover, the National Land Agency's current policy strategies have not effectively integrated mechanisms to acknowledge and register customary land claims. The lack of harmonized regulations contributes to legal uncertainty and hinders the realization of equitable land rights. Therefore, this paper emphasizes the urgent need for a more comprehensive regulatory framework that ensures the legal recognition and protection of customary land within the agrarian reform agenda. This will contribute to stronger legal certainty, social justice, and the preservation of indigenous communities' land rights in Ternate City.
Wanprestasi dan Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia; Best Pratice Executie Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 2/PUU-XIX/2021 Kharie, Maharani Magfira; Alting, Husen; Suwarti, Suwarti
Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Ranah Research : Journal Of Multidisciplinary Research and Development
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/rrj.v8i1.1933

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji pengaturan praktik terbaik (best practice executie) terhadap depositor yang melakukan wanprestasi melalui mekanisme eksekusi garansi kebendaan dengan objek garansi fidusia, serta menganalisis akibat hukum dari Putusan Hakim KonstitusiNomor 18/puu-XVII/2019 jucto Putusan Hakim KonstitusiNomor 2/PUU-XIX/2021 mengenai perumusan klausula dalam perjanjian fidusia, eksekusi garansi fidusia, dan penentuan wanprestasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif, yang berarti bahwa ia berkonsentrasi pada pengumpulan dan analisis hukum positif. Ini mencakup asas-asas hukum, peraturan perundang-undangan, putusan pengadilan, doktrin, dan teori hukum yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan best practice executie terhadap depositor wanprestasi melalui eksekusi garansi fidusia mengalami perbedaan pengaturan antara sebelum dan sesudah keputusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Pelaksanaan eksekusi garansi sebelum Putusan Hakim KonstitusiNomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 juncto Putusan Hakim KonstitusiNomor 2/PUU-XIX/2021 fidusia didasarkan pada Pasal 29 Undang-Undang Garansi Fidusia (UUJF), yang memperbolehkan eksekusi dilakukan melalui tiga cara, yaitu: (1) eksekusi berdasarkan titel eksekutorial, (2) parate executie melalui penawaran publik, dan (3) pembelian di bawah tangan. Namun, setelah Putusan Hakim KonstitusiNomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019, eksekusi garansi fidusia mengalami perubahan besar. Proses eksekusi harus dilakukan melalui permohonan ke Pengadilan Negeri jika depositor menolak atau tidak bersedia menyerahkan garansi secara sukarela. Selanjutnya, berdasarkan Putusan Hakim KonstitusiNomor 2/PUU-XIX/2021, pelaksanaan eksekusi garansi fidusia melalui Pengadilan Negeri oleh kreditur sebagaimana diatur dalam Putusan MK sebelumnya bersifat alternatif, bukan keharusan mutlak. Implikasi hukum dari kedua putusan tersebut menimbulkan pergeseran terhadap norma hukum yang berlaku, khususnya terkait: (1) mekanisme penentuan wanprestasi yang kini harus didasarkan pada kesepakatan antara kreditur dan depositor atau melalui putusan/penetapan lembaga peradilan; (2) perubahan prosedur dan hakikat parate executie sebagai hak istimewa kreditur yang sebelumnya menjadi ciri khas garansi kebendaan dengan asas kemudahan dan kepastian eksekusi; serta (3) perlunya penyesuaian terhadap perumusan klausula dalam perjanjian fidusia agar sesuai dengan prinsip dan arah hukum baru pasca putusan Hakim Konstitusitersebut.
KOEKSISTENSI DAN PERLINDUNGAN MASYARAKAT ADAT O'HONGANA MANYAWA DI WILAYAH PERTAMBANGAN NIKEL Alting, Husen; Sinay, Siti Barora; Alwan, Sultan
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5532

Abstract

Nickel mining in Halmahera, especially in Central Halmahera and East Halmahera Regencies, makes a major contribution to the national economy through the downstreaming of strategic minerals. However, these activities have serious impacts on the forest ecosystem and the lives of the O'Hongana Manyawa indigenous people, which relies heavily on their living space for cultural sustainability and livelihoods. This research aims to analyze the co-existence between mining activities and the protection of indigenous communities, with a focus on the legal framework, evaluation of protection practices. The research uses empirical legal methods through in-depth interviews, field observations, and secondary document studies. The research results show that the overlap of mining concession areas with the living spaces of indigenous communities causes environmental damage, social marginalization and loss of cultural identity. Existing regulations, such as AMDAL, do not fully protect the rights of indigenous peoples because their implementation is weak. Therefore, a more balanced approach is needed, such as recognition of traditional territories, application of the principles of Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC), as well as empowerment programs based on local culture. In conclusion, protection of indigenous communities must be a priority to ensure social, cultural and ecological sustainability amidst industrial development.
Status Hukum Tanah Bekas Hak Guna Bangunan yang Tidak Diperpanjang dalam Perspektif Pemanfaatan Aset Negara (Studi Kasus Lahan Pelabuhan Sofifi) Pradana, Risky Herduiva; Alting, Husen; Sinay, Siti Barora
SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): SENTRI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Februari 2026
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/sentri.v5i2.5729

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the control of former Building Use Right (Hak Guna Bangunan/HGB) land owned by PT. Darko Modul & Timber whose term has expired and was not extended according to the Indonesian land law framework, as well as to examine the legal construction required to provide legal certainty over the status of such land so that it may be utilized as a State Asset (State-Owned Property), with a case study of the Sofifi Port land. This research employs an empirical legal research method with a qualitative approach. Empirical legal research is conducted to examine the implementation of law in practice (law in action) by analyzing how land law regulations and state asset management norms are applied in reality. The data used in this research consist of primary data obtained through interviews with relevant stakeholders and secondary data derived from laws and regulations, court decisions, legal doctrines, and related legal literature. The results of this research indicate that the expiration of the Building Use Right without extension results in the termination of the right by operation of law, and consequently, the land reverts to land directly controlled by the state. This legal consequence is further affirmed by the Decision of the Soasio District Court Number 16/Pdt.G/2025/PN Sos, which declares that the rights of PT. Darko Modul & Timber over the disputed land have been extinguished and that the former Building Use Right Land Number 01 of 1985 constitutes state land. However, although the court decision has provided normative and judicial legal certainty, legal certainty from the perspective of land administration law has not yet been fully realized, as it has not been followed by administrative actions in the form of state land designation and registration of the land as State-Owned Property. Therefore, an integrative legal construction through land administration and state asset management mechanisms is required to ensure that the utilization of the land for public purposes, particularly as the Sofifi Port, is supported by clear legal status and provides legal protection for all parties involved.