Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Maneggio: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Manajemen Asian Journal of Healthcare Analytics indonesian Journal of Administrative Law and Local Government (IJALGOV)
Rambe, Muhammad Juang
Unknown Affiliation
Chemistry Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Veterinary

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Judicial Order in the Examination of the Constitutionality and Legality of Health Financing Norms Rambe, Muhammad Juang; Siregar, Muhammad Azhali; Sembiring, Danioko
Asian Journal of Healthcare Analytics Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): November 2024
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/ajha.v3i2.12583

Abstract

This study examines the role of judicial orders in healthcare financing in Indonesia through decisions by the Constitutional Court (MK) and the Supreme Court (MA). It employs a normative approach with qualitative analysis to explore the role of judicial orders in regulating healthcare financing, focusing on decisions from both MK and MA. The analysis reveals that the MK, through Decision No. 63 of 2012, emphasizes the shared responsibility of the state and individuals in healthcare services, while Decision No. 72 of 2019 upholds the principle of non-regression. The MA, in Decision 7P of 2020, annulled the BPJS premium increase for violating the principle of social justice. This study underscores the importance of legislative responses to judicial decisions to establish a sustainable, fair, and inclusive healthcare financing system aligned with constitutional mandates.
Peran Disiplin Kerja dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Pegawai pada Organisasi Publik Batubara, Soulthan Saladin; Rambe, Muhammad Juang
Maneggio: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Manajemen Vol 8, No 2 (2025): SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Magister Manajemen Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30596/maneggio.v8i2.26938

Abstract

Pegawai sebagai ujung tombak pelayanan dituntut memiliki disiplin kerja yang tinggi agar dapat mencapai tujuan kinerja secara optimal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis pengaruh disiplin terhadap kinerja pegawai di Biro Rektor Universitas Negeri Medan. Dengan menggunakan teknik Simple Random Sampling dan rumus Slovin dengan tingkat kelonggaran (e) sebesar 5%, diperoleh sampel sebanyak 104 pegawai yang berstatus Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner, wawancara, dan studi dokumentasi. Kuesioner diukur menggunakan skala Likert dan diolah menggunakan program SPSS (Statistical Product and Service Solution).Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa baik secara parsial maupun simultan, variabel kepemimpinan dan disiplin kerja berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kinerja pegawai di Biro Rektor Universitas Negeri Medan.
The Ethical Approach in Assessing the Legitimacy of Constitutional Court Decisions: Urgency and Orientation Fathorrahman, Fathorrahman; Rambe, Muhammad Juang; Fahmi, Agung Ali
Indonesian Journal of Administrative Law and Local Government Vol. 1 No. 02 (2024): INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT (IJALGOV)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/ijalgov.v1i02.36462

Abstract

This study examines the importance of ethics as a formal parameter in assessing the validity of Constitutional Court (MK) decisions in Indonesia. The final and binding nature of MK decisions often raises debates regarding absolute power without adequate control mechanisms, especially in the context of ethical violations. This research explores deontological ethics and procedural justice as the basis for analysis, as well as several controversial MK decisions related to ethical issues. This research is a normative legal study that emphasizes a conceptual and statutory approach. The results show that integrating ethics into the assessment of MK decisions can enhance the legitimacy of constitutional justice and ensure more substantive justice. Therefore, this study recommends reformulating the legal framework to incorporate ethics as a key component in the validity assessment process.
Co-Authors Agung Ali Fahmi Fathorrahman Fathorrahman, Fathorrahman Sembiring, Danioko Siregar, Muhammad Azhali