Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 26 Documents
Search

Legal Protection on Pharmaceutical Product Patents by the Government on Covid-19’S Remdevisir and Favipiravir Nurmawati, Bernadete; Iryani, Dewi; Setiawan, Puguh Aji Hari; Herman, KMS
Interdisciplinary Social Studies Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): Regular Issue
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/iss.v2i2.338

Abstract

Background: The implementation of patents by the Government for pharmaceutical products can be carried out in terms of very urgent needs for the benefit of the community, such as medicines that are still protected by patents to overcome Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) in Indonesia. Aim: To analyze the implementation of Patents by the Government according to Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning Patents and legal protection for pharmaceutical product patent holders for the Implementation of Patents by the Government against remdevisir drugs and favipiravir. Method: Research method based on normative juridical approach from various legal materials through literature studies. Findings: To overcome the Covid-19 disease in Indonesia, the government needs to establish an access policy for pharmaceutical products as stated in Presidential Regulation Number 100 of 2021 concerning the Implementation of Patents by the Government against Remdesivir Drugs and Presidential Regulation Number 101 of 2021 concerning the Implementation of Patents by the Government against the Favipiravir Drug, on November 10, 2021. Patent holders of Remdevisir and Favipiravir medicinal pharmaceutical products are entitled to legal protection for the exercise of exclusive rights and payment of compensation during the Implementation of Patents by the Government in the amount of 1% of the net selling value of Remdesivir and Favipiravir drugs.
Legal Protection for Women as Victims of Rape in the Perspective of Feminist Legal Theory Santoso, Niken Larasayu; Suhariyanto, Didik; Setiawan, Puguh Aji Hari
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 4 (2025): December
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17786349

Abstract

Sexual violence against women, particularly rape, remains a serious issue in Indonesia despite the enactment of Law Number 12 of 2022 on Sexual Violence Crimes (UU TPKS). However, in practice, there is a significant gap between normative ideals and the reality of law enforcement. Many law enforcement officers are reluctant or have yet to fully understand the UU TPKS, resulting in sexual violence cases still being processed under the KUHP. Consequently, victims experience revictimization, limited access to restitution and recovery services, and a legal system that fails to recognize women’s experiences as complete legal subjects. This study employs a normative legal method with a qualitative approach. The primary sources of data consist of secondary legal materials, including legislation (particularly UU TPKS and the KUHP), court decisions (West Jakarta District Court Decisions Number 412/Pid.B/2023 and 722/Pid.B/2023), scholarly journals, and literature related to Feminist Legal Theory. The analytical technique used is sociological interpretation to connect legal norms with social realities, examined through the framework of Feminist Legal Theory (FLT) as a critical tool to identify gender bias within the legal system. The findings reveal that legal protection for women who are victims of rape has not yet fully aligned with the principles of substantive justice and feminist perspectives. Although the UU TPKS offers a victim-centered approach and recognizes various forms of non-physical violence, its implementation remains hindered by patriarchal legal culture, insufficient training for law enforcement officers, and weak inter-institutional coordination. Court decisions applying the UU TPKS tend to be more responsive to victims’ trauma compared with those applying the KUHP. 
LEGAL CERTAINTY FOR CONSUMERS IN GOOD FAITH DUE TO THE DEVELOPER COMPANY BEING DECLARED BANKRUPT Hie, Hengky Himawan; Iryani, Dewi; Setiawan, Puguh Aji Hari
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v8i1.1929

Abstract

The issue of legal certainty for consumers in good faith in buying and selling houses becomes even more important when the developer company is declared bankrupt. Consumers who have carried out their obligations, whether in the form of down payment, installments, and repayment, are often only positioned as concurrent creditors in the bankruptcy settlement process. This study uses normative juridical legal methods with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The source of research data was obtained through literature studies which include primary legal materials in the form of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the Civil Code, Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations, as well as several Supreme Court decisions related to developer bankruptcy cases. Secondary legal materials are derived from books, legal journals, and the results of previous research. Data analysis is carried out by interpreting laws in a systematic, contextual, and comparative manner to obtain the right legal construction. The results of the study show that there is a legal disharmony between the Consumer Protection Law and the Bankruptcy Law. Consumers in good faith are often only placed as concurrent creditors so that they do not get optimal legal protection. In fact, Article 28H of the 1945 Constitution guarantees the right of everyone to live and live properly. Therefore, there is a need for legal reconstruction that places consumers as preferred creditors or given a special position in developer bankruptcy, in order to realize legal certainty, justice, and utility. The author recommends that regulatory reform be carried out through amendments to the Bankruptcy Law by accommodating the legal protection of consumers in good faith as a form of implementation of the principles of social justice.
Optimalisasi Fungsi Bakamla Sebagai Indonesian Coast Guard: Antara Regulasi Dan Realita Umra, Alieffandy; Iryani, Dewi; Setiawan, Puguh Aji Hari
JUSTICIA SAINS - Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10, No 2 (2025): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24967/jcs.v10i2.4394

Abstract

The Indonesian Maritime Security Agency (Bakamla) plays a strategic role in ensuring security, safety, and law enforcement within Indonesia’s maritime jurisdiction. Although its authority is normatively stipulated through regulations such as Law No. 32 of 2014, Presidential Regulation No. 178 of 2014, and Government Regulation No. 13 of 2022, in practice Bakamla has yet to fully function as an ideal Indonesian Coast Guard. The absence of a specific law, overlapping authorities with other agencies, and limited resources hinder its operational effectiveness. This study aims to analyse Bakamla’s legal position and authority within the national legal system, identify discrepancies between regulation and operational reality, and formulate institutional strengthening strategies. Using a normative juridical approach, this research concludes that establishing a dedicated Coast Guard Law is an urgent step to develop a unified, professional, and effective national maritime security system
Optimalisasi Mutual Legal Assistance dan Urgensi Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture (NCB) dalam Penanganan Aset Korupsi di Luar Negeri Belinda, Suci Fidia Fitriza; Iryani, Dewi; Setiawan, Puguh Aji Hari
Jurnal Riksa Cendikia Nusantara Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Riksa Cendikia Nusantara - Januari 2026
Publisher : Jurnal Riksa Cendikia Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18691194

Abstract

Korupsi lintas negara menimbulkan tantangan serius dalam upaya pemulihan aset hasil kejahatan yang disembunyikan di luar yurisdiksi nasional. Indonesia telah memiliki instrumen hukum berupa Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2006 serta ratifikasi United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC). Namun demikian, praktik pemulihan aset masih menghadapi hambatan, terutama ketika pelaku tindak pidana tidak dapat dipidana karena melarikan diri, meninggal dunia, atau berada di luar wilayah hukum Indonesia. Dalam konteks tersebut, Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture (NCB) menjadi mekanisme alternatif yang strategis untuk perampasan aset tanpa menunggu putusan pidana. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis optimalisasi penerapan MLA serta urgensi pengaturan NCB dalam penanganan aset korupsi di luar negeri. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sinergi antara MLA dan NCB sangat diperlukan untuk memperkuat efektivitas pemulihan aset korupsi lintas negara. Oleh karena itu, pengesahan Rancangan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset menjadi kebutuhan mendesak dalam rangka memperkuat rezim pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia
Pertanggungjawaban Perdata Lembaga yang Tidak Berbadan Hukum dalam Pengumpulan Dana Publik untuk Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum Khikmatussafira, Ilma; Ismail; Setiawan, Puguh Aji Hari
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 2 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i2.4776

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaturan hukum dan pertanggungjawaban perdata lembaga tidak berbadan hukum dalam kegiatan pengumpulan dana di Indonesia. Praktik penghimpunan dana oleh komunitas, kelompok masyarakat, dan organisasi tanpa status badan hukum semakin berkembang, terutama melalui media sosial dan sarana digital. Namun, perkembangan tersebut belum diimbangi dengan kepastian hukum yang memadai sehingga berpotensi menimbulkan penyimpangan, penyalahgunaan dana, serta ketidakjelasan hubungan hukum antara penyelenggara, donatur, dan penerima manfaat. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan studi kepustakaan untuk mengkaji batasan lembaga yang diperbolehkan melakukan pengumpulan dana menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 1961 tentang Pengumpulan Uang atau Barang beserta peraturan pelaksananya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa regulasi yang ada belum mengatur secara jelas praktik pengumpulan dana oleh lembaga tidak berbadan hukum, sehingga menimbulkan kekosongan norma dan ketidakpastian mengenai legalitas kegiatannya. Dalam aspek pertanggungjawaban perdata, penyelenggara tetap dapat dimintai tanggung jawab melalui mekanisme wanprestasi atau perbuatan melawan hukum, meskipun tidak memiliki status badan hukum. Prinsip dasar hukum perdata menegaskan bahwa setiap subjek yang melakukan perbuatan hukum dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pembaruan regulasi untuk memberikan kepastian hukum, memperkuat perlindungan masyarakat, serta menjamin transparansi dan akuntabilitas dalam setiap kegiatan pengumpulan dana publik