Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

PROSES BALIK NAMA SERTIPIKAT DALAM JUAL BELI TANAH MENURUT PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 24 TAHUN 1997 TENTANG PENDAFTARAN TANAH (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI BULUKUMBA NOMOR 26/Pdt.G/2019/PN Blk) David Oberlin Nugraha Saragih; Gunawan Djajaputra
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Owning land, whether it's for residence or for business is a basic need. The validity as a land owner is proven by a certificate of ownership in the name of the owner. Land ownership can come from inheritance or purchase transactions. Purchase transactions should be carried out before a Notary/Land Deed Official in order to obtain a Sale and Purchase Deed. On the basis of the deed, the buyer can transfer the name of the land to the local Land Office in accordance with Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 Article 37 which requires land registration. In purchase transactions, people often only go through private transactions so that the Sale and Purchase Deed is not obtained. This becomes a problem if the location of the seller or his heirs are not known so that the buyer cannot change the name of the certificate of ownership. To overcome this problem, there is a way that can be made, to file a lawsuit at the local District Court by attaching strong evidence and two witnesses. In the Bulukumba District Court Decision Number 26/Pdt.G/2019/PN Blk., the Panel of Judges granted the lawsuit with legal considerations, by examining all valid evidence, two witnesses who really knew the purchase transaction, conducting a local examination, and based on the laws and regulations. Based on the Court's Decision which grants the claim, the plaintiff can transfer the name of the certificate of ownership. This research uses normative and descriptive research.
Position of Joint Assets in Marriages that Lead to Divorce (Decision Study No.419/Pdt.G/2021/Pn.Tng) Andrew Giovanni Tanjaya; Gunawan Djajaputra
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Marriage is a sacred and noble relationship intended for humans in terms of development to continue offspring and spend life with someone we love. Marriage in Indonesia is regulated in Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage and also the Civil Code. In marriage, assets that have been owned so far will indirectly become joint property since the marriage took place as long as there is no agreement regarding the separation of assets. This study uses a normative juridical method, namely legal research conducted by examining literature or secondary data as the basis for research. The data collection technique is by conducting a literature study of the Law and Decision No.419/Pdt.G/2021/Pn. Tng to find out how the position of joint assets collected during marriage becomes joint property like this when a divorce is in progress. the parties who control the joint property must voluntarily surrender the joint property based on the decision of the marriage agreement made or in accordance with the applicable decision, which can also be done by confiscating the marriage property by the bailiff.
STAGES OF LAND PROCUREMENT FOR PUBLIC INTEREST DEVELOPMENT (STUDY OF DECISION NO.227/PDT/G/2020/PN.MDN) Cindy Situmeang; Gunawan Djajaputra
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Land Procurement for the Implementation of Development in the Public Interest is one of the manifestations of the social function of land rights which has been mandated in Article 6 of the LoGA. appropriate compensation for the land rights without compromising the rights and sense of justice. This includes the interests of the government as well as justice for the rights of the people who are taken and also the public interest in using the facilities built by taking the land of the land owner with the power of his Land Rights. The research method used is a literature study that uses Court Decisions and primary & secondary sources of material as research support. The position of a person in a lawsuit complaint is also very important, in this case the judge's consideration is also needed in viewing a lawsuit, and also for the government, it must provide the right of compensation in kind. The results of this literature study research method state that land acquisition for development is in the public interest to uphold the basic principles of humanity and justice.
KEABSAHAN KONTRAK TANDA TANGAN ELEKTRONIK DALAM PERJANJIAN PENDANAAN P2P LENDING Catherine Carisa Khovin; Gunawan Djajaputra
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Peer-to-Peer Lending is now familiar to the public. Its ease of investing makes people not hesitate to try to invest with this service. In addition, the small risk of loss is also the reason many people try to invest through Peer-to-Peer Lending services. The increasing number of smartphone users makes people who are trying to invest in these services increase because the interest is also in Peer-to-Peer Lending Services more and more. The problem discussed in this study is how the legal force of electronic signatures in funding agreements (P2P Lending) in courts in the event of disputes in courts according to the Civil Procedure Law. The research was conducted using the literature study method with the statute approach method. Civil procedural law does not specifically regulate electronic evidence. Meanwhile, along with the development of technology, legal products are also updated or formed new ones. Although civil procedural law does not directly regulate electronic evidence, the expansion of such evidence is regulated in the Electronic Information and Transactions Law.
KESESUAIAN PUTUSAN HAKIM DILIHAT BERDASARKAN SYARAT PERJANJIAN Janice Vianney; Gunawan Djajaputra
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

As a rule of law, all behavior and behavior of society is regulated by law and law has the highest position in the state. The formation of these written regulations aims to regulate people's behavior in order to create order and legal certainty, where it is hoped that there will be no violation of the rights and obligations of everyone. The term regarding legal subjects comes from the Dutch language recht subject which is generally interpreted as supporting rights and obligations, namely humans and legal entities. In social activities, people (person) and legal entity (recht person) as legal subjects often intersect with agreements. It can be concluded that base on Article 1313 of the Civil Code, “An agreement is an act by which one person or more binds himself to one or more other people”. The purpose of the agreement is to meet the needs and gain profit. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that the purpose of an agreement is contained in the contents of the agreement itself. A new agreement can be said to be a valid agreement if it fulfills the requirements for the validity of the agreement set forth in Article 1320 of the Civil Code.
PERMASALAHAN HUKUM AGRARIA DI INDONESIA Siaw Swhien; Gunawan Djajaputra
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Struktur hukum dan lembaga penegak hukum memiliki peran strategis dalam upaya mencari solusi atas berbagai permasalahan agraria/pertanahan yang terjadi di Indonesia. Struktur hukum beserta kelembagaannya merupakan komponen atau organ struktural yang terlibat dalam suatu mekanisme, baik dalam pembuatan peraturan, maupun dalam pelaksanaan atau pelaksanaan peraturan. Dengan menggunakan metode normatif, penelitian ini menyoroti kondisi kontemporer dan isu-isu kritis dalam permasalahan penegakan dan pelayanan agraria di Indonesia. Hasil penelitian ini juga menunjukkan perlunya penerapan prinsip good governance dalam pengelolaan sertifikat dan hal-hal lain yang berkaitan dengan pertanahan sebagai salah satu konsekuensi dari peningkatan kualitas aparatur di Indonesia pada bidang agraria. Kondisi terkait pelayanan publik dalam pembuatan sertifikasi tanah di kantor BPN menjadi salah satu masalah utama bagi lembaga yang harus segera dibenahi, proses pengurusan yang lama untuk mendapatkan sertifikat hak atas tanah di Kantor BPN tidak efisien, dibutuhkan jangka waktu hingga delapan bulan, belum lagi ditambah dengan beban biaya yang relatif mahal dan rawan masalah korupsi yang memperumit masalah agraria di Indonesia saat ini, masih terdapat praktik pungli oleh aparat, masih banyak praktik makelar oleh aparat dan tidak ada sanksi/tindakan tegas terhadap petugas yang menyalahgunakan wewenang.
POLITIK HUKUM PENGADAAN TANAH BAGI PEMBANGUNAN UNTUK KEPENTINGAN UMUM (Studi Putusan Nomor 2/PDT/2021/PT TJK.) Muhamad Ibnu Afif; Gunawan Djajaputra
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to get more knowledge about the causes of land rights conflicts and possible solutions. According to a method of normative legal analysis, conflicts over land rights are settled by administrative procedures provided by government organizations, in this instance the National Land Agency. After the 1960s BAL went into effect, a number of laws were created in an effort to prevent future hiccups in the decision-making process over how to utilize the land. The BPN Agrarian Directorate further acts as a place for mediation if there are conflicts so that the parties engaged in a land ownership issue may reach a peaceful conclusion. I In the event that land ownership disputes cannot be settled with the assistance of the government, the General Court, the Arbitration Board, and the Directorate of Agrarian Affairs shall all serve as a bridge for the disputing parties to obtain legal clarity on the status of the disputed property. The available choices for handling disputes may be able to balance maintaining the objectives and clarity of the law with the needs of the disputing parties.
PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PERKARA PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM PELELANGAN OBJEK SENGKETA YANG CACAT HUKUM (PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 2893 K/PDT/2021) Omega Kharisma Yeremiarim; Gunawan Djajaputra
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.551

Abstract

Auction is a method of offering goods by verbally mentioning the price from the highest to the lowest. This writing aims to find out the material law that should be stipulated in this case and to find out the basis for the judge's considerations in deciding case Number 2893 K/Pdt/2021. This research approach is a normative juridical approach by discussing the doctrine or legal principles contained in statutory regulations. The results of this study are that the court can cancel the cancellation of auction for the execution of the Mortgage. Cancellations can only be canceled before the auction is held, this is by the provisions in Article 24 of the Minister of Finance Regulation No.106/PMK.06/2013 which states that the auction can be canceled by a court decision before the auction is held. Cancellations of auctions submitted after the auction has occurred cannot be carried out, this is in accordance with the provisions in Article 3 of Minister of Finance Regulation No.106/PMK.06/2013 which reads that auctions that have been carried out in accordance with applicable regulations cannot be cancelled.
Analisis Perspektif Pro Kontra Masyarakat Terhadap Penerapan Sema No. 2 Tahun 2023 Aurora Vania Crisdi Gonadi; Gunawan Djajaputra
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1072

Abstract

Artikel ini bertujuan memberikan gambaran yang cukup komprehensif tentang kontroversi seputar SEMA No. 2 Tahun 2023 di Indonesia terkait dengan perkawinan beda agama. Hasil Penelitian ini menunjukan adanya keragaman agama di Indonesia, peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku, kewenangan hakim, dan pentingnya keadilan serta kepastian hukum merupakan pertimbangan yang sangat relevan. Kontroversi seputar SEMA ini memang sangat kompleks dan mencerminkan ketegangan antara aspek agama, hukum, dan kebebasan hakim. Isu ini memang sangat sensitif dan memerlukan pembahasan mendalam serta pertimbangan yang cermat oleh berbagai pihak, termasuk legislator, pengadilan, dan masyarakat luas. Sebagai solusi, perdebatan ini harus diarahkan menuju solusi yang dapat menghormati hak-hak individu, memperkuat kebhinekaan Indonesia, serta memastikan perlindungan hukum dan administratif yang memadai bagi perkawinan antar-umat berbeda agama.
Perbedaan Putusan Bpsk Dan Pengadilan Negeri Atas Perjanjian Pembiayaan Dengan Penyerahan Hak Milik Secara Fidusia Kea Ezzati Ascarya Kusumonegoro; Gunawan Djajaputra
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1112

Abstract

Penelitian ini membandingkan penyelesaian sengketa antara Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) dan Pengadilan Negeri dalam kasus perjanjian pembiayaan dengan jaminan fidusia. Dalam konteks perubahan kehidupan manusia yang memerlukan tambahan sumber dana, pinjam-meminjam dengan jaminan fidusia umumnya digunakan. Rumusan masalah penelitian adalah perbandingan dalam penyelesaian sengketa antara BPSK dan Pengadilan Negeri. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian normatif dengan analisis data berdasarkan undang-undang, regulasi, putusan pengadilan, dokumen akademik, dan literatur terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan perbedaan signifikan dalam kekuatan hukum putusan antara BPSK dan Pengadilan Negeri. Pengadilan Negeri memiliki kekuatan eksekusi langsung, sedangkan BPSK mengandalkan kesepakatan sukarela. Selain itu, pendekatan penentuan kompensasi juga berbeda, dengan Pengadilan Negeri cenderung memberikan kompensasi lebih tegas. Dalam konteks perjanjian pembiayaan dengan jaminan fidusia, pemilihan metode penyelesaian harus mempertimbangkan karakteristik sengketa dan tujuan pihak yang bersengketa. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa pemilihan antara BPSK dan Pengadilan Negeri perlu mempertimbangkan kebutuhan dan kompleksitas sengketa yang bersangkutan. Pihak ketiga yang terpengaruh juga harus melindungi hak-hak mereka sesuai dengan hukum yang berlaku. Saran penelitian adalah untuk mempertimbangkan karakteristik sengketa dengan cermat. Jika penyelesaian dengan kekuatan hukum dan eksekusi diperlukan, Pengadilan Negeri mungkin menjadi pilihan yang lebih sesuai. Namun, jika sengketa bersifat lebih fleksibel dan lebih memilih kesepakatan sukarela, maka BPSK bisa menjadi alternatif yang baik, memungkinkan para pihak untuk mencapai kesepakatan yang moderat.