Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

The Effectiveness of The Supervision By The Regional Supervisory Council Over Notaries Based On Article 67 Paragraph (5) of The Notary Office Act Intan Nirmala Ramadhani; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti; Diah Aju Wisnuwardhani
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 2 (2025): September
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i2.303

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of supervision by the Malang Raya Regional Supervisory Council (MPD) on the behavior and implementation of notary positions based on Article 67 paragraph (5) of the Notary Position Law. The background of the study is that there are still notaries who do not carry out their duties according to the provisions, so that effective supervision is important. The study uses an empirical method (sociolegal) with a legal and conceptual sociology approach, through interviews, observations, and literature studies. The results of the study indicate that supervision by the MPD is normatively in accordance with the rules, but in practice it is not optimal. Limited intensity, the absence of supervisory mechanisms at times, and a focus more on administrative aspects than professional ethics make the effectiveness of supervision low. The main obstacles include the lack of MPD members, the absence of firm sanctions, and low awareness of notaries. As a result, supervision does not fully reflect the principles of accountability, transparency, and the function of professional development. The study concludes that institutional strengthening, consistent enforcement of sanctions, and ethical development are needed to improve notary professionalism.
LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE ADMISSION OF EXCEPTIO NON ADIMPLETI CONTRACTUS ON A COUNTERCLAIM IN A BREACH OF CONTRACT CASE Sinar Tamba Tua Pandiangan; Rachmi Sulistyarini; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): May
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i3.2878

Abstract

In Indonesian judicial practice, there is a divergence of opinions among judges regarding the legal consequences/implications of the acceptance of Exceptio non adimpleti contractus on counterclaim. This has prompted the author to research the legal implications of the acceptance of Exceptio non adimpleti contractus on the counterclaim in breach of contract cases. This research utilizes a normative legal research method. If Exceptio non adimpleti contractus is granted, the counter claim may still be considered by the panel of judges to fulfill the principles of simple, swift, and low-cost justice. This approach is considered more efficient and avoids delays also additional costs that would arise if the defendant were required to file a new lawsuit. Moreover, within the framework of progressive legal theory, adjudicating a case while considering the counterclaim, even after Exceptio non adimpleti contractus is granted, can provide real benefits to society by ensuring prompter and more affordable access to justice.
EX OFFICIO JUDGE'S AUTHORITY TOWARDS FULFILLMENT OF WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S RIGHTS AFTER DIVORCE AS REVIEWED FROM THE PRINCIPLE OF ULTRA PETITA Helpan Setiabudi; Abdul Rachmad Budiono; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): September
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i5.3864

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the ex officio authority of judges and the ultra petita principle in divorce cases in Religious Courts, as well as their implications for the protection of women's and children's rights. The background of this study is based on the fact that divorce cases in Indonesia continue to increase annually, but only a small proportion of decisions contain the determination of women's and children's rights after divorce without a request from the litigants. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory, case, and conceptual approach. Data sources consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, analyzed using description, interpretation, evaluation, and systematization techniques. The results show that ex officio authority is an important instrument held by judges to protect the rights of vulnerable parties in divorce cases, such as determining iddah (waiting period), mut'ah (waiting for temporary dowry), child custody, and child living expenses. However, its application often clashes with the ultra petita principle, which limits judges from deciding cases beyond what the parties request. The tension between these two principles leads to inconsistent decisions, which impacts on the suboptimal protection of women's and children's rights. This study concludes that there is a need to harmonize ex officio authority and the ultra petita principle through clear technical guidelines and training for judges, so that substantive justice and legal certainty can be achieved in a balanced manner. Recommendations include strengthening judges' understanding of the protection of vulnerable groups, utilizing socio-economic data in decisions, and consistent application of ex officio authority across all Religious Courts.
LEGISLATIVE RATIO OF SEMA NUMBER 3 OF 2023 IN GUARANTEEING SUBSTANTIVE JUSTICE IN DIVORCE CASES Nadia Romadhon; Abdul Rachmad Budiono; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): November
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.3949

Abstract

The high divorce rate in Indonesia, particularly within the religious courts, has drawn serious scrutiny in the practice of family law enforcement. The most dominant grounds for divorce, namely persistent disputes and arguments, are often presented with weak and subjective evidence, potentially creating legal uncertainty and injustice for certain parties, particularly women. To address this issue, the Supreme Court issued Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 3 of 2023, which tightens the requirements for granting a divorce petition on the grounds of persistent disputes, through a new formulation requiring two cumulative elements: first, proven inability to live in harmony between husband and wife, and second, a minimum of six months of separation of residence, unless domestic violence (DV) is proven. This study aims to examine the Ratio legis of the issuance of SEMA 3 of 2023 and its implications for the fulfillment of substantive justice in divorce cases in the Religious Courts. Using a normative juridical approach with qualitative analysis methods, this study examines related laws and regulations, legal literature, and theories of justice and legal certainty. The research findings indicate that SEMA 3 of 2023 plays a significant role in normatively unifying evidentiary standards and emphasizing judges' prudence in deciding divorce cases. However, in practice, these provisions can also create barriers to access to justice for economically, socially, and psychologically vulnerable parties, particularly in proving separation and domestic violence. Therefore, the fulfillment of substantive justice through the implementation of SEMA is highly dependent on judges' sensitivity in understanding the factual realities of households and their ability to interpret norms progressively, flexibly, and contextually.
Paradigm Transformation in Land Area of Plantation Cultivation Right from Agrarian Basic Law to Job Creation Law wicaksono, setiawan; Imam Koeswahyono; Iwan Permadi; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 3 (2025): December In progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i3.312

Abstract

The regulation of land area for plantation cultivation rights (Hak Guna Usaha/HGU) has changed from 1960 to 2023. Paradigm theory is one of the theories that examines why and what reasons lie behind written regulations. When legal changes occur, a paradigm shift also takes place. This article addresses the issue of what paradigm is used to determine the land area for plantation cultivation rights in several laws and whether a paradigm shift has occurred. A normative research method is chosen to examine the provisions regarding the land area of cultivation rights in four laws. The analysis uses a systematic, conceptual, and historical approach. This study shows a shift in paradigm in the granting of cultivation rights, particularly from 1960, which emphasized social justice, to 2023, which prioritizes economic interests.
Analysis Of Cross-Border Insolvency Dispute Resolution In Insolvency Practice In Indonesia Muhammad Dzaky; Budi Santoso; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti
International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Vol 5 No 3 (2023)
Publisher : The Islamic Education and Multiculturalism Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijierm.v5i3.275

Abstract

The resolution of Cross-Border Insolvency disputes in bankruptcy practice in Indonesia, with a focus on court decision Number 26/PAILIT/2010/PN.Niaga.JKT.PST. This highlights the lack of specific regulations in Indonesian law regarding cross-border bankruptcy, which causes legal uncertainty in resolving such disputes. This research uses a normative juridical approach to examine the application of rules and norms in positive law. The case analysis includes a bankruptcy petition against Manwani Santosh Tekchand filed by OCBC Securities Private Limited, which raises issues regarding the evidentiary strength of the special power of attorney granted to the Attorney. This article emphasizes the importance of clear rules and legal certainty to protect creditor rights and facilitate the execution of debtor assets. The court decisions discussed in this article highlight the legal implications of cross-border bankruptcy resolution, stating that foreign court decisions can be valid and convincing evidence regarding debts and the relationship between debtors and creditors if they meet formal requirements as authentic deeds. However, foreign court decisions cannot be recognized and implemented by Indonesian courts unless there is a ratified convention or the principle of reciprocity. The article concludes that the resolution of cross-border bankruptcy disputes in bankruptcy practice in Indonesia is limited by existing regulations and suggests the possibility of litigation or filing new bankruptcy applications based on debt instruments.
Legal Relationship Between Platform Service Providers and Online Transportation Driver as Gig Workers (Platform Workers) Hadiati, Dian; Abdul Rachmad Budiono; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti
International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Vol 5 No 3 (2023)
Publisher : The Islamic Education and Multiculturalism Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijierm.v5i3.276

Abstract

This research aims to determine the classification of legal relationships between platform service providers and online transportation drivers as gig workers (platform workers). The choice of theme is motivated by the fact that so far the legal relationship that occurs between platform service providers and online transportation drivers is a partnership relationship, but the partnership relationship that occurs does not implement the principles of partnership in its implementation in the business world. This partnership cooperation relationship is not regulated in the Law Number 20 of 2008 regarding Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises or the Indonesian labour law because the Indonesian labour law only recognizes working relationships, while in the Law Number 20 of 2008 regarding Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises because the original intent of the partnership in Law No.20/2008 is very different from the partnership relationship that is currently happening between platform service providers and online transportation drivers. Then the writing of this paper uses a normative juridical method with a statutory approach and an analytical approach. The legal material obtained by the author will be analyzed using descriptive analytical analysis techniques, namely a method of analyzing legal material by determining the content or meaning of legal rules in terms of partnership cooperation relationships, as well as the Civil Code. From the results of research with the above methods, the classification of legal relationships between platform service providers and online transportation drivers as gig workers (platform workers) is classified as a partnership relationship based on the Subordinate union of partnership, namely a partnership based on the merger of two or more parties that are subordinately related
CONTINUOUS DISPUTES AND FIGHTS ARE THE MOST POPULAR REASONS FOR DIVORCE Nadia Romadhon; Abdul Rachmad Budiono; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): September
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i5.3950

Abstract

Marriage is a spiritual and physical bond between a man and a woman to form a family that is peaceful, loving, and merciful. However, not all marriages are harmonious and lasting. Data from the Religious Courts shows that the most common reason for divorce in Indonesia is persistent disputes and quarrels. This study aims to analyze the legal provisions related to these reasons, as stipulated in Article 116 letter (f) of the Compilation of Islamic Law and Article 19 letter (f) of Government Regulation No. 9 of 1975, as well as the implementation and development of their formulation through SEMA Number 3 of 2023. In practice, judges have the freedom to assess whether a household conflict has met the requirements of "continuous" and "no hope of reconciliation" to be the basis for a divorce decision. This study shows that economic factors, poor communication, and the presence of a third party contribute to these dominant reasons for divorce. Therefore, strengthening regulations and understanding judges is important to maintain a sense of justice for the parties.
Legal Certainty of Lease Rights for Foreign Citizens of Ownership Land in Indonesia Yudha Tri Dharma Iswara; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti; Novitasari Dian Ph
Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani Vol. 3 No. 5 (2023): May, 2023
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/mudima.v3i5.3841

Abstract

In Indonesia, regulations have been issued that guarantee certainty over land in Indonesia, one of which is Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning the Basic Agrarian Law, which was subsequently reduced using Government Regulation Number 10 of 1961 concerning Land Registration and replaced with Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 Concerning Land Registration, Foreign Citizens who have an interest in investing in Indonesia do a lot of land lease agreements, especially in Bali, because the term of a lease in Indonesia is not specifically regulated, law smuggling often occurs where a lease agreement has a long term, even indicating a lease for lifetime. Therefore the importance of a legal certainty regarding the lease term is regulated in a statutory regulation, so that in determining the term in the lease agreement it still has a decency and fairness in its implementation.The research method in this writing uses normative juridical law research with a statutory approach , legal concept approach  and case approach. In this thesis, the author discusses two legal issues related to legal certainty regarding the time limit for leasing private land in Indonesia for foreign nationals and the legal consequences arising from the ambiguity of legal norms regarding arrangements related to the time limit for leasing private land in Indonesia. The results of the research show that in terms of determining legal certainty related to the lease term for now, it can use or be based on the principle of decency in Article 1339 Kuperdata. The consequences that arise when a lease agreement has a time limit indicating a living well lease is a non-existent legal act
Legal Protection for the Winners of the Execution of Mortgage Rights in the Auction Case of Blocking of Property Rights Certificates (SHM) which Become the Object of the Auction Rizky Melani Dian Pratiwi; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti; Diah Aju Wisuwardani
Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani Vol. 3 No. 6 (2023): June, 2023
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/mudima.v3i6.4127

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the meaning of the phrase "object of dispute in court" in the provisions of Article 45 paragraph 1 letter e of Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration and In the event that the auction object is blocked, the winning bidders have legal protection when exercising their mortgage rights. Researchers employed a normative juridical research style in this study. The study's findings demonstrate that various parties have different interpretations of Letter E of Article 45 of PP Number 24 of 1997. Land Offices, so that any object of claim including objections to auctions because the limit value is considered low is still used as a reason to refuse registration of a rights transfer by auction. The type of law protection for auction winners, namely preventive protection which is preventive in nature, is still very weak, where The only thing the auction winner can do is wait for the Court's ultimate ruling. Taking legal action is another option to restrictive legal protection. The winning bidder may seek the District Court for help in removing the item. The auction winner can sue Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (PMH) against the Blocking Applicant and The representative for the to conduct the auction is the Land Office. in order to make the seller accountable through payment of damages. the blocking record