Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.288
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unram Law Review Jurnal Selat Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani (MUDIMA) International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Mahadi : Indonesia Journal of Law
Hanif Nur Widhiyanti
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
THE POSITION OF AN APOSTASY WIFE AS A CAUSE FOR THE DISSOLUTION OF A MARRIAGE IN THE COMPILATION OF ISLAMIC LAW AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR POST-DIVORCE RIGHTS Alhadi Saputra; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti; Nur Chanifah
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v6i1.4448

Abstract

Conversion to religion (apostasy) in Islamic marriage is a complex phenomenon that gives rise to debate between legal norms and social reality. In the context of Indonesian national law, apostasy has not been explicitly regulated in Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. This legal gap is filled by the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), which, in Article 116 letter (h), stipulates that conversion to religion or apostasy can be grounds for divorce. However, in religious court practice, there is a disparity in decisions between courts that interpret apostasy as grounds for fasakh (annulment) and those that interpret it as grounds for divorce (talaq). This disparity has legal implications for women's rights after divorce, particularly regarding the right to maintenance during the iddah period, mut'ah, maskan, and kiswah. This study aims to explain the position of a wife who apostatizes as a cause of marital dissolution from the perspective of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) and analyze its legal consequences for post-divorce rights. The method used is normative legal research with a statutory, conceptual, and analytical approach. The results of the study indicate that a wife who apostatizes causes the marriage contract to be annulled (fasakh), but in practice, religious courts often still process it through the divorce mechanism (divorce talak) to ensure orderly legal administration. This disparity impacts the different treatment of the rights of apostate wives. From the perspective of legal utility, judges should consider the value of substantive justice and protection for women, even if the woman concerned has left Islam.
Conceptualization of Crypto Asset As A Collateral Object In Indonesian Positive Law Firda Shafira; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti; Stephanie Wilamarta
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 4 (2026): March In Progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i4.335

Abstract

The development of digital technology has given rise to crypto assets as a new form of digital wealth with economic value and can be legally traded in Indonesia, based on Bappebti regulations. However, their legal status as fiduciary collateral remains controversial because Indonesian property law does not fully accommodate intangible assets such as crypto assets. This study aims to analyze the feasibility of crypto assets as fiduciary collateral from the perspective of Indonesian positive law, using normative juridical research methods through legislative and conceptual approaches. The results show that functionally, crypto assets fulfill the characteristics of objects in collateral law, as they have economic value, can be legally transferred, and can be used as a basis for debt repayment. However, the lack of a mechanism for registration, assessment, and execution of digital collateral creates legal uncertainty in financing practices. Comparisons with other countries such as Switzerland, the United States, and Singapore indicate that the successful recognition of crypto assets as collateral depends heavily on a clear legal framework governing ownership protection and oversight mechanisms. In the Indonesian context, Law Number 4 of 2023 concerning the Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector (P2SK) provides an opportunity for reform by expanding the authority of the Financial Services Authority (OJK) in regulating digital financial assets. Therefore, harmonization of the Civil Code, the Fiduciary Guarantee Law, the P2SK Law, and Bappebti regulations is necessary to ensure that crypto assets can be legally and effectively accommodated as collateral. With appropriate regulations, national law will be able to adapt to digital innovation without sacrificing the principles of legal certainty, justice, and expediency.
Analysis of Priority Criteria In Offering Special Mining Business Permit Areas (WIUPK) To Religious Community Organizations Firlia Nurani Rakhma; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti; Tri Sulistiowarni
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 4 (2026): March In Progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i4.342

Abstract

This study examines the legal implications and urgency of setting priority criteria for the offering of Special Mining Business License Areas (WIUPK) to Religious Community Organization-Owned Enterprises (BU-OMK) as stipulated in Article 83A of Law Number 3 of 2020 and Article 75 of Government Regulation Number 96 of 2021. The main focus of the study lies in the lack of norms governing priority parameters, including aspects of feasibility, operational capacity, and verification mechanisms for BU-OMK. Using a normative juridical method based on analysis of laws and regulations and the principles of good mining governance, this study finds that this lack of regulation creates legal uncertainty and opens up broad scope for interpretation for decision-makers. As a result, there is potential for unequal treatment, conflicts of interest, and abuse of power in the process of granting WIUPK. This study also shows that giving priority to BU-OMK is a form of positive discriminatory policy (affirmative discrimination) that is theoretically justifiable, as long as it is implemented through a proportional, objective, and accountable mechanism. However, without clear priority criteria-including legality of the business entity, financial capability, technical capacity, environmental protection assurance, and governance integrity—this policy risks inefficiency and potential irregularities, including the use of BU-OMK as intermediaries for certain interests (beneficial ownership risks). Therefore, this study emphasizes the need for the establishment of comprehensive, auditable derivative regulations that align with the principles of government administrative law to ensure the effectiveness, accountability, and sustainability of the WIUPK bidding policy.
JUSTICE OR EQUALITY? EXAMINING ARTICLE 97 OF THE KHI IN THE CONTEXT OF POST-DIVORCE PROPERTY DIVISION Maya Anggraeni Rahmah Permana; Abdul Rachmad Budiono; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4564

Abstract

This study aims to critically analyze the provisions of Article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) in the context of the division of joint assets after divorce, emphasizing the need for legal reform that prioritizes the principle of substantive justice. The main issues examined include the extent to which these provisions reflect the principle of substantive justice and how Article 97 of the KHI is implemented in religious court practice. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory, conceptual, and case-based approach. The results show that Article 97 of the KHI is still oriented towards rigid arithmetic equality and does not consider the actual contributions, both material and immaterial, of each party. In judicial practice, a number of judges have implemented progressive interpretations of this norm, which opens up space for the reformulation of Islamic family law in Indonesia. Therefore, this study recommends normative reform of Article 97 of the KHI to include provisions that explicitly accommodate proportional division of assets, as well as implementing steps in the form of training on a substantive justice perspective for judges.
Co-Authors ABDUL RACHMAD BUDIONO Alhadi Saputra Budi Santoso Budi Santoso Clarita Stefanie Panjaitan Diah Aju Wisnuwardhani Diah Aju Wisuwardani Dody Heryanto Firda Shafira Firlia Nurani Rakhma Hadiati, Dian Helpan Setiabudi Himawan Sutanto I NYOMAN NURJAYA Ilham Nugroho Imam Koeswahyono Intan Nirmala Ramadhani Istislam Istislam Iwan Permadi Kodir, Abdul - Maya Anggraeni Rahmah Permana Moerdany, Vira Muhammad Dzaky Nadia Romadhon Novitasari Dian Ph Nur Chanifah Prija Djatmika Rachmi Sulistyarini Rachmi Sulistyorini Rizky Melani Dian Pratiwi Robby Pramono Setiawan Wicaksono, Setiawan Sinar Tamba Tua Pandiangan Situmorang, Boy Kresendo Stephanie Wilamarta Sukarmi Taradita Nindyawati Tri Sulistiowarni Yudha Tri Dharma Iswara Zulfahmi