This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal TAM (Technology Acceptance Model) SELAPARANG: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Berkemajuan JURNAL TEKNIK INFORMATIKA DAN SISTEM INFORMASI Jurnal Informasi dan Komputer Kurawal - Jurnal Teknologi, Informasi dan Industri JuSiTik : Jurnal Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi Komunikasi Jurnal Informatika Global Jurnal Teknologi Komputer dan Sistem Informasi JPP Jurnal Kesehatan Poltekkes Palembang JATI (Jurnal Mahasiswa Teknik Informatika) Jatilima : Jurnal Multimedia Dan Teknologi Informasi Ihsan: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Sains Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Bina Darma Brilliance: Research of Artificial Intelligence Informatics and Enginering Dedication Jurnal Teknologi Sistem Informasi Klik - Jurnal Ilmu Komputer Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Publikasi Hasil Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat. Prioritas : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Ilmu Multidisplin DEVICE : JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEM, COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Jurnal Teknik Mesin, Industri, Elektro dan Informatika Proceeding of International Conference Health, Science And Technology (ICOHETECH) MDP Student Conference Jurnal Penelitian Sistem Informasi Journal of Embedded Systems, Security and Intelligent Systems Journal Of Artificial Intelligence And Software Engineering Manaruko: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi Journal of Informatics and Advanced Computing Jurnal TAM (Technology Acceptance Model) JTKSI (Jurnal Teknologi Komputer dan Sistem Informasi)
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : journal of embedded systems security and intelligent systems

Sensitivity Analysis of Weight Normalization Schemes in McCall-Based Software Quality Measurement Ahmad Farisi; Dafid
Journal of Embedded Systems, Security and Intelligent Systems Vol 7 No 3 (2026): September 2026
Publisher : Program Studi Teknik Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59562/jessi.v7i3.11711

Abstract

Purpose – This study examines the sensitivity of McCall-based software quality measurement to alternative weight normalization intervals and rounding configurations. It specifically evaluates whether different weighting schemes produce consistent Total Quality scores and quality classifications when the evaluated system, criteria values, and aggregation procedures remain unchanged. Design/methods/approach – A quantitative experimental design was applied to the Product Operation dimension of the McCall model using Simponi, a web-based learning management system at Universitas Multi Data Palembang, as the case study. Criteria values were obtained from 166 student respondents, while indicator importance ratings were provided by two software engineering experts. Three normalization intervals, namely 0.1–0.5, 0.1–0.4, and 0.4–0.8, were evaluated using floor and ceiling rounding configurations. The resulting scores were calculated through hierarchical weighted additive aggregation. Findings – Weight normalization substantially influenced the resulting software quality assessment. The moderate and expanded weighting schemes produced comparable Total Quality outcomes and consistently classified the evaluated system at the highest quality level, whereas the compressed weighting scheme generated a lower overall assessment and shifted the system into a lower quality category. In contrast, differences between floor and ceiling rounding configurations were negligible and did not alter the resulting quality classification. Research implications/limitations – Weight normalization should be explicitly documented and standardized to improve comparability across McCall-based evaluations. The findings are limited to the Product Operation dimension, three predefined intervals, and one academic web application. Originality/value – This study provides empirical sensitivity evidence showing that weight interval selection is a substantive methodological decision that can alter software quality interpretations, whereas rounding configurations have negligible practical effects.