Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
7.124
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA LAW REFORM LAW REVIEW Jurisprudentie Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Lex Renaissance Jurnal Justisia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial Administrative Law & Governance Journal Unes Law Review Journal of Humanities and Social Studies JISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Jurnal Yudisial Pagaruyuang Law Journal Dialogia Iuridica PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Selisik : Jurnal Hukum dan Bisnis JUSTISI Santhet: (Jurnal Sejarah, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora) Transparansi Hukum ADIL : Jurnal Hukum Journal of Law and Policy Transformation Jurnal Darma Agung Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Jurnal Syntax Transformation Majalah Hukum Nasional Journal of Judicial Review Indonesian Journal of International Law JURNAL PENDIDIKAN IPS Constitutionale Jurnal Konstitusi The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research Jurnal Hukum Sehasen Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia
Anna Erliyana
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia
Religion Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 70 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search
Journal : LAW REVIEW

 1 
Keputusan Administrasi Negara (Beschikking) Erliyana, Anna
LAW REVIEW Vol 4, No 3 (2005)
Publisher : Pelita Harapan University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Adiministrative decision made by government, legally called administrative Decree  (Ketetapan Aministrasi), is a decision issued by the authority in order to give legal basis  for all administrative actions of public agencies. Not only that, such Decree is also the  rules of procedure or code of conduct upon which every state of government agencies  conduct their interrelation and cooperation. The competence vested within its organs  agencies, which in turn also serves as the source of law for those agencies to operate. A  Decree issued by an Agency not given the legal authority is considered invalid that is,  null and void.
Upaya Administratif Erliyana, Anna
LAW REVIEW Vol 5, No 3 (2006)
Publisher : Pelita Harapan University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Upaya Administratif diperlukan untuk memelihara keseimbangan antara kepentingan individu dan kepentingan umum menuju huhungan yang rukun  antara rakyat dan pemerintah. Perdamaian melalui musyawarah merupakan aspek penting untuk mencapai keputusan yang dapat diterima oleh para pihak. Oleh karena itu badan yang menyelesaikannya hams bersikap objektif dalam memberikan pertimbangan hukum dan pertimbangan kemanfaatan.
Peraturan Presiden No.36 Tahun 2005 dan Berbagai Permasalahannya Erliyana, Anna
LAW REVIEW Vol 5, No 1 (2005)
Publisher : Pelita Harapan University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Presidential Regulation Number 36 of the year 2005 on Land Availability for Public Usage contains several weakness, such as not taking into considerations what soever that making available of land for public interest must be acquired in fairly manner and, on the first instance, through direct consent by the owner or holder of the ownership right; not mentioning the Law No. 32/2004 on Local Government; Government Regulation No. 40/1996 on The Right of Land of Business, Construction and Private Usage Purposes; Government Regulation No. 24/1997 on Land Registration and Government in the Autonomous Territory; he substantial meaning of public interest has been downsized into, and limited to, the interest of majority of the society, whereas the scope of the projects has been extended; provisions on human rights matter shall be regulated in different laws inform of parliamentary acts.
Asas Larangan Melampui Wewenang Pada Penerbitan Keputusan Presiden Republik Indonesia Tahun 1987-1998 Erliyana, Anna
LAW REVIEW Vol 4, No 2 (2004)
Publisher : Pelita Harapan University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The policy making power held by President is difficult to control in practice. Discretionary administrative power is apparently a permanent feature of modern governments, including purportedly democratic ones. But many worrie whether the broad discretionary power that resides in Presidents hand will be used arbitrarily. This research tries to find out how broad Presidents discretionary power is already used through the decree of President. Are there of power in President s discretionary power? How to determine which decree of Presidents is abuse of power is the goal of this research.
KAJIAN GOOD GOVERNANCE SINGAPURA DAN INDONESIA: STUDI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI [Singapore and Indonesia's Good Governance Review: An Anticorruption Study] Andreas Sulardi; Anna Erliyana
Law Review Volume XXI, No. 2 - November 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Village, Tangerang 15811 - Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v0i2.3950

Abstract

Eradication of Corruption in Indonesia in 2015-2019 in a row did not experience significant progress. In contrast to Indonesia, in 2019 Singapore actually occupied the number two position for the Asia Pacific region and number one in the ASEAN region in eradicating corruption. How to compare the eradication of corruption in the two countries? This article will explore the eradication of corruption in Singapore and Indonesia with a Good Governance approach and analysis of data reading from the two countries’ corruption eradication institutions. The results show that there are three key pillars in eradicating corruption in Singapore which consist of political will, independence, and effectiveness of corruption eradication institutions, and the application of good administrative services. The results of the next study explained that the eradication of corruption in the 2015-2019 period in Indonesia was deemed not optimal due to three things: political patronym and the power of investors that hindered the eradication of corruption, the ineffectiveness of taking action against the KPK, and the vision of Jokowi’s leadership that was too focused on the development and economic growth but did not pay attention to it. bureaucratic reform agenda. The benefits of this paper are primarily intended to assist Indonesia in optimizing the eradication of corruption by learning from Singapore. It is hoped that good and corruption-free governance can be implemented in Indonesia.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia pada 2015-2019 secara berturut-turut tidak mengalami kemajuan yang berarti. Berbeda dengan Indonesia, pada 2019 Singapura justru menduduki posisi nomor dua untuk wilayah Asia Pasifik dan nomor satu di wilayah ASEAN dalam pemberantasan korupsi. Bagaimana membandingkan pemberantasan korupsi pada kedua negara tersebut? Artikel ini hendak mengupas pemberantasan korupsi Singapura dan Indonesia dengan pendekatan Good Governance dan analisa pembacaan data dari kedua lembaga pemberantasan korupsi negara tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat tiga pilar kunci dalam pemberantasan korupsi di Singapura yang terdiri dari political will, independesi dan efektivitas lembaga pemberantasan korupsi, dan penerapan pelayanan administrasi yang baik. Hasil penelitian berikutnya memaparkan bahwa pemberantasan korupsi pada kurun 2015-2019 di Indonesia dirasa tidak optimal karena tiga hal: patronisme politik dan kuasa pemodal yang menghambat pemberantasan korupsi, ketidakefektifan penindakan KPK, dan visi kepemimpinan Jokowi yang terlalu fokus pada pembangunan dan pertumbuhan ekonomi namun kurang memperhatikan agenda pembaharuan birokrasi. Manfaat penulisan ini terutama ditujukan untuk membantu Indonesia dalam optimalisasi pemberantasan korupsi dengan belajar dari Singapura. Harapannya kepemerintahan yang baik dan bebas korupsi dapat terselenggara di Indonesia.
STUDI PERBANDINGAN IMPLEMENTASI PERLINDUNGAN HAK ATAS PENDIDIKAN BAGI PEREMPUAN DI INDONESIA DAN TURKI [A Comparison Study of the Implementation of Women’s Right to Education between Indonesia and Turkey] Andi Hugeng; Anna Erliyana
Law Review Volume XXI, No. 3 - March 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Village, Tangerang 15811 - Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v0i3.4651

Abstract

The 2018 International Student Assessment data puts Indonesia at 72nd and Turkey at 40th in the world, but that’s not all, the Times Higher Education World University Rankings Research puts 49 universities in Turkey on the list of the best university in the world, while Indonesia has left behind with only 9 campuses. In 2020, the literacy rate in Indonesia is 98.28% while Turkey is at 99.07%. However, how exactly is the fulfillment of the right to education for women in both countries? This article aims to explore the education system, budget allocation and education delivery based on the principle of equality. The results of the study show that although the law has guaranteed equal access to education, there is still discrimination in access to education for women in Indonesia, especially for coastal women and pregnant women. This study uses a qualitative method with a deductive approach, while the benefits of this article are to provide an overview of the education system and the fulfillment of education rights for women in both countries that can be used as lessons to build a better education system based on the principle of equality.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Data Internasional Student Assessment tahun 2018 menempatkan Indonesia di peringkat 72 dan Turki di peringkat 40 dunia, tak hanya itu, Penelitian Times Higher Education World University Rankings menempatkan 49 Universitas di Turki masuk dalam daftar kampus terbaik didunia, sedangkan Indonesia jauh tertinggal dengan hanya 9 kampus. Tahun 2020, angka melek huruf di Indonesia adalah 98,28% sedangkan Turki berada di angka 99,07%. Namun, bagaimana sebenarnya pemenuhan hak atas pendidikan bagi perempuan dikedua negara? Artikel ini hendak mengupas sistem pendidikan, alokasi anggaran dan penyelenggaran pendidikan yang berdasarkan pada prinsip kesetaraan. Hasil penelitian menunjukan meskipun Undang-undang sudah menjamin kesetaraan akses atas pendidikan namun masih terdapat diskriminasi akses pendidikan bagi perempuan di Indonesia, khususnya bagi perempuan pesisir dan perempuan hamil. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode Kualitatif dengan pendekatan deduktif, adapun manfaat artikel ini untuk memberikan gambaran sistem pendidikan dan pemenuhan hak pendidikan bagi perempuan di kedua negara yang dapat dijadikan pelajaran untuk membangun sistem pendidikan yang lebih baik berlandaskan pada prinsip kesetaraan.
Co-Authors Abdalla Jouf, Haekal Afif Juniar Ahmad Haidar Muiny Alvayedo, Muhammad Brillyan Andi Hugeng Andie Hevriansyah Andie Hevriansyah Andreas Sulardi Anjas Rinaldi Siregar Arief Fahmi Lubis Atmaja, A.P. Edi Audrey G Tangkudung Audrey Tangkudung Barokah, Muhamad Raziv Clarissa, Gavinela Dampaka, Yaka Dewi, Lia Riesta Dzikry Gaosul Ashfiya Edmon Makarim Elfrieda Anggi Basamarito Erma Yustiyah Fahmi Ramadhan Firdaus Geraldi Fauzi, Muhammad Alifian Hadi, Ilman Happy Hayati Helmi Happy Hayati Helmi Indah Mutiara Sari Indra Wahyu Bintoro Jassinta, Melani Aulia Putri Khalid Dahlan Khaliza Fauzi, Maghfira Nur Lidya Rahmawati Luh Rina Apriani Marvin, Renius Albert Moch Chafid Moch Chafid Muhammad Ali Hasan Muhammad Alifian Geraldi Fauzi Mustikaningsih, Rahmah Mutiara Nico Handoko Utama Nisrina, Virihana Widad Paramita Ersan Parluhutan Sagala Paulus Rudy Calvin Sinaga Puteri Anggun Amirillis Putri Aprilia Anggraini Putri Wanda Nisyah Bela Rahmah Mutiara Mustikaningsih Rahman Ruslan, Arief Reydonaldo Thomas Sidabutar Samuel Ivander Aritonang Saragih, Yessi Nadia Giatma Setyawan, Yhannu Siagian, Lowrenszya Siti Labiba Fathin Siti Rahmaniah Jamaluddin Sjarif, Fitriani Ahlan Suha Qoriroh Sukma, Ahmad Novindri Aji Sukri, Indah Fitriani Syafri Hariansah Syafrijal Latief Wahyu Ardiansyah wili utama, Alif Winanta, Rendro Prastyan Yunita Nurwulantari Yustiyah, Erma