Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 20 Documents
Search

COMPARISON OF LEARNING MATH LEARNING RESULT STUDENTS WITH SAVI MODEL AND NHT MODEL ON STUDENT SMKN 1 KOLAKA S. Supratman; Sri Wulandari Muhlis
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol 3, No 1 (2018): JME
Publisher : Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (952.39 KB) | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v3i1.495

Abstract

The formulation of the problem in this research are: (1) How the result of learning mathematics of students after taught by SAVI learning model?, (2) How the result of learning mathematics of students after taught by NHT learning model?, (3) Is the result of learning mathematics of students who taught with SAVI learning model is higher than students taught by NHT learning model. The purpose of this study are: (1) To know how the results of learning mathematics students after teaching with SAVI learning model, (2) To find out how the results of learning mathematics students after being taught with NHT learning model, (3) To determine whether the results of learning mathematics students taught by SAVI learning models higher than students taught by NHT learning models. Type of research using experimental method. The population in this study is all students of class X spread in 11 parallel classes with the number of 310 people. Sampling was done by using cluster random sampling technique. In this research as a sample taken 2 classes from the entire population that is class X A3 as experiment class 1 using SAVI learning model and class X A1 as experiment class 2 using NHT learning model. From result of data analysis obtained that: (1) result of student learning taught by using SAVI learning model which consist of 25 students show minimum value 62, maximum value 96, mean (mean) 80,36, with standard deviation 9,10; (2) student learning outcomes taught using NHT learning model consisting of 25 students showing minimum score 62, maximum value 96, mean (mean) 79,62, with standard deviation 10,512; (3) result of t-test analysis using independent sample t-test obtained tcount = 0,302 at = 0,05 with degrees of freedom (dk) = 48 obtained t table = 2,011. Because t t table then Ha is rejected and H0 is accepted. So it can be concluded that the mathematics learning outcomes of students who were taught with the SAVI model was not higher than the students taught by the NHT model.
Fuzzy Logic to Determine the Effect of Parental Attention and Peer Environment on Mathematics Learning Outcomes Supratman; Andi Mariani Ramlan; Raden Sulaiman
International Journal of Scientific Multidisciplinary Research Vol. 1 No. 7 (2023): August 2023
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/ijsmr.v1i7.5361

Abstract

The results of learning mathematics is a process of changing new behavior which is the result of giving experiences received by students in the learning process which includes cognitive, affective, and psychomotor aspects whose success can be measured through written and oral tests. The learning outcomes achieved can be good or bad depending on the factors that influence them, including learning motivation and environmental factors study. This study aims to determine the effect of parental attention and peer environment on student learning outcomes at SMA Negeri 1 Kolaka in 2022 using the Fuzzy logic of the Tsukamoto method. The data obtained in this study came from a questionnaire for the attention of parents and peers that had been filled out by students as well as mathematics learning outcomes obtained through the results of the even semester 2022 daily test scores. Based on the research results obtained in fuzzy calculations consisting of people's attention questionnaires parents and peer environment, it was found that the mathematics learning outcomes achieved were not good at 34.87 towards good mathematics learning outcomes at 65.12.
THE DIFFERENCE OF LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT USING COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL APPLIED ON THE GRADE VIII STUDENTS OF SMP NEGERI 1 KOLAKA Supratman Supratman; St. Rahma
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol 2, No 1 (2017): JME
Publisher : Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v2i1.288

Abstract

The design of this research was experiment and aimed to know whether there was difference of learning result of mathematics between students taught by using cooperative learning model type TSTS, NHT, and STAD. The population in this study was all students of class VIII SMP Negeri 1 Kolaka academic year 2015/2016 while the sample taken was by Cluster Random Sampling technique. Techniques of collecting data used test and observation technique. To get a representative test, the validity and reliability test were conducted. The data obtained were analyzed using normality test, homogeneity test, and One Way Anova test. From the analysis result, it was found that the initial analysis for normality test at 5% level (n = 26) obtained Dtabel = 0,264 while Dcount = 0.0975 (experiment class I) Dcount = 0.1668 (experiment class II) and Dcount = 0.1451 (control class), Because Dcount Dtable then H0 was accepted so the data was normally distributed. For homogeneity test at 5% level (n = 78) obtained F (0.05, 2, 75) = 3.12 and L = 2.364 Since L Ftable then H0 was accepted so the data was homogeneous. With One Way Anova test obtained Fcount = 13.427 and at 5% level obtained (2:75) Ftable = 3.12 for Fcount Ftable then H1 was accepted so there were differences in learning outcomes between students taught using cooperative learning model type TSTS, NHT and STAD. Since H1 was accepted then a further test was conducted using scheffe t test. At level of 5% (dk = 50) obtained ttable = 2.0085 and tcount = 5.181.  Because tcount ttable then H1 was accepted so the mean result of students' mathematics learning taught by model of cooperative learning type TSTS was better than mean result of cooperative learning type STAD. At 5% level (df = 50) obtained ttable = 2.0085 and tcount = 2.6429. Because tcount ttable then H1 was accepted so the mean result of students' mathematics learning taught by model of cooperative learning type NHT was better than cooperative learning type STAD. At level 5% (df = 50) obtained ttable = 2.0085 and tcount = 2.5387. Because tcount ttable then H1 was accepted so the mean result of students' mathematics learning which was taught by cooperative learning model of TSTS type was better than mean of mathematics learning result of student taught by NHT type.
COMPARISON OF LEARNING MATH LEARNING RESULT STUDENTS WITH SAVI MODEL AND NHT MODEL ON STUDENT SMKN 1 KOLAKA S. Supratman; Sri Wulandari Muhlis
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol 3, No 1 (2018): JME
Publisher : Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v3i1.495

Abstract

The formulation of the problem in this research are: (1) How the result of learning mathematics of students after taught by SAVI learning model?, (2) How the result of learning mathematics of students after taught by NHT learning model?, (3) Is the result of learning mathematics of students who taught with SAVI learning model is higher than students taught by NHT learning model. The purpose of this study are: (1) To know how the results of learning mathematics students after teaching with SAVI learning model, (2) To find out how the results of learning mathematics students after being taught with NHT learning model, (3) To determine whether the results of learning mathematics students taught by SAVI learning models higher than students taught by NHT learning models. Type of research using experimental method. The population in this study is all students of class X spread in 11 parallel classes with the number of 310 people. Sampling was done by using cluster random sampling technique. In this research as a sample taken 2 classes from the entire population that is class X A3 as experiment class 1 using SAVI learning model and class X A1 as experiment class 2 using NHT learning model. From result of data analysis obtained that: (1) result of student learning taught by using SAVI learning model which consist of 25 students show minimum value 62, maximum value 96, mean (mean) 80,36, with standard deviation 9,10; (2) student learning outcomes taught using NHT learning model consisting of 25 students showing minimum score 62, maximum value 96, mean (mean) 79,62, with standard deviation 10,512; (3) result of t-test analysis using independent sample t-test obtained tcount = 0,302 at = 0,05 with degrees of freedom (dk) = 48 obtained t table = 2,011. Because t t table then Ha is rejected and H0 is accepted. So it can be concluded that the mathematics learning outcomes of students who were taught with the SAVI model was not higher than the students taught by the NHT model.
Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning Model For Enhancing Capability of Investigation tipe group Resolution on Student Mathematical Hight School S. Supratman; Akbar Nasrum
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol 3, No 2 (2018): JME
Publisher : Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v3i2.845

Abstract

TThe purpose of this study are: (1) To determine the ability of mathematical problem solving class X SMA Negeri 1 Wundulako taught using cooperative learning model Group Investigation. (2)To determine the ability of mathematical problem solving class X SMA Negeri 1 Wundulakoyang taught using conventional learning model in teaching trigonometry. (3) To determine whether the mathematical problem solving ability of students taught bycooperative learning model of Group Investigationbetter than mathematics problem solving ability of students taught by conventional learning models in Class 1 Wundulako State XSMA in teaching trigonometry. This type of research used experimental method. The population in this study were all students of class X are scattered in seven classes in parallel with the number of 155 people. Sampling was conducted using random cluster sampling technique. In this study as a sample taken two classes of the population that there is a class X2 as an experimental class and class X4 as the control class. From the results of data analysis showed that: (1) average math problem solving ability X2 grade students taught using cooperative learning model type investigative groups (Group Investigation), which consists of 19 students showed minimum value maximum value 96.00 72.00 , the average (mean)87.0526, median88.00 and mode86.00, With a variance40.608And standard deviation 6.37246, (2 average math problem solving ability X4 grade students taught using conventional learning model which consists of 22 students showed 68.00 minimum value, maximum value 96, 00 average (mean)82.3636, median82,00, and mode82.00, With a variance58.147And standard deviation7.62543, (3) the results of t-test analysis using independent samples t-test obtained t =2.116 on the significant 0,005 α = 0.05then H0 is rejected and H1 accepted. With the rejection of H0, it can be concluded that the increase in mathematical problem solving ability of students taught using cooperative learning model type investigative groups (Group Investigation) is better than math problem solving ability of students taught using conventional learning models.
Analysis of College Students’ Difficulties in Mathematics Education of the Class 2013 in Sembilanbelas November University in Solving the Problem of One-Way Analysis of Variances (One Way Anova) on Applied Statistics Course S. Supratman; H. Herlina
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol 2, No 2 (2017): JME
Publisher : Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v2i2.361

Abstract

Statistic is one of the branches of applied mathematical science developed by Karl Pearson (1857-1936). Applied statistic is the study of the application of statistical use. Many students think that applied statistic course are difficult, which can only mastered by smart students. Even the students’ anxiety arises every time they are dealing with the applied statistic course. This anxiety due to the acquisition of applied statistic value is generally lower compared to the acquisition of the other course’s value, it is seen that many students who have not been able to solve the problem related to the analysis of one-way varience (One-Way Anova).  This research is done to identify, recognize, analyze, then got a result of research about students’ difficulties in solving the problem of one-way variance analysis. Specifically the purpose of this study is to determine the difficulties that experienced by the students of mathematics education of sembilanbelas November University, Kolaka, in solving the problem of analysis of one-way variance inapplied statistic course, as well as the efforts that can be done to overcome these difficulties. To realize it in this research, the researcher use verifikatif qualitative design to describe the actual situation and verify it, this research tries to describe the actual requirement for the learners of mathematics which of course through the requirement analysis process then verified in order to find an ideal learning design. This research will be conducted in scientific procedures in the academic realm. This research will be carried out at Sembilanbelas November University, kolaka, with active students of Teachers and Education Faculty on mathematics, alumni, and lecturer of Teacher and Education Faculty on mathematics study program will be chosen as informant with purposive sampling technique. In-depth interview, unstructured observation, and dokumen analysis will be pplied as the technique of data collection in this research, while the instruments to be used in the data collection are semi-structured interview guides, observation sheets, and documents. In analyzing the data, the researcher uses content-analysis that systematically and objectively identifies a specific message characteristic. From the results obtained, that there are three types of mistakes made by the students, such as, there are ten students who make a conceptical mistake that is equal to 29,41%, twenty two students or equal to 64,71% who make a mistake in principle, while those who make verbal errors as much as nineteen students or equal to 55,88%.
THE DIFFERENCE OF LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT USING COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL APPLIED ON THE GRADE VIII STUDENTS OF SMP NEGERI 1 KOLAKA Supratman Supratman; St. Rahma
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v2i1.288

Abstract

The design of this research was experiment and aimed to know whether there was difference of learning result of mathematics between students taught by using cooperative learning model type TSTS, NHT, and STAD. The population in this study was all students of class VIII SMP Negeri 1 Kolaka academic year 2015/2016 while the sample taken was by Cluster Random Sampling technique. Techniques of collecting data used test and observation technique. To get a representative test, the validity and reliability test were conducted. The data obtained were analyzed using normality test, homogeneity test, and One Way Anova test. From the analysis result, it was found that the initial analysis for normality test at 5% level (n = 26) obtained Dtabel = 0,264 while Dcount = 0.0975 (experiment class I) Dcount = 0.1668 (experiment class II) and Dcount = 0.1451 (control class), Because Dcount < Dtable then H0 was accepted so the data was normally distributed. For homogeneity test at 5% level (n = 78) obtained F (0.05, 2, 75)= 3.12 and L = 2.364 Since L < Ftable then H0 was accepted so the data was homogeneous. With One Way Anova test obtained Fcount = 13.427 and at 5% level obtained (2:75) Ftable = 3.12 for Fcount > Ftable then H1 was accepted so there were differences in learning outcomes between students taught using cooperative learning model type TSTS, NHTand STAD. Since H1 was accepted then a further test was conducted using scheffe t test. At level of 5% (dk = 50) obtained ttable = 2.0085 and tcount = 5.181. Because tcount > ttable then H1 was accepted so the mean result of students' mathematics learning taught by model of cooperative learning type TSTS was better than mean result of cooperativelearning type STAD. At 5% level (df = 50) obtained ttable = 2.0085 and tcount = 2.6429. Because tcount > ttable then H1 was accepted so the mean result of students' mathematics learning taught by model of cooperative learning type NHT was better than cooperative learning type STAD. At level 5% (df = 50) obtained ttable = 2.0085 and tcount = 2.5387. Because tcount > ttable then H1 was accepted so the mean result of students' mathematics learning which was taught by cooperative learning model of TSTS type was better than mean of mathematics learning result of student taught by NHT type.
THE EFFECT OF USING MATHEMATICAL SOFTWARE IN UNDERSTANDING MATERIAL IN STATISTICS COURSES Akbar Nasrum; Supratman Supratman
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2019): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v4i1.846

Abstract

This research was conducted at the Sembilanbelas November Kolaka University. This study aims to show the effect of the use of software in learning on the understanding ofstatistical material. The material discussed is the data normality test. To achieve that goal the researcher measures the understanding of student material before and after use of the software. Next, data analysis is done by comparing the results of the pre-testand post-test that have been obtained. The final result of the study shows that use mathematical software has a very significant effect of statistical material understanding, especially in data normality testing.
ANALYSIS OF COLLEGE STUDENTS’ DIFFICULTIES IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION OF THE CLASS 2013IN SEMBILANBELAS NOVEMBER UNIVERSITY INSOLVING THE PROBLEM OF ONE-WAY ANALYSIS OF VARIANCES(ONE WAY ANOVA)ON APPLIED STATISTICS COURSE Supratman Supratman; Herlina Herlina
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2017): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v2i.361

Abstract

Statistic is one of the branches of applied mathematical science developed by Karl Pearson (1857-1936). Applied statistic is the study of the application of statistical use. Many students think that applied statistic course are difficult, which can only masteredby smart students. Even the students’ anxiety arises every time they are dealing with the applied statistic course. This anxiety due to the acquisition of applied statistic value is generally lower compared to the acquisition of the other course’s value, it is seenthat many students who have not been able to solve the problem related to the analysis of one-way varience (One-Way Anova). This research is done to identify, recognize, analyze, then got a result of research about students’ difficulties in solving the problem of one-way variance analysis. Specifically the purpose of this study is to determine the difficulties that experienced by the students of mathematics education of sembilanbelas November University, Kolaka, in solving the problem of analysis of oneway variance inapplied statistic course, as well as the efforts that can be done to overcome these difficulties. To realize it in this research, the researcher use verifikatif qualitative design to describe the actual situation and verify it, this research tries todescribe the actual requirement for the learners of mathematics which of course through the requirement analysis process then verified in order to find an ideal learning design. This research will be conducted in scientific procedures in the academic realm. This research will be carried out at Sembilanbelas November University, kolaka, with active students of Teachers and Education Faculty on mathematics, alumni, and lecturer of Teacher and Education Faculty on mathematics study program will be chosen as informant with purposive sampling technique. In depth interview, unstructured observation, and dokumen analysis will be pplied as the technique of data collection in this research, while the instruments to be used in the data collection are semi-structured interview guides, observation sheets, and documents. In analyzing the data, the researcher uses content-analysis that systematically and objectively identifies a specific message characteristic. From the results obtained, that there are three types of mistakes made by the students, such as, there are ten students who make a conceptical mistake that is equal to 29,41%, twentytwo students or equal to 64,71% who make a mistake in principle, while those who make verbal errors as much as nineteen students or equal to 55,88%.
The Influence of the Adventure Picture Storybook of Petualangan Si Kancil on Reading Comprehension and Reading Motivation Based on Gender Tundreng, Syarifuddin; Supratman, Supratman
EduBasic Journal: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Vol 6, No 2 (2024): EduBasic Journal: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Kampus Serang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17509/ebj.v6i2.76227

Abstract

This study aims to examine the influence of the use of the Petualangan si Kancil picture storybook on reading comprehension and motivation among ninth-grade students in the Tanggetada sub-district, Kolaka Regency, with a focus on gender differences. The quantitative design quasi-experimental scheme was used by nonrandomized control, pretest, and posttest design with 54 students divided into an experimental group (27 students) and a control group (27 students). The experimental class used a picture storybook of Petualangan Si Kancil and the control class used the 2013 curriculum book. The experimental class consists of 11 male and 16 female genders, while the control class consists of 10 male and 17 female genders. The instrument used was a written test questionnaire. Data were collected through pretest and posttest measures of reading skills and motivation and analyzed using an Independent sample-t test, with pre-requisite tests (Normality, Homogeneity, and Hypothesis testing) conducted to ensure validity. Results indicate that the picture storybook significantly improves both reading comprehension and motivation, with greater gains observed in the experimental group compared to the control group. Gender-based analysis revealed notable differences, emphasizing the importance of considering gender in educational interventions. These findings suggest that integrating storybooks into the curriculum can support language development, emotional regulation, and memory skills, providing practical implications for educators. Future research should explore the long-term effects of storybooks on student learning across different contexts.