Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 16 Documents
Search

Agenda Media Detik.com Tentang Film Dirty Vote Rasyid, Nur Aini; Herawati, Maimon; Sirait, Rinda Aunillah
JIPSI Jurnal Ilmu Politik dan Komunikasi Vol 15 No 1 (2025): JIPSi : Jurnal Ilmu Politik dan Komunikasi
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Komputer Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34010/jipsi.v15i1.16009

Abstract

The media has a significant role in shaping public opinion through the attention it gives to certain issues. The same is true in a political context such as the 2024 election, where the Dirty Vote movie has drawn controversy for revealing the 2024 Election fraud scheme but aired during the quiet period. This study aims to analyze Detik.com's media agenda in the coverage of the film ‘Dirty Vote’ during the period 11-14 February 2024, focusing on the three dimensions of the media agenda according to Manheim (1987): visibility, audience salience, and valence. The method used was descriptive quantitative content analysis of 43 news articles from Detik.com. The results show that Detik.com accentuates the issue of power elite response in the ‘Election Rigging Response’ issue category (27.9%) and political conflict in the ‘Controversial Film’ issue category (16.3%) in the visibility dimension with the dominance of news values ‘Power Elite’ (32.6%) and ‘Conflict’ (23.3%) as indicators of the audience salience dimension. Meanwhile, in the valence dimension, the tone of the news was dominated by a neutral tone (48.8%), more sources were quoted from Prabowo-Gibran supporters (20.9%) and the government (20.9%). The contribution of this research lies in strengthening understanding of the dynamics of online media agendas in the context of controversial issue coverage, as well as practical recommendations for the media to improve the balance and depth of analysis. Keywords: Media Agenda, Detik.com, Dirty Vote, Content Analysis, Indonesia General Election 2024
Media Sosial dan Edukasi Sejarah Dakwah Islam: Analisis Kreativitas Pengembangan Konten Instagram @gen.saladin Nuraini, Fira Pujia; Deddy Mulyana; Maimon Herawati; Efi Fadilah
Jurnal Komunikasi Islam Vol. 14 No. 1 (2024): June
Publisher : Departement of Islami Comuunication and Broadcasting, Faculty of Da'wah and Communication, State Islamic University of Sunan Ampel (UINSA) Surabaya Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/jki.2024.14.1.119-145

Abstract

The presence of social media, especially Instagram, is a blessing for Muslim content creators in teaching Islamic da’wah history. The textual, visual, and auditory features in Instagram allow them to create educational content that can bridge Islamic history information and modern understanding, making it easier to understand and not boring. This study examines an Instagram account @gen.saladin in creating creative means of Islamic history education. Using qualitative content analysis and a media ecology approach, the results of the study have revealed that to create creative educational content about Islamic history, @gen.saladin emphasizes the use of contemporary terms, mentioning film titles, song lyrics, or current news when discussing topics of Islamic da’wah history. Hence, it appears more relevant and interesting to the audience.
Framing Analysis of Iran-Israel’s 2024 Conflict in Kompas.id, Aljazeera.com, and NYTimes.com Nuraini, Fira Pujia; Mulyana, Deddy; Herawati, Maimon
Jurnal Kajian Jurnalisme Vol 8, No 1 (2024): KAJIAN JURNALISME
Publisher : School of Journalism, Faculty of Communication Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24198/jkj.v8i1.55562

Abstract

This research seeks to explore how the Israel-Iran conflict in April 2024 is framed by the online media Kompas.id, Aljazeera.com, and NYTimes.com. This research aims to investigate how different narratives about the long-standing conflict pertaining to Iran-Israel complex tensions are carried by these media that present distinct geopolitical perspectives. This study uses a qualitative approach employing Robert M. Entman's framing model analysis consisting of four elements: defining the problem, diagnosing causes, making moral judgments, and suggesting solutions. Data was captured from articles written during a specific period in April 2024. Examination may include determining bias, thematic emphases and narrative strategies for each story. It was found that each media outlet had different frames for conflict. Kompas.id tends to take a more neutral approach. Aljazeera.com emphasizes the implications of Middle Eastern geopolitics of the conflict, while NYTmes.com concentrates on the broader international impact as well as the foreign policy interests of America. Such variations are politically and culturally biased according to the diverse media outlets used. This research highlights the biases and priorities reflected in the media report of the geopolitics conflict presented by various media outlets and provides insight into how the conflict is portrayed by the large media.
Penerapan Akurasi CNNIndonesia.com dalam Pemberitaan Serangan Rudal Israel ke Kota Isfahan, Iran Nyimas Rahmatallah; Henny R.; Maimon Herawati
Jurnal Komputer, Informasi dan Teknologi Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Penerbit Jurnal Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53697/jkomitek.v5i1.2236

Abstract

Konflik antar negara-negara di Timur Tengah memang rumit dan tidak pernah selesai hingga saat ini. Tepatnya pada April 2024, konflik antara Israel dan Iran kembali memanas setelah Israel menyerang sebuah komplek fasilitas militer milik Iran di kota Isfahan. Sebelumnya diawali juga oleh Iran yang menyerang Israel dengan 300 pesawat tak berawak dan rudal. Oleh karena itu, objektivitas media sangat dibutuhkan dalam memberitakan isu-isu tersebut. Penelitian ini menganalisis penerapan akurasi CNNIndonesia.com dalam memproduksi pemberitaan terkait isu tersebut dengan menggunakan teori objektivitas Westerstahl (1983) sebagai acuan dan metode analisis isi kuantitatif Krippendorff (2004). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis CNNIndonesia dalam menyajikan informasi yang akurat kepada masyarakat terkait pemberitaan yang mengandung konflik. Hasil penelitian terhadap 50 berita terkait Israel menyerang dengan rudal ke kota Isfahan Iran menunjukkan bahwa CNNIndonesia.com secara umum memenuhi standar objektivitas dalam sub-dimensi akurasi. Namun, penelitian ini juga menemukan beberapa artikel yang menyajikan informasi tidak akurat. Temuan ini diharapkan dapat memberikan kontribusi pada pengembangan praktik jurnalistik untuk mempublikasikan berita yang akurat di masa depan.
Kepuasan Followers Atas Pemberitaan RUU TNI di Instagram @narasinewsroom Periode 13-20 Maret 2025 Shilvia Yulianti Sumarna; Henny Sri Mulyani; Maimon Herawati
Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Penerbit Jurnal Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53697/iso.v6i1.4004

Abstract

The growth of social media has positioned Instagram as one of the primary sources of information for Indonesian society (Habibah & Irwansyah, 2021). This study aims to examine the level of satisfaction among followers of @narasinewsroom regarding coverage of the Revision of the Indonesian National Armed Forces Law (RUU TNI) during March 13–20, 2025. Employing the Uses and Gratifications theory through Palmgreen's Gratifications Sought (GS) and Gratifications Obtained (GO) model, this study used a descriptive quantitative approach with a survey questionnaire distributed to 100 active followers who had accessed RUU TNI-related content. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test and mean score comparison. The findings reveal a significant difference between GS and GO (sig. 2-tailed = 0.001 ≤ 0.1), with a total mean GS of 426.6 exceeding the GO mean of 418.0. This indicates that followers have not yet reached satisfaction across the four dimensions examined: information, personal identity, social integration and interaction, and entertainment. The largest gap was found in the entertainment dimension, while the smallest appeared in social integration and interaction. These findings suggest that although information needs were relatively met, limitations in content format and the complexity of the issue affected overall audience satisfaction. Audiences expect more varied, interactive, and accessible content, particularly when covering politically sensitive policy issues such as the RUU TNI. These results underscore the importance of innovation in digital news content presentation to more optimally meet audience expectations.
Menolak Intervensi Pengiklan sebagai Pertahanan Independensi Bocor Alus Politik Jacinda Claramuti Purnomo; Maimon Herawati; Achmad Abdul Basith
TUTURAN: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, Sosial dan Humani... Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Februari: TUTURAN: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, Sosial dan Humaniora
Publisher : Institut Nalanda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47861/tuturan.v4i1.2286

Abstract

The financial sustainability of the media in Indonesia relies heavily on advertising as its primary source of revenue. This dependence puts editorial independence in a difficult position, as the advertiser is the very same entity that is the subject of the news coverage. This study examines how Bocor Alus Politik resists advertiser interference as a means of defending its editorial independence. Using a qualitative approach with a case study design, data was collected through in-depth interviews with the managing editor, producers, journalists, and the business team, and supplemented by document analysis. The analysis is grounded in the five principles of public service (independence) by Kovach & Rosenstiel (2001) and the concept of the dual product market by Robert G. Picard (1989). The findings indicate that Bocor Alus Politik’s defense of its independence operates on multiple levels: a structural separation between the editorial and business teams that is internalized as a collective value across divisions; strict selection of potential collaboration partners; editorial control over content substance without exception; and public transparency through explicit disclaimers on collaborative content.