Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.986
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajaran (KIBASP) Tadbir Muwahhid Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Metalingua BAHTERA : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra JURNAL Al-AZHAR INDONESIA SERI HUMANIORA Jurnal Studi Guru dan Pembelajaran Literatus Ksatra: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa dan Sastra Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan Masyarakat Indonesia Foremost Journal Journal of General Education and Humanities REFEREN DIALEKTIKA: JURNAL BAHASA, SASTRA DAN BUDAYA Aksara
Saifur Rohman
Universitas Negeri Jakarta
Religion Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Palestine and Israel Conflict: Disagreement Strategies on Social Media X Discussion Purnawati Purnawati; Miftahulkhairah Anwar; Saifur Rohman
Foremost Journal Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Volume 6 No. 2
Publisher : Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Syekh-Yusuf Islamic University Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33592/foremost.v6i2.7728

Abstract

Nowadays, social media has become a profound place for people to express their opinion and ideas, one of them is X social media (formerly known as Twitter). This study analysed how people expressed their opinion specifically on their disagreement strategies in X post. Thus, the focus of this research is to examine the types of disagreement found in the X corpus based on the linguistic used. There are 176 tweets taken from disagreement comments on 4 postings about recent Palestine and Israel conflicts. It was analysed manually by codifying on the types of disagreement. The finding revealed that the major type of disagreement is mitigating disagreement reaching 65%. While 10% of unmitigated disagreements expressions were categorized as aggravated. Furthermore, there were found types of employed mitigated disagreement including: Adding support (43%), Sarcasm (25%), Indirect (23%), Modulation (5%), and Delay (3%). The finding showed that people on social media tend to mitigate their disagreements using explanation and sarcasm. The mildest way to convey disagreements gained the least numbers of frequency. Therefore, it can be said that people in social media tend to openly express their disagreements by strong statements. This research can be a reference on how people digitally interact in social media.
Co-Authors Abdul Hamid Aly Aceng Rahmat Adijaya, Nuryansyah Ahmad Muzaki Ahmad Zaki Munibi Arianty Visiaty Arya Yoga Swara Sumantri Dhika Santhi Didah Nurhamidah Dwi Septiani Endry Boeriswati Epos Sister Krismon Selan Dakhi Erfi Firmansyah Hafizah Hafizah Hamidah Hamidah Hanip Pujiati Hendrawanto Ch Ida Maulida M. Yanuardi Zain Martini Martini Mclean HY Miftahulkhairah Anwar MIMIN AMINAH Mu'thia Mubasyira Purnawati Purnawati Ratna Ratna Renzy Agathy Amazeli Saiyidinal Firdaus Sastri Br Rajaguk-guk Sri Zulfida Sulistio, Prayogo Hadi Yules Sianipar Zuriyati Zuriyati Zuryati Zuryati