Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.727
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Daulat Hukum Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER Jurnal Selat JURNAL CENDEKIA HUKUM SOEPRA Jurnal Hukum Kesehatan WAJAH HUKUM Jurnal Yuridis Sarwahita : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Borneo Law Review Journal Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesian Journal of Society Engagement (IJSE) Law Development Journal Jurnal Abdimas Le Mujtamak Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Adagium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Suherman
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Distributive Accountability in the Allocation of Music Royalties: A Comparative Legal Study of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand Rianda Dirkareshza; Suherman; Muthia Sakti; Muhammad Helmi Khair; Shubham Pathak; Pete Phimanphrom; Muhammad Fauzan; Zahra Shafarina
Adagium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 4 No 2 (2026): Adagium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Publisher : PT. Meja Ilmiah Publikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70308/nxc99x75

Abstract

The debate on music royalty management in Indonesia has centred on which institution may collect royalties, whereas whether royalties paid by users actually reach right holders has received far less attention. This prescriptive normative legal research introduces the concept of distributive accountability, namely the duty of every party holding royalties to account, in an enforceable manner, for each portion of those royalties to the right holder entitled to it. Employing statutory, functional-comparative, and conceptual approaches, the study examines Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand across seven links of the distribution chain: the status of the funds, usage data, the allocation key, deductions, deadlines and individual information, unidentified royalties, and redress. None of the three systems has a complete chain. Malaysia’s strength in force is a statutory Copyright Tribunal, while its 2025 distribution guidelines are currently stayed by the courts. Thailand creates traceability at the point of collection but does not regulate distribution by statute. Indonesia has usage-based distribution and an annual public audit, yet its allocation key is determinate at only one of three stages, its deductions stack without a cumulative cap, right holders receive no individual distribution statements, and unrecorded royalties may become reserve funds. The article proposes a distributive accountability model resting on five principles: funds held for the benefit of right holders; traceability and proportionality to use; legality and reasonableness of deductions; timeliness and individual transparency; and claims that survive reallocation, with enforceable redress, implemented in stages according to the hierarchy of laws and regulations.
Co-Authors Aditya Suud Afrisya Rahmany Ali Imran Andriyanto Adhi Nugroho Anissa Nabilla Arrisman Arrisman Chori Diah Astuti Christine Magdalena Kurniasih Sena Ferdian Kowanda Human Santoso Iwan Erar Joesoef Marina Ery Setyawati Muhammad Fauzan Muhammad Helmi Khair Muhammad Rizqi Alfarizi Ramadhan Muthia Sakti Pete Phimanphrom Putri Mufidah Putri, Citraresmi Widoretno Rianda Dirkareshza Salsabilla Hassani Satino Shubham Pathak Sonyendah Retnaningsih, Sonyendah Sulastri Suprima Tharisya El Subekti Varel Tristan Ayub Laiskodat Wahyo Santoso Yoni Agus Setyono Yuliana Yuli Yuliana Yuli W Yuliana Yuli Wahyuningsih Zahra Shafarina