Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Penerapan Pasal 340 KUHP Mengenai Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana: Analisis Putusan Nomor 1474Pid.B2019PN Dps: Bima Guntara, Ayni Suwarni Herry*, Dian Mohamad Eron Siata Bima Guntara; Ayni Suwarni Herry; Dian Mohamad Eron Siata
JISOSEPOL: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Ekonomi dan Politik Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): JISOSEPOL : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Ekonomi dan Politik, Edisi Januari-Juni 2024
Publisher : Samudra Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61787/18ne8m35

This research was conducted to find out and examine the application of Article 340 by the judge in handing down a criminal decision for the defendant in the crime of murder of Halimah in Decision Number 1474/Pid.B/2019/PN Dps. As well as to find out and analyze whether the elements contained in Article 340 of the Criminal Code have been fulfilled or not so that the defendant Rudianto was sentenced to 16 years in prison. This research uses normative juridical research methods, namely those carried out based on main legal materials by examining theories, concepts, legal principles, and statutory regulations related to this research. Based on the analysis of the facts and data that the author has obtained, the author finally concludes: 1. That the judge in applying article 304 in Decision Number 1474/Pid.B/2019/PN Dps) did not properly consider whether or not the planned elements had been fulfilled in advance. 2. That the element was planned in advance, namely, in a calm atmosphere to decide the will. From the emergence of the will to the implementation of the will, there was sufficient time available, and the implementation of the will (action) in a calm atmosphere did not result in the murder of Halimah.

SOSIALISASI PENCEGAHAN DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KORBAN KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA (KDRT) Syaifullah, Syaifullah; Guntara, Bima; Dadang, Dadang; Hendra, Rio; Sianipar, Ferry Agus
Abdi Laksana : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Vol 2 No 3 (2021): Abdi Laksana : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pamulang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32493/al-jpkm.v2i3.13524

Domestic violence is an act of violence against women that is often invisible. Along with cases of domestic violence that are increasing day by day, the government issued a Law on the Elimination of Domestic Violence, with the aim that victims of domestic violence, especially women, are expected to obtain legal protection. The problem that arises then is how to protect the law against victims of Domestic Violence (KDRT) to prevent criminal acts of domestic violence. The existence of Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence is expected to be able to provide significant legal protection for victims of Domestic Violence (KDRT). The forms of protection regulated in this law are temporary protection from the police, court protection and placement of victims in "safe houses". However, the results of research, both through District Court decisions and informants, show that the form of protection for victims of domestic violence is still dominant through repressive actions (imprisonment sentences) to perpetrators, while temporary protection and permanent protection from the courts are less attention Domestic violence is an act of violence against physical, psychological, sexual and neglect in the family. Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence (PKDRT) has regulated the protection for victims, but it does not fully fulfill the rights of victims. Criminal action, which is the goal of the Domestic Violence Law, often has a negative impact on victims, including: divorce and domestic disharmony. In addition, the imposition of a criminal offense is also contrary to other objectives to be achieved by the Act, namely: the maintenance of a harmonious and prosperous household. The PKDRT law provides opportunities for the involvement of the government, victims and the community in accordance with the idea of restorative justice which is already known by the Indonesian people as a form of local wisdom, but the protection of victims has not been fulfilled. Meanwhile, if the crime will be used in resolving domestic violence cases, it must be as selective as possible, especially if the consequences of the acts of the perpetrators of domestic violence will threaten and endanger the survival of the victim. Regarding forms of violence, violence is not merely physical in nature such as: beatings, torture or torture which easily leaves visible evidence. In many ways violence always takes many forms as well as many dimensions. Psychological violence such as constant fear, receiving threats, making someone feel humiliated, is another form that is very difficult to prove but leaves a long imprint on everyone's memory.

MARAKNYA KORUPSI DI PEMERINTAHAN DAERAH DALAM ERA DESENTRALISASI Bima Guntara
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2020): February
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v12i1.813

Keinginan bagi kita semua bangsa Indonesia untuk memiliki pemerintahan yang terbebas dari praktik korupsi, namun itu semua terasa hanya sebuah angan-angan saja melihat maraknya praktik korupsi yang terjadi di negara ini, hal ini di perparah dengan banyaknya praktik korupsi yang dipertontonkan oleh aparatur pemerintah daerah. Praktik korupsi yang menjamur di daerah menjadikan cita-cita demokrasi yang terbebas dari praktik korupsi di pemerintahan daerah seakan sulit terwujud. Penanganan terkait semakin maraknya praktik korupsi pun telah dilakukan oleh negara mulai dari membuat regulasi hingga membentuk sebuah lembaga yang khusus menangani penyakit yang tak kunjung terobati dan terus menggerogoti sendi-sendi kehidupan di tanah air yang kita cinta ini. Tujuan dilakukannya penelitian ini ialah untuk mengetahui tren korupsi yang terjadi di pemerintahan daerah dalam era desentralisasi. Penulis memilih menggunakan pendekatan studi pustaka dengan teknik analisis deskriptif dalam metode penulisan agar mengetahui lebih jauh mengenai lahirnya desentralisasi dan tren korupsi dalam hubungannya dengan penerapan otonomi daerah serta fenomena menjamurnya praktik korupsi yang terus berlangsung di daerah.Kata Kunci: Korupsi; Pemerintahan Daerah; Desentralisasi

CONFLICT OF AUTHORITY BETWEEN THE PRESIDENT AND THE DPR IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL CHECKS AND BALANCES MECHANISM Fartini, Ade; Eva Hudzaefah; Amanda Roja Agustin; Ayu Safitri; Bima Guntara
AL-QISTHAS: JURNAL HUKUM DAN POLITIK Vol. 16 No. 2 (2025): Juli-Desember 2025
Publisher : Jurusan Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37035/alqisthas.v16i2.02

This study explores the power dynamics between the President and the DPR in Indonesia's presidential framework, highlighting the challenges in applying the mutual oversight principle, which is often disrupted by political rivalries. Key issues include differing views on the Constitution and tensions in the lawmaking process and oversight roles. Its primary goal is to investigate the legal foundations, types of conflicts, control mechanisms, and their impacts through the case of the 2019 KPK Law revision. The method employed involves normative legal research, with a detailed analysis of constitutional documents, such as the 1945 Constitution and related rules. Findings indicate that, although the mutual oversight principle is well-regulated, its effectiveness is limited by the influence of political parties and uneven negotiations, which can lead to excessive power dominance. The main recommendation stresses the need for reforms in political culture to enhance state accountability.

PRAKTIK TRIAL BY THE PRESS DAN CITIZEN JOURNALISM TERHADAP PRINSIP FAIR TRIAL DI INDONESIA Bima Guntara; Asmariah
Jurnal Hukum Unsulbar Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Hukum Unsulbar
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Universitas Sulawesi Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31605/j-law.v9i2.6469

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis praktik trial by the press terhadap penerapan prinsip fair trial dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia, khususnya di tengah perkembangan media digital dan citizen journalism. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan analitis melalui kajian terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, doktrin hukum, serta literatur ilmiah yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa praktik trial by the press terjadi ketika pemberitaan media melampaui fungsi informatifnya dengan menyajikan informasi yang belum terverifikasi secara memadai, membentuk opini publik yang mengarah pada penghakiman, serta mengungkap identitas seseorang secara berlebihan sebelum adanya putusan pengadilan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap. Praktik tersebut berpotensi melanggar asas praduga tak bersalah, mengganggu independensi proses peradilan, dan mengancam terwujudnya prinsip fair trial. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa kebebasan pers harus dijalankan secara bertanggung jawab dengan tetap berpedoman pada Undang-Undang Pers, Kode Etik Jurnalistik, serta penghormatan terhadap hak asasi manusia agar keseimbangan antara kebebasan berekspresi dan perlindungan hak setiap individu dalam proses peradilan tetap terjaga.

Penerapan Pasal 340 KUHP Mengenai Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana: Analisis Putusan Nomor 1474Pid.B2019PN Dps: Bima Guntara, Ayni Suwarni Herry*, Dian Mohamad Eron Siata Bima Guntara; Ayni Suwarni Herry; Dian Mohamad Eron Siata
JISOSEPOL: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Ekonomi dan Politik Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): JISOSEPOL : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Ekonomi dan Politik, Edisi Januari-Juni 2024
Publisher : Samudra Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61787/18ne8m35

This research was conducted to find out and examine the application of Article 340 by the judge in handing down a criminal decision for the defendant in the crime of murder of Halimah in Decision Number 1474/Pid.B/2019/PN Dps. As well as to find out and analyze whether the elements contained in Article 340 of the Criminal Code have been fulfilled or not so that the defendant Rudianto was sentenced to 16 years in prison. This research uses normative juridical research methods, namely those carried out based on main legal materials by examining theories, concepts, legal principles, and statutory regulations related to this research. Based on the analysis of the facts and data that the author has obtained, the author finally concludes: 1. That the judge in applying article 304 in Decision Number 1474/Pid.B/2019/PN Dps) did not properly consider whether or not the planned elements had been fulfilled in advance. 2. That the element was planned in advance, namely, in a calm atmosphere to decide the will. From the emergence of the will to the implementation of the will, there was sufficient time available, and the implementation of the will (action) in a calm atmosphere did not result in the murder of Halimah.

A Comparative Legal Study of Indonesia’s Narcotics Law No. 35 of 2009 and Canada’s Cannabis Regulations SOR/2018-144 on Medical Cannabis Regulation Bima Guntara
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 2 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.7414

Cannabis has long been subject to strict legal control due to its psychoactive properties and potential for abuse, while at the same time attracting increasing attention for its potential medical applications. This study examines the legal regulation of medical cannabis through a comparative analysis of Indonesia’s Law Number 35 of 2009 on Narcotics and Canada’s Cannabis Regulations SOR/2018-144. The research addresses two main issues: first, how medical cannabis is regulated under the respective legal frameworks of Indonesia and Canada; and second, how Indonesia’s institutional approach, particularly through the National Narcotics Agency, responds to medical cannabis needs in comparison with Canada’s regulatory model. This study employs normative legal research using statutory and comparative approaches, supported by legal literature and relevant institutional data. The findings indicate that Indonesia adopts a prohibition-based approach by classifying cannabis as a Schedule I narcotic, thereby excluding its use for medical purposes on the basis of abuse prevention and public health protection. In contrast, Canada recognizes the medical use of cannabis and regulates it through a comprehensive licensing, distribution, and supervision system involving healthcare professionals. The comparative analysis highlights fundamental differences in legal priorities, regulatory design, and institutional responses, demonstrating how public health considerations and risk management are addressed differently within each legal system. These findings provide insight into the regulatory implications of divergent legal approaches to medical cannabis within contemporary narcotics law.

Title

Found 27 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 27 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 27 Documents
Search