Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 26 Documents
Search

Constitutional Legitimacy, Limitations, and Strengthening of State-Owned Enterprise Monopoly Supervision in Economic Development and Protection of Healthy Business Competition in Indonesia Budi Joyo Santoso; Hamid, Adnan
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2554

Abstract

This study highlights the central role of State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) in managing strategic sectors as a realization of the mandate of Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This paper questions the legitimacy, constitutional limitations, and oversight mechanisms for monopoly rights granted by the President to SOEs, as well as the challenges of policy implementation in the context of national economic governance reform. The methodology used is a normative legal approach with conceptual analysis, legislation, and comparative studies with other countries. The study was conducted on key regulations such as Law No. 5 of 1999, Law No. 1 of 2025, and KPPU documents, supported by a review of Constitutional Court decisions. The analysis was conducted using legal hermeneutics and qualitative methods to interpret the constitutional limits and effectiveness of SOE monopoly supervision. The results of the discussion found that the constitutional legitimacy of SOE monopolies is indeed sourced from Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution, but their implementation must meet the requirements of efficiency, justice, and legal certainty. It was found that granting monopolies without periodic supervision and evaluation risks causing abuse of authority, market distortion, and discriminatory practices against other business actors. The KPPU's role as an independent supervisory body has proven strategic in preventing violations and correcting monopolistic policies inconsistent with the principles of fair competition. Strengthening oversight mechanisms, transparency of audit results, public involvement, and regular independent audits are needed as a foundation for adaptive and accountable governance. Recommendations for regulatory reform, effective KPPU involvement, and public participation are proposed to balance state interests and protection of business competition. The conclusion emphasizes that monopoly by state-owned enterprises is not an end in itself, but rather an instrument for realizing public welfare if implemented with transparency, strict oversight, and high accountability in accordance with the principles of constitutional economic democracy.
TANTANGAN DAN PELUANG DALAM PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEKERJA SEKTOR INFORMAL DALAM PEMBANGUNAN KETENAGAKERJAAN DI INDONESIA Hamid, Adnan
Pancasila Law Review Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Desember
Publisher : Pancasila Law Review

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menyelidiki, merasionalisasi dan mengidentifikasi isu perlindungan hukum bagi pekerja informal yang masuk kategori kritikal. Oleh karena itu, artikel ini diberi judul Tantangan dan Peluang Dalam Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pekerja Sektor Informal Dalam Pembangunan Ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan yuridis normative, studi dokumen, menggunakan metode kualitatif dalam menganalisis data dan menggunakan data sekunder sebagai sumbernya. Hasil penelitian ini menemukan bahwa Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 tentang Cipta Kerja menjadi Undang-Undang sama sekali tidak mengatur tentang pekerja informal sehingga terjadi kekosongan dalam hal perlindungan hukum bagi pekerja informal di Indonesia. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan peraturan perundang-undangan nasional tentang perlindungan hukum bagi pekerja informal yang pada intinya adalah memuat perjanjian kerja antara pengusaha dan pekerja/buruh informal. Dengan demikian, pemerintah bersama legislatif diharapkan dapat menetapkan peraturan dan perundang-undangan guna melindungi pekerja informal dan rentan di tengah-tengah meningkatnya informalisasi pasar kerja akibat dampak akselerasi kemajuan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi.
Constitutional Legitimacy, Limitations, and Strengthening of State-Owned Enterprise Monopoly Supervision in Economic Development and Protection of Healthy Business Competition in Indonesia Budi Joyo Santoso; Hamid, Adnan
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2554

Abstract

This study highlights the central role of State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) in managing strategic sectors as a realization of the mandate of Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This paper questions the legitimacy, constitutional limitations, and oversight mechanisms for monopoly rights granted by the President to SOEs, as well as the challenges of policy implementation in the context of national economic governance reform. The methodology used is a normative legal approach with conceptual analysis, legislation, and comparative studies with other countries. The study was conducted on key regulations such as Law No. 5 of 1999, Law No. 1 of 2025, and KPPU documents, supported by a review of Constitutional Court decisions. The analysis was conducted using legal hermeneutics and qualitative methods to interpret the constitutional limits and effectiveness of SOE monopoly supervision. The results of the discussion found that the constitutional legitimacy of SOE monopolies is indeed sourced from Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution, but their implementation must meet the requirements of efficiency, justice, and legal certainty. It was found that granting monopolies without periodic supervision and evaluation risks causing abuse of authority, market distortion, and discriminatory practices against other business actors. The KPPU's role as an independent supervisory body has proven strategic in preventing violations and correcting monopolistic policies inconsistent with the principles of fair competition. Strengthening oversight mechanisms, transparency of audit results, public involvement, and regular independent audits are needed as a foundation for adaptive and accountable governance. Recommendations for regulatory reform, effective KPPU involvement, and public participation are proposed to balance state interests and protection of business competition. The conclusion emphasizes that monopoly by state-owned enterprises is not an end in itself, but rather an instrument for realizing public welfare if implemented with transparency, strict oversight, and high accountability in accordance with the principles of constitutional economic democracy.
Cultural Approach Based on Bhinneka Tunggal Ika in Horizontal Conflict Resolution Bahuri, Firli; Surono, Agus; Hamid, Adnan; Irwansyah, Irwansyah
Jurnal Lemhannas RI Vol 13 No 4 (2025)
Publisher : Lembaga Ketahanan Nasional Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55960/jlri.v13i4.1155

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyse the characteristics of horizontal conflict in Indonesia and evaluate the significance of a cultural approach based on Bhinneka Tunggal Ika (Unity in Diversity) for conflict resolution. This study also examines the contribution of a cultural approach to more effective, sustainable conflict resolution strategies, aligned with the Asta Gatra framework as a pillar of national resilience. Study Design/Methodology/Approach: This study uses an interpretivist-phenomenological philosophy with an empirical-inductive method and an archival study strategy to identify patterns of culture-based conflict resolution in various regions of Indonesia. The data were obtained through a literature review, document analysis, and stakeholder interviews and then analysed reductively to ensure links with the socio-cultural, ideological, and security dimensions of Asta Gatra. Findings: The research results indicate that a cultural approach based on Bhinneka Tunggal Ika (Unity in Diversity) has significant potential to reduce horizontal conflict and strengthen social cohesion. However, implementation limitations due to a lack of integration with policy, development, and the legal system require collaboration between the government, indigenous communities, and legal institutions as a key to national stability.
Prinsip Maṣlaḥah dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Adat: Kajian terhadap Praktik Musyawarah Adat Dayak Kenyah di Desa Pampang Hamid, Adnan; Syahrina R, Nurul Ain
Tasyri' : Journal of Islamic Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Tasyri'
Publisher : STAINI Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53038/tsyr.v4i2.423

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of the maṣlaḥah principle in the dispute resolution mechanism of customary land among the Dayak Kenyah community in Pampang Village, Samarinda. This issue is significant because customary land functions not only as an economic asset but also as a source of identity, spirituality, and cultural sustainability. The maṣlaḥah approach in Islamic law offers an ethical framework that aligns with the communal justice and social harmony values upheld by indigenous communities. This research employs a qualitative method with a normative-empirical approach. Data were collected through the study of legislation, customary documents, interviews with traditional leaders, and direct observation of customary deliberation practices. The analysis connects the principles of maṣlaḥah mursalah and Islamic social justice theory with the indigenous dispute resolution practices that emphasize deliberation, consensus, and the balance of collective interests. The findings reveal that the Dayak Kenyah customary dispute resolution mechanism reflects maṣlaḥah values, particularly in maintaining collective welfare, preventing social division, and ensuring proportional justice distribution. However, its effectiveness remains limited due to the lack of formal recognition of customary decisions. This study recommends integrating the outcomes of customary deliberations into the national legal system to strengthen legal certainty and promote social justice based on maṣlaḥah values.
Analisis Yuridis Kode Etik Notaris Terkait Larangan Kemitraan dengan Biro Jasa dalam Mencari Klien Anuddin, Ihramsyah; Hamid, Adnan; Abdullah, Zaitun
PESHUM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 3: April 2026
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/peshum.v5i3.16355

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji kesenjangan implementasi Kode Etik Notaris terkait larangan kemitraan dengan biro jasa dalam mencari klien, yang mengancam independensi profesi di era digital. Tujuan penelitian adalah menganalisis penerapan normatif, faktor pendorong pelanggaran, dampak yuridis-etis, serta merumuskan rekomendasi penguatan pengawasan. Jenis penelitian hukum normatif kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Populasi meliputi peraturan perundang-undangan, Kode Etik INI, dan doktrin hukum; sampel purposif mencakup Pasal 4 ayat (4) Kode Etik INI 2015, UUJN, serta literatur terkait. Instrumen berupa studi kepustakaan, dianalisis deskriptif-analitis dengan content analysis. Hasil menunjukkan praktik bundling digital dan referral fee marak akibat distribusi notaris tidak merata dan pengawasan reaktif MPD. Kesimpulan merekomendasikan gradasi sanksi, amendemen kode etik, audit SIDNot, dan pelatihan etika wajib untuk penurunan pelanggaran 50% dalam tiga tahun.