Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 26 Documents
Search

Zakat is not Just Charity Why Professional Fund Management Shapes the Future of the Ummah Furkony, Deni Konkon Furkony; Ridwan, Ahmad Hasan; Mahmud, Mahmud; Suntana, Ija; Syaripudin, Enceng Iip; Mohd, Ismail Bin
Involvement International Journal of Business Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): April 2025
Publisher : PT Agung Media Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62569/iijb.v2i2.127

Abstract

Zakat, often perceived merely as a religious obligation or charitable act, holds untapped potential as a strategic instrument for socio-economic transformation in Muslim communities. This study argues that zakat must be viewed not just as an act of giving, but as a fund requiring professional management to realize its full impact on community development and the future of the Ummah. Using a qualitative research design, the study explores professional fund management practices in selected Zakat Management Units (UPZs) across Indonesia. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with UPZ leaders and financial managers, as well as document analysis of financial reports, program structures, and governance models. The findings indicate that UPZs which adopt professional financial governance—characterized by transparency, accountability, data-driven planning, and skilled human resources—are significantly more effective in achieving measurable outcomes such as improved mustahik welfare, sustainable livelihoods, and increased trust from muzakki. Professionalism transforms zakat from reactive charity into proactive socio-economic empowerment. This study underscores the urgency of redefining zakat management frameworks to embrace modern financial and organizational practices while remaining rooted in Sharia principles. As zakat institutions become more professional, they not only fulfill their spiritual mandate but also emerge as pivotal players in driving the long-term resilience and welfare of the Ummah. The future of Islamic social finance lies in bridging tradition with innovation through professional stewardship.
Muzâra'ah As a Model and Practice of Pesantren Agricultural Cooperation in Improving the Welfare of Farmers in West Java Aminulloh, Ali; Janwari, Yadi; Nurrohman, Nurrohman; Suntana, Ija
International Journal of Social Science, Education, Communication and Economics Vol. 2 No. 6 (2024): February
Publisher : Lafadz Jaya Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/sj.v2i6.257

Abstract

This research is motivated by the fact that there is still a lot of unproductive agricultural land in West Java, even though the agricultural sector contributes a lot to the community's economy. There needs to be an effort to involve various components of society, especially Islamic boarding schools, in increasing the productivity of agricultural land through cooperation using the muzâra'ah system involving many parties to improve the welfare of farmers and Islamic boarding schools. The aim of this research is to analyze and discover land management practices, cooperation models, and the impact of agricultural cooperation on the welfare of farmers in West Java. This research is field research using a qualitative approach. The research results show that, First, agricultural land management practices in West Java are collaborated with various parties, both internal Islamic boarding schools such as students, teachers and administrators as well as with the surrounding farming community. The two Islamic boarding school agricultural collaborations with the muzâra'ah system in West Java were expanded in scope, not just farmers and landowners, but there were elements of academics, government, the business world, financial institutions, markets and non-governmental organizations. Islamic boarding schools innovate agricultural cooperation with the quintuple helix model using multi contracts, namely connecting these parties to optimize the agricultural business being collaborated. Islamic boarding schools also build aspects of farmers' spirituality through guidance on the application of religious values in agricultural cooperation. Third, Islamic boarding school agricultural cooperation is able to absorb agricultural labor, so that farmers are able to improve their economy, have permanent jobs and increase their religious understanding and practice.
ISLAMIC ECONOMIC LAW "A CONTINUOUS ECONOMIC STUDY PERSPECTIVE OF ISLAMIC ECONOMIC LAW" Hadiat; Hasan Ridwan, Ahmad; Suntana, Ija; Rumatiga, Hidayat
DE'RECHTSSTAAT 2024: SPECIAL ISSUE ON LEGAL BUSINESS, PUBLIC POLICY, AND GREEN TECHNOLOGY
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Djuanda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ausing a consumptive and materialistic nature which results in environmental damage due to uncontrolled use of resources. This research aims to determine sustainable economics from the perspective of Islamic Economic Law. This article uses a descriptive qualitative method with a normative-empirical approach. This research finds strong arguments and signs that Islamic economics is very concerned with sustainable economics with a focus on optimizing resources without ignoring environmental aspects, so that economic buildings are able to provide sustainable benefits. The real form of a sustainable Islamic economic system is at least visible in sharia banking's concern for the environment.
Comparison of Legal Maxims in Common Law and Islamic Law: Similarities and Differences in Dispute Resolution Wahyudi; Suntana, Ija
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 14 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.14.2.2025.425-458

Abstract

This study compares legal maxims or legal principles in common law and Islamic law, focusing on the similarities and differences in applying these rules in dispute resolution. The legal maxim in these two legal systems is a fundamental principle that guides judges and legal practitioners in interpreting legal rules and deciding cases. In common law, legal maxims develop through precedent and jurisprudence. In contrast, in Islamic law, this rule comes from religious texts such as the Qur'an and Hadith, as well as the development of law by scholars. The normative-comparative approach method is used to analyze the similarities and differences of the maxim legal in both legal systems. This method helps identify important points of similarity and differences and reveals ways in which the two legal systems can complement each other. This comparative study concludes that Common Law and Islamic Law originate from different foundations, secular precedent versus divine revelation; they share a fundamental commitment to justice, embodied in maxims like "no punishment without law." Their paths diverge in methodology: Common Law prioritizes legal certainty through precedent, while Islamic Law seeks balance through moral objectives (maqasid-al-shari'ah). Significantly, in pluralistic systems like Indonesia, these traditions converge pragmatically. Courts creatively blend principles, merging pacta sunt servanda with al-`ādatu muhakkamatun to deliver legally sound and contextually just rulings. This demonstrates that the future of effective dispute resolution lies not in choosing between systems, but in their thoughtful integration to achieve substantive justice.
Menelaah Ijma Ulama tentang Crypto Currency dari Sudut Pandang Kaidah Muamalah Al-Aslu Fil Muamalah Ibahah Purba, Asnan; Suntana, Ija; Anwar, Syahrul
Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Sharia Journal and Education Center Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62976/ijijel.v4i1.1581

Abstract

The rapid development of blockchain technology and cryptocurrency has generated significant legal challenges within Islamic commercial law, particularly in determining the permissibility of digital financial instruments that were unknown in classical fiqh literature. This article aims to examine the legal status of cryptocurrency based on the fiqh maxim al-aslu fil muamalah ibahah and to analyze the implications of the ulama consensus established during the 2021 Ijtima’ Ulama of the Indonesian Council of Ulama (MUI). This study employs a normative legal research method using conceptual, typological, and comparative approaches. Cryptocurrency is systematically categorized into five types: utility tokens, security tokens, asset-backed tokens, decentralized finance (DeFi) tokens, and non-fungible tokens (NFTs), each analyzed through definitional, operational, sharia compliance, and ijma-based perspectives. The findings demonstrate that cryptocurrency cannot be assessed through a generalized legal judgment but must be evaluated differentially according to its function, characteristics, and underlying assets. Utility tokens and security tokens may be considered permissible when they fulfill the requirements of lawful commodities, provide tangible benefits, and avoid elements of gharar, maysir, and riba. In contrast, purely speculative cryptocurrencies lacking clear utility or asset backing tend to conflict with Islamic legal principles. This study affirms the continued relevance of al-aslu fil muamalah ibahah as a methodological framework for addressing contemporary digital financial innovations while maintaining adherence to maqasid al-shariah and legal prudence.
IMPLEMENTASI PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN NEGARA TERHADAP ANAK TERLANTAR BERDASARKAN PASAL 34 UUD 1945 DI KABUPATEN GARUT PERSPEKTIF SIYASAH MALIYAH Salva Safira Salsabila; Ija Suntana; Chaerul Shaleh
GOVERNANCE: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Politik Lokal dan Pembangunan Vol. 13 No. 4 (2026): 2026 April
Publisher : Lembaga Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Politik (LKISPOL)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56015/gjikplp.v13i4.751

Abstract

asal 34 UUD 1945 secara tegas mengamanatkan negara untuk memelihara anak terlantar, namun realitas di lapangan sering kali menunjukkan kesenjangan antara regulasi dan implementasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk dan efektivitas pertanggungjawaban negara terhadap anak terlantar di Kabupaten Garut, serta meninjaunya dari perspektif Siyasah Maliyah (Hukum Keuangan Publik Islam). Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis empiris dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Data dikumpulkan melalui observasi dan wawancara mendalam dengan pihak Dinas Sosial Kabupaten Garut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara normatif, Pemerintah Kabupaten Garut telah menerbitkan Peraturan Daerah Nomor 11 Tahun 2023 dan menjalankan prosedur rehabilitasi sosial dasar. Namun, implementasi kebijakan tersebut terhambat oleh ketiadaan rumah singgah (shelter), kurangnya kendaraan operasional, dan keterbatasan anggaran. Dalam tinjauan Siyasah Maliyah, kondisi ini mengindikasikan bahwa kebijakan anggaran daerah (APBD) belum sepenuhnya menerapkan prinsip prioritas (Fiqh al-Awlawiyat) yang menempatkan keselamatan jiwa anak sebagai kebutuhan mendesak (dharuriyat). Kesimpulannya, pertanggungjawaban negara di Garut baru berjalan optimal pada tataran administratif, namun masih lemah dalam dukungan infrastruktur dan keberpihakan anggaran bagi kaum rentan.
Contracts as the Main Legal Basis in Islamic Economic Disputes: A Juridical-Empirical Study of Lawlessness in Religious Courts Chandra Chandra; Beni Ahmad Saebani; Ija Suntana; Hasan Bisri
Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan Vol 13, No 1 (2026): January-June
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia (Islamic Law) at Fatmawati Sukarno State Islamic University Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/mzn.v13i1.10669

Abstract

Despite the growing body of literature on Islamic economic dispute resolution, no study has systematically reconstructed the conceptual boundary between unlawful acts (perbuatan melawan hukum) and contractual default (wanprestasi) within the framework of sharia contract law. This gap produces legal inconsistency and undermines substantive justice in Indonesian Religious Courts. This study critically examines and reconceptualizes the application of unlawful act doctrine in sharia economic disputes, proposing a contract-centered legal reasoning model integrated with maqāṣid al-sharī'ah as a normative corrective framework. A juridical-empirical approach with qualitative case study design was employed. Data were drawn from Religious Court decisions on sharia economic disputes, supplemented by in-depth interviews with judicial officials and systematic documentary analysis of the Compilation of Sharia Economic Law (KHES) and DSN-MUI fatwas. Inductive thematic analysis followed the Miles and Huberman interactive model, with source and method triangulation to ensure validity. Judges consistently accepted unlawful act claims in contract-originated disputes without adequately examining the contractual structure as the primary legal foundation. References to KHES and DSN-MUI fatwas were marginal and non-systemic, resulting in significant inter-decision inconsistency across cases with substantively similar fact patterns. Practical flexibility in evidentiary standards emerged as a key driver of this misqualification. This study is the first to offer a conceptual reconstruction of unlawful act doctrine within sharia economic dispute law by positioning the contract as the primary analytical anchor and unlawful acts as a residual legal regime, applicable only when the disputed conduct falls entirely outside the contractual relationship. Unlike prior work focused on institutional or procedural dimensions, this study integrates modern contract law theory, socio-legal analysis, and maqāṣid al-sharī'ah into a coherent normative framework for religious court adjudication. The findings provide actionable guidance for judges, policymakers, and the Supreme Court in developing interpretive standards that strengthen legal certainty and sharia compliance in Islamic economic justice
Pertimbangan Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Putusan Nomor 15/Puu-Xxiii/2025 Tentang Penghapusan Hak Imunitas Jaksa Dalam Penangkapan Jaksa Prespektif Siyasah Dusturiah Salma Alfia Widjana; Ija Suntana; Taufiq Alamsyah
PESHUM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 4: Juni 2026
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/peshum.v5i4.16912

Abstract

Keputusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor 15/PUU-XXIII/2025, yang menghapuskan hak imunitas jaksa dalam penangkapan, membawa perubahan mendalam dalam sistem peradilan Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis substansi keputusan tersebut, khususnya dalam kaitannya dengan prinsip keadilan dan kesetaraan di hadapan hukum. Menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode analisis hukum normatif, penelitian ini mengandalkan sumber data utama berupa teks putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dan peraturan perundang-undangan terkait, serta literatur sekunder yang membahas konsep siyasah dusturiyah dan relevansinya terhadap sistem hukum Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Mahkamah Konstitusi memutuskan untuk menghapuskan hak imunitas jaksa karena dianggap dapat menciptakan ketidaksetaraan serta potensi impunitas, sementara prinsip akuntabilitas pejabat negara yang tercermin dalam keputusan ini menegaskan bahwa jaksa tetap harus mempertanggungjawabkan tindakannya. Meskipun hak imunitas dihapuskan, Mahkamah memberikan pengecualian dalam dua kondisi, yaitu saat jaksa tertangkap tangan atau terlibat dalam tindak pidana yang sangat serius. Dari perspektif siyasah dusturiyah, keputusan ini sejalan dengan prinsip bahwa setiap pejabat negara harus dipertanggungjawabkan atas tindakannya, serta menekankan pentingnya pengawasan terhadap kekuasaan untuk menjaga integritas sistem hukum. Keputusan ini diharapkan dapat memperkuat transparansi dan akuntabilitas dalam sistem peradilan Indonesia tanpa mengurangi perlindungan yang diperlukan bagi jaksa dalam menjalankan tugasnya.
KEABADIAN AIR: Telaah Teologi Energi dalam Islam dan Hukum Termodinamika Ija Suntana
Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 14 No. 2: December 2018
Publisher : Fakultas Studi Islam dan Peradaban, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/AIIJIS.2018.0089.242-261

Abstract

Artikel ini mengupas tentang perbandingan konsep teologi energi dalam Islam dengan teori termodinamika, terutama menyangkut tentang keabadian air. Pertanyaan riset yang dibahas dalam artikel ini adalah apakah pandangan teologi Islam, yang diwakili oleh aliran Muktazilah dan Al-As’ariyah perihal substansi alam memiliki korelasi dengan teologi energi di kalangan para ekolog, terutama dengan hukum Termodinamika? Hasil pembacaan penulis ditemukan bahwa aliran kalam Muktazilah memandang bahwa energi air memiliki karakter kekal, sehingga tidak akan habis dieksploitasi oleh manusia. Pandangan ini senada dengan hukum Termodinamika I, yang menegaskan bahwa energi memiliki karakter keabadian. Sedangkan, aliran Al-As’yariyah menyatakan bahwa substansi alam tidak memiliki karakter abadi, termasuk energi air. Pandangan teologi Al-A’asyariyah sehaluan dan satu prinsip dengan hukum Termodinamika II, yang menyatakan bahwa energi mengalami penyusutan.Telaah teologi energi ini dapat dijadikan sebagai konsep eksploitasi lingkungan. Berdasarkan teori Muktazilah, eksploitasi lingkungan dapat dilakukan tanpa batas, karena substansi alam tidak memiliki batas (abadi). Adapun didasarkan pada pandangan Al-As’ariyah, eksploitasi alam harus memertimbangkan sisi keterbatasannya, karena substansi alam berbatas waktu dan volume.
High Integrity Low Publicity: Research Performance of Professors in Indonesian State Islamic Universities Ija Suntana; Tedi Priatna; Dede Kania; Siti Nurfatoni
Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 18 No. 1: June 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Studi Islam dan Peradaban, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/afkaruna.v18i1.14195

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the performance of the publihed research results by professors in three State Islamic Universities (UINs). By using the descriptive–qualitative analysis and quantitative data reading, this study analyzes research outputs of lecturers with a full professorship in the State Islamic Universities from January to October 2019. The research finds that most of the professor’s research results were not published whether in the forms of books or scientific journal articles. 60% of the professors have a lack of understanding of the open journal system, which causes a low level of publication among them. One program that is very effective in helping them to increase the productivity of the publications is a program of publication assistance.  The well-versed information technology assistants help the professors to get familiar with the information technology. This study adds to the existing literature regarding the research performance of university professors, especially in understanding what factors that hinder the publication performance of State Islamic University professors in Indonesia.