Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 30 Documents
Search

Legal Aspects of Cooperatives’ Issuance of Products to Non-Member Communities in Indonesia Adristi, Dhia Novita; Gultom, Elisatris; Faisal, Pupung
Lentera Hukum Vol 8 No 2 (2021): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v8i2.21783

Abstract

Regulations of savings and loan cooperatives allow cooperatives to collect funds, resulting in the chance of issuing products to non-member communities. This study aimed to analyze the practice of issuing products to non-member communities by cooperatives. By highlighting the principle of membership as the specialty of cooperatives in Indonesia, it argued that issuing products to non-member communities is a deviation of cooperative's business activity. It accounted for the cooperative regulations, objectives, and principles of membership in cooperatives to the practice of issuing products to non-member communities that deviate from statutory regulations does not arise. The study used legal research derived from secondary data, among others primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. This study showed that the practice of issuing products to non-member communities is a deviation from statutory regulations, objectives, and membership principles in cooperatives. In the meantime, cooperatives while maintaining their identity requires all cooperative actors, the government, and the general public in preventing and following up on savings and loan cooperative practices that eliminate membership rights for service users. KEYWORDS: Cooperative Law, Cooperatives in Indonesia, Economic Democracy.
IMPLICATIONS AND LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF IMPLEMENTING A RISK BASED ONLINE SINGLE SUBMISSION SYSTEM FOR LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY BUSINESS LICENSING Kusmiati, Susi; Afriana, Anita; Faisal, Pupung
Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): JURNAL POROS HUKUM PADJADJARAN
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23920/jphp.v5i1.1367

Abstract

Limited Liability Company (PT) as a Business Entity must have permits to carry out its business activities legally. Risk-based Online Single Submission (OSS) is designated as a Business Licensing portal based on the level of risk of a business activity in determining the type of business licensing. The purpose of this research is to find out how much influence the implementation of business licensing through the risk-based OSS system has in the business licensing of Limited Liability Companies and to formulate the legal consequences that arise if the Limited Liability Company does not comply with the standards of its business activities. The research method used is a normative juridical approach with analytical descriptive research specifications. Data analysis was carried out using qualitative normative methods. The results of the study show that the implementation of business licensing through the risk-based OSS system in practice has implications for limited liability company business licensing, namely providing convenience for limited liability companies in managing business licensing, because permits are issued at the beginning then the government as the authority will verify compliance with business activity standards. legal consequences that arise if the Limited Liability Company does not fulfill the standards of its business activities is the imposition of administrative sanctions on the Limited Liability Company.
LEGAL PROTECTION OF CAPITAL MARKET INVESTORS IN THE EVENT OF A SUSPENSION OF STOCK TRADING ON THE INDONESIAN STOCK EXCHANGE BASED ON INDONESIAN LAW Zakiar, Rafi Andriawan; Ikhwansyah, Isis; Faisal, Pupung
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v7i1.1379

Abstract

Stock investment in the capital market is a high-risk high return investment. One of the risks faced by capital market investors is the stock trading suspension sanction imposed by the IDX as experienced by capital market investors in PT HK Metals Utama (HKMU) stocks. This suspension sanction is detrimental to investors due to the suspension of HKMU stock trading. Investors should be more careful to carry out risk management by cutting losses when they see a notation that HKMU shares will be suspended. This research aims to analyze the legal consequences and legal position of investors in the event of a suspension of stock trading and to analyze the legal actions or steps that can be taken by investors to sell their shares through off-exchange transactions.This research uses a research method with a normative juridical approach that is referred to the laws and regulations in the field of capital markets and applicable legal theories. The specification of this research is descriptive analytical. The data collection techniques used by researchers in this research are in the form of literature studies by searching for data as complete as possible from secondary data derived from primary and secondary legal materials that are relevant to related cases, then analyzed qualitatively. Based on the research results, the following can be obtained. First, the legal consequences experienced by investors are that investors cannot conduct buying and selling transactions of HKMU shares on the stock exchange as stated in Article I.5. IDX Regulation regarding Securities Suspension and investors have legal standing guaranteed by Articles 28-30 of the OJK Law and legal standing to conduct transactions outside the stock exchange as stipulated in Article 6 paragraph (3) POJK regarding Securities Transactions. Second, legal actions that can be taken by investors are selling their stocks through off-exchange transactions, submitting claims to OJK to make written orders by conducting disgrogement funds, and as a last resort can file a claim or lawsuit for compensation to the emiten.
KEPASTIAN HUKUM KEDUDUKAN PEMEGANG SAHAM AKIBAT PUTUSAN PEMBATALAN AKTA PEMINDAHAN SAHAM OLEH PENGADILAN Elvaretta, Alysia; Afriana, Anita; Faisal, Pupung
JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Vol 8, No 1 (2025): JUSTITIA Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/justitia.v8i1.183-187

Abstract

Terdapat pemindahan hak atas saham yang terjadi akibat putusan pembatalan akta pemindahan saham oleh pengadilan dan tidak diberitahukan kepada Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Penelitian ini meneliti bagaimana kedudukan hukum kepemilikan saham yang telah dibatalkan akta pemindahan sahamnya oleh pengadilan dan kepastian hukum terhadap pihak yang telah dinyatakan sah oleh pengadilan  yang tidak dilakukan pemberitahuan kepada Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dengan spesifikasi deskriptif analitis dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian disimpulkan bahwa pihak yang telah dibatalkan akta pemindahan hak atas sahamnya oleh pengadilan tidak memiliki kedudukan hukum sebagai pemilik saham dalam perseroan terbatas tersebut dan pihak yang telah dinyatakan sah dapat menjalankan hak-haknya dengan syarat memenuhi ketentuan yang telah diatur dalam UUPT. Diperlukan pencatatan nama pemegang saham yang telah dinyatakan sah dalam daftar perseroan.
KEPASTIAN HUKUM KEDUDUKAN PEMEGANG SAHAM AKIBAT PUTUSAN PEMBATALAN AKTA PEMINDAHAN SAHAM OLEH PENGADILAN Elvaretta, Alysia; Afriana, Anita; Faisal, Pupung
JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Vol 8, No 1 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/justitia.v8i1.183-187

Abstract

Terdapat pemindahan hak atas saham yang terjadi akibat putusan pembatalan akta pemindahan saham oleh pengadilan dan tidak diberitahukan kepada Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Penelitian ini meneliti bagaimana kedudukan hukum kepemilikan saham yang telah dibatalkan akta pemindahan sahamnya oleh pengadilan dan kepastian hukum terhadap pihak yang telah dinyatakan sah oleh pengadilan  yang tidak dilakukan pemberitahuan kepada Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dengan spesifikasi deskriptif analitis dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian disimpulkan bahwa pihak yang telah dibatalkan akta pemindahan hak atas sahamnya oleh pengadilan tidak memiliki kedudukan hukum sebagai pemilik saham dalam perseroan terbatas tersebut dan pihak yang telah dinyatakan sah dapat menjalankan hak-haknya dengan syarat memenuhi ketentuan yang telah diatur dalam UUPT. Diperlukan pencatatan nama pemegang saham yang telah dinyatakan sah dalam daftar perseroan.
Legal Analysis Of The Implementation Of Risk Allocation In Cooperation Schemes With The Government And Business Entities In Infrastructure Provision In Indonesia Rezkyna, Nabilah; Faisal, Pupung; Trisnamansyah, Purnama
JURNAL LEGALITAS Vol. 14, No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (498.712 KB) | DOI: 10.33756/jelta.v14i2.11828

Abstract

Risk allocation is a key feature in government-business partnerships. In the Public Private Partnership scheme, risk allocation is a difficult thing. The transfer of risk to the private sector has an impact on the price of the project. Likewise, allocating risk to the public sector which in practice tends to reduce Value For Money. In addition, project risk is dynamic and changes throughout the life of the project so it cannot be predicted with certainty. This normative research aims to examine the guiding principles for increasing the effectiveness of risk allocation and maximizing Value For Money from existing regulations in Indonesia and Government Cooperation agreements with Business Entities based on best practices in several other countries. The approach used in this paper uses a conceptual and comparative approach. The results obtained from this paper are that it is necessary to identify and anticipate risks including alternative solutions that are adjusted to the principle of risk allocation to minimize risk, as well as adjustments to the matrix that have been made by PT PII, risk allocation principles, best practices and related regulatory frameworks in Indonesia. Result, risks in KPBU projects are often an obstacle in the success of KPBU implementation in Indonesia. To minimize the risks that will be faced or may be faced, it is necessary to identify and anticipate risks including alternative solutions that are adjusted to the principle of risk allocation. In developing an effective risk matrix, innovative thinking is needed that is adapted to the characteristics of the KPBU project and the principles of risk management. This must also be adjusted to the matrix that has been made by PT PII, the principles of risk allocation, best practices and related regulatory frameworks in Indonesia are used as references. If properly implemented, this principle is expected to result in a lower risk premium and lower project costs, thus having a positive impact on the project's stakeholders.
Pernyataan Pailit Terhadap Perusahaan Efek atas Permohonan Nasabah Lestari Sutanto, Pusphita Rahayu; Suryanti, Nyulistiowati; Faisal, Pupung
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v4i2.9396

Abstract

Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (“PKPU”) dan Kepailitan merupakan suatu resiko yang tidak dapat dihindari oleh perusahaan efek yang menjalankan usahanya sebagai manajer investasi yang lalai dalam memenuhi kewajibannya. Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (“UUK-PKPU”) telah mengatur bahwa hanya badan pengawas pasar modal yang berwenang yang dapat mengajukan permohonan PKPU dan pailit terhadap perusahaan efek. Realitanya masih terdapat putusan yang tidak mengacu pada ketentuan tersebut, yaitu dalam perkara PKPU dan pailit PT Emco Asset Management (“PT EAM”). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami ketepatan pertimbangan majelis hakim dalam memutus pailit PT EAM berdasarkan permohonan PKPU oleh nasabahnya dan pelaksanaan putusan pailit PT EAM. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif dan diuraikan secara deskriptif-analitis. Hasil penelitian ini adalah pertimbangan majelis hakim dalam memutus pailit jika dilihat dari segi materiil berdasarkan Pasal 230 ayat (1) jo. Pasal 281 ayat (1) UUK-PKPU telah sesuai dengan ketentuan dalam UUK-PKPU, namun sudah seharusnya permohonan PKPU oleh nasabah terhadap PT EAM yang mendasari diputusnya pailit tidak dapat dikabulkan oleh majelis hakim karena bertentangan dengan Pasal 223 UUK-PKPU dan pelaksanaan putusannya tidak bisa dilaksanakan dikarenakan bertentangan dengan ketentuan Pasal 2 ayat (4) UUK-PKPU dan Pasal 55 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.
Tinjauan Yuridis Praktik Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Atas Dasar Pelanggaran Bersifat Mendesak Dikaitkan dengan UU Cipta Kerja dan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Lainnya Salsabila, Salma; Singadimedja, Holyness N.; Faisal, Pupung
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research (Special Issue)
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v4i3.11505

Abstract

Kehadiran mekanisme PHK pelanggaran bersifat mendesak dalam Pasal 52 ayat (2) dan (3) PP 35/2021 tidak mengatasi perbedaan tafsir penerapan asas praduga tidak bersalah yang ditinggalkan pasca dibatalkannya Pasal 158 UU Ketenagakerjaan. Saat ini, masih terdapat praktik PHK yang dilakukan tanpa hadirnya aturan pelanggaran bersifat mendesak dalam kaidah otonom sebagai hal yang disyaratkan Pasal 52 PP 35/2021 dan tanpa didahului adanya putusan pidana yang menyatakan kesalahan pekerja/buruh. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji, secara yuridis, praktik PHK karena pelanggaran bersifat mendesak dikaitkan dengan UU Cipta Kerja dan peraturan perundang-undangan lainnya serta menganalisis perlindungan hukum bagi pekerja/buruh terhadap PHK karena pelanggaran bersifat mendesak dalam UU Cipta Kerja dikaitkan dengan asas praduga tak bersalah. Metode pendekatan yang digunakan bersifat yuridis normatif dengan spesifikasi penelitian deskriptif analitis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa praktik PHK karena pelanggaran bersifat mendesak tidak sesuai dengan Pasal 52 ayat (2) PP 35/2021 sebagai aturan pelaksana UU Cipta Kerja, namun ketidaksesuaian tersebut dapat dibenarkan berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan lainnya. Perlindungan terhadap pekerja/buruh terhadap PHK karena pelanggaran bersifat mendesak dalam UU Cipta Kerja tidak pula sesuai dengan asas praduga tak bersalah. Kata Kunci: PHK, Pelanggaran Bersifat Mendesak, Asas Praduga Tak Bersalah The enactment of GR 35/2021, specifically Article 52 (2), does not suffice to reconcile the disparities in the interpretation and application of the presumption of innocence principle that persisted following the annulment of Article 158 of Manpower Law. Currently, there remain practices wherein dismissals occur without the existence of the autonomous rules classifying the action or behaviour as urgent violation, as required by Article 52 (2) of GR 35/2021 and without a preceding criminal court decision establishing the fault of the worker. This research aims to undertake a legal analysis of employment dismissal practice on the grounds of urgent violation in association with the Job Creation Law and other applicable regulation and to examine the legal protection provided for the employee in relation to the presumption of innocence principle. This research adopts a juridical-normative method and utilizes descriptive analytical specification. The result reveals that the practices under analysis were not in conformity with Article 52 (2) of GR 35/2021. However, alternative statutory provisions support the justification for this nonconformity. The existing legal protection provided for the employee, with regard to the practice of dismissal for reasons of urgent violation, overlook the principle of presumption of innocence. Keywords: Employment Dismissal, Urgent Violation, Presumption of Innocence Principle
LEGAL PROTECTION OF CAPITAL MARKET INVESTORS IN THE EVENT OF A SUSPENSION OF STOCK TRADING ON THE INDONESIAN STOCK EXCHANGE BASED ON INDONESIAN LAW Zakiar, Rafi Andriawan; Ikhwansyah, Isis; Faisal, Pupung
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v7i1.1379

Abstract

Stock investment in the capital market is a high-risk high return investment. One of the risks faced by capital market investors is the stock trading suspension sanction imposed by the IDX as experienced by capital market investors in PT HK Metals Utama (HKMU) stocks. This suspension sanction is detrimental to investors due to the suspension of HKMU stock trading. Investors should be more careful to carry out risk management by cutting losses when they see a notation that HKMU shares will be suspended. This research aims to analyze the legal consequences and legal position of investors in the event of a suspension of stock trading and to analyze the legal actions or steps that can be taken by investors to sell their shares through off-exchange transactions.This research uses a research method with a normative juridical approach that is referred to the laws and regulations in the field of capital markets and applicable legal theories. The specification of this research is descriptive analytical. The data collection techniques used by researchers in this research are in the form of literature studies by searching for data as complete as possible from secondary data derived from primary and secondary legal materials that are relevant to related cases, then analyzed qualitatively. Based on the research results, the following can be obtained. First, the legal consequences experienced by investors are that investors cannot conduct buying and selling transactions of HKMU shares on the stock exchange as stated in Article I.5. IDX Regulation regarding Securities Suspension and investors have legal standing guaranteed by Articles 28-30 of the OJK Law and legal standing to conduct transactions outside the stock exchange as stipulated in Article 6 paragraph (3) POJK regarding Securities Transactions. Second, legal actions that can be taken by investors are selling their stocks through off-exchange transactions, submitting claims to OJK to make written orders by conducting disgrogement funds, and as a last resort can file a claim or lawsuit for compensation to the emiten.
Kewenangan Pengadilan Niaga Terkait Klausula Perjanjian Arbitrase Jika Terjadi Keadaan Force Majeure pada Perkara Kepailitan Hanif Hasyimawan Mubarak; Nyulistiowati Suryanti; Pupung Faisal
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 4 (2025): Tema Hukum Perdata dan Kenotariatan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i4.1071

Abstract

Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations (“PKPU”) and Bankruptcy are risks that companies cannot avoid, prompting various efforts to prevent bankruptcy declarations. This study aims to examine the authority of the Commercial Court at the Central Jakarta District Court in handling bankruptcy cases that involve arbitration clauses and force majeure claims asserted by the PKPU Respondent, which should be considered in the judge’s deliberations. The research employs normative legal methods with a legislative and case approach. In case decision No. 337/PDT.SUS-PKPU/2023/PN.NIAGA.JKT.PST, the respondent, PT. Pacific Global Utama, claimed the occurrence of force majeure and the presence of an arbitration clause. Findings based on the Bankruptcy and PKPU Law (UU-KPKPU) indicate that the commercial court retains authority to review and resolve bankruptcy petitions despite arbitration clauses and force majeure conditions. The force majeure claim should be considered by the judge, as the absence of force majeure would mean the debt would not have arisen.