Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Post-Divorce Copyright Legal Status: An Indonesian Legal Perspective Zahry, Ariel Alvi; Fidhayanti, Dwi; binti Muhammad Jebat, Damia Batrisyia
Jurnal Mahkamah : Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol. 9 No. 2 December (2024)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Ma'arif NU (IAIMNU) Metro Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25217/jm.v9i2.4978

Decision Number 1622/PDT.G/2023/PA.JB is a new precedent for the world of Indonesian law in the future, especially regarding copyright in the context of divorce because it raises problems related to the distribution of economic rights after divorce that arise over copyrighted works. This research aims to determine the position of work objects created during marriage and the status of economic rights to work objects after divorce. The research method used in this research is normative juridical with a statutory and regulatory approach. Primary and secondary legal materials are obtained through literature studies and explained using grammatical and extensive legal interpretation. The research results show that the position of created objects owned during marriage can be considered joint property, with the emphasis on the principle of togetherness in the marital relationship. Referring to Article 37 of Law no. 1 of 1974 and Article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law, the economic rights status of post-divorce copyrights which become joint property can be transferred, either in whole or in part for certain reasons. Therefore, the division of copyright after divorce needs to consider the contribution of each party in creating the work as well as the economic value of the copyrighted work itself. This research provides an important contribution in understanding the position of creative works as intangible assets in marriage and their impact on the division of joint assets after divorce.

EMPOWERING FUTURES: Unveiling Zakat's Vital Role Economic Development and Legal Framework in Malaysia's Daud, Mohd Zaidi; Mohd Noh, Mohd Shahid; Fidhayanti, Dwi; Mat Hussin, Mohd Norhusairi
Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Vol 16, No 1 (2025): Jurisdictie
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j.v16i1.31424

This study investigates the vital role of zakat in Malaysia's economic development within the context of its legal and public policy frameworks. Zakat, an obligatory form of almsgiving in Islam, serves as a critical instrument for wealth redistribution and social welfare. The background of this study highlights zakat's potential to alleviate poverty, promote social justice, and drive economic empowerment in Muslim-majority countries. The primary objective is to examine how Malaysia's legal provisions, regulatory mechanisms, and public policy initiatives enhance the effectiveness of zakat in achieving these socio-economic goals. The methodology involves a comprehensive review of statutory instruments, state enactments, and administrative practices governing zakat, supported by case study analysis and statistical data on its economic impact. This mixed-methods approach enables a nuanced understanding of the intersection between zakat governance, legal structures, and economic outcomes. The study’s findings reveal that Malaysia's structured legal framework and progressive public policies have significantly improved zakat management, leading to effective poverty alleviation, economic empowerment, community development, and crisis response. Importantly, this research contributes to the fields of law and public policy by illustrating how legal reforms, institutional strengthening, and policy integration can maximize the socio-economic benefits of religious fiscal instruments like zakat, thereby fostering a more equitable and resilient national economy.Penelitian ini mengkaji peranan penting zakat dalam pembangunan ekonomi Malaysia dalam konteks kerangka hukum dan kebijakan publik. Zakat, sebagai kewajiban dalam Islam, berfungsi sebagai instrumen utama dalam redistribusi kekayaan dan kesejahteraan sosial. Latar belakang penelitian ini menyoroti potensi zakat dalam mengentaskan kemiskinan, mempromosikan keadilan sosial, dan mendorong pemberdayaan ekonomi di negara-negara dengan mayoritas Muslim. Tujuan utama penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis bagaimana ketentuan hukum, mekanisme regulasi, dan inisiatif kebijakan publik di Malaysia memperkuat efektivitas zakat dalam mencapai tujuan sosial ekonomi tersebut. Metodologi yang digunakan melibatkan tinjauan komprehensif terhadap instrumen hukum, enakmen negara bagian, serta praktik administratif yang mengatur zakat, yang didukung oleh analisis studi kasus dan data statistik terkait dampak ekonomi zakat. Pendekatan metode campuran ini memungkinkan pemahaman yang mendalam mengenai keterkaitan antara tata kelola zakat, struktur hukum, dan hasil-hasil ekonomi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kerangka hukum yang terstruktur dan kebijakan publik yang progresif di Malaysia secara signifikan meningkatkan pengelolaan zakat, sehingga efektif dalam pengentasan kemiskinan, pemberdayaan ekonomi, pembangunan komunitas, serta penanganan krisis. Secara khusus, penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi pada bidang hukum dan kebijakan publik dengan menunjukkan bagaimana reformasi hukum, penguatan kelembagaan, dan integrasi kebijakan dapat memaksimalkan manfaat sosial ekonomi dari instrumen fiskal keagamaan seperti zakat, guna mewujudkan perekonomian nasional yang lebih adil dan tangguh.

Comparative Analysis of Undue Influence as a Basis for Contract Annulment: Comparison Indonesia and Malaysia Fidhayanti, Dwi; Umam, Khairul; Hanafi, Hanira
Arena Hukum Vol. 18 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum2025.01801.7

This research offers novelty by conducting a comparative analysis of the application of the doctrine of undue influence in contract cancellation in Indonesia, particularly in the context of comparing different legal systems. Previous study such as those conducted by Ariyanto (2023), revealed that Indonesia lacks a clear legal framework regarding undue influence in contract cancellation. Meanwhile, Azam (2020) highlighted that the doctrine in consumer financing cases in Indonesia limits contractual freedom. This study compares the application of the doctrine of undue influence as a basis for contract cancellation in Indonesia and Malaysia, aiming to formulate an ideal model for Indonesia inspired by the application in Malaysia. The research method employs normative legal research method with a comparative legal approach. Legal materials are collected through extensive library research and analyzed using systematic and grammatical legal interpretation methodology. The novelty of this study lies in its in-depth comparison of the application of this doctrine in Indonesia and Malaysia, focusing on significant similarities between two countries, influencing how the harmed party seek cancellation. Indonesia has the opportunity to adopt Malaysia’s approach, which encourages judges to offer alternative solution and conduct deeper psychological analysis. This research may inspire ideas to explore the application of the doctrine of undue influence in the countries with different legal systems, such as those following common law or civil law systems.

Implementing Confidentiality Principles in Sharia Economic Dispute Resolution Through Online Dispute Resolution in Indonesia Fidhayanti, Dwi; Mohd Noh, Mohd Shahid; Ramadhita, Ramadhita; Setyobudi, Teguh; Dwi Septyanto, Mochamad Fikry
Al-Risalah Vol 25 No 1 (2025): June 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30631/alrisalah.v25i1.1681

The resolution of Sharia economic disputes through Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) in Indonesia has been growing in parallel with advancements in digital technology. In this context, the principle of confidentiality has become a crucial aspect to protect the privacy and security of the disputing parties' information. This research aims to analyze the implementation of the principle of confidentiality in ODR within arbitration institutions in Indonesia and identify the challenges and solutions related to data protection. The methodology employed is a sociological-juridical approach, utilizing primary data collected through interviews, focus group discussions (FGD), and documentation, alongside secondary data from relevant journals and regulations. The findings indicate that, while institutions such as Basyarnas and BANI have implemented various protocols to uphold confidentiality, including the use of secure digital platforms and strict regulations on data access, significant challenges remain, notably the potential for data breaches due to cyberattacks or technical negligence. Furthermore, inconsistencies in laws and legal interpretations have created legal uncertainty, which in turn impacts privacy protection. The contribution of this research is to provide recommendations for strengthening digital security standards, consistent policies, and raising awareness of the importance of confidentiality in ODR, thereby creating legal certainty and enhancing trust in the online resolution of Sharia economic disputes.

Ratio Decidendi of Judges’ Decisions on The Use of Foreign Language Agreements in Indonesia Amin Amirudin; Dwi Fidhayanti
Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 27 No. 1 (2025): June 2025
Publisher : Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/jjr.v27i1.10405

This research examines the legal issues surrounding agreements made in foreign languages without an accompanying Indonesian version, specifically regarding the judges’ legal considerations in canceling such agreements and the resulting legal consequences. The study uses a normative juridical method with statutory and case approaches. Primary legal materials were derived from relevant laws and judicial decisions, while secondary materials were obtained from literature studies, analyzed using grammatical interpretation. The study reveals inconsistencies in judicial interpretation. In Decision No. 3395 K/Pdt/2019, the court ruled that an agreement not using Indonesian was null and void. Conversely, in Decision No. 1124 K/Pdt/2020, the court considered a similar agreement valid and binding, despite the absence of an Indonesian translation. This discrepancy reflects a lack of uniformity in upholding the mandatory use of Indonesian as regulated by Article 43(1) of Law No. 2 of 2014 on Notary Position. The article mandates that deeds involving foreign parties must be in Indonesian or accompanied by an Indonesian translation. Violations of this requirement constitute breaches of imperative legal norms, rendering the agreement void. The research aims to promote legal awareness on the mandatory use of Indonesian in agreements and to highlight the need for consistent judicial interpretation to uphold legal certainty.

Regulatory Frameworks In Islamic Fintech: Comparative Insights From Indonesia and Malaysia Fidhayanti, Dwi; Mohd Noh, Mohd Shahid; Hanafi, Hanira; Satria, Muhammad Hatta
Jambura Law Review VOLUME 7 NO. 2 JULY 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/jlr.v7i2.30447

Despite the rapid expansion of Islamic fintech in Indonesia and Malaysia, research comparing the legal and regulatory frameworks in both jurisdictions remains limited. This study addresses that gap by examining the differences and challenges within each country’s legal infrastructure that impact the development and governance of Sharia-compliant financial technology. The objective of this research is to analyze and compare the regulatory systems in Indonesia and Malaysia to identify structural strengths, weaknesses, and their implications for legal certainty and financial innovation. Employing a normative juridical method with a comparative legal approach, the study analyzes statutory instruments, regulatory frameworks, and institutional roles in both countries. The findings reveal that Malaysia benefits from a more cohesive and structured legal framework under the Islamic Financial Services Act 2013, supervised by Bank Negara Malaysia and the Securities Commission, ensuring enforceable Sharia compliance and robust innovation support. In contrast, Indonesia's regulatory environment suffers from fragmented oversight between OJK and DSN-MUI, resulting in legal uncertainty and limited enforcement of Sharia principles. This research contributes to the field of Islamic financial law by offering policy recommendations to harmonize regulatory frameworks, enhance legal clarity, and promote the sustainable growth of Islamic fintech ecosystems in Southeast Asia.

The Evaluation Of Warehouse Receipt System Object Regulation: A Perspective Study Of Commodity Goods Concept In Indonesia Hidayah, Khoirul; Nasyi'ah, Iffaty; Fidhayanti, Dwi
JURNAL LEGALITAS Vol 15, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

There are normative issues related to the concept of commodity goods with the object of warehouse receipts and social issues regarding the benefits of warehouse receipts for grain or rice farmers. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the regulation of the object of the warehouse receipt system so that it has a unique contribution to small farmers. The research applied in this research is juridical-empirical with a qualitative approach. The fact shows that rice farmers do not want to use the Warehouse Receipt System (WRS) because of the high cost and tend to choose the People's Business Credit program. Based on the study of the concept of commodities and benefits, it is necessary to change regulations related to the concept of WRS objects so that it is better to equate it with the concept of commodities. Grain or rice is a staple food that is excluded from the WRS object following the commodity concept because it has access to subsidies and special incentives from the government for national food security. Smallholders do not need to store rice in warehouses as in the WRS procedure to gain access to credit. This study shows that the government is reviewing the regulation of WRS objects in Indonesia so that it is beneficial for small farmers in particular.

Implementing Confidentiality Principles in Sharia Economic Dispute Resolution Through Online Dispute Resolution in Indonesia Fidhayanti, Dwi; Mohd Noh, Mohd Shahid; Ramadhita, Ramadhita; Setyobudi, Teguh; Dwi Septyanto, Mochamad Fikry
Al-Risalah Vol 25 No 1 (2025): June 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30631/alrisalah.v25i1.1681

The resolution of Sharia economic disputes through Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) in Indonesia has been growing in parallel with advancements in digital technology. In this context, the principle of confidentiality has become a crucial aspect to protect the privacy and security of the disputing parties' information. This research aims to analyze the implementation of the principle of confidentiality in ODR within arbitration institutions in Indonesia and identify the challenges and solutions related to data protection. The methodology employed is a sociological-juridical approach, utilizing primary data collected through interviews, focus group discussions (FGD), and documentation, alongside secondary data from relevant journals and regulations. The findings indicate that, while institutions such as Basyarnas and BANI have implemented various protocols to uphold confidentiality, including the use of secure digital platforms and strict regulations on data access, significant challenges remain, notably the potential for data breaches due to cyberattacks or technical negligence. Furthermore, inconsistencies in laws and legal interpretations have created legal uncertainty, which in turn impacts privacy protection. The contribution of this research is to provide recommendations for strengthening digital security standards, consistent policies, and raising awareness of the importance of confidentiality in ODR, thereby creating legal certainty and enhancing trust in the online resolution of Sharia economic disputes.

Title

Found 38 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 38 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 38 Documents
Search