Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.288
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JOURNAL OF EDUCATION Al Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan Sarwahita : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal Psychosophia: Journal of Psychology, religion, and humanity International Journal of Islamic Educational Psychology Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengukuran Psikologi: JPPP Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Journal An-Nafs: Kajian Penelitian Psikologi
Anna Armeini Rangkuti
Universitas Negeri Jakarta
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Neuroscience Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 20 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : JOURNAL OF EDUCATION

 1 
Opportunity as a Threat to Academic Integrity Anna Armeini Rangkuti
JOURNAL OF EDUCATION Vol 4, No 01: November 2011
Publisher : LPPM UNY

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (5042.32 KB)

Abstract

This study is aimed at determining the factors most responsible for academic dishonesty in the education students as prospective teachers. Using the quantitative research method, 518 students participated as respondents. Findings show that chances/opportunities have direct and significant impacts on academic dishonesty. Opportunity allows students to commit academic dishonesties without being detected. Opportunities may also be due to ignoran­ce of educational institutions and faculty members to the phenomena of academic dishonesty that occur. Actually, the educational institutions and teaching staff have primary authority in creating academic integrity on campus. Therefore, it is important to create some policies that aim to reduce and even eliminate the opportunities of students to commit academic dishonesties. These policies include: types of exam questions or assign­ments, clear rules concerning the implementation of evaluation of learning outcomes, as well as a firm associations with academic dishonesty, especially on the part of teachers as those who interact directly with students.
Co-Authors Adhissa Qonita ADJENG HAYU HERNINGTYAS Agustian, Rayhan Alif Ardhi Mohamad Azam, Uzma Bambang Sumintono Deasyanti, Deasyanti Deasyanti, Deasyanti DEVI OKTAVIANI FAJRIN Devie Yundianto DIANDRA ARIANI SYAFITRI Fathony, Ahmad Gita Irianda Rizkyani Medellu Herdiyan Maulana HILMI ABDUL AZIS Juriana Juriana Khatami, Muhammad Kurrota Aini Listyasari, Winda Dewi Lussy Dwi Utami Mohamad Arif Purwanto Onny Dwi Puspita Sari R.A Fadhallah Rafif, Muhammad Rayendra Rahmadianty Gazadinda Salshabila, Maya Santi Yudhistira Siti Shella Syahputra, Wahyu Syahrinda, Yusuf Akbar Utami Wahyuni, Lussy Dwi Zuniyanti Khoiriyah