Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.782
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Kebijakan Publik Al-Amwal : Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syari\'ah JUMLAHKU: Jurnal Matematika Ilmiah STKIP Muhammadiyah Kuningan Wave: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Maritim MANNERS Management and Entrepreneurship Journal Journal of Trends Economics and Accounting Research Jurnal Hukum Prioris Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Jurnal Arjuna : Publikasi Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Matematika Amicus Curiae Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah Jurnal Matematika Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Kuningan Journal of New Trends in Sciences
Dian Purnamasari
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 32 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 32 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
PERBEDAAN LEMBAGA PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA DI INDONESIA DAN AUSTRALIA DALAM PENGAWASAN TERHADAP PERJANJIAN TERTUTUP: Differences in Competition Supervisory Agencies in Indonesia and Australia in the Overseeing Confidential Agreement Ryan Wirangga Satya; Dian Purnamasari
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i4.24991

Abstract

Exclusive dealing is an agreement entered into by one or more business actors with other businesses of a different tier. In Indonesia and Australia, each each has a competition watchdog that deals with all matters related to business competition, including including competition offences such as restrictive covenants exclusive dealing. Therefore, this research will discuss the differences between competition supervisory institutions in Indonesia and Australia. Type of research research type that will be used is normative type and descriptive in nature by using secondary data from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. using secondary data from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Data data is collected through literature study and conclusions are drawn using the deductive method. deductive method. The results show that competition supervisory institutions in Indonesia and in Indonesia and Australia have differences in the form of licensing rules, approach in assessing violations, to the authority possessed by each business supervisory institution. business supervisory institution.
PERBANDINGAN PENGATURAN TANGGUNG JAWAB DIREKSI BUMN (PERSERO) ANTARA INDONESIA DAN JERMAN : Comparison of the Regulations on the Responsibilities State-Owned Enterprises (Persero) Directors between Indonesia and Germany Meyra Tiara Rizyanka Marsaoleh; Dian Purnamasari
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 8 No 2 (2026): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v8i2.25322

Abstract

The Board of Directors (BoD) plays crucial role as a corporate organs, bearing full responsibility for the management and interests of the company. This study analyzes the comparative regulation of the responsibilities of the BoD of State-Owned Enterprises (Persero) under Indonesian and German law. The research question in this study is how the regulation of the responsibilities of directors of SOEs (Persero) compares under Indonesian and German law. The legal research method used is a descriptive normative legal method, by examining primary legal materials such as Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies and Law Number 19 of 2003 and its amendments concerning SOEs for Indonesian regulations, GmbHG and AktG for German regulations, as well as relevant secondary legal materials. The results of the study and conclusions indicate that there are similarities in the basic principles of the BoD responsibilities, namely the obligation to act prudently and prioritize the interests of the company. The main difference lies in the function of legal protection and insurance for directors, where Indonesian law emphasizes the exemption of directors from liability without personal contribution obligations, while German law limits insurance protection through a self-retention mechanism to strengthen accountability.
Co-Authors Alvalaneda Amira Wristy Mutiah Anastasya Islamiah Andre Setyawan Andri Suwandi Anggi Suci Winarti Aryo Dewantoro Azizah Mutiara Chandra Sagul Haratua Deny Tri Ardianto Diana Djuwita, Diana Erandaru Erandaru Eva Mulida Hazana Ferra Yuliantika Asmara Murni Fraya Layola Nainggolan Gheryl Sebastian Sijabat Hasriantirisna Hasriantirisna I Gede Yudi Arsawan Izaz Alhady Klaura Dwi Kinasih Kristiastuti, Francisca Lilis Aenun Zariah Lukman Lukman Meyra Tiara Rizyanka Marsaoleh Michelle Kwok Michelle Silsa Muhammad Adrian Ilham Ramadhan Neviar Amira Emor Novika Andriani Nur'Afianti Nurul Arfinanti Rendi Juanda Rini Purwaningsih Ryan Wirangga Satya Salsabila Indah Safitri Sujianto ' Supardi U.S. Tsuraya Amalia Yesi Ismawati