Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.642
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-'Adalah Al-Ahkam Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Journal of Law and Policy Transformation Al-Manahij : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Legal Protection for the Partnership Agreement Parties HIKMATUNA: Journal for Integrative Islamic Studies Hikmatuna Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman
M. Nurul Irfan
Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Al-Ahkam

 1 
PEMBERHENTIAN BUPATI GARUT DALAM PERSPEKTIF FIKIH SIYĀSAH AL-MAWARDI Irfan, M. Nurul
AL-AHKAM Volume 24, Nomor 1, April 2014
Publisher : AL-AHKAM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (60.419 KB)

Abstract

Artikel ini bermaksud menganalisis kasus pemberhentian Bupati Garut, Aceng Fikri dari jabatannya dalam perspektif Fikih Siyāsah al-Mawardi. Alasan pemberhentian adalah pelanggaran terhadap Pasal 28 huruf f UU No. 32 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemerintah Daerah. Pasal tersebut menyatakan bahwa kepala daerah dan wakil kepala daerah dilarang menyalahgunakan wewenang dan melanggar sumpah atau janji jabatannya. Di samping itu, ia juga dinilai tidak dapat memenuhi kewajiban sebagai kepala daerah sebagaimana disebutkan dalam Pasal 27 angka (1) huruf e, yaitu kepala daerah dan wakil kepala daerah mempunyai kewajiban menaati dan menegakkan seluruh peraturan perundang-undangan. Dalam perspektif Fikih Siyasah al-Mawardi, seorang pemimpin yang tidak adil dapat diber­henti­kan dari jabatannya. Salah satu indikator ketidakadilan seorang pemimpin adalah pelanggaran terhadap etika.***This article intends to analyze the case of Garut Regent dismissal, Aceng Fikri from his position according to al-Mawardi’s Fiqh Siyāsah perspective. Reasons for the dismissal was a violation of Article 28 f of Law No. 32 / 2004 on Regional Government. The article states that the head of regional and the deputy of head of regional are prohibited from misusing authority and violation of the oath of position. In addition, he is also considered not to meet the obligation for local office as mentioned in Article 27 point (1), letter e, which is the regional head and deputy regional head have the obligation to obey and enforce all laws and regulations. In the perspective of Fiqh Siyasah of al-Mawardi, an unfairly leader can dismissed from his position. One indicator of an injustice leader is a ethical violation.***Keywords: siyāsah, kepala daerah, sumpah jabatan, adil
Fatwa Institutions in Handling Religious Blasphemy Crimes in Indonesia and Malaysia Ilahi, M. Ridho; Irfan, M. Nurul; Kamarusdiana, Kamarusdiana; Hidayatulloh, Hidayatulloh; Zulfa, Eva Achjani
Al-Ahkam Vol 34, No 1 (2024): April
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/ahkam.2024.34.1.18624

Abstract

The position of fatwa institutions in cases of blasphemy by cult groups is often seen as representing only the majority Muslims and blaming minority Muslims, as in Indonesia, or seen as a tool to suppress anti-government groups, as in Malaysia. This study aims to explain the position of the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) and Jawatankuasa Fatwa in handling heresy, including the reasons behind the differences in the positions and roles of the two institutions. Researchers use qualitative methods with a comparative legal approach. This study found that MUI's heretical fatwas had no legal force, the central MUI has the authority to enact heretical fatwas within MUI institutions, but not absolutely to respond to national laws, and not play a role in the criminal justice system. Meanwhile, Jawatankuasa Fatwa Kebangsaan (JFK) has the force of law with certain conditions, however, the federal state Jawatankuasa Fatwa has the authority to determine heretical fatwas to respond and strengthen state regulations (blasphemy laws). This research can be used as a reference for law enforcement in handling blasphemy cases by considering the views of MUI and Jawatankuasa Fatwa, which are regulated adequately by laws and regulations.
Fatwa Institutions in Handling Religious Blasphemy Crimes in Indonesia and Malaysia Ilahi, M. Ridho; Irfan, M. Nurul; Kamarusdiana, Kamarusdiana; Hidayatulloh, Hidayatulloh; Zulfa, Eva Achjani
Al-Ahkam Vol. 34 No. 1 (2024): April
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/ahkam.2024.34.1.18624

Abstract

The position of fatwa institutions in cases of blasphemy by cult groups is often seen as representing only the majority Muslims and blaming minority Muslims, as in Indonesia, or seen as a tool to suppress anti-government groups, as in Malaysia. This study aims to explain the position of the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) and Jawatankuasa Fatwa in handling heresy, including the reasons behind the differences in the positions and roles of the two institutions. Researchers use qualitative methods with a comparative legal approach. This study found that MUI's heretical fatwas had no legal force, the central MUI has the authority to enact heretical fatwas within MUI institutions, but not absolutely to respond to national laws, and not play a role in the criminal justice system. Meanwhile, Jawatankuasa Fatwa Kebangsaan (JFK) has the force of law with certain conditions, however, the federal state Jawatankuasa Fatwa has the authority to determine heretical fatwas to respond and strengthen state regulations (blasphemy laws). This research can be used as a reference for law enforcement in handling blasphemy cases by considering the views of MUI and Jawatankuasa Fatwa, which are regulated adequately by laws and regulations.
Co-Authors Ali Imron Atmo Prawiro Eva Achjani Zulfa Hidayatulloh Hidayatulloh Ilahi, M. Ridho Kamarusdiana, Kamarusdiana Khamami Zada Madnur, Madnur Marjuni, Kamaluddin Nurdin Mashilal Masyrofah Masyrofah Nahrowi Nahrowi Nahrowi Rosyid, Maskur