Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

PEMBERHENTIAN BUPATI GARUT DALAM PERSPEKTIF FIKIH SIYÄSAH AL-MAWARDI Irfan, M. Nurul
AL-AHKAM Volume 24, Nomor 1, April 2014
Publisher : AL-AHKAM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (60.419 KB)

Artikel ini bermaksud menganalisis kasus pemberhentian Bupati Garut, Aceng Fikri dari jabatannya dalam perspektif Fikih SiyÄsah al-Mawardi. Alasan pemberhentian adalah pelanggaran terhadap Pasal 28 huruf f UU No. 32 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemerintah Daerah. Pasal tersebut menyatakan bahwa kepala daerahÂ dan wakil kepala daerah dilarang menyalahgunakan wewenang dan melanggar sumpah atau janji jabatannya. Di samping itu, ia juga dinilai tidak dapat memenuhi kewajiban sebagai kepala daerah sebagaimana disebutkan dalam Pasal 27 angka (1) huruf e, yaitu kepala daerah dan wakil kepala daerah mempunyai kewajiban menaati dan menegakkan seluruh peraturanÂ perundang-undangan. Dalam perspektif Fikih Siyasah al-Mawardi, seorang pemimpin yang tidak adilÂ dapat diberÂhentiÂkan dari jabatannya. Salah satu indikator ketidakadilan seorang pemimpin adalah pelanggaran terhadap etika.***This article intends to analyze the case of Garut Regent dismissal, Aceng Fikri from his position according to al-Mawardiâs Fiqh SiyÄsah perspective. Reasons for the dismissal was a violation of Article 28 f of Law No. 32 / 2004 on Regional Government. The article states that the head of regional and the deputy of head of regional are prohibited from misusing authority and violation of the oath of position. In addition, he is also considered not to meet the obligation for local office as mentioned in Article 27 point (1), letter e, which is the regional head and deputy regional head have the obligation to obey and enforce all laws and regulations. In the perspective of Fiqh Siyasah of al-Mawardi, an unfairly leader can dismissed from his position. One indicator of an injustice leader is a ethical violation.***Keywords: siyÄsah, kepala daerah, sumpah jabatan, adil

READING FATWAS OF MUI A PERSPECTIVE OF MASLAHAH CONCEPT Rosyid, Maskur; Irfan, M. Nurul
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 19, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Abstrak: Kemaslahatan dan kebaikan manusia merupakan tujuan pokok setiap bentuk peratuan, termasuk fatwa-fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI). Salah satubidang fatwa yang diterbitkan MUI adalahhukumkeluarga. Fokusutamatulisaniniadalahmembacaulang dan menganalisa fatwa-fatwa MUI dalambidanghukumkeluargadenganperspektifkonsepmaslahatmayoritas fuqaha yang juga telahditerbitkandalam Fatwa MUI tentangKriteriaMaslahatNomor: 6/MUNAS VII/MUI/10/2005. Fatwa-fatwa tersebut, dilihatmenggunakanparadigmakonsepmaslahat, adakalanya masuk dalam kategori ma?la?ahmu?tabarah, ma?la?ahmursalah, dan adaindikasibeberapa fatwa yang masuk kedalam kategori ma?la?ah mulghah. Adapun fatwa MUI dalam bidang hukum keluarga yang dimaksud dalam tulisan ini yaitu fatwa tentang Aborsi, tentang Perkawinan Beda Agama, tentang Kewarisan Beda Agama, tentang Perkawinan Di BawahTangan (sirri, tidak dicatatkan), dan tentang Nikah Wisata.Kata kunci: Ma?la?ah, GradasiMa?la?ah, MUI, HukumKeluargaAbstract: Human benefit and goodness are the main objectives of every form of regulation, including the fatwas of the Council of Indonesian Ulama (MUI). One of the fatwa fields issued by MUI is family law. The main focus of this paper is to reread and analyze the fatwas of the MUI in the field of family law with the perspective of the concept of majority fuqaha masses which have also been published in the MUI Fatwa concerning the Maslahat No. 6 / MUNAS VII / MUI / 10/2005. These fatwas, are seen using the concept of maslahat, sometimes include to the category of ma?la?ahmu?tabarah, ma?la?ahmursalah, and there are indications of several fatwas that include to the category of ma?la?ahmulghah. The fatwas of the MUI in the field of family law referred to in this article is a fatwa on Abortion, concerning Differential Marriage, about Different Religions, About Marriage Under the Hand (sirri, not recorded), and about Tourism Marriage.Keywords: Ma?la?ah, Gradation of Ma?la?ah, MUI, Family Law

CHILD PROTECTION IN INDONESIA IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF NATIONAL LAW AND ISLAMIC LAW Madnur, Madnur; Irfan, M. Nurul
Journal of Law and Policy Transformation Vol 8 No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/jlpt.v8i1.8111

This qualitative research discusses child protection in terms of regulations in force in Indonesia and Islamic law. Child protection is a particular discussion because it is an integral part of the nation; protecting children means protecting the nation's generation. In Indonesia itself, there are various formulations of laws and regulations that regulate child protection. Meanwhile, efforts to protect children in Islamic law are part of implementing maqasid sharia, which upholds human values. To realize this, severe sanctions have been stipulated in national and Islamic law for perpetrators of acts of violence against children, aiming to provide a deterrent and deterrent effect on perpetrators of child crimes. However, these sanctions are still being debated in the community. Regardless of all that, efforts to guarantee child protection in preventing violence against children must continue whenever and wherever.

Fatwa Institutions in Handling Religious Blasphemy Crimes in Indonesia and Malaysia Ilahi, M. Ridho; Irfan, M. Nurul; Kamarusdiana, Kamarusdiana; Hidayatulloh, Hidayatulloh; Zulfa, Eva Achjani
Al-Ahkam Vol 34, No 1 (2024): April
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/ahkam.2024.34.1.18624

The position of fatwa institutions in cases of blasphemy by cult groups is often seen as representing only the majority Muslims and blaming minority Muslims, as in Indonesia, or seen as a tool to suppress anti-government groups, as in Malaysia. This study aims to explain the position of the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) and Jawatankuasa Fatwa in handling heresy, including the reasons behind the differences in the positions and roles of the two institutions. Researchers use qualitative methods with a comparative legal approach. This study found that MUI's heretical fatwas had no legal force, the central MUI has the authority to enact heretical fatwas within MUI institutions, but not absolutely to respond to national laws, and not play a role in the criminal justice system. Meanwhile, Jawatankuasa Fatwa Kebangsaan (JFK) has the force of law with certain conditions, however, the federal state Jawatankuasa Fatwa has the authority to determine heretical fatwas to respond and strengthen state regulations (blasphemy laws). This research can be used as a reference for law enforcement in handling blasphemy cases by considering the views of MUI and Jawatankuasa Fatwa, which are regulated adequately by laws and regulations.

Negotiating Sharia in Secular State: A Case Study in French and Germany Zada, Khamami; Irfan, M. Nurul
Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Vol 5, No 1 (2021): Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/sjhk.v5i1.9753

The European Muslims, the majority of them come from Muslim countries, are facing the identity dilemma. On the one hand, they are the Muslims who are obliged to carry out their religious teaching, but on the other hand, they are the Muslims who have acquired European citizenship who cannot enforce religious laws and instead submit to secular state laws. The study analyzes French and Germany Muslim aspirations and their negotiations on carrying out sharia in the secular state. This is field study by qualitative approach. Primary data was collected by interviews with Muslims of Moroccan, Tunisian, Algerian, and Turkish descent living in France and Germany. The study found that French and German Muslims want to apply sharia, but France and Germany do not allow religious law to be made a state law. These have left French and German Muslims to negotiate without opposition, resistance, and conflict. As European citizens, they accept secular law without losing their religious and social identity, though couldn’t fully implement Sharia.

GRATIFIKASI DI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DAN WACANA HUKUMAN MATI Irfan, M. Nurul
Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman Vol 18, No 2 (2014): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/madania.v18i2.20

Gratification in The Constitutional Court and Discourse of Death Penalty. The gratification case doneby an ex-governor and an ex-judge of The Constitutional Court is very irony. As the last gate guard in lowenforcement, the Court which concerns in struggling justice has “fallen off” due to greasing the palm done bythe ex-chief judge. In view of Islamic perspective, the gratification crime belongs to jarîmah ta’zîr, a punishmentrelates to the policy of local government. It does not belong to jarîmah qishâs or hudûd which the punishmentis determinated by the Qur’an and hadîts. Hence, there is discourse of death penalty for the gratification casein The Constitutional Court in order to make wary effect. It is because one of the ta’zîr punishments is deathpenalty that causes big hazard effect for all.

Deradicalization Strategy: Correcting Terrorist Inmates’ Understanding of the Implementation of Islamic Law in Indonesia Nahrowi; Masyrofah; Irfan, M. Nurul; Prawiro, Atmo
Hikmatuna : Journal for Integrative Islamic Studies Vol 11 No 1 (2025): Hikmatuna: Journal for Integrative Islamic Studies, June 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/hikmatuna.v11i1.10841

The deradicalization program in Indonesia has yet to achieve its intended goal of halting the spread of radical terrorist ideologies. This article explores a deradicalization strategy focused on Islamic religious perspectives concerning the application of Islamic law in Indonesia, specifically targeting terrorist inmates at a correctional facility located in Sentul, Bogor. Data were collected through interviews and document analysis. This study finds three core elements are instrumental in the deradicalization strategy aimed at correcting inmates’ misperceptions of Islamic law enforcement in Indonesia through religious education: instructional content, instructors/facilitators, and teaching methodologies. Elements from Islamic law and the Indonesian legal system positively contribute to the curriculum, serving as educational material for instructors. The content provided is in-depth and addresses fundamental Islamic legal concepts integrated with Indonesia's prevailing legal framework. As a result, terrorist inmates can gain a more comprehensive and integrated understanding. However, the current curriculum does not adequately cover the legislative application of Islamic law in Indonesia through statutory regulations, necessitating its ongoing development and periodic revision. There is also a shortage of qualified personnel capable of integrating and effectively communicating both Islamic legal principles and Indonesian law in a factual and comprehensible manner. An integrated understanding of Islamic religious perspectives and national identity is essential to align inmates’ knowledge with the legal application of Islamic law in Indonesia. Furthermore, the limited understanding among terrorist inmates regarding Indonesia's legal system and democratic governance has led to the erroneous belief that Indonesia is not a country that applies Islamic law.

Deradicalization Strategy: Correcting Terrorist Inmates’ Understanding of the Implementation of Islamic Law in Indonesia Nahrowi; Masyrofah; Irfan, M. Nurul; Prawiro, Atmo
Hikmatuna : Journal for Integrative Islamic Studies Vol 11 No 1 (2025): Hikmatuna: Journal for Integrative Islamic Studies, June 2025
Publisher : UIN K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/hikmatuna.v11i1.10841

The deradicalization program in Indonesia has yet to achieve its intended goal of halting the spread of radical terrorist ideologies. This article explores a deradicalization strategy focused on Islamic religious perspectives concerning the application of Islamic law in Indonesia, specifically targeting terrorist inmates at a correctional facility located in Sentul, Bogor. Data were collected through interviews and document analysis. This study finds three core elements are instrumental in the deradicalization strategy aimed at correcting inmates’ misperceptions of Islamic law enforcement in Indonesia through religious education: instructional content, instructors/facilitators, and teaching methodologies. Elements from Islamic law and the Indonesian legal system positively contribute to the curriculum, serving as educational material for instructors. The content provided is in-depth and addresses fundamental Islamic legal concepts integrated with Indonesia's prevailing legal framework. As a result, terrorist inmates can gain a more comprehensive and integrated understanding. However, the current curriculum does not adequately cover the legislative application of Islamic law in Indonesia through statutory regulations, necessitating its ongoing development and periodic revision. There is also a shortage of qualified personnel capable of integrating and effectively communicating both Islamic legal principles and Indonesian law in a factual and comprehensible manner. An integrated understanding of Islamic religious perspectives and national identity is essential to align inmates’ knowledge with the legal application of Islamic law in Indonesia. Furthermore, the limited understanding among terrorist inmates regarding Indonesia's legal system and democratic governance has led to the erroneous belief that Indonesia is not a country that applies Islamic law.

KRIMINALISASI POLIGAMI DAN NIKAH SIRI Irfan, M. Nurul
al-'adalah Vol 8 No 2 (2011): Al-'Adalah
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/adalah.v10i2.248

Kriminalisasi Poligami dan Nikah Siri. Pernyataan bahwa pelaku jenis perkawinan nikah siri, poligami dan perkawinan mut’ah atau kawin kontrak dapat dianggap sebagai sebuah pelanggaran dengan ancaman pidana penjara telah menimbulkan permasalahan tersendiri. Menikah yang nota bene merupakan ibadah mengapa harus dikriminalisasi. Namun pada umumnya para tokoh di Indonesia menyetujui upaya pemerintah untuk mengkriminalisasi poligami, nikah siri, nikah mut’ah. Selain itu suami yang menolak untuk bertanggungjawab dan seseorang yang bertindak sebagai wali padahal tidak berhak untuk melakukannya, serta perceraian yang dilakukan di luar sidang pengadilan pun dapat dikenakan tindak pidana kriminal.Kata kunci: kriminalisiasi, poligami, nikah siriPENGINDEKSAN

Jarîmah Al-Maksu, Al-Ikhtilâs Dan Al- Intihâb Dalam Hukum Pidana Islam Irfan, M. Nurul
al-'adalah Vol 10 No 2 (2013): Al-'Adalah
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/adalah.v11i2.258

Terdapat tiga macam tindak pidana yang erat sekali dengan tindak pidana korupsi, yaitu al-maksu (pungli), al-ikhtilâs (pencopetan), dan al-intihâb (penjambretan). Ketiga macam tindak pidana ini masuk dalam kategori jarimah ta’zir, sebab ketiganya berbeda dengan jarimah hirabah atau perampokan dan sariqah atau pencurian, yang keduanya secara tegas diterangkan jenis sanksinya dalam Alquran dan Hadis. Sanksi hukum bagi pelaku jarimah al-maksu, al-ikhtilâs dan al-intihâb tidak disebutkan secara kongkrit. Oleh sebab itu terhadap hakim di sebuah Negara diberikan kesempatan untuk menetapkan jenis sanksi hukum kepada pelaku ketiga macam jarimah tersebut.

Title

Found 12 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 12 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 12 Documents
Search