Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

Faithful Silencing: The Rejection of Loudspeakers as Islamic Piety in West Java, Indonesia Asep Muhamad Iqbal; Irma Riyani
Jurnal Studi Agama dan Masyarakat Vol 21 No 2 (2025): JURNAL STUDI AGAMA DAN MASYARAKAT
Publisher : IAIN Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/jsam.v21i2.10178

Abstract

The phenomenon of non-use of technology remains relatively underexplored. In West Java, certain religious communities choose not to use specific technologies, particularly within the Islamic anti-speaker group known as the Aspek (anti-speaker) community. This study aims to analyze the piety of Muslim members of the Aspek community in rejecting the use of loudspeaker technology. Data were collected through fieldwork, including unstructured interviews with leaders and members of the Aspek community, as well as direct observation. The data were analyzed using the multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation as the theoretical framework. The findings reveal that the Aspek community’s rejection of loudspeakers is influenced by user-related factors, particularly religious beliefs and interpretations, as well as technology-related factors. These two aspects shape a form of communal technological non-use deeply rooted in cultural and spiritual values.
Performing Islamic Rituals in Non-Muslim Countries: Wedding Ceremony among Indonesian Muslims in The Netherlands Irma Riyani
Journal of Asian Social Science Research Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019): Journal of Asian Social Science Research
Publisher : Centre for Asian Social Science Research (CASSR), Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (321.287 KB) | DOI: 10.15575/jassr.v1i1.7

Abstract

This paper discusses how the Indonesian Sunni Muslim leader Abdurrahman Wahid and the Iranian Shiite Muslim leader Ayatollah Khomeini responded to the debate about the relationship between Islam and the state. Their responses impacted on the struggle of Indonesian and Iranian Muslims in considering the ideological basis of Indonesian and Iranian states. On the one hand, Wahid with his educational and social background and Indonesian political context rejected the concept of an Islamic state. He did not agree with the formalization of Islamic sharia. To implement his idea, he promoted the idea of Pribumisasi Islam. For Wahid, islamization was not arabization. Khomeini, on the other hand, believed that Islam is a religion that has complete laws and way of life including social rules. According to Khomeini, to effectively implement these rules, Muslims need to have executive power. In Khomeini’s view, when the Quran calls for Muslims to obey Allah, the messenger, and ulil amri, this means that Allah instructs Muslims to create an Islamic state. To realise his views, Khomeini proposed the doctrine of Velayat-e al Faqeeh. Thus, different religious-political contexts of these two leaders contributed to their different responses to the relationship between Islam and the state.
Synthesizing Hadith Criticism and Linguistics: An SFL-Based Validation of Al-Wahidi’s Asbab al-nuzul Narrations Irma Riyani; Ai Yeni Yuliyanti; Mu'min Mu'min
Diroyah : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hadis Fakultas Ushuluddin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/diroyah.v10i1.36107

Abstract

This study proposes a novel interdisciplinary framework for validating the Asbab al-nuzul database in Al-Wahidi’s seminal work by utilizing Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL). While the significance of Asbab al-nuzul (occasions of revelation) is paramount for Qur’anic contextualization, traditional hadith transmissions often encounter issues of linguistic ambiguity and structural inconsistency. This research moves beyond a purely quantitative assessment to emphasize the theoretical utility of SFL as a rigorous validation tool. By systematically segmenting transmission events specifically those utilizing formal phrases such as Akhbarana and Haddatsana into discrete categories of speaker, recipient, and content, this approach effectively resolves ambiguities within the chain of narration. Using Surah Al-Baqarah as a case study, the analysis demonstrates how identifying these thematic and interpersonal elements allows for a more reliable verification of hadith integrity. The findings conclude that SFL analysis provides a robust, qualitative framework for clarifying the reliability of asbab al-nuzul transmissions, thereby supporting more accurate thematic exegesis (Mawdlu'i). This study offers a scalable methodology for modern Islamic scholarship, enabling a deeper, linguistically grounded validation of classical religious texts